February 11, 2009 5:37 PM

Panel: McDermott Violated Ethics Standards

US Congressman Jim McDermott gestures while addressing a speech at the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), in New Delhi 01 July 2004. McDermott came to India to meet with the Indian government to understand the vision of the new government on the Indo

US Congressman Jim McDermott gestures while addressing a speech at the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), in New Delhi 01 July 2004. McDermott came to India to meet with the Indian government to understand the vision of the new government on the Indo (Getty Images)

(AP)  Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated ethics standards by giving reporters access to an illegally taped telephone call involving Republican leaders a decade ago, the House ethics committee said Monday.

McDermott, who at the time was the panel's senior Democrat, failed to meet his obligations as a committee leader, said a report released two days after Congress adjourned for the year. The panel took no action other than the report.

"Rep. McDermott's secretive disclosures to the news media ... risked undermining the ethics process regarding" former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the committee said. It said McDermott's actions "were not consistent with the spirit of the committee's rules."

The ethics complaint stems from a tape recording made by a Florida couple, who gave it to McDermott in January 1997. The tape recorded then-Speaker Gingrich, R-Ga., in a December 1996 conference call with GOP leaders regarding a separate ethics investigation of Gingrich.

McDermott leaked the tape to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and The New York Times, which published stories on the case in January 1997.

Gingrich, who was heard on the call telling House Republicans how to react to the ethics charges against him, was later fined $300,000 and reprimanded by the House.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against McDermott in a related civil case in March. The 2-1 opinion upheld a lower court ruling that McDermott had violated the rights of Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, who was heard on the 1996 call. Boehner, then a Gingrich lieutenant, is now House majority leader.

The full nine-member appeals court vacated the three-judge ruling this spring and heard new arguments in the case in October. A ruling is expected next year.

McDermott, in an e-mail to The Associated Press, said he was pleased the ethics panel had concluded he did not violate overall House rules.

"I am also pleased with the committee's acknowledgment that pending litigation in the federal court will decide the question of law over the First Amendment issues involved," he said.

Because of the pending civil case, McDermott said he would not offer additional comment.

Rep. David Hobson, R-Ohio, a former ethics committee member who filed a complaint against McDermott in November 2004, said he was disappointed the ethics panel did not sanction McDermott.

"I'm not sure this decision reflects well upon the House as a whole or the ethics process," Hobson said.

He said he might change his long-standing support for an internal ethics panel and consider replacing it with an independent inspector general to investigate House members.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by frankly6 December 13, 2006 1:18 AM EST


Another one straight from the GOP vault. Dust off the dinosaur sh*t before you roll these things out guys.

Reply to this comment
by swift2--2008 December 12, 2006 10:21 PM EST
THIS IS FROM TEN YEARS AGO, ABOUT THE LAST TIME THE ETHICS COMMITTEE ACTUALLY LOOKED AT ANYTHING.

Is this the best you can do?

I'll give you one: this guy Jefferson, whom the party did its best to demote, defeat and then keep demoted, is corrupt. Sadly, he won his election. Maybe because he's corrupt.
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 5:22 PM EST


janem4?

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 5:22 PM EST


janem4

I don't think the HUGENESS of this HUGE scandal has really sunken in here. Please check with Rush and report back to us on what this means.

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 5:15 PM EST
McDermott seems to be saying something important in this photo. Perhaps he's saying the word HUGE!!!

HUGE!!
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 5:08 PM EST


janem4

Please tell the people how HUGE this is.

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 5:07 PM EST



Man..I just can't believe how HUGE this is! Where's the outrage people?! I for one am changing my party affiliation back to Republican. This is the straw that broke this camels back.

This unethcal attempt to uncover a cover up about an ethics violation is just.....just....unethical. I am totaly disgusted and demoralized here. Everything I thought was right and true...all the values I held near and dear...shattered. Shattered!!!

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 4:59 PM EST


People are you listening?

HUGE!!!!!!

Tell them how huge this is Janem!




Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 4:57 PM EST


The HUGENESS of this HUGE scandal is mind blowing!

HUGE!!!


Reply to this comment
by frankly6 December 12, 2006 4:55 PM EST
Janem4

Are you on top of this?

When will he resign? Check with Rush and get back to us.

This is going to blow the lid off this whole Democratic corruption thing that janem4/bellaL/lestb35 has been talking about.

Man this is just huge!! Like colosal dinasaur t*rd huge!

Huge!



Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook