February 11, 2009 5:41 PM

Keeping A Hawkeye On Obama

By
Jennifer Hoar
(CBS)  By CBS Evening News producer Ward Sloane

It's official. The 2008 Iowa caucuses' sweepstakes have started. That's because Des Moines Register political reporter Thomas Beaumont wrote an article last weekend about Sen. Barack Obama.

Beaumont reported that the first-term senator from Illinois has put out feelers to Democratic Party activists. Obama talked to John Norris, a Des Moines Democrat who engineered John Kerry's come-from-behind victory in 2004. Norris said Obama "truly wanted to know what he had to do and when he had to do it," in order to compete in Iowa.

One activist said that if Obama were to compete in Iowa, it would be the most exciting campaign since Gary Hart ran his insurgent campaign against Walter Mondale in 1984. But the issue is: Can Obama win there?

"He's such a phenomenon — he came out of nowhere, it seems anything is possible," said Democrat George Appleby, also of Des Moines.

Of course, there is also the race issue at hand — namely whether an African American could win a statewide election in Iowa. Seasoned politicians in the Hawkeye State say yes, and it's all in the math.

In this year's Democratic gubernatorial primary, liberal Ed Fallon got 26 percent of the vote. This is a good base for Obama. Add the fact that Iowa Democrats will have one of their own in the race, outgoing two-term Gov. Tom Vilsack, who is expected to win the caucuses outright. Then add spirited campaigns by Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., and 2004 presidential hopeful John Edwards. Mix in a dash of Al Gore and/or a pinch of retired Gen. Wesley Clark and perhaps a tablespoon of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. Suddenly, 20 or 25 percent could easily be enough for a first- or second-place finish.

"A candidate who comes in second could well be considered the 'relative winner' against a native son," said one Democrat.

Of course, coming in second would be easier for Obama if the other Big Name Democrat decided not to run or — heresy — decided to bypass Iowa. That Big Name, of course, is Hillary Clinton. Big-time Iowans say that so far, she hasn't contacted anyone in the state about 2008.

"Why should she run here? She runs the risk of losing to Vilsack, and if you're Hillary Clinton, you can't afford to lose to anyone," said one activist. "She'd be better off saying that Tom Vilsack is a good man, he deserves the support of his home state and then she can double her time" in New Hampshire and Nevada and South Carolina (the next three states on the 2008 calendar).

So, there's a whole lot of thinking going around this holiday season. And that's true for Republicans as well. On Monday they announced the date of their straw poll — Aug. 11, 2007, in Ames, Iowa. A guy named George W. Bush won the last one, in August 1999.

Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor said the only person who knows when the senator will make a decision is Obama himself. As for Sen. Clinton, a spokesman says she has not made up her mind whether to run for President and has not, in fact, been in contact with anyone in Iowa about the caucuses.


By Ward Sloane

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment
by agnim November 30, 2006 8:56 PM EST
katia327 at 08:11 AM : Nov 30, 2006

Stop trying to be a man!
A woman DOES NOT have to know anything about war, except to have no stomach for it.

A female's role is to Produce, Protect, and Promote LIFE!

Leave the 'killing game' to the more foolish and wombless men!

Women produce the humans and mindless men kill them!
You shouldn't want to be that kind of a man; unless you are as lost as those warmongering and foolish females who want to be man-like killers?
Reply to this comment
by katia327 November 30, 2006 11:11 AM EST
k911lowe

How dare you put down women, in your assumption that they do not know anything about war.

They're FIGHTING in this war.
Reply to this comment
by geri2008a November 30, 2006 3:22 AM EST
Obama for president in %u201908. Here's what others that work with him say:

Sen. John McCain (R): Sen. Obama is a serious legislator. He has a great deal of charisma. %u2026he is a future leader of this country. I have great respect for him.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R): Barack%u2019s got the capability, I believe%u2014and the pizzazz and the charisma%u2014to be a leader of America, not a leader of Democrats.

Sen. Kirk Dillard (IL R state senator): He is destined for great things%u2026 an extraordinary man: his intellect, his charisma. He's to the left of me on gun control, abortion. But he can really work with Republicans.

Sen. *** Durbin: (has a petition at www.dickdurbin.com to urge Obama to run in '08)
. . . Barack Obama has a message and a chemistry with people which is unique in American political life. ...We%u2019ve had many serve in that capacity, some have been governors, some have been senators in the past. And they bring to it experience, which is important, but they also bring to it native ability and values. And I think he wins on all three... what I think Barack offers is the power of unifying this country.

Me too! Obama in '08!

Reply to this comment
by agnim November 29, 2006 10:12 PM EST
This guy is more competent that bush will ever dream of being; but Americans seem to prefer mediocrity to down right stupid for leadership.
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 November 29, 2006 9:29 PM EST
k911lowe


Amercian sons and daughters are dying because Bush and Co. went into this thing unilateraly and with poor planning and not enough troops to do the job. Since then they have made one miscalculation after another. In short they have been criminaly incompetant. It's hard to imagine them *** up more if they tried. Maybe they are trying. Halliburton has been making record profits off of this debacle.


Reply to this comment
by dock98 November 29, 2006 9:13 PM EST
llinois Democratic Sen. Barack Obama is also calling for a "gradual and substantial" withdrawal of soldiers from Iraq.
what a surprise.either elect him or a woman. neither knows jack about war except to sit down and have tea. peace be with you while americas sons and daughters die.
Reply to this comment
by senstill2be November 29, 2006 8:29 PM EST
No matter ehat he should be on the ticket. I am not sure it should be the top but possibly the VP slot. I like Gore/Obama, or Clinton/Obama, or even Edwards/Obama.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook