Is $100M Guantanamo Courthouse Necessary?
Pentagon's Plans For Another Facility To Try 60 People Are Questioned
-
Play CBS Video
Video
One Expensive Courthouse
Congress is questioning the Pentagon's plans for a $100 million courthouse on Guantanamo Bay that would be used to try 60 detainees. Sharyl Attkisson reports on how your tax dollars are being spent.
-
Photo
Detainees held at Guantanamo Bay. The Pentagon wants to build a $100 million courthouse to try about 60 detainees being held there. (CBS)
-
Interactive
Gitmo Tribunals
Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.
-
Interactive
Military 101
Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
"This is very expensive for the number of cases, 60, which they anticipate trying," says Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
That's right, a $100 million courthouse to try about 60 cases. That's $1.6 million per defendant ... just for the building. The trials will cost many millions more.
Of course, these aren't run-of-the-mill defendants. They're terror suspects including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammad. Still, both Republicans and Democrats in Congress are balking at the idea — and the cost — in private meetings with Defense Department officials.
"I asked them if they had looked at alternatives in the United States, looked at them, and the answer was no," Feinstein says. "I was surprised that they hadn't looked at Fort Leavenworth, at other places to build a courthouse, to bring these people over, to keep them in secure custody, to try them."
But this building will house more than courtrooms. The courthouse would sleep up to 1,200 people, there would be a dining facility for 800, and a garage big enough for 100 vehicles.
Tax watchdog Tom Finnigan of Citizens Against Government Waste says his radar antennae went up when the Pentagon recently tried to push the plans through Congress on an emergency basis without any votes.
"They tried to rush the funding through the process. That alone raises a red flag this could be a boondoggle in the works," Finnigan says.
No one from the Defense Department would agree to an interview, but a spokesman told CBS News the new facility is needed so more than one defendant at a time can be tried under heavy security. The trials could take years, and the space allows for lots of observers and reporters for maximum transparency, the Pentagon says.
It looks as though there's enough skepticism on Capitol Hill that the Pentagon will have to put the project through the formal processes in January, so Congress can actually vote on whether to spend $100 million of your money on a very special courthouse.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- Visas for Foreign Retirees Could Be a Boon
- Senators Criticize Cheney Cover-Up
- Swine Flu Threat Not Gone, U.S. Warns



I don't think so! how stupid is that.
Dee dee dee!
Please ask him to try to keep Haliburton's hands off the deal!
I just do not believe that this 'courthouse' will ever be used as such. Most likely, these detainees will never see a court of any sort. They will simply be held indefinitely, or possibly they will be sent to another country who will look into the matter and find there was no reason to hold them to start with.
$1,000,000,000 apparatus to execute these guys. Has this administration totally sold out to special interest?
What IS this? A courthouse or a spa?
They have a courthouse now. It should be sufficient to handle 60 prisoners. End of story. The court house needs to be big enough top handle the judges, the lawyers, the prisoner, a couple of file clerks, translators, a maintenance man, security and a couple of gofers. We are talking about 20 people or less.
The fact that someone tried to rush this through in the dead of night shows that our %u201Cconservatives%u201D are not conservative at all when it comes to spending our money. This $100 million is a nice fat backdoor payback for someone. We need to find out who the benefactor is and who the beneficiary is and run them all out of town.
I am sick of these people taking the taxpayers money, lying and duping the tax payer---sick of it. This is beyond not having a conscience--to blatant, in the face B.S.
Will it really cost 100 Million or is some of that going in their pockets? It's hard to know due to constant continous lies.
Posted by ObservantX at 09:08 AM : Dec 19, 2006
Brilliant deduction Watson and well said.
Posted by jerryomara at 03:54 AM : Dec 19, 2006
You are sooooooooooo right! Good blogs today!
www.newswithview.com/Craig/roberts10.htm
It is were America is headed.
Why not build a $200-million courthouse we don't want to be outdone by Iran or the Saudis.
Posted by hvac1000 at 01:33 PM : Dec 19, 2006
That works for the good folks of Marijo county in Arizona (Phoenix). They have a tent city for jail overflow. Of course the difference there is that the sheriff (even though he's pretty much an as*s on most things) is actually going to let his prisoners have a fair trial. Something the neocons have no intention of doing.
Their trial rules:
Fair trial = defendant is convicted;
Good trial = conviction on all charges;
Excellent trial = conviction on all charges and advance guilty verdicts on some future charges.
The $100 million courthouse probably wouldn't be completed before the shrub is gone. The next holder of that office might be rational so that trials not completed will be conducted constitutionally, so that the courthouse wouldn't be needed. Then it could be renovated as a spa facility for pentagon brass. It'd only take about $150 million or so more as an emergency inclusion for either KBR or Parsons.
When the government can so easily steal citizens monies as tax dollar, why not squander it. There is always more to fleece.
Talk about 'tax and squander'! LOL
And the hypocrites do the most squandering of Americans' hard earned wealth!
An "illegal war of aggression" is regarded as an extremely serious offense in the eyes of U.S. ratified international law, of which, our public servants Constitutionally bound to uphold.
One relevant treaty is the Nuremberg Charter. Following WWII, the U.S. and others, used this treaty as a framework to try many top Nazi officials. The actions of these WWII Nazi, officials have many striking similarities to the heinous conduct of the Bush League and the rest of the neo-conservative/liberal movement.
Several of the leading WWII Nazi figures were sentenced to death by hanging. The globe will celebrate when our criminal "leadership" is finally brought to justice.
Guantanimo Bay would make an excellent location to process the Bush League global pirates through war-crimes tribunals. I'd even bet that Castro would extend the lease at no cost for this purpose.
If you've ever read any of the stuff from the Nuremberg trials, the B-C team could have xeroxed the Nazi's statements as their strategy book. Hermann Goering said, "...the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." Sounds familiar, doesn't it? DI CKhas played Goering to the current war-criminal-in-chief.
http://911truthdvd.com/
Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/141206trafficcontroller.htm
"How lucky it is for rulers, that men don't think" Adolph Hitler.
Personally I see Cheney as Goering too (fat, full of threats and darkness and possibly addicted to drugs), with Rove as Goebbels (sawed off little liar that he is) and Rice as a combination of Magda Goebbels and Eva Braun(devoted to der fuehrer and servicing him sexually at his command). Besides I could just see Condi in thigh-high leather boots with a whip. "You've been a very naughty president Bushy! A very very naughty president indeed!"
-
by randalds
December 20, 2006 5:19 PM PST
- I support this decision for the new courthouse. I believe that besides those that are already captured, many more terrorists will pass through its halls in the years to come.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 44 CommentsPosted by Sevenveils at 04:32 PM : Dec 20, 2006
I agree. Terrorists like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and (no we haven't forgotten you you little as*shole) Wolfowitz. It'll serve as a nice secure place to bring in judges from the Hague to conduct trials and then to ship the above named off to be dropped into Sadr City, after they're convicted of course.