February 11, 2009 5:36 PM

Is $100M Guantanamo Courthouse Necessary?

By
Melissa McNamara
(CBS)  The U.S. government already has a courthouse at Guantanamo Bay, but the Pentagon isn't satisfied, CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports. It plans to spend $100 million of your tax dollars to build a huge new facility just down the hill.

"This is very expensive for the number of cases, 60, which they anticipate trying," says Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

That's right, a $100 million courthouse to try about 60 cases. That's $1.6 million per defendant ... just for the building. The trials will cost many millions more.

Of course, these aren't run-of-the-mill defendants. They're terror suspects including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammad. Still, both Republicans and Democrats in Congress are balking at the idea — and the cost — in private meetings with Defense Department officials.

"I asked them if they had looked at alternatives in the United States, looked at them, and the answer was no," Feinstein says. "I was surprised that they hadn't looked at Fort Leavenworth, at other places to build a courthouse, to bring these people over, to keep them in secure custody, to try them."

But this building will house more than courtrooms. The courthouse would sleep up to 1,200 people, there would be a dining facility for 800, and a garage big enough for 100 vehicles.

Tax watchdog Tom Finnigan of Citizens Against Government Waste says his radar antennae went up when the Pentagon recently tried to push the plans through Congress on an emergency basis without any votes.

"They tried to rush the funding through the process. That alone raises a red flag this could be a boondoggle in the works," Finnigan says.

No one from the Defense Department would agree to an interview, but a spokesman told CBS News the new facility is needed so more than one defendant at a time can be tried under heavy security. The trials could take years, and the space allows for lots of observers and reporters for maximum transparency, the Pentagon says.

It looks as though there's enough skepticism on Capitol Hill that the Pentagon will have to put the project through the formal processes in January, so Congress can actually vote on whether to spend $100 million of your money on a very special courthouse.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by randalds December 20, 2006 8:19 PM EST
I support this decision for the new courthouse. I believe that besides those that are already captured, many more terrorists will pass through its halls in the years to come.
Posted by Sevenveils at 04:32 PM : Dec 20, 2006

I agree. Terrorists like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and (no we haven't forgotten you you little as*shole) Wolfowitz. It'll serve as a nice secure place to bring in judges from the Hague to conduct trials and then to ship the above named off to be dropped into Sadr City, after they're convicted of course.
Reply to this comment
by sevenveils December 20, 2006 7:32 PM EST
I support this decision for the new courthouse. I believe that besides those that are already captured, many more terrorists will pass through its halls in the years to come.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 20, 2006 4:39 PM EST
I have a quote back to ya that Bush must believe in too.

"How lucky it is for rulers, that men don't think" Adolph Hitler.

Personally I see Cheney as Goering too (fat, full of threats and darkness and possibly addicted to drugs), with Rove as Goebbels (sawed off little liar that he is) and Rice as a combination of Magda Goebbels and Eva Braun(devoted to der fuehrer and servicing him sexually at his command). Besides I could just see Condi in thigh-high leather boots with a whip. "You've been a very naughty president Bushy! A very very naughty president indeed!"
Reply to this comment
by kata8 December 20, 2006 5:25 AM EST
Everyone must watch this video, concerning 9/11 and the evidence. The links are below.

http://911truthdvd.com/

Boston Air Traffic Controller Says 9/11 An Inside Job
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/141206trafficcontroller.htm
Reply to this comment
by firststate December 20, 2006 3:53 AM EST
RandalDS, not bad yourself, let the Iraqi's handle it. I'll love to see his expression when he was dropped off in sadr city. He'd probably be willing to listen to his intellectual and moral superiors and really want his daddy to rescue him.

If you've ever read any of the stuff from the Nuremberg trials, the B-C team could have xeroxed the Nazi's statements as their strategy book. Hermann Goering said, "...the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." Sounds familiar, doesn't it? DI CKhas played Goering to the current war-criminal-in-chief.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 20, 2006 2:27 AM EST
Couldn't have said it better myself FeelFree1. I 2nd that motion. The crimes of the Bush administration certainly do mirror the Nazi crimes in many ways and Cuba would be a wonderful place to hold a Nuremberg type trial. I would hope of course that we bring international judges in however as it'll give the trials much more credibility. Also I think a more fitting punishment then outright hanging would be to turn them over to the families of the Iraqi's they've murdered and let them punish them themselves in what ever way the choose.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 December 20, 2006 1:42 AM EST
I am in favor of this project. With the completion of this courtroom, we will then own a top-rate, full-service compound, with the capacity to detain, try, convict, and sentence the members of the illegitimate Bush-puppet regime.

An "illegal war of aggression" is regarded as an extremely serious offense in the eyes of U.S. ratified international law, of which, our public servants Constitutionally bound to uphold.

One relevant treaty is the Nuremberg Charter. Following WWII, the U.S. and others, used this treaty as a framework to try many top Nazi officials. The actions of these WWII Nazi, officials have many striking similarities to the heinous conduct of the Bush League and the rest of the neo-conservative/liberal movement.

Several of the leading WWII Nazi figures were sentenced to death by hanging. The globe will celebrate when our criminal "leadership" is finally brought to justice.

Guantanimo Bay would make an excellent location to process the Bush League global pirates through war-crimes tribunals. I'd even bet that Castro would extend the lease at no cost for this purpose.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 20, 2006 12:41 AM EST
That's why they won't bring them here for the trial catt, because it'll be more transparent. The last thing this pathetic Bush government wants is to expose more of their lies, torturing and phony charges against people they have no evidence against. They swept these people up when they invaded Afghanistan by telling the drug lords they'd pay a bounty for every Taliban member they turn over to them. Of course every poppy farmer in the country used this as a chance to get rid of anyone who'd pis*sed them off, Taliban or not. Most of the people in Gitmo are there just because they happened to be in the wrong place (their home) at the wrong time.
Reply to this comment
by catt42701 December 19, 2006 11:23 PM EST
I think the time is past asking them to find somewhere else. It's time to tell them to find a courthouse and secure holding cells for the prisoners stateside. They would be more secure stateside in the first place and it would be more transparent and there would already be somewhere for everyone to sleep.I also think it is time to write your congress person to tell them that, quickly, before they start building. Shame on them.
Reply to this comment
by agnim December 19, 2006 10:33 PM EST
'Easy come, easy go' the tax dollars!

When the government can so easily steal citizens monies as tax dollar, why not squander it. There is always more to fleece.

Talk about 'tax and squander'! LOL

And the hypocrites do the most squandering of Americans' hard earned wealth!
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook