February 11, 2009 5:36 PM
- Text
States File Soot Suit Against EPA
(CBS/AP)
More than a dozen states sued the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday to lower soot levels from smokestacks and exhaust pipes, a move the state officials argue would save thousands of lives.
The states argue that the Bush administration is ignoring science and its own experts in refusing to slightly reduce the allowed threshold for soot. The "fine particulate matter" in soot contributes to premature death, chronic respiratory disease and asthma attacks, said New York Attorney General and governor-elect Eliot Spitzer. The pollution also leads to more hospital admissions and other public health costs, he said.
Officials from California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and the District of Columbia joined New York in the action filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington.
"It is unfortunate that this coalition of states must resort to legal action to get the EPA to do its job — protect the environment and the public health," said Spitzer.
An EPA spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
The emissions, described as much smaller than a grain of sand, come from automobiles, power plants, factories and wood fires.
The states want to reduce the current limit by 1 microgram or 2 micrograms of soot allowed per cubic foot of air. The current maximum is 15 micrograms. The states contend the EPA has ignored their pleas and scientific evidence in choosing to continue the current standard.
The federal Clean Air Act requires a review every five years to determine if air pollution standards should be adjusted. The states argue this compels the EPA to act. The states want the federal court to find the EPA failed to obey its "Congressional mandate to protect the environment and the public health," according to a statement from Spitzer's office.
In April, 10 states, plus the District of Columbia and New York City, sued the EPA for failing to adopt strong emission standards to reduce air pollution from new power plants across the nation. They were joined in the suit by several environmental groups.
New York and other states have fought with the Bush administration for years over carbon dioxide emissions.
In July 2005, a three-judge panel in the same court upheld the EPA's decision not to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks under the Clean Air Act. The agency argues the law does not authorize them to regulate emissions to reduce global warming, and maintains there is not enough scientific data to support such a move.
The April lawsuit was filed largely in response to the 2005 ruling, in the hopes that the courts will rule specifically whether the Clean Air Act can be used to fight global warming.
The states argue that the Bush administration is ignoring science and its own experts in refusing to slightly reduce the allowed threshold for soot. The "fine particulate matter" in soot contributes to premature death, chronic respiratory disease and asthma attacks, said New York Attorney General and governor-elect Eliot Spitzer. The pollution also leads to more hospital admissions and other public health costs, he said.
Officials from California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and the District of Columbia joined New York in the action filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington.
"It is unfortunate that this coalition of states must resort to legal action to get the EPA to do its job — protect the environment and the public health," said Spitzer.
An EPA spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
The emissions, described as much smaller than a grain of sand, come from automobiles, power plants, factories and wood fires.
The states want to reduce the current limit by 1 microgram or 2 micrograms of soot allowed per cubic foot of air. The current maximum is 15 micrograms. The states contend the EPA has ignored their pleas and scientific evidence in choosing to continue the current standard.
The federal Clean Air Act requires a review every five years to determine if air pollution standards should be adjusted. The states argue this compels the EPA to act. The states want the federal court to find the EPA failed to obey its "Congressional mandate to protect the environment and the public health," according to a statement from Spitzer's office.
In April, 10 states, plus the District of Columbia and New York City, sued the EPA for failing to adopt strong emission standards to reduce air pollution from new power plants across the nation. They were joined in the suit by several environmental groups.
New York and other states have fought with the Bush administration for years over carbon dioxide emissions.
In July 2005, a three-judge panel in the same court upheld the EPA's decision not to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from cars and trucks under the Clean Air Act. The agency argues the law does not authorize them to regulate emissions to reduce global warming, and maintains there is not enough scientific data to support such a move.
The April lawsuit was filed largely in response to the 2005 ruling, in the hopes that the courts will rule specifically whether the Clean Air Act can be used to fight global warming.
Popular Now in SciTech
- Retro Duo will play your old Nintendo games
- Apple iPad 3 rumors: thicker, sharper, coming soon
- Obama's 2012 campaign playlist now on Spotify
- Anonymous breaks into Assad's server
- FBI releases Steve Jobs background report
- Hackers release Symantec pcAnywhere source code
- Ethical iPhone 5 petitions head to Apple stores
- Apple faces $1.6 billion iPad trademark lawsuit
- Apple iPhone 5 rumors, reports say June release
- Apple iPad 3 rumors resurface, sources say March release
- Scientists say online dating doesn't work
- Facebook graffiti artist David Choe, from homeless to millions
- Pinterest secretly swaps links for profit
- Facebook RIP pages defaced by British man
- Shocking Stats on Texting While Driving
- Apple supplier Foxconn hit by hackers
- Facebook required for Spotify account, here's a trick
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Aaron's falls on concern over chairman's comments
- Grains futures, livestock prices fall
- Grammy Awards to be "Adele's coronation?"
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
on CBS News






