February 11, 2009 5:41 PM

Muslim Says He Was Abducted By U.S.

By
Amy Clark
(CBS)  This article was written by CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian and CBS News producer Phil Hirschkorn.


Khaled El-Masri says he is not after money but answers about why he spent five months in harsh captivity as a prisoner in the war on terrorism.

"It's a question of moral values, of principles. I want to find out why they did to me what they did," El-Masri told CBS News in an exclusive interview. "I want an explanation, and I want an apology."

El-Masri, 44, was born in Kuwait to Lebanese parents and lives in Germany, which has been his home for the past 20 years. El-Masri says that two years ago, he was a victim of mistaken identity in the CIA program called "rendition," which transports foreign suspects to countries whose interrogation techniques, critics say, are tantamount to torture, such as Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Morocco.

"It was difficult from day one on up to the last day. From the very beginning I was fearing for my life," El-Masri told us.

El-Masri came to the U.S. this week on a special visa to attend a court hearing about his lawsuit against the former director of the CIA, George Tenet, CIA agents whose identities are not known, and the companies that owned and operated the Boeing 737 believed to have transported him – Premier Executive Transport Services, of Massachusetts, and Aero Contractors Limited, of North Carolina, and Keeler and Tate Management, of Nevada.

In addition, CBS News has learned, El-Masri and his attorneys from the ACLU are contemplating suing another major American company, Boeing, because newly available travel records suggest a Boeing subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning may have arranged El-Masri's rendition flights and many others.

"I have confidence in the American justice systems and its courts," El-Masri said through his translator outside the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond Tuesday. "What I really want is that they admit to me that an injustice was done to me."

It was New Year's 2004, when El-Masri, a car salesman on a vacation without his wife and children, traveled by bus to Macedonia. At the border, Macedonian police arrested him and then detained him for three weeks in a hotel room in Skopje, allowing him out of the bed only to go to the bathroom.

After 23 days and many questions about his associations in Germany, the base of the main al Qaeda cell behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings, police took him the Skopje airport. There, El-Masri says, a group of men in black masks beat, blindfolded and drugged him before dragging him in chains onto a private jet bound for Kabul, Afghanistan.

"I was humiliated," El-Masri told us in the interview. "They took pictures of me without clothes on."

His home for the next four months was a small, squalid cell in an abandoned brick factory prisoners called the Salt Pit.

"I was deprived of sleep. I only had one blanket in my cell, and these were very cold days in Afghanistan at that time of year," El-Masri says. "The food and the water were awful. You wouldn't even give that to your pets."

After a total of 149 days in captivity, shedding 60 pounds, growing his hair and beard long, El-Masri was freed. This time, he was flown in a private jet to Tirana, Albania, and given a commercial airline ticket back to Germany.

"This mistake could have been resolved early on if these people had called a German authority to clarify that a mistake was made," El-Masri says.

After filing a complaint with German police, which launched a criminal probe, El-Masri, with the help of the ACLU, filed suit against the CIA and the aviation firms thought to be involved in his rendition.

In May, a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia quashed the civil lawsuit seeking compensatory damages by accepting the U.S. government's argument that a public trial over El-Masri claims would expose "state secrets."

Among the secrets to be protected, government lawyers say, are the identities of operatives at home and abroad, cooperating foreign governments and companies, and intelligence gathering sources and methods.

"Even the unintended disclosure of a single piece of information can have a cascading effect, resulting in widespread harm to foreign intelligence capabilities, our nation's foreign relations, and our national defense," the government wrote in its briefs opposing reinstatement of El-Masri's lawsuit. "When the national security conflicts with an individual's interest in pursuing his civil claim, the interests of the individual must give way."

The ACLU counters that the government cannot legitimately keep secret what is already widely known.

"I think courts are beginning to recognize that this administration is using secrecy to avoid accountability," says ACLU attorney Ben Wizner, who argued El-Masri's appeal Tuesday in Richmond. "The government says that it can never even acknowledge what it did with Mr. El-Masri, and that is further abuse."



Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by tj1504 November 30, 2006 1:56 PM EST

"It should take more to make peace than to prevent war. The sword once drawn, full justice must be done. 'Indemnification for the past and security for the future,' should be painted on our banners." --Thomas Jefferson to Robert Wright, 1812. ME 13:184
Reply to this comment
by tj1504 November 30, 2006 1:32 PM EST
In what the London Daily Telegraph newspaper called, "the starkest assessment yet of the dangers facing Britain," Manningham-Buller said Islamist militants with ties with al-Qaida are "grooming" young teenagers "to be suicide bombers." She conceded that British involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan respectively were seen as anti-Muslim, despite the government's efforts to dispel this view, and this perception has played into the hands of fundamentalist recruiters.
Reply to this comment
by tj1504 November 30, 2006 1:31 PM EST
http://www.worldpoliticswatch.com/article.aspx?id=335
Reply to this comment
by tj1504 November 30, 2006 1:31 PM EST
there are no rules .... we are still at risk....
Reply to this comment
by tj1504 November 30, 2006 1:30 PM EST
LONDON -- The head of the British Security Service (MI5), Eliza Manningham-Buller, who rarely makes public pronouncements, rattled off some chilling statistics Thursday about the Islamist terrorist threat to Britain. The service, she said, is investigating at least 30 top-priority terror plots.

Under surveillance are about 200 groups or networks, comprising more then 1,600 individuals "who are actively engaged in plotting or facilitating terrorist acts here or overseas," she said in a speech at Queen Mary College, London.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat November 30, 2006 1:25 AM EST
Would I send my wife to this war? You might ask would I send her to WW-II? Or Vietnam? Maybe you would distinguish those conflicts and whether you would send your wife to fight in them. But that question is directed in a very important way: I cannot command my wife, she does me. I have no choice. So the better question would be: would I, BushDucks21, volunteer to fight in Iraq, WW II, Vietnam? Would I volunteer BushDucks21 to fight in any war? Respond if drafted? I don%u2019t know. To a hypothetical question, I can answer, NO. And I have nightmares of battle (from my past life as a Hamburgerbite). So how do I feel toward those who do volunteer? Impressed and maturely knowing that many things go into their decision. But I do strongly believe that a country that can't find those women is doomed. The fact that we can find them is one reason why I say there is a failure in Iraq. Objectively, I also believe it for other reasons. An attempt to establish theocracy in the Middle East is a poor, ailing, dispecable effort, for sure a failure. That's why I greatly disrespect and shame those who have made the attempt--the Walkig-Liar administration. They have been resolute, something I have not seen in my lifetime. They may not succeed, for reasons within their control or fault: traitors on the home front being a big one. Now we traitors have apparently occupied the high ground. Yet... we're still in Iraq. Why?...I'm waiting, and for longtime.
bushducks1
Reply to this comment
by sim828524s November 29, 2006 7:48 PM EST
Will every please stop talking about this.

Look lets just pretend we don't know anything about what happen to this guy, and lets just sweep it under the rug ok.

If we can just ignore it, it might go away
Reply to this comment
by themooniac November 29, 2006 7:36 PM EST
Pakaal: is it it El- Masri or Al-Masri? is it Osama bin Laden or Usama bin Laden. They got the right guy, semantics wont help excuse this guy. Is my hispanic friends name Jorge or George? Am I Tomas or Thomas. Hiding behind semantics?
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy November 29, 2006 6:06 PM EST
Bushrocks1,

The objective of your post has now been rendered powerless by your obsessive spaming. You have now also removed all doubt about your mental condition. You are welcome to join us back here in the reality based community. Otherwise, thanks for exposing yourself for the fruitcake that you undoubtedly are.
Reply to this comment
by pakaal November 29, 2006 5:27 PM EST
themooniac, the main problem with your argument about Khaled El-Masri being suspected of being a terrorist (from the article you posted the link to, I presume), is that the whole point of this story is there's a REAL terrorist named Khaled al-Masri ("al" with an "a", not "el" with an "e") who is NOT this man. The rest of the article you posted the link to is correct, but they fail to point out that the terrorist al-Masri was seen while El-Masri was in detention.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_al-Masri

Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook