February 11, 2009 5:37 PM

McCain: Deploy More Troops to Iraq

(AP)  Sen. John McCain said Thursday that America should deploy 15,000 to 30,000 more troops to Iraq to control its sectarian violence, and give moderate Iraqi politicians the stability they need to take the country in the right direction.

McCain made the remarks to reporters in Baghdad, where he and five other members of Congress were meeting with U.S. and Iraqi officials.

"The American people are disappointed and frustrated with the Iraq war, but they want us to succeed if there's any way to do that," McCain, a possible 2008 presidential candidate, said at a news conference at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone.

The Arizona Republican said five to 10 more brigades of U.S. combat soldiers must be sent to Iraq. Brigades vary in size but generally include about 3,000 troops, meaning he was recommending 15,000 to 30,000 additional forces.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., said the delegation had met with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, and urged him to break his ties with anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and disarm his Mahdi Army militia.

Al-Sadr controls 30 of the 275 parliament seats and is a key figure in al-Maliki's coalition.

The U.S. military has about 140,000 troops in Iraq, and President Bush is considering a change of strategy in the country, including Baghdad, where stepped-up efforts to curtail sectarian violence failed this summer. The U.S. force includes about 15 combat brigades made up of 50,000-60,000 soldiers, the U.S. military said.

McCain has joined other legislators and military analysts in saying that Mr. Bush sent far too few troops to Iraq after the coalition toppled Saddam Hussein in March 2003, leading to widespread violence at the hands of Sunni Arab insurgent groups and Shiite militias.

But McCain said U.S. military commanders in Iraq had not asked the delegation for more U.S. troops, and one of the senators traveling with him didn't seem to accept his argument.

"Iraq is in crisis. The rising sectarian violence threatens the very existence of Iraq as a nation," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. The current U.S. strategy in Iraq has failed, but "I'm not yet convinced that additional troops will pave the way to a peaceful Iraq in a lasting sense," she said.

"My fear is that if we have more troops sent to Iraq that we will just see more injuries and deaths, that we might have a short-term impact, but without a long-term political settlement," Collins said.

Gunmen in military uniforms kidnapped dozens of people Thursday from a commercial area in central Baghdad, police said, and a car bomb killed two policemen who were trying to defuse it in Baghdad's Sadr City section, where officers were on high alert after receiving tips that militants were moving more bombs into the Shiite slum.

McCain said he realizes that only about 15 percent to 18 percent of Americans favor deploying more U.S. troops to Iraq, and that if such a move proved unsuccessful in the unpopular war it could hurt his presidential ambitions.

But the Vietnam War veteran also said that Americans must realize that if U.S. troops leave Iraq in a state of chaos, insurgent groups such as al Qaeda in Iraq "will follow us home."

Lieberman said the U.S. delegation left its meetings with al-Maliki, President Jalal Talabani and other Iraqi officials believing "there is a force of moderates within the context of Iraqi politics coming together to strengthen the center here against the extremists."

"We need more, not less, U.S. troops here" to improve Iraq's security, he said.

Lieberman said the U.S. delegation was "quite explicit" about "how important it is that the Iraqis themselves begin to take aggressive action to disarm the militias, to stop the sectarian violence and to involve all the people in country to governance," including promised provincial elections.

Last month, Lieberman won re-election to the U.S. Senate as an independent after losing the Democratic primary in his state of Connecticut in part because he supports the Iraq war.

The delegation also included Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and John Thune of South Dakota, and Rep. Mark Kirk, R-Ill.

They were scheduled to travel on Thursday to Iraq's southern port city of Basra and to Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province, a dangerous area where many insurgent groups are fighting U.S. and Iraqi forces.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by nynative1340 December 15, 2006 11:41 PM EST
missAmerica: Your post here has disappeared, but I did see your other post re: the Bay of Pigs fiasco. A lot of information about that 'CIA venture' didn't become public until many years later. For instance, the 'invaders' were transported into Cuban waters on ships owned by United Brands, more commonly known as 'Chiquita Banana.' It seems Chiquita had a stake in Cuba in that Castro confiscated all private property owned by U.S. businesses, including Chiquita's property.

Two things contributed to the failure: 1) The CIA was certain that the Cuban people would join them. However Castro's agents had infiltrated the resistance groups. 2) The CIA had information that the Soviets knew the data of the invasion and didn't tell Kennedy.

Unfortunately the 'pigs' disaster was celebrated in Cuba for many years (probably still is) and solidified the support that Castro received in Cuba.

About seven years earlier, in a similar incident, Chiquita was instrumental in getting the CIA to overthrow the newly elected president of Guatamala. Just another one of the many 'CIA coups' of fledgling democracies.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 December 15, 2006 6:32 PM EST
McCain's torture experiences in Viet Nam have undoubtedly left him with severe brain damage.
Reply to this comment
by sim828524s December 15, 2006 1:57 PM EST
Like everything else, this too shell pass
Reply to this comment
by nynative1340 December 15, 2006 4:22 AM EST
Ranger and Calvary: I applaud your courage and your convictions to support your Commander in Chief. However, you should know that WE are not the enemy, nor are we cowards hiding under rocks (That's an immature statement!) just because we don't agree with an illegal war started with lies.

Many of us are seasoned military veterans (28 years here) who have experienced the ravages of war and also served in that 'other' war that was started with a lie. Many were there at the end when we had no choice but to 'cut and run.' In fact, many were plucked off the Embassy roof as the NVA was moving in for the kill.

We also remember how frustrating that war was because the ineffective leadership didn't understand the culture or the determination of the enemy.

Nothing has changed except the technology of the weapons used. But even the most advanced weapons are ineffective against terrorists, just as they were against the guerrillas in Vietnam. But our leaders don't understand that.

Go fight your war and I'll be very proud of you for following orders without question. That's what you are supposed to do. Just remember, in this country we have the right to dissent.

On the other hand, I am not so proud of what Bush & Co., including McCain, have done to my country.

Reply to this comment
by randalds December 15, 2006 4:12 AM EST
You know if he's elected in 08 he'll be 72, the oldest man ever to be elected president, even older then Reagen (69). One has to begin to wonder if maybe all of the wheels are still turning inside the mans skull or if he's stripped a few gears.
Reply to this comment
by randalds December 14, 2006 8:16 PM EST
Does McCain have any brains left?

Posted by nikosk1 at 05:11 PM : Dec 14, 2006

I honestly think he's gone senile.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 December 14, 2006 7:09 PM EST
News flash McCain. According to recent polls, the US population want us to get out of Iraq. I don't think winning at the cost of another thousand US soldiers dead is acceptable. We won't even think about the addition dead Iraqis or the additional carnage.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 December 14, 2006 7:05 PM EST
And McCain wants to run for president! God save us from that fate! Retire, old man.

More troops are NOT going to solve the problem. Hasn't it been said over and over, "the answer is not going to be military. It must be political." What good are 30,000 more troops going to do? They will make good targets! All that will happen is that more US soldiers will be dead, the civil war will continue on unabated and so will the insurgency. Iraquis are prepared to fight to the death until the next giant asteroid hits the earth and the apocolypst comes.

They will far outlast any US troops there. It is their homeland, their lives, their religious beliefs they are fighting for. That is pretty good motivation.

What are US troops fight for?? They are suppose to be defending the US. OOPs, forgot, Iraq never attacked us. Next reason we are there, spread democracy. Now how is that for motivation??

On this side we have an insurgent, prepared to give his life and take the life of many infidels, to defend his home.

On the other side we have a US Marine. Not defending his homeland, nope not that. What is the mission, you ask? He is trying to spread democracy and to people who do not want it. Soldier, I have a question for you. Are you prepared to give your life here today to spread democracy to an unwilling population. If the answer is yes, you need a mental checkup. If the answer if no, good f***ing luck! You might just end up giving your life or limbs in persuit of that goal anyway.

Reply to this comment
by rsoxfan1123 December 14, 2006 6:46 PM EST
notice this story right below the "breaking point one"...
Reply to this comment
by heetseeker December 14, 2006 6:44 PM EST
McCain's propositions suggest that we have totally run out of ideas.... it is a classic scattergun approach... "lets try anything and hope something works".... unfortunately what the administration fails to understand is that we are no longer masters of our own destiny in Iraq...

We are under the misapprehension that the massive and overwhelming deployment of force is the answer...

If it was the insurgency would have been put down long ago, US troops would have stood down and we would now be making the case for war in Syria or Iran.... painful though it may be.... we have met our match in Iraq... our smart weapons are little use against a "dumb" but enterprising enemy...

The only leverage we have left is over the Iraqi Government and even that appears to be tenuous at best...

Reply to this comment
See all 51 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook