TEL AVIV, Dec. 7, 2006

Israel Rejects Iraq Study Group Proposals

PM Doesn't See Link Iraq War-Israel Link, Doesn't Want Talks With Syria

    • Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert speaks at to editors in Tel Aviv, Dec. 7, 2006. Photo

      Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert speaks at to editors in Tel Aviv, Dec. 7, 2006.  (AP)

    • Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas,  at his office in Ramallah, Dec. 7, 2006. Photo

      Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, at his office in Ramallah, Dec. 7, 2006.  (AP)

    • White tents, portable latrines and water tanks erected by Hezbollah protesters block an intersection in front of the prime minister's complex in Beirut, Dec. 7, 2006. Photo

      White tents, portable latrines and water tanks erected by Hezbollah protesters block an intersection in front of the prime minister's complex in Beirut, Dec. 7, 2006.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Mideast Conflict

    Events, key players and a history of the world's most unstable region.

  • Interactive Iraq Study Group Report

    Bipartisan commission warns that situation is "grave and deteriorating."

  • Photo Essay Historic Vote

    Palestinians vote in their first parliamentary election in a decade.

(CBS/AP)  Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Thursday rejected a U.S. advisory group's conclusion that a concerted effort to resolve Israel's conflict with its neighbors will help stabilize the situation in Iraq, saying there is no connection between the two issues.

Olmert also rebuffed the group's recommendation that Israel open negotiations with Syria, but said Israelis want "with all our might" to restart peace talks with the Palestinians.

The Iraq Study Group report, released Wednesday in Washington, calls for direct talks between Israel and its neighbors, Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinians and says resolving the Israeli-Arab conflict would improve conditions in Iraq.

Olmert rejected that finding. "The attempt to create a linkage between the Iraqi issue and the Mideast issue — we have a different view," Olmert said during the prime minister's annual meeting with Israeli journalists. "To the best of my knowledge, President Bush, throughout the recent years, also had a different view on this."

Most Israelis oppose handing the Golan Heights back to a radical regime like Syria, as the study group recommends, reports CBS News correspondent Robert Berger. Israel is also concerned about the report's call for the U.S. to open a dialogue with Iran. Israeli officials say the best strategy to stop Iran's nuclear program is isolation, not dialogue.

In other developments:

  • A panel appointed by the Palestine Liberation Organization has recommended that the moderate Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas (right), dissolve the militant Hamas-led government and call new elections as early as March, an official close to the president said. Abbas sought the committee's recommendations after declaring last week that his efforts to form a more moderate coalition government with Hamas had reached a dead end. Hamas denounced the notion of early elections.

  • Lebanon's Hezbollah-led opposition called Thursday for its supporters to take to the streets this weekend in a massive show of force, stepping up the pressure on the U.S.-backed government, which has vowed not to give in to protesters. Street demonstrations by Hezbollah and other pro-Syrian parties, which want to pressure Prime Minister Fuad Saniora into quitting, were in their seventh day with no end in sight to the deepening political crisis that is threatening to tear the country apart.

  • Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said negotiations for the release of an Israeli soldier captured by Palestinian militants are in their final stage, according to a newspaper report. Militants linked to the Islamic militant group Hamas, which leads the Palestinian government, crossed the Gaza border into Israel and captured Cpl. Gilad Shalit in June.

  • Olmert will meet with Pope Benedict XVI during a trip to Europe next week. Olmert's spokeswoman, Miri Eisin, said the meeting will take place at the Vatican on Wednesday. There were no immediate details on the agenda.

  • Wealthy Israeli businessman Avi Shaked is offering the ruling Islamic militant group Hamas a billion dollars in investments in the Palestinian territories, if it abandons violence and makes peace with Israel, reports Berger. Shaked says Israelis and Palestinians are "cousins" who should be able to talk. It's a high risk investment but Shaked knows all about that. He made his fortune running Internet gambling sites.

    Answering reporters' questions for more than an hour, Olmert said conditions were not ripe to reopen long-dormant talks with Syria and added that he received no indications from Mr. Bush during his recent visit to Washington that the U.S. would push Israel to start such talks.

    Palestinian officials were more receptive to the panel's recommendations.

    "We welcome the Hamilton-Baker report and hope the U.S. administration will translate it into deeds," Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said. "The region needs peace, the region needs dialogue and we have always stuck to dialogue toward a comprehensive peace."

    Syrian President Bashar Assad has called in recent months for a new round of talks with Israel. Syria is a key backer of the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Hezbollah, the Lebanese guerrilla group that battled Israel during an inconclusive month-long war last summer.

    While some top Israeli officials have urged Olmert to accept Assad's offer, the prime minister said he didn't think talks would change Syria's close ties to radical anti-Israel groups.

    "I don't think there is a Syrian desire for war with us. We certainly don't have a desire to fight with them. That doesn't mean conditions are ripe for us to negotiate with them," he said.

    Olmert, however, said that Israel was deeply interested in restarting talks with the Palestinians and said Israel would work "with all our might" to make them happen.

    He also welcomed a peace initiative put forward by Saudi Arabia, saying it contains "interesting innovations that should not be ignored." However, he did not fully endorse the plan, first floated in 2002, which called for Israel to withdraw from all of the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem, a stipulation Israel rejects.

    Olmert also rejected suggestions that Israel's recent cease-fire with Palestinian militants in Gaza would allow the militants to rearm and regroup for another round of fighting, saying that Israel would not allow that to happen.

    He said that despite occasional rocket attacks by Gaza militants at Israel, "we will continue to show restraint."

    Olmert also addressed the controversy over Iran's nuclear ambitions, reiterating Israel's position that it will not tolerate a nuclear Iran, but will not take unilateral action, preferring that the dispute should be settled by the international community as a whole.

    He also reiterated his support for the U.S. war in Iraq, a position that caused some controversy during his U.S. trip last month.

    "We always felt, like other nations in our region, that the removal of Saddam Hussein was a major, major contribution to stability in our part of the world," he said.


    ©MMVI CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from World

    Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
    by ceres5 December 7, 2006 10:57 AM PST
    For decades, Israel always has has been pragmatic, just, and brave in trying to defend itself from agression. However, during the last conflict in Lebanon, it behaved as if the Incredible Hulk went berserk inside a porcelain shop. Most probably, the blessings and the green light that Mr. Bush gave to Mr. Olmert, it is the reason for such a crazy response in Lebanon. The same as the Bush leadership is for the the United States, y firmly belive that Mr. Olmert is a liability for Israel. He lacks sound judgement, and his jumpy style simply generates more hatred around the world toward the Jewish state.
    Reply to this comment
    by grazinggoat December 7, 2006 12:08 PM PST
    This guy must go. He is so low in popular support in his country, that any negotiation he comes with, shall be opposed, rejected by Israeli right-wingers. He is not representative of the general now-peace-seeking Israeli mind. This pair (Walking-LiarBush and Turtle-FaceOlmert) got to go. Impeached.

    The Iraq Study Group report is intended to USA, so who cares if Turtle-FaceOlmert rejects it.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 7, 2006 1:24 PM PST
    It shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that the Jews reject these kinds of proposals.

    More Americans need to become wise to the fact that the both groups of Semites over there have their own agenda that are deeply and insanely based in their religions.

    It should be obvious by now that the Jews or so-called 'chosen people' aren't much concerned with what we gentiles call 'peace' and 'peaceful coexistence' with other humans.

    The only 'peace' that is of interest to the so-called 'chosen people' is a 'piece' of land, a delusional 'promised land' in which they think that they can commune with their god.

    For the Jews, wars, death, and ethnic cleansing are just par for the course. No problem.

    What Americans need to do is to coax the the Israelis back to reality.

    The Israelis need to be awaken in no uncertain manner to the fact that the 'chosen people' are 'chosen' by America!

    The 'chosen people' has an Israeli existence as a state not because of some imagined god or jehovah; but by their god, Uncle Sam. LOL.

    Americans want the mundane 'peace' on the planet and a reduction in the unwarranted body bags. As a result, some useful recommendations are being made, and the Israelis need to go along for the good of ALL including good for the Jewish people.

    If Iran is attacked and they retaliate (as we can anticipate that they will) with rockets into the Israeli nuclear facilities, then the holey land could be inhabitable for ALL.
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 December 7, 2006 1:51 PM PST
    I got a great idea lets let Israel take care of themselves and we get out of the region. That way they can blow themselves up and we do not have to be there.
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 1:57 PM PST
    People do not confuse these European Jews with the original Jews dating back to biblical days! There are clear distinctions between them! So stop trying to condemn Gods %u201CChosen People%u201D
    Reply to this comment
    by old300d December 7, 2006 3:09 PM PST
    9 months of study and they come up with " It's Israel's fault". If all the Jews moved to Florida do people really think they would stop fighting in Iraq ? Genesis 16:12 says: He will be a wild donkey of a man. His hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.
    It is talking about Ishmael. Palestinians claim to be Ishmael. You can believe the Bible or not but this would indicate Ishmael has been fighting for a long time. Not only with Jews but with each other.
    It's kind of like being a Hell's Angel. You can't say you are a Hell's Angel then say you don't like to fight.
    Reply to this comment
    by Syndicate December 7, 2006 3:09 PM PST
    Yea there diffrent one group is decended from the other.
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 3:13 PM PST
    Cbscrash07


    These European Jews have not descended from the biblical Jews. Fact!
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 3:18 PM PST
    The original Jews in Africa 2000 years ago were a Black African people as an ethnic group. (Massey: Egypt Light of the Word p501) Many of them still are Black, in northenrn Africa such as the Falasha Jews of Ethiopia. A New York Times editorial (3/2/84) described them as "a lost tribe that has kept it identiy for more than 2,000 years in a remote corner of Africa." Abraham, ancestor of the Hebrews, was from Chaldea; the ancient Chaldeans were Black. In fact, Africa takes it name from Ophren, a son of Abraham by his wife, Keturah (Whiston: The Life and Works of Flavius Josephus p50) Like Jesus, Mary and Joseph, the lineage of Ethiopian Emperor, Haile Selassie also goes back to Judah -through Solomon/Queen of Sheba and King David.
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 3:19 PM PST
    Roman historian Tacitus wrote that many of his time believed that the Jews "were a race of Ethiopian origion." The Bible classifies the Ethiopians & Jews together, "Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the Lord." (Amos 9:7) Black Paul is mistaken for an "Egyptian" and declares himself to be a "Jew." (Acts 21:37-39, 22: 2,3) That the Jews got their language, religion & culture from the Canaanites & Sumerians through Babylon, is well documented by historians. The original ancient Hebrew alphabet was identical to that of the Phoenicians. "Semitic languages" are really dialectical variants of African languages.
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 3:20 PM PST
    The word Semite is from semi which means half. Half what? Half BLACK! (mulatto!) Semite refers to the descendants of Shem, one of Noah's sons. The word originates from the Latin prefix semi which means half. "half Black and half white... therefore Black (since Black is genetically dominant)" points out Dr. Cress Welsing. Historian Cheikh Anta Diop also points out that the "Semitic" arises in the 4th millennia B.C. from crossbreeding between Black inhabitants of the holy land and white northern invaders. While many Semites (such as Jews & gypsies) have mixed so much with whites that they've forgotten or deny their African roots, racism (white supremacy) will never let them forget this no matter how light-skinned they become, as proved by Hitler, who mandated their destruction because they were classified by whites as "non-white" peple originating in Africa. The very word gypsy means "out of Egypt."
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 3:29 PM PST
    It is amazing what you can learn by spending hours in the library reading and not getting your history by watching some made for television movies with altered facts!
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 3:53 PM PST
    How many Israelis does it take to change a lightbulb?

    Two.

    One to call in an airstrike, and one to bomb a bunch of innocent civilians.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad December 7, 2006 3:59 PM PST
    GOD bless Israel it is not their fault that our TexasDickTater got us in this mess in Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by drinuk December 7, 2006 4:26 PM PST
    cryonbrian,
    Hey ! dont you dare to presumme that anyone is chosen in this world unless you include all of us. I get so dam sick of jews saying they are the chosen people because you are not. Furthermore you stole a country and it's leaders were terrorists, yes like the ones Bush and Blair are using as an excuse right now. Begin and Mayer killed British soldiers and don't you bloody well forget it.
    Reply to this comment
    by cryonbrian December 7, 2006 4:31 PM PST
    Do not kill the messenger! Your issue is with God not me. God inspired man to write what is in the bible, not me! God chose a people not me. See God on your issue!

    P.S. Please check your anger at the door and pick it up when you leave the room! Thanks
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 7, 2006 5:18 PM PST
    DRinUK, even Mohammad skited that he took the land from the Jews and slaughtered the people as he went. The UK has faired no better over the centuries, that means yours and my ancestors went to war against others, and like the Jews there were many reasons why they had to go to war. History has been one bloody war, greed, jealousies, pride, power and religion have caused so many wars, however people also have the right to protect their own from others trying to kill them...
    As one psychologist once said, that if the world followed what the Ten commandments said through Moses, that even if they didn't believe in a god that the whole world would live in peace and harmony with each other.
    Abraham followed Gods laws while others hated God and continued to sacrifice babies, children etc to their gods and slaughtering where ever they went. Imagine if you had a son who was very faithful to you, you would then also favour his children over those who hated you eh... I am not a Jew But I do understand... Israel is so very tiny now, so why should they have to give back any more land, land they won in war. Do we know of any other country who has ever had to give back land back they have won in war..nop.. so why Israel..
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 7, 2006 5:25 PM PST
    ozilot, I think more billions have been poured into the middle east than into Israel. Israel stands on its own doesnt it...
    you say, It would also help if the world stop coddling the Arabs and playing to their self image of being victims...to large extent the Arabs are as much of victim of themselves than they are of outside influence, for example the west, Iran, Russia..
    this you are dead right on...they are totally their own worst enemies. They are a pathetic nation even with all the tillion the world is pouring into them and the tillions that they get from oil..and the worst thing is that they are not told that we pour tillions into their country, and of the other help we give them, I wonder what the purpose is of not telling their people that..
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 5:39 PM PST
    Gaye5,

    Re: "Israel stands on its own doesnt it..."

    No, it does not. In fact, billions upon billions of U.S. tax dollar welfare payments are donated to the failing-terror-State of Israel.

    Not only is this a shocking waste of billion$ of U.S. treasure, but this dole is payed with money that we don't have.

    What's more, the cost in U.S. blood exerted to prop-up Israel is well beyond what we can afford.
    The illegal war of aggression against Iraq, is a good example of that toll.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 5:41 PM PST
    Correction"

    "billions upon billions of U.S. tax dollar welfare payments are donated to the failing-terror-State of Israel.)

    Should be:

    {billions upon billions of U.S. tax dollar welfare payments are donated to the failing-terror-State of Israel- each year.)
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 5:43 PM PST
    Re: "Israel Rejects Iraq Study Group Proposals"

    Funny. So did Kagan and Kristol.

    Who'da thunk it?
    Reply to this comment
    by tibu987 December 7, 2006 5:53 PM PST
    Israel snaps it's fingers and the U.S. jumps.
    Billions are poured into Israel every year, much in the form of the latest military equipment, which gives Israel much superiority over it's advsersaries.
    This must stop. As long as the U.S. supports Israel there will always be problems in the mid-east. This country (Israel) of about 6 million people, less than the population of New York has too much power over U.S. foreign policy. Time will tell, in the meantime, many people will die.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 6:00 PM PST
    Agnim,

    Not all Jews support Zionism.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dSHl3C9kgY
    Reply to this comment
    by olebd December 7, 2006 6:03 PM PST
    Both Israel and the U.S. need to be more receptive to talks with Syria, Iran and whoever else in the Middle East. Who knows, a little diplomacy may create a bit of peace. It's worth a try.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 7, 2006 6:10 PM PST
    "Not all Jews support Zionism.

    Posted by FeelFree1 at 06:00 PM : Dec 07, 2006"

    I'm well aware of that, Free; just as we are also aware that "not all" Americans support the AMERICAN WAR on Iraq, right? LOL
    Reply to this comment
    by sharncedar December 7, 2006 6:26 PM PST
    What do the Jews have over Washington, I mean seriously. How do they control our foreign policy 100%, so that whatever comes out of Israel comes out of Bush's mouth the same day.

    We all see its a fact; but what interests me is how they do it. Does anybody know? I used to have a Jewish friend who joked about it, like saying hey if Jews control the world where's my Mercedes. But the concidences are just too unlikely; how come American foreign policy in the MidEeast seems like only Israeli foreign policy and nothing less, even to our own terrible detriment.
    Reply to this comment
    by mrwhitey3 December 7, 2006 6:59 PM PST
    @ SharnCedar "What do the Jews have over Washington, I mean seriously. How do they control our foreign policy 100%"

    The answer is simple:
    6 Jews control the media and destroy anybody that goes against the Zionist company line.

    Jews control and own the central banks of the world allowing easy access to money for Jews. It is easy to take control of the world when you have everyone elses money to work with.

    Israel has the largest spy network in the world. Bribes are not the currency of trade in Washington, it is blackmail.

    EXAMPLE George Bush's grandfather gave Hitler 100 million to build 5 labor camps. The Jews could sue his family for holocaust damages and take their money. Hence the Zionist sock puppet Bush boys.

    Carl Roves grandfather was a media person for Hitler. Real name was Rovertine as I recall.

    Make the federal reserve a government agency and break the media into a thousand pieces and you will be able to actually select who you get to vote for. Presently it is being done by Raum Emanual (A Jew) The Jews have used race and religion to further themselves. You have nothing to fear of Muslems, it is Jews right here and now that have made a mess of this country and the world.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt December 7, 2006 7:02 PM PST
    SharnCedar-

    Brief answer: The U.S is a Judeo-Christian country with an extremely powerful lobby representing the Jewish interests. Add to that the fact that we have a fundamentalist President and all things Jewish are good, all things Palestinian are bad.

    Take the case of Jonathan Pollard. He was a sailor who the Israeli's turned into their spy. He was caught and sent to prison, but did that hurt Israeli-American relations? Of course not.

    Also, I'll mention the U.S.S. Liberty which the Israeli's attacked in 1973 to stop it from advising Washington that Israel was "cooking" Egyptian messages, a clear violation of their agreement with the U.S.

    If you need more, let me know.....
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 7, 2006 7:14 PM PST
    "What do the Jews have over Washington, I mean seriously. How do they control our foreign policy 100%, so that whatever comes out of Israel comes out of Bush's mouth the same day.

    Posted by SharnCedar at 06:26 PM : Dec 07, 2006"

    The Jews have much learning

    The Jews have much wealth.

    The Jews have a 4,000 year-old culture and a religion, to which a good number of American minds are enslaved.

    What do Americans have to compare? LOL

    Brain beats brawn every time, or most of the time.
    And the Jews have sat down and developed good brains. That puts them clear in the driver's seat. LOL

    Does that answer your question?
    Reply to this comment
    by December 7, 2006 8:41 PM PST
    Agnim, Have you ever heard of the phrase "The Times are really changing"? Well back in the Biblical days it was a miracle for an @ss to speak and I can clearly see that the times really are changing, you do it all the time.....
    Reply to this comment
    by pakaal December 7, 2006 8:44 PM PST
    As for our interest in supporting Israel, there are a lot of reasons, but don't forget it's the West's gatekeeper to the Holy Land. Sort of a Crusades mentality - as long as non-Muslims have control over Jerusalem, everything's going to be OK.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 7, 2006 9:28 PM PST
    Posted by ncolsens at 08:41 PM : Dec 07, 2006

    In the same way a vile vampire is repelled by the brilliant light of the Sun, your little mind likewise is repelled in disarray by the searing insights of my posts, right?

    Isn't that the reason you are forced to make Agnim the topic? LOL

    You are having as much time wrapping a warp mind about the truths spoken, as the Israelis are having a hard time wrapping their insecure and vengeful and non-peace minds around a recommendation for peace with her neighbors, and less body bags of Americans for nothing.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 7, 2006 9:54 PM PST
    'grazinggoat' is right.

    Olmert really DOES have a turtle-face.
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 7, 2006 10:23 PM PST
    Agnim, if Jews didnt care about others then why do they help those who come to their hospitals. They help all who are injured even though they might have been Muslims trying to destroy them, and why when they have the means to totally destroyed Muslim neighbours did they not do so when terrorists blew themselves up sitting beside Jewish children, in buses, in shopping centers, and synogues, why did they offer millions when there was the massive earth quake, to a nation which was trying to destroy Israel and they wanted to not only give millions but they wanted to help, (which was refused by the Muslims of course)... We all know that the media does not tell us the truth, it is slanted the way that they want us to behave, so I suggest we learn our details from other sources... we are being manipulated to think a certian way...as has happened in other recent wars..Germany is a good example, the lies that were told about Isreal then we discovered later were to make the world hate them and was not true, and are we going to repeat the same mistake again... Since the beginning of time such things have happened...
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 8, 2006 12:25 AM PST
    "We all know that the media does not tell us the truth, it is slanted the way that they want us to behave, so I suggest we learn our details from other sources...

    Posted by Gaye5 at 10:23 PM : Dec 07, 2006"

    My 'source' is the history on the ground independent of your 'media'.

    The people are ethnically cleansed by the Jews to create their delusional 'promise land'. That IS NOT media story. The refugees are there as proof!

    Is that how you would show that you 'care' for fellow humans by ethnically cleansing them and making them refugees in foreign camps?

    One can clearly observe a certain Israeli pattern: Every time there it seems like there could be a bit of peace progress, there are some devilish groups in Israel who will ALWAYS do something to derail any progress, and why?

    Because the only 'peace' the Jews have ALWAYS been interested in is 'piece' of delusional 'promise land'!

    This Israeli leader is throwing cold water on the carefully thought out recommendations; because our mundane peace IS NOT of importance to Jews, 'piece' of 'promise land' IS! And the Jews want want it ALL and not to give any ground!
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 12:42 AM PST
    Agnim, I think you need to go a bit further back than that...I dont know of any ethnic cleansing, here is a little bit of history to help your education:

    A FEW UNFASHIONABLE FACTS WORTH KNOWING ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST
    1. Nationhood and Jerusalem. Although Israel was a nation before 1312B.C, Israel became a nation-state in 1312 B.C, 2,000 years before the rise of Islam.

    2. Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as part of a Palestinian people in 1967, two decades after the establishment of the modern State of Israel.
    When the Jews started returning to their own country in 1948, the land was pretty devoid of permanant occupants, which consisted of some Jews (who had never left) and a few Arab nomads. It was only then that a few poor migrant workers from the surrounding Muslim countries began to flood in to work for the Jews. almost all of the people calling themselves "Palestinians" today are the descendants of those migrant workers.

    3. Since the Jewish conquest in 1272 B.C., the Jews have had dominion over the land for 1,000 years with a continuous presence in the land for the past 3,300 years and beyond.



    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 12:45 AM PST
    And also.....
    4. The Arabs Muslims conquered Palestine in 635 AD, stealing it from its legitimate Jewish rulers, Palestine was stolen from the Jews by the Muslims and not the other way around. Arab sovereignty over Palestine ended in 1071 when the area was conquered by Seljuk Turks. Palestinian Arabs never held sovereignty over and cannot even pronounce the name of their supposed homeland.

    5. For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem has been the Jewish capital. Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even when the Jordanians occupied Jerusalem, they never sought to make it their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.

    6. Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in the Jewish Holy Scriptures. Jerusalem is not mentioned once in the Qur'an (Koran).

    7. King David founded the Jewish city of Jerusalem. Mohammed never came to Jerusalem.

    8. Arab and Jewish Refugees: In 1948 the Arab refugees were encouraged to leave Israel by Arab leaders promising to purge the land of Jews. Sixty-eight percent left without ever seeing an Israeli soldier.

    9. The Jewish refugees were forced to flee from Arab Muslim lands due to Arab brutality, persecution and pogroms.

    10. The number of Arab refugees who left Israel in 1948 is estimated to be between 400,000 and 630,000, many of whom in fact were allowed to return after the Israeli war of Independence ended.. The number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands was much larger.

    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 12:49 AM PST
    and again...
    11. Arab refugees were INTENTIONALLY not absorbed or integrated into the Arab lands to which they fled, despite the vast Arab territory. Out of the 100,000,000 refugees since World War II, the Arabs are the only refugee group in the world that has never been absorbed or integrated into their own peoples' lands. Jewish refugees were completely absorbed into Israel, a country smaller than the state of New Jersey.

    12. There is only one tiny Jewish nation. The 22 Arab nations initiated all five wars and lost. Israel defended herself each time and won.

    13. Under Jordanian rule, Jewish holy sites were desecrated and the Jews were denied access to places of worship. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian sites have been preserved and made accessible to people of all faiths.

    14. The U.N. was silent while 58 Jerusalem Synagogues were destroyed by the Jordanians. Kind of like its silence over the massacres of Algerians or Sudanese by Arab Muslim fascists.

    15. The U.N are silent while Muslim terrorists blew up schools, mall's, bus's, and Synagogues killing babies, children and adults. The media reports are almost non existant in regards to the hundreds of families each year who cry for their dead as they hold their bloodied babies in their arms.. The world tells them to put up with the agression against them and condems Israel trying to protect itself.
    America struck back when 3000 died in the Sep 11th disaster, Jews have disasters happen every day of their lives.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 8, 2006 12:55 AM PST
    "1. Nationhood and Jerusalem. Although Israel was a nation before 1312B.C, Israel became a nation-state in 1312 B.C, 2,000 years before the rise of Islam.

    Posted by Gaye5 at 12:42 AM : Dec 08, 2006"

    Who gives a rat's arse about the islamic insanity?
    We are concerned about HUMANS, not idiotic ideology!
    Hello!

    And the Jewish own history tells of them ethnically cleansing the land of the HUMANS to build their first Jewrusalem on their way from Egypt.

    And again coming out of Europe, the Jews are savagely repeating bad history by again ethnically cleansing the place of HUMANS to recreate their delusional 'promise land'.

    The Jews don't care about fellow humans.

    The Jews don't care about the cries of fellow humans.
    And the Jews don't give a chit what the world maybe saying; because in their ignorance and arrogance, they think themselves some 'chosen people', special.

    The Jews have blinders on!
    They have one goal, a stupid piece of land, 'promise land'.

    It is insanity to live that way.
    The maniac muslims are not different.

    Americans are making a huge mistake by fueling the fanaticism in the Middle East.

    We shouldn't want to live with generations of vengeance and violence as 'normal living' as ALL the sick Semites have been doing.
    That is worse than beastly living.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 8, 2006 1:34 AM PST
    Here is a film highlighting some of the atrocities committed by the Israelis, during their recent rampage against the civilians in Lebanon:

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOpB1x5Qzyg
    Reply to this comment
    by December 8, 2006 6:15 AM PST
    During my days in the military I worked along side of Israelis in Florida with Rockwell International developing weapons of war in the fight for peace, I doubt that you Agnim have ever met anyone outside of the U.S and believe everything you see on television. Its time to wake up and pull your head out of your @ss. And I not laughing out loud, maybe at you for being such an ignorant fool
    Reply to this comment
    by December 8, 2006 6:21 AM PST
    When the ISG was taking its sweet time preparing this report for the world to see I envision them sitting around a round table playing the board game "Risk" The game about conquering the world. And just like the game... It makes little attempt to accurately simulate military strategy, the size of the world, the logistics of long campaigns, or real-world luck. In short they wasted their time on this report if not endangered the friendship with other countries, the idea that you can say well we want other countries to talk to their neighbors is just a bit rude. And if the U.S continues on this track it will have no allies, then WWIII can begin. Then we will see who's Bible wins....if their is any winner at all
    Reply to this comment
    by kcstan11 December 8, 2006 6:47 AM PST
    SCREW THE JEWS!!! I have seen this *** going on since before 1948. All of the violence in Palastine has been perpetuated by the JEWS.

    DUMBYA has allowed the Jews to "KILL AT WILL" in Gaza, the West Bank and the complete destruction on Lebonon. He will do anything that Olmert wants, the same as he did for that fat pig, Ariel Sharron. He publically backed the Palastinian election, until Hamas won ... now all bets are off, he has financially strangled the Palastinians.

    As far as I am concerned ... give all of that land back to the Arabs so anyone can go there and live/visit in peace ... the way it was prior to 1948.

    The ONLY reason that the US invaded Iraq is ... to save the JEWS from having to do it. The US and our MORON PRESIDENT was the only country that could do that, because if the JEWS tried it, every Arab country in the middle-east would have destroyed the JEWS.

    All of the jews on this planet are not worth even 1 of the 3000 dead GI's in Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 8, 2006 11:24 AM PST
    "During my days in the military I worked along side of Israelis in Florida with Rockwell International developing weapons of war in the fight for peace,

    Posted by ncolsens at 06:15 AM : Dec 08, 2006"

    "weapons of war in the fight for peace"?

    What a stupid and fantastic concept?

    Only an adolescent mind or an overly brainwashed so-called 'military man' would talk such baby talk about 'peace'.

    Unfortunate American minds like yours are precisely the reasons why the insecure and equally delusional Jews (and delusional Arabs too) are not about to give up their own 3,000 year-old fantasy about some 'promise land': The insecure and religiously fanatical Jews are at least smart enough to know that "weapons in the fight for peace" is an even more stupid a position than their own biblical bull position of 'promise land'.

    The Jews are not about to give into such childish understanding of 'peace' and desert their tradition, as mindless and as laughable as the roots of those traditions may be.
    And why should they?

    We know the Jews are smart people.
    Why give up one big load of krap about some delusional 'promise land' for an even bigger load of krap and misunderstanding about 'peace'? LOL
    Reply to this comment
    by bushrocks1 December 8, 2006 12:06 PM PST
    Would I send my son to this war? You might ask would I send him to World War II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your son to fight in them. But that question is misdirected in a very important way: I can't command my son to go to war. He has to make that choice. So the better question would be: would I volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. I'm not equivocating, only addressing that it is a hypothetical. To a hypothetical, I can answer, sure I'd fight. But I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Jacobite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those men is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is no failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish democracy in the Middle East is a bold, brilliant, noble effort, facing a high chance of failure. That's why I greatly respect and admire those who have made the attempt--the Bush administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons outside their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now those traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 December 8, 2006 2:33 PM PST
    hamiltongrad,

    Re: "Many of the writers here are bigots."

    It takes a lot of courage to admit that. I may have given you less credit than you deserve.
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 8:31 PM PST
    FeelFree, I have no doubt that we needed to go to Iraq, and I believe that they DID have weapons of mass distruction, however I cant understand why Mr. Bush warned them that he was coming for 18 months giving them time to transport their weapons either into another country or bury it in the sand as was reported on the August 6, 2003 NewsMax.com which said that NewsMax has obtained exclusive photos of a buried Iraqi jet fighter being recovered by U.S. Air Force troops. The Iraqi jet, an advanced Russian MiG-25 Foxbat, was found buried in he sand after an informant tipped off U.S. troops. The MiG was dug out of a massive sand dune near the Al Taqqadum airfield by U.S. Air Force recovery teams.
    So what else is buried there???
    And yes FeelFree, I knew that America poured some money into Israel, but it is only a drop in the bucket of what goes into Iraq, plus we Australians send billions into Iraq also, along with other countries and with all the sales from oil they still cant make it..
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 10:25 PM PST
    bushrocks1, your letter is very good, but now that it has been on this and other sites ever so many times, couldnt you give it a break, pleeeeeeese....
    It is no better than many other very excellent letters on here...
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 8, 2006 10:34 PM PST
    Agnim, I can see where this weapons of war in the fight for peace comes from...
    Throughout history the nation who was the strongest and the better weapons always won... that is logical. And if you are a peaceful nation, then other nations will leave you alone if you have the best...hence peace....
    The person who unleashed nuclear opened a can of worms, and I would far rather have America keeping a step ahead of other nations who are producing nuclear than being behind. America has had this capability for how many years now?? and they could have taken the world, and committed genicide of many natioins, but on the whole they only go into other countries when asked or if they are a threat to us...Yes America is a long way from Iraq, but the weapons dont discriminate distance when they can go great distances...
    Reply to this comment
    by agnim December 9, 2006 1:44 PM PST
    Posted by FeelFree1 at 02:33 PM : Dec 08, 2006

    LOL

    Good retort to the ridiculous. LOL
    Reply to this comment
    See all 51 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs