WASHINGTON, Dec. 14, 2006

Senator Stricken With Undiagnosed Illness

Senate Balance Of Power Could Shift If Tim Johnson, Democrat, Can't Return To Work

  • Born and educated in South Dakota, Sen. Tim Johnson has represented his home state in Congress for twenty years, first in the House, and since 1996, in the Senate.

    Born and educated in South Dakota, Sen. Tim Johnson has represented his home state in Congress for twenty years, first in the House, and since 1996, in the Senate.  (CBS/AP)

  • Who's Who Leadership Shuffle

    The Democrats' success in the 2006 elections means changes at the top in the House and Senate.

  • Interactive The 109th Congress

    Meet the leaders and follow the action in the House and Senate.

(CBS/AP)  Democratic Sen. Tim Johnson of South Dakota was hospitalized and underwent surgery late Wednesday, weeks before his party is to take control of the Senate by a one-vote margin.

Johnson, who turns 60 on Dec. 28, was admitted to George Washington University Hospital with an undiagnosed illness, said a spokeswoman, Julianne Fisher. However, she said the senator did not suffer a stroke or heart attack. His office had said earlier Johnson may have had a stroke.

There has been no word on the nature of Johnson's surgery, which lasted past midnight, or on his condition.

Sources close to the situation, speaking before the surgery was made public, tell CBS News the situation is definitely not good.

Johnson became disoriented during a call with reporters at midday, stuttering in response to a question. He appeared to recover, asking if there were any additional questions before ending the call.

"Every member of the United States Senate sends our best to him and to his family at this difficult time, and we wish him a full recovery," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who calls Johnson "a dear friend."

Johnson's condition could determine control of the Senate, CBS News correspondent Gloria Borger reports.

Should Johnson be unable to continue to serve, it could halt the scheduled Democratic takeover of the Senate. Democrats won a 51-49 majority in the November election.

South Dakota state law says that the governor can appoint a replacement when there is a "vacancy," but Secretary of State Chris Nelson tells CBS News political producer Steve Chaggaris that it's unclear whether a seat held by an incapacitated senator would be considered "vacant."

Unless Johnson dies, the state of South Dakota is unsure of how to proceed if he's incapacitated. If he dies, however, the governor, Mike Rounds, would appoint a replacement who would serve until the next general election in 2008, Chaggaris explains.

Because Rounds is a Republican, an appointment of this nature could affect the balance of power in the Senate, and thus the entire Congress. Leadership would be given back to the Republicans, because in a split Senate, the deciding vote is given to the vice president.

Rounds released a statement saying, "we are hopeful of good news for our friend and colleague."

Johnson, 59, a fourth-generation South Dakotan, was born in Canton to college professor Van Johnson and homemaker Ruth Johnson. He attended school in Canton, Flandreau and Vermillion and graduated from Vermillion High School in 1965.

He attended the University of South Dakota, where he met the woman he would marry shortly after graduation — Barbara Brooks of Sioux Falls. Johnson went on to earn both a master's degree in public administration and a law degree from USD.

Johnson started a law practice in Vermillion in 1975 and ran for statewide office in 1978. He served four years in the state House of Representatives and another four years in the state Senate before setting his sights on Washington.

He was elected to South Dakota's U.S. House seat in 1986 and served five terms before moving to the U.S. Senate in 1996.

Johnson was most recently re-elected in 2002, narrowly defeating then-Rep. John Thune, and currently serves on the Senate's Appropriations Committee, Budget Committee, Banking Committee, Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the Indian Affairs Committee.

The couple, who still have a home in Vermillion, have two sons and a daughter: Brooks, who served in the U.S. Army in Bosnia, Kosovo, South Korea, Afghanistan and Iraq and is still in the military, posted stateside at the moment; Brendan, a Sioux Falls lawyer; and Kelsey, who works in public service in Washington.

Both Johnson and his wife have battled cancer.

The senator underwent prostate cancer in 2004 and subsequent tests have shown him to be clear of the disease. Barb Johnson is a two-time breast cancer survivor.

©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 68 Comments
by munseym1 December 14, 2006 1:18 PM EST
DKOColo, wouldn't the right thing to do in 2001 have been to keep all the committee chairmanships Republican, because the American people elected a Republican majority? Need I remind you that they disregarded the will of the people and flipped the leadership of every single committee, even ones that had nothing to do with Jumpin Jim Jeffords? Where was the outcry then? Your crocodile tears now are duly noted.
What was the right thing to do in Massachusetts in 2004, when the Democrats changed the law to prevent Republican governor Romney from selecting a replacement for "President" Kerry? It seems like the Democrats are only interested in the will of the people when it suits them.
Reply to this comment
by shortestfuse December 14, 2006 1:08 PM EST
"Has anyone checked the Senator's office for traces of Polonium? I would not put anything past these outlaws in the administration"

Has anybody bothered listening to the news. Sen. Johnson suffers from bleeding in the brain caused by a congenital arteriovenous malformation. Try to blame that on our OUTSTANDING PRESIDENT!
Reply to this comment
by tucson23 December 14, 2006 12:48 PM EST
ebbarn, Communism and Facism are not the same thing. Not appearing to understand the differences between Stalinism, Leninism, Communism, and Facism doesn't do your credibility any good, and neither does quoting the Bible to make "factual" arguments. The Bible is what you call "truthiness."

Fascists are Capitalists, and tend to be radical in the sense that re-distribution of wealth should be minimal. Communists believe distribution of wealth should be forced by thier government. Americans are just about in the middle of this divide: We have Republicans who want to de-regulate and de-tax corporations and the rich, while resisting forces that might reduce corporate profits (environmental laws, minimum wage, etc.)--sounds a little fascism. Then we have Democrats who want to take from the rich and give to the poor--sounds a little like communism.

But both parties are right in the middle, in the big scheme of things. It's just as silly to call Republicans "fascists" as it is to call Democrats "commies." Neither is really true.
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 11:11 AM EST
Re: DKOColo

DKOColo certainly has a point worth seriously considering. I think we are overshooting our target though. We do not know what the outcome of the Honorable Tim Johnson illness will be. Also, it is my understanding that even if Senator Johnson is totally incapacitated, as long as he is alive, he can not be removed from office except under his personal recommendation. For that matter, his staff can continue as is, and conduct the affairs of his office as long as he is alive.

It is my understanding that should Senator Johnson die, then the United States Constitution leaves it up to the individual state as to how a replacement is chosen. In the case of the State of South Dakota, the governor is delegated the responsibility for the appointment of a replacement.

This is where things get sticky. Should the Democrat seat be continued because Senator Johnson is a Democrat? That is a good position.

Another case might be that the governor considers it is to the best interest of the state to appoint a very qualified Republican? Remember, this is not a national issue in its purest form as far as I can see. It is a state issue. Another good position?? Maybe.

Another position might be that Senator Johnson won only by about 600 votes vs the governor winning by an overwhelming majority of around 62%. An overwhelming majority trusted the Republican governor to make decisions he feels is in the best interest of the state. Another good position?? Maybe.
Reply to this comment
by gmond December 14, 2006 11:03 AM EST
All this crazy commentary because nobody will offer any explanations as to what is medically wrong with the Senator. Doctors don't operate without a clue, so why all the secrecy? Just so it can fuel all this conspiracy ***?
Reply to this comment
by dkocolo December 14, 2006 10:40 AM EST
OTHER STATES SHOULD PREPARE FOR S.D. "BOYCOTT"

There is a saying many of you may know: "Do the Right Thing, because it's the Right Thing to Do."

Should the senator from South Dakota be rendered unable to fulfill the duties of his ELECTED office, I would encourage governors of other states to make clear ramifications for the state of South Dakota, should their governor even -- think -- of appointing someone from the Republican Party to replace the elected Democrat.

This should be prepared for now...and all citizens of South Dakota who ELECTED Senator Johnson that the right thing to do is replace him with a Democrat. And Democrats, alike, should behave similarily in similar situations.

Because it the Right thing to Do.

Dennis
Colorado
Reply to this comment
by jn122736 December 14, 2006 10:14 AM EST
There are those who are geniuses in their own minds. They place themselves on precariously high pedestals to look down on others merely to come crashing down when their characters are exposed by their degrading and insulting comments.
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 9:31 AM EST
fascistusa

Part 4 of 4

Point 14. Boy, I like this one. If you knew a little history you would not even touch this one. Fascism in the form of Nazism and Communism did not find their roots in the so called "ruling class" or prosperous businesses. They started on the individual working class level. Reference Germany, USSR, Venezuela, etc.

Now I know that this will not change your mind in the least. Let me refer to a little more of the wisdom literature in the Holy Scriptures; Provervs 12:16, "A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult."
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 9:30 AM EST
fascistusa

Part 3 of 4

Point 9. First Amendment. Few presidents have been non-religious and none have be anti-Christian. Most have attached their selves to Christianity.

Point 10. By its very nature government has corruption whether dominated by one party or the other. I can give case in point. Do you want me to embarrass you on this point?

Point 11. I don't have a clue as to what you consider intellectual or art. I know that I have recently been invited to become a member of a debate and discussion group made up of intellectuals. Do you think having a crucifix in urine is art? I really don't know what you mean by art. Admittedly, I am not much in favor of government funded art. I think it belongs to the private sector. Government is incapable of art.

Point 12. Crime is increasing in the United States. You live near one of the worst crime areas in the United States. Do you think crime should not be punished? Actually the legal system right now is incapable of adequately enforcing the law and convicting the criminals, and it is getting progressively worse.

Point 13. Florida and Ohio I assume. No matter how many times the ballets have been checked and rechecked the outcome is no different. The United States Constitution was not written in the 20th century. The electoral college works fine due to its checks and balances. It protects both the rights of the individual as well as give a fair voice to each state, regardless of size.
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 9:29 AM EST
fascistusa

Part 2 of 4
Point 2. French and Indian War, Revolutionary war, War of 1812, Civil War, Spanish American War, World War I, World War II, Korean War, Vietnam War, War in Bosnia, Terrorist attacks (plural), War in Afghanistan, War in Iraq. Were all these under the administration of Republicans? There will always be war. It does not matter who is control of the White House and Congress.

Point 3. Do you even understand the basis of the design of the flag and have you no respect for the men and women who have died protecting its honor.

Point 4. Human rights. Amendment 1, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion (or non-religion) , Freedom of the press. You are exercising all right now and I don't think the Secret Service is going to knock on your door.

Point 5. Who have attacked the United States and its interests since the Vietnam War? Terrorists, terrorists, terrorists.

Point 6. The military is under the command of civilian control. The generals don't lead the county and you can't prove otherwise.

Point 7. National security? Terrorists, Terrorists, Terrorists.

Point 8. Microsoft is no more protected than any other corporation. As far as software companies are concerned they have been under greater scrutiny and have had to by court order release code to other companies so they too can fairly compete.
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 9:27 AM EST
fascistusa

PART 1 OF 4

Did I say I served in World War II? No I did not. I am a student of history in particular World War II.

You see how easy you jump to unsubstantiated conclusions. Do you hate Christians? Do you hate Jews? Hitler had the Jews killed as well as the Christians who resisted him. Google "Dietrich Bonhoeffer" and see what happened to him.

"Thou shalt not kill." "Thou shalt not bear false witness." "Thou shall love your neighbor as thyself." "Honor your father and your mother so your days shall be long on this earth." Etc. Etc. Is this stuff bad?

There was a man named Daniel Webster and he started a dictionary. Encyclopedia Britannica marketed the Webster company's three volume set. This is what the Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines fascism as: 1. the principles of the Fascisti; also: the movement or governmental regime embodying their principles 2a: any program for setting up a centralized autocratic national regime with severely nationalistic policies, exercising regimentation of industry, commerce, and finance, rigid censorship, and forcible suppression of opposition b: any tendency toward or actual exercise of severe autocratic of dictatorial control (as over others within an organization)

I looked at your 14 points.

Point 1 - You are using the media and anyone in the world with Internet access can read just how foolish you are.
Reply to this comment
by blahblahbla5 December 14, 2006 9:04 AM EST
To all the people out there that are shocked at the level of conspiracy theories don't be -- in fact it is *your fault* for electing a government that inspires distrust with lies, big ones. It's your fault for electing the Religious Reich who prey on children and have more scandals and corruption than can really be listed in a forum like this. It's your fault for the vitriol and hate.

You reap what you sow. If you don't want a country half-filled by conspiracy then start acting like responsible citizens. You can start by lobbying your Republican governor to appoint a Democrat, which would be the non-partisan, fair decision.
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa December 14, 2006 8:20 AM EST
Miss FreeBush,

We ARE 911. Former Soldiers. College Grads. Patriots. Americans.

Sorry to have burst your illusions of a Democratic America. It won't sink in for a while. When it finally hit you that AMERICA IS FASCIST, it's going to sting.

Join the rest of us.

At least we still have Rocky, Superman, and the last Star Wars movies. Kinda help get us out of FASCISM the LAST TIME.
Reply to this comment
by missamerica4 December 14, 2006 8:12 AM EST
I am sorry Sen. Johnson is ill and I pray for his full recovery.
Reply to this comment
by missamerica4 December 14, 2006 8:10 AM EST
CALL 911,
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa December 14, 2006 8:05 AM EST
ebbarn,

So... you served in WW2. That seems to make you an expert of Fascism. Enlighten us. I flew on a plane once, that automatically makes me an expert on aviation.

Just because our Country exhibits behavior EXACTLY like Fascist Germany, you find it downright silly to see America as Fascist.

You could google the 14 points of Fascism, but I doubt you would take the time.

CONTROLLED MASS MEDIA -PROPOGANDA - fake news
ENDLESS WAR - iraq, afghanistan, iran...
EXTREME NATIONALISM - flags, bumper stickers
DISTAIN FOR HUMAN RIGHTS - torture??
IDENTIFICATION OF ENEMIES FOR UNIFYING CAUSE - terrorists
SUPREMACY OF THE MILITARY - uh...got war?
OBSESSION WITH NATIONAL SECURITY - what alerat today?
CORPORATE POWER IS PROTECTED - MONOPLIES? microsoft
CHURCH SUPPORT THE STATE - born again bush
RAMPANT CORRUPTION - wow. no corruption here
DISTAIN FOR INTELLECTUALS AND ARTS
OBSESSION WITH CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - animal cops? ***?
FRAUDULANT ELECTIONS
LABOR POWERS SUPPRESSED - unions? gone



Reply to this comment
by missamerica4 December 14, 2006 8:02 AM EST
fascistusa

Do you even know what fascism is?
Maybe a little stint in Russia may make you appreciate the US.
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa December 14, 2006 7:54 AM EST
I don't live far from D.C.

Anyone out there, it is time for the citizens to watch the Watchers.

Get a video camera. Go to the hospital.

Don't trust the Media. Don't trust the Police. Don't trust the Government.
Reply to this comment
by barnetteb December 14, 2006 7:52 AM EST
I want to be as kind as I can regarding the use of claims of murder by the Republicans and accusations of the Republicans being fascists. I know a little about World War II and to attach the term fascist to the Bush administration is just downright foolish.

Here we have all the talk about murder during the Clinton administration. Regardless of all these claims you would think the United States Attorney General as appointed by President Clinton and the Justice Department would have keyed in on these deaths and at least have brought one Republican to justice.

If the claims of murder have any truth to them, then President Clinton really must have been incompetent in his appointments.

There are two types of opinions. One is subjective. It requires little thought and usually even less work. Subjective opinions, by and large are the result of a lazy mind.

Then there is the objective opinion. This requires putting aside our prejudices and actually looking at the truth for what it is.

I had a professor in my graduate study that gave me a definition for truth. He said, "Truth is that which is consistent, does not disagree with itself, and corresponds to reality."

The Holy Scriptures are often considered as truth. I am reminded on a verse in the wisdom literature Proverbs 18:2. It says, "A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions." (NIV) That is the "sujective opinion".

By the way, I am not a Republican.
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa December 14, 2006 7:46 AM EST
missamericafreebush,

Woah. You go to whatreallyhappened.com and you are NOT Paranoid?

You don't realize BOTH parties are corrupt?

That America is a FASCIST NATION?

Do you even read anything past the word Clinton?

SENATORS MYSTERIOUSLY BEING KILLED/INJURED AND THE PROPOGANDA MEDIA ALREADY DECLARING HIM DEAD/ UNABLE TO PERFORM HIS DUTIES SHOULD SCARE THE HELL OUT OF YOU!!!


Reply to this comment
See all 68 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: