February 11, 2009 5:38 PM

Brazil Charges U.S. Pilots In Deadly Crash

Police on Friday formally accused two U.S. pilots in connection with Brazil's deadliest air disaster, saying their "lack of caution" at the controls of an executive jet played a role in the collision over the Amazon that killed 154 people.

If convicted of exposing an aircraft to danger, the two could face up to 12 years in prison, Brazilian federal police said.

Joseph Lepore, 42, of Bay Shore, N.Y., and Jan Paladino, 34, Westhampton Beach, N.Y., were questioned Friday by police for six hours and then allowed to pick up their passports and leave the country. They are required to return to Brazil for their trial.

Lepore and Paladino were piloting a Brazilian-made Legacy executive jet on Sept. 29 when it collided with a Gol Airlines Boeing 737-800 heading south over the Amazon jungle. All 154 people aboard the Gol flight were killed, while the Legacy landed safely with all seven people aboard unharmed.

Police filed the accusation because "elements and evidence in the investigation indicated a lack of caution necessary and expected from pilots during flight," police said in a statement.

Under Brazilian law, a judge will now decide whether to indict the pilots and send them to trial, a process that could take weeks or months.

Police said Lepore and Paladino told them they would respond to the accusations in court. Their attorney said they were notified of the allegations when they walked into Friday's meeting with police.

"The decision of this investigator to accuse Joe and Jan of a crime without ever hearing their testimony is incredibly absurd," said the attorney, Robert Torricella.

The Legacy, owned by ExcelAire of Ronkonkoma, N.Y., was heading northwest on its maiden voyage from the southern city of Sao Jose dos Campos to the United States when the accident occurred at 37,000 feet, an altitude usually reserved for flights headed in the opposite direction.

Transcripts suggest the Legacy had been authorized by the tower in Sao Jose dos Campos to fly at 37,000 feet to Manaus, although that contradicted the plane's original flight plan. The pilots have denied any wrongdoing.

There is "no question they had permission to be at 37,000 feet," Torricella said. "They were never given a contrary instruction."

Warning systems failed on both planes before they collided, an Air Force investigator said last month.

Brazilian authorities seized the pilots' passports after the crash to prevent them from leaving the country, and they had been staying in a hotel on Rio's Copacabana Beach. A court released their passports this week, saying there were no legal grounds for restricting their movements.

Another lawyer for the pilots, former Justice Minister Jose Carlos Dias, said Lepore and Paladino picked up their passports and were taken to Guarulhos airport for a charter flight to the United States.

Dias called the police decision "biased" and "discriminatory," and said police were simply "looking for someone to blame for the crime." He added that if the factors leading to the fatal collision were considered unintentional, the maximum penalty would fall to four years in prison.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by swwils December 9, 2006 8:25 AM EST
I really don't think that trying to imprison those pilots will justify anything.Now if they had been drinking or taking drugs that is a different story.Those pilots I'm sure are already suffering emotional stress that will remain with them the rest of their days,and jail will not rewind time so that this would never have happened.I do feel sympathy for the victims and their families.
Reply to this comment
by jw218389 December 9, 2006 1:12 AM EST
This is a total farce! The Brazilian Air Traffic Controllers screwd up and gave these pilots the wrong altitude. They are blaming them because they are foreigners.

It is sad that the Brazilian government isn't examining how their air traffic control system caused this - so they CAN FIX IT!
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall December 9, 2006 12:13 AM EST
"They are required to return to Brazil for their trial. "

LOL oh right, like how is BRAZIL going to make them return for trial.

Manner- this is BRAZIL, their laws are not our laws, nothing they or any other country does has to make any sense to us or exert fair justice. In Mexico a traffic accident is not an accident it is a criminal offense, best course of action is don't go to foreign countries if you don't like their crazy laws.
Reply to this comment
by flolake December 8, 2006 11:34 PM EST
One of the defendants' Brazillian Attorneys said it best when he:" called the police decision "biased" and "discriminatory," and said police were simply "looking for someone to blame for the crime."

If the facts are indeed true as stated, the blame rests squarely on ths shoulders of the workers in the tower that issued the order for the smaller jet to climb and maintain 37,000 ft.

This whole issue seems to be about who the deceased's relatives will direct their lawsuits toward. As usual, it's all about money, money and more money. So sad.
Posted by flolake at 08:33 PM : Dec 08, 2006
Reply to this comment
by flolake December 8, 2006 11:33 PM EST
One of the defendants' Brazillian Attorneys said it best when he:" called the police decision "biased" and "discriminatory," and said police were simply "looking for someone to blame for the crime."

If the facts are indeed true as stated, the blame rests squarely on ths shoulders of the workers in the tower that issued the order for the smaller jet to climb and maintain 37,000 ft.

This whole issue seems to be about who the deceased's relatives will diret their lawsuits toward. As usual, it's all about money, money and more money. So sad.
Reply to this comment
by manner6 December 8, 2006 11:23 PM EST
Why is this event being called a crime and not an accident? If the American pilots had permission to fly at that altitude and the warning systems didn't work, then what exactly did they do wrong? Do we have an extradition agreement with Brazil? And do the Brazilians really expect them to return for the court appearance?
Reply to this comment
by dogsoul December 8, 2006 8:51 PM EST
More than what they are telling??? Surely you can't possible think this was an orchestrated outcome - I mean... if you wanna bring down a plane, I'm guessing actually clipping it with your own plane would get shot down in the board room - unless it's a suicide mission. Somebody messed up, either the pilots or the control tower... If I were the pilots though, I'd be a bit concerned about getting a fair trial in Brazil - I don't know much about that country, but if it's anything like the rest down thatta ways - you never know WHAT'S gonna happen in court...
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman December 8, 2006 8:21 PM EST
IMHO, Something tells me there is more to this than what they are telling...

Reply to this comment
by aeasus December 8, 2006 6:38 PM EST
He added that if the factors leading to the fatal collision were considered unintentional, the maximum penalty would fall to four years in prison.
................

So they are saying everyone in that NEW,maiden voyage "Legacy" airplane, were suicide pilots that preferred a new plane smell on their death wish flight? Unfortunately though they didn't crash themselves,when their plane landed. This is absurd!!
Reply to this comment
by kalatur December 8, 2006 5:44 PM EST
I have no comment about this.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook