Goodbye To The Do-Nothing Congress

Bob Schieffer Offers A Eulogy To The 109th

(CBS)  Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.

---

This marks the end of what may have been the least productive Congress of modern times.

And, what finer way to remember it than two stories that broke last week?

First, when Democratic leaders announced the new Congress would work five days a week instead of the barely three days a week they worked this year, Democrats and Republicans howled.

Democrat Debbie Wasserman said it would force her to reschedule her daughter's Brownie troop meetings. Republican Jack Kingston said it would mean less time with his family and showed Democrats didn't care about families.

Earth to Congress: there are a lot of working parents who have to juggle family and work schedules. Maybe another line of work would better suit your lifestyles.

And there was this: The House Ethics Committee concluded House leaders had probably known for years that former Congressman Mark Foley was making inappropriate contact with teenage pages but chose to ignore it.

Yet the committee decided bad judgment didn't mean house rules had been violated so they recommended no punishment – not even a reprimand – for anyone.

As the father of grown children who once interned at the Capitol, I believe the time has come to shut down all congressional page and intern programs. Congress has demonstrated it has no real interest in protecting kids from what they might encounter there.

As for Congress working too hard, we should not only demand it work five days a week, but that members punch a time clock like many working Americans.

That way, we would at least know where they are.

---

E-mail Face the Nation.

[jasperlily]

When are these lazy, deceitful, self-serving slobs going to be told to pay back the taxpayers that part of their pay they didn't work for? I mean, compare their time worked on behalf of their constituents (as opposed to being gone, enjoying themselves) versus time paid for and demand back the difference. Hell, these overpaid self-servers couldn't hold down a job at minimum wage in the private sector.

[aeasus]

Quick slam and bolt the door!!

[aeasus]

* cheers * for ainttaken's posts

[nothappyatall]

Oh NO, they did a LOT while they were in session, they ran up the national debt by 5 trillion dollars, they cause increased hate of the US, caused the deaths of 3000 soldiers and tens of thousands of civilians, embroiled us in a never ending war, have trampled on the Constitution, taken away rights, oh yes, they have done a lot!

[starlady2]

Well, under the one-party system one thing was accomplished: making communist far wealthier than Americans :(
"Chinese to climb ranks of world%u2019s richest
By Chris Giles in London

Published: December 8 2006 22:10 | Last updated: December 8 2006 22:10

China%u2019s population is so large and its economy growing so quickly that the Chinese are set to take over second place in the league table of the world%u2019s wealthy people in the next decade.

Research published this week by the World Institute for Development Economics Research of the United Nations University (UNU-Wider) showed that an adult needed to own $61,000 of net assets to be in the richest 10 per cent of the world%u2019s wealth distribution and that in 2000, Chinese people represented less than 1-in-100 of this group."

[egresor]

bravo newster1! it certainly was NOT a do nothing congress!

if they knew about the inappropriate behavior and did nothing about it----why is that not a failure to perform their duty to protect the pages? how can the panel say there were no rules broken? sounds like a behind the scenes expediancy/protection deal being made to me.

[rharrin1]

Notice the big push to get the bush bills through at the last minute. We need to get the rest of them next election. Why no budjet???

[emhawks]

Good riddance! Hit the road boys!!

[kaowinston]

A speedy goodbye to the Republicans. Even from this distance in London, I welcome the change. There are a lot of issues facing the country which has not been resolved. I look forward to the new session.

[icykewl]

Geez, how do I qualify for a job like this and who does the hiring so I can run over and apply?

[flolake]

We are just fanning "BUSHROCKS1"'s flames and acknowledging his pathetic existance, Jacobites et al.

To get rid of this pest, ALL of us need to click on: + report this comment and enter your 250 word maximum complaint. There is strength numbers. Please help in ridding this valuable venue here @ CBSnews.com of this selfish, repetitive parasite so that the serious commentors can comment in peace & the newcomers don't inadvertantly address this guy. This really needs to stop!

Thanks to all for your consideration in this vexing matter

[sharncedar]

"Please help in ridding this valuable venue here @ CBSnews.com of this selfish, repetitive parasite "

Nah, thats what bushrocks handlers want. They want to entice you to suppress yer own free speech. Just let this automated post keep going, someone will take down the server or turn it off in a year or two, once it has served its purpose.

Freedom does have a cost, it isn't free. Bushrocks is essentially a free speech virus, possibly produced by a corporation or Republican party insiders to punish CBS news or to check out its capabilities.. Did you think the corporations will put up with uncontrolled infomation forever, when their domination of our populace comes from controlling information more than any other means? I predict full-scale speech warfare on the Internet in the coming years, with corporate fascists trying to virally overwhelm blogs or take down servers, etc. But because they are fascists, they won't be able to keep up with the technology or the flexibility of the humans, that will make it an interesting struggle.

The only way the free speech people are going to win is to be more flexible that the corporate fascist state, to move on when things get ugly, to keep finding new ways to communicate with eachother outside of the realm of "controlled speech", ie advertising and news media.

Let our human endowments prevail.

[lawmantoo]

Well, cheese and crackers!! So, now we learn the Republicans didn't even attempt to work a full week. The rest of us have to do so. They got what they deserve in the recent election, hope they learn that they have not governed for the country, only their own interest. BYE-BYE.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front. Now those traitors have occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq; the President hasn%u2019t been impeached. Why?...I'm waiting.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front. Now those traitors have occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq; the President hasn%u2019t been impeached. Why?...I'm waiting.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front. Now those traitors have occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq; the President hasn%u2019t been impeached. Why?...I'm waiting.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front. Now those traitors have occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq; the President hasn%u2019t been impeached. Why?...I'm waiting.

[mikekleber]

I think that every member of congress should receive minimum wage, have to go without any health insurance benefits, and plan and save for their own retirement benefits like many Americans do today. Maybe then, we would have a congress that takes care of Americans as they should.

[bluestardad]

DON'T GO AWAY MAD JUST GO AWAY YOU PIMPS!

[rafterman1]

Three whole days a week. Wow. How do those rich people in Congress manage? Most of them already have wealth, plus a $160,000 Congrssional salary and now they have to work a whole 5 days? That's just terrible. I'm sure the other 95% of the country that has both parents working 5 (or more) days a week for a lot less than $160,000 a year will feel just terrible for all you Congress people.

[cmorical]

Bob Schieffer I couldn't have said it better myself...it's the best speach ever! Good riddens to all the bad and hope we have nothing but good to look forward to in 2007! May our troops come home and may we start focusing on the USA and helping the so many poor and homeless in our own country.

[observantx]

This weekend I had the dubious pleasure of listening to DennyLiarHastert%u2019s farewell address to Congress. What a load of whitewash. Those must be really industrial strength rose tinted contacts he has on. He must have been in a different Congress than the one the rest of us saw sit on their collective brains. They did nothing done except walk on their knees to K Street and kiss the rears of the lobby crowd there for campaign money. Then they turned around and walked on their knees to our White House to kiss Clueless Leader%u2019s butt and bleat their allegiance.

Let%u2019s see now. $160,000 for only three days %u201Cwork%u201D. I believe each one of these do nothings owes us 40 percent of their pay for the two days they did nothing after doing nothing the other three. That would be $64,000 times 6 years equals $384,000 from each member of our semiroyalty.

That money can be put to much better use for education, the environment, Katrina relief, etc.

No more pay raises for these bloated buffoons until we see poverty in this country eliminated.

[rafterman1]

How about Congress's pay, benefits and health insurance are all tied to the average of the country? So, the more average pay people get and the more widespread healthcare is, the Congressmen get the same cut. Their job compensation should reflect the typical American's. Maybe then they will spend more time helping people instead of lining their own pockets. At least the ones who aren't rich will.

[clestes-2009]

Work 5 days a week?? How could you ask them to do such a thing. Why it is outradgeous!

Biggest paid goof offs in US history. These jerks can't get anything done and when someone else suggests they work longer and maybe get something done, for their constituants mind you, they say that shows Dem don't care for families. How about our families? Most of us work 5 days a week, you ***. How stupid do you think we are??

[adventurepa]

What a bunch of over paid blow-hards.
We need to pass a new rule.
"American citizens get to vote for congress pay raises.
If you do a good job, you get a raise.
Then we could really make them work!

"the committee decided bad judgment didn't mean house rules had been violated"
I wonder if that excuss would work with a judge?

Debbie Wasserman, "needs to reschedule her daughter's Brownie troop meetings?"
Stop your winning and get to work.
Jack Kingston said "it would mean less time with his family."
So get a new job Jack and don't ya come back, no more, no more, no more, no more.
Hit the road Jack.
Your Fired!

We should have gotten rid of all the fat cat's in congress.
2 years from now, in 08, vote out the other fat cat do nothing members of Congress.
Maybe we can get some 5 day a week, regular working people to represent us.
Probably do a better job anyway.

[bluestardad]

Dicktater and the Boys will never be the same, chew on that Tom the Hammer Delay!

[tejasdemo]

Rafterman,

I could not have said it better !

[tejasdemo]

The pathetic thing is that these crooks walk away with lifetime pensions and healthcare benefits and they could carealess what we say.

[timetrips1]

I agree how unreasonable of us to ask them to work 5 days a week. I've lost track of all the "school functions" of my child I've missed because of my job. I agree with Schieffer, lets pass a law requiring congress to punch a clock and get paid by the hour but no overtime authorized because they are not productive enough during regular business hours.

[bushrocks1]

Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front. Now those traitors have occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq; the President hasn%u2019t been impeached. Why?...I'm waiting.

[olebd]

These people are SUPPOSED to be public SERVANTS working for me and you. Through the course of history, what has caused their rise to be put upon a pedestal other than their own bloated sense of entitlement? For starters, there are too many enablers in DC that stroke them with free perks and special treatment.

If they are not in their office or in session at least 5 days a week from 9 to 5, they should be walking the streets and talking to the people they represent.

I vote we put ankle bracelets on them and the means for every "common" person to keep track of them through the internet.

[ethom90148]

While I laud Mr Shiffers commentary, I can't help but think "are you all just figuring these guys out?" The Republicans have been walking in "lockstep" since the first kangaroo court that Colin Powell presided over in the UN. Not to mention that our dimwitted President landed on an aircraft carrier and announced that the war was over! Mission accomplished! I could have sworn that wars have two sides and one side can't end it unilaterally. Kind of like Japan announcing that WWII was over two months after bombing Pearl Harbor. We as a nation, have got to start holding these "Politicians" accountable for their actions. Why isn't the penalty for cheating the American People through poor and fraudulent behavior in Congress, just as stiff as that for tax evaders? What we have seen from this Republican Congress is the worst side of Americans. We need to wash them ALL out of government come November of 2008.

[mreberry]

This is an insult to hard working Americans. Congress has worked a three day week and the least in modern history during a time of major problems like immigration, the war, increased gap between the rich and the rest of us, balanceing security with individual freedom, the biggest mess we have ever had after the disaster in New Orleans, government corruption, and on and on. On top of that, the biggest deficit in history and no accounting of what happended to all our tax dollars wasted on projects and in departments.

[kaliveotin]

THIS WAS NOT A DO-NOTHING CONGRESS. THEY GAVE THEMSELVES A THIRTY-THOUSAND DOLLAR A YEAR RAISE.
Think about it. A person working FULL-TIME for an entire year on the minimum wage makes only one-third as much as the raise that congress gave itself. Let me repeat that. Congress while refusing to increase the minimum wage gave themselves a thirty thousand dollar raise which in and of itself was three times as much, three times as much as the total wages for a minimum wage worker working an entire year at full time.
P.S. Congress worked slightly less than two days a week. CONGRESS WORKED LESS THAN TWO DAYS A WEEK.

[kaliveotin]

I forgot to mention this was the ninth raise they've given themselves since the compassionate conservative republicants took control of congress 12 years ago.