Report: U.S. Schools Not Making The Grade
High-Powered Panel Warns That American Kids Can't Compete With Global Peers
-
Play CBS Video Video All Children Left Behind American public schools are falling behind their international counterparts. Thalia Assuras reports on the revolutionary recommendations presented by a Blue Ribbon Commission on education.
-
Neha Sharma, center, says she thinks public education in America is worse than in India, her homeland. (CBS)
-
Interactive Education In America Backpack ready? Learn more about education in America through fun facts, national statistics and unusual schools.
-
Interactive The Nation We Live In Who are Americans and what do they do? A comprehensive look at our economic, sociological and racial breakdown.
"I am really worried about where this country is," says ex-Sen. Bill Brock, a former Secretary of Labor. "We've got an information world, we're networked to the rest of the world, it's a global economy and we're not preparing our young people for that world."
Students from Asia to Europe outperform Americans on tests. Thirty years ago, the U.S. boasted 30 percent of the world's college students. That figure is now 14 percent. Meanwhile, most other industrialized nations educate their 16-year olds at a college level.
Neha Sharma is 16. The daughter of a diplomat from India, she's in an advanced college-level program in Virginia, rare in U.S. public high schools.
"I hate to say this, but the education system over here is worse than it is in India," Sharma says.
Emerging giants like India are churning out college graduates who often have more advanced skill sets than American graduates. Many go on to take U.S. jobs.
"That is going to drive the standard of living down in the United States," says Commissioner Mark Tucker.
The commission calls for a radical overhaul to stream all students to college.
Public schools would no longer be run by local districts. Instead, schools could be managed by groups of teachers or private companies. Teachers would need to pass rigorous assessments ... and be paid a lot more. All 4-year-olds and all low-income 3-year-olds would enroll in universal pre-K. Finally, high school students should be prepared to pass college-level board exams by age 16, like Neha Sharma and her classmates.
Do students think they are ready for what's going to be the new globalized world? "Absolutely not, no!," Sharma and her classmates say, laughing.
It's not the answer any parent or teacher in this country wants to hear.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 52 Comments"I saw this in a black-and-white film once. I couldn't understand the narrator though. He was speaking in German." - George Carlin
Hey, keep your government schools if you want. Let's just make it that those who don't use them, don't want to use them, and never will use them, don't have to pay for them. Let them who use them pay for them by user fees or some such pay-as-you-go money making scheme. But that would make them too much like private schools, wouldn't it? Freedom of choice, gotta love it!
We need to have the teachers in charge, the parents supporting and backing the teachers, the kids in uniforms, sitting quietly and attentively at their desks with no electronic games or cell phones to distract them. The school isn't supposed to be a place with no rules and kids do anything they want. It's supposed to be a place where "students" come to follow the rules for the purpose of getting a education.
When I was in school and the bell rang, you were quietly in your seat with your book open to the proper page and your home work ready to hand in and if you acted up both the teacher and your parent were in your face.
Imagine an apprentice program where children, particularly those who are not so good at "book-learning," earn while they learn and good grades are rewarded with bonuses and pay raises. Imagine some smart entrepreneur developing the Wal-Mart of primary and secondary education that delivers the quality of product the consumer (parent and/or student) wants at the lowest price ("Always"). If they fail to deliver, they go out of business.
What is needed is for the government to get out of the way and drop all these programs of minimums which force teachers to teach to a test and not the subject they are supposed to be teaching. And requiring that teachers are educated in the subjects they teach and not just trained teachers, as if that was enough education in itself, would certainly help.
In just about every subject, the private sector can provide a better product at a lower cost for the end consumer than anything produced by a government monopoly. Imagine how much better the mail would run if UPS and Fed-Ex were allowed to compete with the USPS...
The education system in the US didn't just go to He llovernight and fixes won't be quick, but changes need to start. At this point, it's time to try almost anything. How much harm can be done by any reasoned approach for changing a system in such disrepair? It is approaching the point where further harm is unlikely to result from any genuine attempt at improvement.
I had planned to train new quality control employees for an industrial startup operation a few years ago. I thought I could cover concepts specific to the industry and brush up on some basic statistics. I wound up having to put together a remedial math course, first. Several of the employees who had bachelor's degrees had no concept of fractions, decimals or basic math operations. If the level of math skills among high school graduates is lower then we should be grateful that today's cash registers calculate the change due a customer. Otherwise the fast food and convenience store sectors would crumble under the complexity of making change.
But that would not solve a thing.
The way I see it, the way of the world has changed.We have to change our way of thinging or teaching.To keep the students interested enough to learn.It takes a certian type of person to keep things interesting and teach.The cost of books,paper&pencils ect. per student. A laptop is probly cheaper. I guess what I'm saying is we need to change our school structure.to catch up,or surpass the rest of the world.
We are a world leeder lets stay on top
s,computer engineers,etc.
Posted by newsjeff at 04:34 PM : Dec 15, 2006"
Good point.
But how about youngsters and their families seeing to their education so that the graduates can GROW UP AND BEGIN THEIR OWN ENTERPRISE?
See, the pursuit of knowledge is not about others egging you on: It's also about children and their families TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR OWN SELF DEVELOPMENT!
Posted by nadeau4201 at 12:33 PM : Dec 15, 2006"
Dam, guy!
You are EXACTLY right on 200%! LOL
This is incredibly platitudinous. What specifically should students know to prepare for this brave new networked world?
I can definitely relate to Neha's academic pursuance and achievement. I orignate from a third world country. I too graduated high school at 16. It took discipline and preparedness to achieve this but it is more interesting to note that 70% of the graduating class was 16 years old and the other 30% were between 17 & 18 years. At 16 we were mentally prepared to take on global issues which makes the transition into university less difficult.
My area of Northern California makes over $10,000,000,000.00 a year selling pot illegally, and over 70% of that goes to this nations schools. All this because we were duped into thinking people needed their medicine. We just unleashed drug dealers that don't stop at the front doors of our school system.
Having teachers grade their own students may not be the best idea. Schools get their money from how many graduate and attend, This should change.
Crazy violent entertainment, Play stations to die for, Drug dealers backed by the law and pedophiles, These are the things we allow to access our children.
I think these things could easily destroy a young persons chance at an education.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 52 Comments