February 11, 2009 5:39 PM

Suburban Poverty Rising In U.S.

(AP)  As Americans flee the cities for the suburbs, many are failing to leave poverty behind.

The suburban poor outnumbered their inner-city counterparts for the first time last year, with more than 12 million suburban residents living in poverty, according to a study of the nation's 100 largest metropolitan areas released Thursday.

"Economies are regional now," said Alan Berube, who co-wrote the report for the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. "Where you see increases in city poverty, in almost every metropolitan area, you also see increases in suburban poverty."

Nationally, the poverty rate leveled off last year at 12.6 percent after increasing every year since the decade began. It was a period when the country went through a recession and an uneven recovery that is still sputtering in parts of the Northeast and Midwest.

"Looking back at the 1970s, you would have seen cities suffering and suburbs staying the same," said Berube, research director at the Brookings Institution's Metropolitan Policy Program. "But the story is different today."

Berube said several factors are contributing to an increase in suburban poverty:

  • Suburbs are adding people much faster than cities, making it inevitable that the number of poor people living in suburbs would eventually surpass those living in cities.

  • The poverty rate in large cities (18.8 percent) is still higher than it is in the suburbs (9.4 percent). But the overall number of people living in poverty is higher in the suburbs in part because of population growth.

  • America's suburbs are becoming more diverse, racially and economically. "There's poverty really everywhere in metropolitan areas because there are low-wage jobs everywhere," Berube said.

  • Recent immigrants are increasingly bypassing cities and moving directly to suburbs, especially in the South and West. Those immigrants, on average, have lower incomes than people born in the United States.

    Berube and research analyst Elizabeth Kneebone studied poverty figures for the 100 largest metropolitan areas, measuring changes from 1999 to 2005, the most recent data available.

    In 1999, the number of poor people living in cities and suburbs was roughly even, at about 10.3 million apiece, according to the report. Last year, the suburban poor outnumbered their urban counterparts by about 1.2 million.

    The federal government defined the poverty level as $15,577 for a family of three in 2005.

    "Traditionally, cities have been viewed as home to poor populations, surrounded by middle- and upper-income suburbs," the report said. "This 'tipping' of poor populations to the suburbs represents a signal development that upends historical notions about who lives in cities and suburbs."

    Marc H. Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League, said many of the same social and economic problems that have plagued cities for years are now affecting suburbs: struggling schools, rising crime and low-paying jobs.

    "I call it the urbanization of the suburbs," Morial said.

    "I hope this says to people that the way to confront poverty is not to wall it off and concentrate it," Morial said. "You really need policies to eliminate it."

    Cleveland was the city with the highest poverty rate last year, at 32.4 percent, while San Jose had the lowest, at 9.7 percent.

    Suburban McAllen, Texas, at the southern tip of the state, was the suburb with the highest poverty rate last year, at 43.9 percent, while suburban Des Moines, Iowa, had the lowest, at 3.7 percent.
  • © 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
    by bellal-2009 December 10, 2006 1:16 AM EST
    Oh my, Hermit22, I am now a blushingbella. I am happy to be named after your computer. I hope we meet again. Goodnight.
    Reply to this comment
    by nadeau4201 December 9, 2006 10:05 PM EST
    A man in another county from me bought a house for 200,000 4 years ago, and then some rich a**hole built a house right next to him for 2 million, which made the property value go up. The only way that would of benefited him, is when he sold his house which he was forced to when his taxes went up 2,000. The rich are wiping out the middleclass and the government is helping them. This happens all the time and there is nothing we can do, the rich get richer and well you know the rest...
    Reply to this comment
    by hermit22 December 9, 2006 8:46 PM EST
    Every county needs 1-800-gov-fuss or bellyach.gov
    so when a human has to deal with the twin to Nurse Ratchet at the DMV who gets insidious pleasure out of snaping when a person's eyes are rolling up to the corner and mouth is twisted....you can call up and ask: "WHY does a person who takes such lousy pictures actually get paid from year to year at that job?"

    We had a woman working in social services that was so insidiously cruel that the women in Christian Prayer Meeting PRAYED that woman OUT of that office! A few years ago, I called social services and the voice answering the phone gave me the cold chills! Like when you have the insinct to keep away, FAR away....and it turned out the be the DIRECTOR!
    Reply to this comment
    by olebd December 9, 2006 7:47 PM EST
    Oh, and this increase happened after property reasessment went up by 135% which means property taxes went up an average of $600 per year. And they're building a new $60 million county gov't complex/library. I know, time to move.
    Reply to this comment
    by olebd December 9, 2006 7:40 PM EST
    I'll add an example related to the last couple posts.

    The town that I lived in just raised sewerage rates from $4 per 1000 gallons to $11 per 1000 gallons. Why? So they can qualify for a grant to make improvements to the wastewater treatment plant to comply with upcoming federal regulations. They explained to me that in order to get this grant, a certain percentage of the population (the poor) had to not be able to afford their sewerage bill. How ridiculous.
    Reply to this comment
    by hermit22 December 9, 2006 7:29 PM EST
    Well THANK YOU BellaL. Do you know? When I got this old relic,which I'm very grateful to have,....when I got this old computer I named her BELLA! Bella 1,She fritzed right away, then Bella 2.this second, second hand....

    Come to find out that
    "bella" has association with the "brain"....cerebellum,cerebella....right?
    Perfect name for a computer, huh? so when I see you on line I've always gotten such a charge out of your sign on name! LOL and enjoy!God bless you! Is your sign up name, because that is your name? or because you are so "gorgeous"? Isn't that another meaning for "bella"? Oh well, for privacy sake I guess we will just assume you are gorgeous!
    Reply to this comment
    by bellal-2009 December 9, 2006 6:52 PM EST
    If the local yokels keep a certain percentage of poverty they are more likely to get federal funding for whatever projects they want help for.
    It is a cruel use of people in poverty. There is NO incentive to the economic development guy to DO something to originate work for poverty people because he can use the poverty statistics to whine around for federal funds for whatever....It should be the other way around. If "Economic Development" doesn't see to that poverty rates have gone down by 2 percent every month HIS head rolls....and if the poverty rates didn't go DOWN, the federal funds to the well offs would have to be repaid to the Federal Funding and Grants etc....Here is their whine: "Nearly 1/2 the kids in the county live in poverty, so we need $89,000 for some gizmo at the hospital from Federal funding...." They always seem to come up with the cash for keeping the greens at the golf course though. The poor kids ain't never gonna put their toe on those greens either!Probably won't get to use the gizmo at the hospital either.
    Posted by Hermit22 at 03:49 AM : Dec 08, 2006

    I thought this deserved a repost.
    Reply to this comment
    by bellal-2009 December 9, 2006 6:50 PM EST
    BRAVO, hermit22. You got it.
    Reply to this comment
    by hermit22 December 9, 2006 6:11 PM EST
    Our "social" "service" director would NOT be living in that big brick house, driving that big fat red car, getting paid to go on ad nauseum trips, gas mileage, hotel paid and even MORE money to pay for feeding her round face if it were not for a certain percentage of the county living in poverty.

    "Social", which nobody wants to socilize at,"services",which nobody ever wants to be in the situation to have to grovel to,...."Social Services" REFUSE to work with economic development because then they would obviously see their way out of their own gushy job!
    Reply to this comment
    by hermit22 December 9, 2006 6:02 PM EST
    Poverty most often hits women and children. If the powers that be put the screws to all the fathers who have left their family in the lurch how much of the poverty problem would be fixed up? How many men have a first family, truck off to somewhere else, cook up another batch and don't really take care of any of them? How many are on the poverty list because of some man's cating around. Ooops! don't want to embarrass the cats! God BLESS all the FAITHFUL DADS!
    Reply to this comment
    See all 46 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook