DETROIT, Nov. 29, 2006

38,000 Workers Accept Ford's Buyout Plans

Deadline To Take One Of The 8 Packages Offered Expired Monday

  •  (AP / CBS)

  • Photo Essay Auto Picks '06

    Japanese automakers monopolize top spots in Consumer Reports' annual vehicle guide.

  • Photo Essay Auto Show

    The latest and greatest in the motoring world takes the spotlight at the North American International Auto Show.

(AP)  Almost half of Ford Motor Co.'s hourly production workers — 38,000 so far this year — have accepted buyouts or early retirement offers as the nation's second biggest automaker shrinks in the face of multibillion-dollar losses and fierce competition from Asian carmakers.

The figure includes approximately 30,000 buyouts during the open signup period that concluded late Monday, plus about 8,000 who took deals offered at limited plants earlier this year.

Faced with lower demand for its products, Ford had hoped that 25,000 to 30,000 workers would sign up during the just-expired round of buyout offers so it could reduce manufacturing capacity to better match demand. The number who did was at the top end of that range.

The 38,000-worker reduction this year would amount to nearly 46 percent of the 83,000 unionized employees that Ford had at the start of the year. Ford has 10,423 unionized workers at nine plants in Ohio.

Ford shares rose 4 cents to $8.19 in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Those who accepted the buyout packages will begin to leave the company starting in January, the company said.

The eight packages offered to employees ranged from $35,000 to $140,000 depending on their years of service, age and how close they are to retirement. One four-year package offered up to $15,000 per year for college tuition, plus half of the workers' salaries and health benefits. Another offer paid 70 percent of employees' salaries and tuition for two years.

"One of Ford's priorities, and a large cost component of our `Way Forward' plan for North America, is our ability to adjust manufacturing capacity with demand, while continuing to reduce operating costs and becoming more efficient," Ford President and Chief Executive Alan Mulally said in a statement. "While I know that in many cases decisions to leave the company were difficult for our employees, the acceptances received through this voluntary effort will help Ford to become more competitive."

The open enrollment period began in October. The offers included traditional packages for employees eligible for retirement, as well as nontraditional packages for employees with at least one year of service.

The company said just more than half of the employees accepted the nontraditional packages, which provided options such as lump-sum payments, tuition reimbursements or scholarship funds for family members.

Ford lost $7 billion in the first nine months of the year, and the company on Monday announced that it plans to get about $18 billion in financing due to negative operating cash flow and to pay for its restructuring. Ford's share of the market has declined from around 26 percent in the early 1990s to 17.6 percent at the end of October.

The company expects to cut its annual operating costs by $5 billion through 2008 through a combination of the reductions in hourly workers and by also offering packages to 10,000 white-collar workers, with further unspecified reductions in 2009.

Ford spokeswoman Marcey Evans said the company is offering three programs to salaried workers — two early retirement packages and a buyout program. If the salaried workers are offered one of the packages, they are not able to select another, although the programs at this point are voluntary, she said.

Offers for two of the programs already have been made, while a third will go out in mid-December, she said.

"We think that the majority of the people who take the voluntary separation packages will do so by the end of the first quarter," Evans said.

Ford has 1,210 salaried workers at its Ohio operations.

Ford has announced plans to close 16 plants as part of the restructuring plan. Nine of the plants have been identified — including a transmission plant in Batavia near Cincinnati and a stamping plant in Maumee near Toledo — but the company has not named the remaining seven.

The company has said it doesn't expect to return to profitability until 2009, and that things would get even worse in the fourth quarter as market share continues to drop and Ford pays for further plant closures and job cuts to bring its manufacturing in line with lower demand.

©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by geokir-2009 November 30, 2006 7:50 PM EST
The problem with Ford as well as the other car makers is that they have not learned from their past mistakes. They have been though this before.

I bet upper management will not feel the pain that the average Ford employee is feeling.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 30, 2006 4:06 PM EST
My point is, if the cars are built here, maintained here, by American workers, the problem form my own experience, has to be with Management from the Builder on down.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 30, 2006 3:55 PM EST
olebd

I think you are right, they are built here.

Also, the dealerships employ American folks in the neighborhood, in sales, service, parts, the buildings the dealerships are in are built by American tradesmen.

Just for the record and my own experience---I have a new American car, my wife has a new foreign make.
Over a period of 3 years.
My American make was back for warranty work nine times, My wifes car was back once. They picked up my wifes car at our home and droped off a loaner. I had to take my car in and they gave me a ride to work "9 times".

Guess what my next car will be?
Reply to this comment
by tiddsanbeer November 30, 2006 2:17 PM EST
Katia327, you are a moron's moron. Your'e the type more likely to be a SLAPEE than a SLAPPER. Calling fellow americans "stupid" for shopping around and BLAMING americans for Detroits problems is akin to you being a blue balled democrat who probably works in a plant getting paid $30/hr to put on hubcaps.

Frankly6 has it right, although I believe AMERICAN cars these days ARE AS GOOD as the Japanese. They just cost to *** much for the average blue collar worker. The unions are dragging down the big 3...thats why the fan is brown. Sure,You could cut more at the top, but the bottom is what needs cleaning now for them to survive.
Reply to this comment
by docpeter-2009 November 30, 2006 12:46 PM EST
Now that the US is going to have an additional paid 38,000 unemployed I have to wonder when the suits & ties are going to be laid off. What kind of severance packages will they get, perhaps $22 mil like Fiornia with HP?

Want to sace $$ Ford (an other corporations, including drug manufacturers)? I have a few suggestions to cut: unload the big $$ at the top (CEOs, CFOs, ect); get your name off the old Silver Dome(s), cut back on commercials (we know your name); produce a better product cheaper than we can get elsewhere; keep the blue collars, they are your backbone for production.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad November 30, 2006 12:20 PM EST
katia327 I believe in equal rights and responsibilities so you would be responded to in kind. Have you registered for the draft yet or are you still living off the sacrifice of others?
Reply to this comment
by olebd November 30, 2006 12:16 PM EST
Aren't Hondas and Toyotas sold in the USA also now made in the USA?
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad November 30, 2006 12:05 PM EST
It is cheaper for FORD to build apartments house and feed its Mexican Work force in Mexico as they are doing right now than to keep these Arrogant Ford Management and Union slugs in Detroit showing up four days a week sitting on lawn chairs at their assembly lines. The unions have bargained away the backbone of American Manufacturing with their greed and now American families are paying for the greed of a few. I have been in Tier One Automotive for almost twenty years and know first hand of Union PRIDE production. And just because your American cars lasted longer than the payoff most of them do not.
Reply to this comment
by katia327 November 30, 2006 11:35 AM EST
"Quantifiably the Engineered Life Span of an American made Car is 5 to 7 years less than its foreign competition, do the math stupid!"

More bull. And I'm wondering where you get your statistics. I had two cars, over 15 years old, still running strong, when they were sold. YOU are the one who needs to brush up on his math. American made vehicles LAST.

As I said....stupid people buying foreign vehicles/garbage, have brought Ford and other UNITED STATES manufacturers and the American workers to their knees.

And if you were to call me stupid to my face, I'd have to SLAP yours.




Reply to this comment
by bluestardad November 30, 2006 10:59 AM EST
Quantifiably the Engineered Life Span of an American made Car is 5 to 7 years less than its foreign competition, do the math stupid!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad November 30, 2006 10:53 AM EST
You are worth more at home to the company so we will pay you never to come back. What does that say about the Union Worker! The bad thing is that thousands of Tier one workers that only make twelve dollars an hour loose their jobs too then these big companies cut back production. Good thing is that after a couple years the company will be better off now that they have reduced their Union liability.
Reply to this comment
by olebd November 30, 2006 10:26 AM EST
We'll all be chanting the Wal-Mart cheer in Chinese someday. I just hope by then they will have fixed the healthcare crisis.

Forget about retirement. They'll be propping our corpses up at the front door as greeters.

Durable goods will be a thing of the past. Everything will be disposable.

Shop, shop shop, sell, sell, sell, buy, buy, buy.
Reply to this comment
by katia327 November 30, 2006 8:56 AM EST
This all started when STUPID people, started buying the foreign garbage. Don't tell me how much better the cars were. Our American workers take PRIDE, in their products. We built good vehicles. Everyone in THIS country, should have stood behind OUR companies, and bought OUR cars/trucks.

The American public is to blame for this downfall, and it will only get worse with the 'domino effect'.

For all of you who say the foreign manufacturers build a better vehicle? Bull. DUMB people bought them because they were CHEAPER, rather than support OUR companies and economy.


Reply to this comment
by frankly6 November 30, 2006 5:10 AM EST


Toyota and Honda simply make better, more innovative cars.

The US auto industry has been dragging it's feet on improving fuel efficiency. They've been saying that it would cut into profits. Look around. The manufacturers that make the most fuel efficient vehicles (Toyota and Honda) are the most profitable!

When you've lost your way. Model success. Do what they do but do it better.

Reply to this comment
by sharncedar November 30, 2006 12:26 AM EST
If unions were the problem, then the manufacturing segment would be better off now than in the 1960's. But in the 1960's, with 30% of Americans in unions, we ruled the world in all segments of manufacturing. Best products, best prices, hands down. Now we have busted the unions, and we are losing fast. Why? Tell me, you genius economist wannabes. If you union-haters are so smart, why is it the country you rule is failing?

Actually you are 100% wrong and backwards. Empowered workers who believe in the system make much better products, its union-busting that killed our manufacturing economy, starting with Reagan, may he rot in Hell.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar November 30, 2006 12:21 AM EST
You idiots - they are setting up here to make the cars in China. I can't believe you are blaming American workers when these vicious traitors are destroying your country around you. Where are your kids going to work, at Taco Bell? The other jobs in America, the "service" and "management" jobs are derivative of the productive jobs, like manufacturing. Without those basic productive, export producing jobs, the others will slowly dry up over time, since we can't sustain borrowing based on the good credit of our former country's reputation forever.

How dumb you are to blame unions. When you understand your folly, you'll really be ashamed. We had many more and much stronger unions through our glory years where our economoy dominated the world, it is the union-busting free traitors starting with Reagan who destroyed America. And you are buying their stupid propaganda again.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 29, 2006 8:31 PM EST
Look, I have a relative that works at a dealersh-it, he is the new car pre-delivery guy, they pay him 1/3 what the union guys get to make the car deliverable to a customer. Radios that dont work, windows wont work, doors and locks that wont work, trunks that leak rain ,various rattles and squeaks and on and on.

And guess what, if he does not fix it right the first time, they do not pay him for a refix.
Hel#, the union guys did not even build it right the first time for 3 times the money he makes.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 29, 2006 8:06 PM EST
What, I am not allowed to say cra#?
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 29, 2006 8:02 PM EST
Ford is crying about all the imported autos, If those over paid workers built a better car, Ford would not be in this spot They have been building *** for years and it all is catching up to them.


And you all thought we won W W 2, better take another look around.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad November 29, 2006 7:19 PM EST
Poor Union workers, their productivity cost ratio is so low that the company pays them not to come back! How sad is that?
Reply to this comment
See all 30 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: