U.N. Ambassador John Bolton To Step Down
Controversial Envoy Was Unable To Win Senate Confirmation
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Ambassador Bolton To Step Down
CBS News RAW: U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton has handed in his resignation to President Bush. The Senate never confirmed Bolton's nomination. Peter Mayer reports.
-
Video
Japan's Ambassador On Bolton
CBS News RAW: Japan's ambassador to the U.N., Kenzo Oshima, comments on reports of U.S. Ambassador John Bolton's resignation. Oshima says he finds the news disappointing.
-
Photo
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton told the White House he intended to leave his post when his current appointment expires, no later than early January. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
-
Interactive
United Nations
For more than 60 years, the United Nations has struggled to forge peace, end poverty and heal the world.
-
Interactive
Bush Presidency
The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
-
Interactive
The 109th Congress
Meet the leaders and follow the action in the House and Senate.
Bolton's nomination has languished in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for more than a year, blocked by Democrats and several Republicans. Sen. Lincoln Chafee, a moderate Republican who lost in the midterm elections Nov. 7 that swept Democrats to power in both houses of Congress, was adamantly opposed to Bolton.
In a statement, President Bush expressed "deep regret" at Bolton's decision and accused senators who blocked a vote by the full Senate on Bolton's confirmation of "stubborn obstructionism."
"They chose to obstruct his confirmation, even though he enjoys majority support in the Senate, and even though their tactics will disrupt our diplomatic work at a sensitive and important time," Mr. Bush said.
Senate Democrats welcomed Bolton's departure.
"President Bush has made the right decision in accepting Ambassador Bolton's resignation," said Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. Reid said the president "should now nominate a U.N. Ambassador who is ready and willing to work with our allies around the world, and who understands the pressing need to change course in Iraq."
Senator John Kerry, who lost the 2004 White House race to Mr. Bush, won't miss Bolton. The Massachusetts Democrat said America needs a U.N. ambassador who has "the full support of Congress." Kerry said Bush ought to pick a replacement who, in his words, "can put results ahead of ideology."
The White House had argued in recent weeks that Bolton had demonstrated his value and professionalism in the job and deserved to be confirmed. But even a Senate still in Republican hands didn't have the numbers to make it happen, CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports.
Critics have questioned Bolton's brusque style and whether he could be an effective bureaucrat who could force reform at the U.N.
"Ambassador Bolton failed to secure confirmation because of his criticism of the U.N. itself, his role in arms intelligence before the Iraq war, as well as his negotiating style," said CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk.
"But by all accounts he grew into the job, negotiating support for some tough resolutions supporting the administration's position on North Korea and Iran," Falk said.
Mr. Bush gave Bolton the job temporarily in August 2005, while Congress was in recess. Under that process, the appointment expires when Congress formally adjourns, no later than early January.
The White House resubmitted Bolton's nomination last month. But with Democrats capturing control of the next Congress, his chances of winning confirmation appeared slight. The incoming chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Democratic Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, said he saw "no point in considering Mr. Bolton's nomination again."
While Mr. Bush could not give Bolton another recess appointment, the White House was believed to be exploring other ways of keeping him in the job, perhaps by giving him a title other than ambassador. But Bolton informed the White House he intended to leave when his current appointment expires, White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said.
Mr. Bush planned to meet with Bolton and his wife later Monday in the Oval Office.
"He served his country with extraordinary dedication and skill, assembling coalitions that addressed some of the most consequential issues facing the international community," the president said. "During his tenure, he articulately advocated the positions and values of the United States and advanced the expansion of democracy and liberty.
"Ambassador Bolton led the successful negotiations that resulted in unanimous Security Council resolutions regarding North Korea's military and nuclear activities. He built consensus among our allies on the need for Iran to suspend the enrichment and reprocessing of uranium," Mr. Bush added. "His efforts to promote the cause of peace in Darfur resulted in a peacekeeping commitment by the United Nations. He made the case for United Nations reform because he cares about the institution, and wants it to become more credible and effective."
Bolton, who pushed strongly for U.N. reform, has had strained relations with many in the U.N. Secretariat, led by Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and has repeatedly called for all top U.N. officials to leave when Annan steps down as U.N. chief on Dec. 31 and is replaced by Ban Ki-moon.
"I think Ambassador Bolton did the job he was expected to do," Annan said Monday morning when asked about Bolton's resignation. "He came at a time when we had lots of tough issues from reform to issues on Iran and North Korea. I think as a representative of the U.S, government, he pressed ahead with the instructions he had been given and tried to work as effectively as he could."
As late as last month, Mr. Bush, through his top aides, said he would not relent in his defense of Bolton, despite unwavering opposition from Democrats who view Bolton as too combative for international diplomacy.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 96 CommentsI wish he had waitied until Congress had adjourned.
Now America can be better served by someone who has vision and the nation at heart, instead of narrow self-centered and asinine agenda.
When devils depart, the world becomes a better place.
Now if the President and his cronies would just have the decency to step down, we could put the country back on track.
We might as well turn the UN into a something profitable like a YMCA or maybe a church or something.
This begs the question, why do the dems want to destroy our country...why? Dont they like this country? What could anyone have against Bolton??? The only guy that stood up for America in the face of all the swine n the UN.....
That Jacka$$ of a president we have always criticizing when someone disagrees with him, always putting blame...he's like a little spoiled child...oh wait he is a little spoiled child
Good riddance to bad rubbish!
Next?
The Devil in Miss Rice. LOL
Now will Condi resign or will she stand by her man?
Will she amorously follow the 'devil' to the depths of hell.
Bush still can't see the forest for the trees. He thought Bolton "deserved" a vote simply because he said so. Well, that is the type of response I'd expect from such an arrogant man as Bush. I think it, therefore it should happen.
Welcome to the real world where men hold other men accountable for their actions. Ready to talk faked war documents now?
That way, America can be more like Europe.
That's what the Democrats want - to be part of the European Union.
Not much chance of a strong Ambassador with the Democrats in power.
The Democrats will probably insist on apointing Madeleine Albright, so she can give more free basketballs to North Korea, and have pajama parties with Iran.
This is such hogwash. Bush is not "resolute" he got us into Iraq on lies and mis-information. You don't go into a TRIBAL society and try and turn it into a democracy!! Are you nuts??? We are losing Afganistan to the Taliban because we failed to improve the infrastructure now we are losing Iraq to civil war because we have a president who has only listened to his cabal of arrogant fools who lack the most elementary foreign policy skills.
GOOD RIDANCE!
Bush not being satisfied the first time all this came up foisted this idiot off on us by "temporarily" appointing him in a sneak move, and then he continued foisting him on us again, now finally we will be rid of this sour, dour faced John Wayne wanna be that only BUSH wanted in office.
They just want someone who looks pretty.
Shallow, stupid Democrats are destroying this country bit by bit every day.
It's time for a civil war again.
Howard, anit Christ, Dean.....or
Ted, Mary Jo, Kennedy......or
Robert, KKK Byrd....... you have a lot to be proud of ..........
But of course you don't give specifics.
The question remains... WHY did he leave?
What does he know that we DON'T??
I believe he can do a good job there and it is too bad that partisan politics has to weed out all opposition no matter how good they may be in their jobs.
Hard partisan politics is not the best thing for the U.S.
There is something about "Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid of Nevada" that gives me the absolute crawls.
It's called "Checks and Balance" - get used to it.
And it's not to be confused with "Fair & Balanced" which has come to have no meaning whatsoever.
And it was Chaffee, a Republican, that killed this nomination. A shame such a decent American needed an election defeat to stand up to extremists in his party.
Another justification for Checks and Balance.
His arguments are flawed:
* The USS Cole was bombed 12 Oct 2000
* The Khobar Towers were bombed 25 June 1996
* Bush was sworn 20 Jan 2001
How is Bush responsible for these? Both events were under Clinton.
that is all I meant, it was a well stated remark with some creative writing added and all anyone else had to say was he was on par with Joseph Gobbels.
in order to have a civilized debate we (as americans) need to understand people can have differing views and have the courage to express them with out fearing a visceral reaction to it, boiling down to calling them a fasist or communist or a nazi.
Get ready to be bullied by North Korea, Iran, Syria and Venezuela!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 96 Comments