Democrats Get A Bench

Lynch: Raft Of New Governors Bring New Talent And Fresh Ideas To The Party

(CBS)  Dotty Lynch is CBSNews.com's Political Points columnist. E-mail your questions and comments to Political Points.

---

With all the hoopla about the Democrats taking control of the Congress, the 36 elections for governor received short shrift in the national media. But the Democrats made some significant gains in the statehouses as well, adding six to 22 they already held. All 13 Democratic governors running for re-election won, and Democrats now hold 28 of the 50 statehouses.

This week, Iowa's outgoing Gov. Tom Vilsack will be the first candidate to formally declare his candidacy for president in 2008. Vilsack just finished two terms as governor and saw himself succeeded by another Democrat, Chet Culver. In the 2004 campaign cycle, Vilsack ran the Democratic Governors Association, where he set fundraising records; in 2006, he ran a PAC that also focused on electing Democratic governors. TV comedian Jon Stewart likes to snicker about Vilsack — but governors who have a lot of friends in statehouses around the country have done pretty well in presidential bids recently. Do the names of Reagan, Carter, Clinton and George W. Bush ring a bell?

Governors are not only important as a source of Presidential candidates and for formulating and executing public policy, but they provide a bench of public officials who will be contenders for federal offices in the future. In 2006 the Democrats elected a number of interesting prospects. Here are a few to watch:

Elliot Spitzer: The former New York Attorney General who took on Wall Street was elected with 69 percent of the vote — running slightly ahead of Hillary Clinton's re-election to the Senate. Expectations are high for Spitzer, who has a track record of bold action and is likely to a high-profile governor.

DeVal Patrick: Massachusetts' first African-American governor is only the second in U.S. history. (Douglas Wilder of Virginia was the first in 1989.) Patrick, a deputy Attorney General for Civil Rights during the Clinton administration, beat Democratic Party favorite Tom Reilly in the primary and won a three-way race in November with 56% of the vote. Patrick succeeds Republican Mitt Romney in this very blue state and promises to do things differently from the old boy establishment. If Illinois Sen. Barack Obama decides to sit out ’08 and get some seasoning in the Senate, look for Patrick to emerge on some vice presidential shortlists.

Martin O’Malley: The 43-year-old mayor of Baltimore has been described by the Washington Post as "A politician molded by Irish rebels, Jesuit ideals." He's been labeled a rising star since he was a volunteer in Gary Hart's campaign in 1984. O'Malley beat popular incumbent Republican Robert Ehrlich with 53 percent of the vote and has received national attention as co-chair of the U.S. Conference of Mayors' Task Force on Homeland Security.

Kathleen Sebelius: Kansas' governor since 2003 has turned a very red state a bluish shade of purple. In 2006 she got 58 percent of the vote. As the daughter of former Ohio Gov. John Gilligan, Sebelius has a number of friends in national politics. If Hillary Clinton hesitates or falters, Sebelius' name is sure to crop up as a strong contender for the No. 2 slot.

Janet Napolitano: Arizona's governor is another VP shortlister if Hillary isn't on top. (The idea of putting two women on the 2008 ticket would upset establishment just too much.) In 2006 she received 63% in Arizona, the state that sent Barry Goldwater and John McCain to the Senate, and navigated the thorny immigration issue with finesse.

Jennifer Granholm. Strong communication skills allowed her to prevail in Michigan with 56% of the vote while running against a multimillionaire in a state with a lousy economy. She was born in Canada and can't be elected president, but she is a popular national spokesperson and has not been shy about seeking national platforms.

John Lynch: New Hampshire's Lynch topped all the governors by garnering 74% of the vote and carrying two new Democratic members of Congress and both houses of the state legislature — which is Democratic for the first time since 1874. He will be actively courted by Presidential contenders … and reporters who follow their scent.

Bill Richardson: Like Vilsack before him, Richardson made a lot of friends this cycle as head of the Democratic Governors Association. He also got 69% of the vote in his reelection contest in New Mexico. Richardson is one of many potential 2008 presidential hopefuls, and he brings his Hispanic heritage and foreign policy credentials to the table.

Some Republicans withstood the tide. Arnold Schwarzenegger reinvented himself in California won with 56% and Jodi Rell in Connecticut got 63% of the vote while the Republican candidate for Senate was receiving a mere 9.7%.

During the 1980s and early 1990s, governors were the silver lining for Republicans when they were out of power in the Congress. Democrats now have an opportunity to look to the statehouses for new talent and fresh ideas.


©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Share:

• Share
• Yahoo! Buzz
• Twitter
• Mixx

Add a Comment

by frankly6 November 27, 2006 10:13 PM EST

If you find the pointless posting and re-posting of the same message by Bushrocks1 annoying, just click on report this comment below his post and report it.

Reply to this comment

by observantx November 27, 2006 4:50 PM EST

Bushrocks seems to be unable to pull their head out of their repeated posting. They just keep pasting it everywhere. After all, it%u2019s so much easier than thinking about anything or attempting an analysis of its relevance. Just paste it and paste it again.

Years ago, some white lab coat types wired up the pleasure centers of the brains of live mice to a lever. When the mice pushed the lever, they felt pleasure. They dropped dead of exhaustion from pressing the lever. They wouldn%u2019t even stop to eat or drink. I guess this is bushrock%u2019s lever. Just like whacking off, I guess. In the meantime, let%u2019s try to be polite and not encourage him by commenting on his pasting post.

Reply to this comment

by getcentered November 27, 2006 1:43 PM EST

YES!

We need NEW people, NEW ideas, NEW levels of tolerance, NEW understanding if America is going to once again lead the world.

The last 6 years have been a disaster for the USA and it is all to blame on very few people who are or were our leaders and a completely complicit voting public that let the GOP/Republican party rule for FAR TOO LONG.

If you vote for Republicans, it's time to take the blinders off; cause all the Republicans care about is MONEY and maybe the HORSES.

Reply to this comment

by bluestardad November 27, 2006 1:23 PM EST

The Iraq Study Group is touted as a bipartisan 10-member commission led by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, IS NOT CREDIBLE. This study group is buying time for a failed policy. These politicians who reference it's upcoming findings as reasons for not taking the voter mandated immediate changes in Iraq policy, are purchasing time on a failed "Stay the Course" policy at the cost three American soldiers Lives and millions of tax payer dollars a day for their inaction. Remember James Baker III is an old Bush family friend who defended the Saudi Government in court against the Survivors of 911. His motives are questionable at best as he is hardly an American Statesman with the lives of the American Soldiers at the forefront of his interest. This commission will not make any recommendations that will call for the immediate or phased withdrawal of our troops as there are currently permanent American Military bases being built in Iraq.

Reply to this comment

by abbe7 November 27, 2006 1:10 PM EST

ainttaken:
"Saddam was already contained with no fly zones".
Better even:

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061030/nym224.html?.v=44

Reply to this comment

by blarma November 27, 2006 9:26 AM EST

California is a good example of how the country should be run as a whole. They have the checks and balances with a Replubican governor which the U.S. should have had from 2000 on. Global warming and foreign energy dependence are issues that California is dealing with that the U.S. as a whole has not addressed because of Republican domination.
Along with all the other commentary about Iraq: I can't believe that the "War on Terror" could not have been fought in a much smarter way. For a fraction of the cost Saddam could have been contained (The Soviet Union was contained for 50 years) while all the money spent could have bought much needed energy independence to the U.S. I DON'T believe that Isreal is more than 20% of the problem with the Middle East - the problem is oil. An independent America could have much more leverage with Iran, but now Iran has a big energy weapon in oil that we are doing nothing about. Sooner or later people are going to see that politicians who are stooges of Big Oil are really traitors to the U.S. (as Mark Rich was whom Clinton pardoned) and ultimately world peace. I don't blame oil companies, but I do blame politicians who work with their lobby to grant them everything they wish.
Teddy Rosevelt stood up to Big Oil - that's why he was a great president (even though I'm a Democrat I admire him). Bush is no Teddy Rosevelt - he's an oil man through and through.

Reply to this comment

Add a comment

Comment SUBMIT

Click here to add another comment.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Comment reply

Submit Cancel

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Report offensive content:

If you believe this comment is offensive or violates the CBSNews.com Terms of Use, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.

Select type of offense:

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements, commercial links, or repetitive posts

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Off-topic: Commentary unrelated to the storyline

Comments (optional):

Report Cancel

E-mail this comment to a friend.

E-mail this to: (Separate multiple e-mail addresses with commas. Limited to 10 addresses.)

Your e-mail address:

Send me a copy of this message

Note: Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipients's address will be used for any other purpose.

Add your own personal message: (Optional)

Hi, I found this user's comment on CBSNews.com and thought you might be interested in reading it. Send e-mail Cancel

[frankly6]

If you find the pointless posting and re-posting of the same message by Bushrocks1 annoying, just click on report this comment below his post and report it.

[observantx]

Bushrocks seems to be unable to pull their head out of their repeated posting. They just keep pasting it everywhere. After all, it%u2019s so much easier than thinking about anything or attempting an analysis of its relevance. Just paste it and paste it again.

Years ago, some white lab coat types wired up the pleasure centers of the brains of live mice to a lever. When the mice pushed the lever, they felt pleasure. They dropped dead of exhaustion from pressing the lever. They wouldn%u2019t even stop to eat or drink. I guess this is bushrock%u2019s lever. Just like whacking off, I guess. In the meantime, let%u2019s try to be polite and not encourage him by commenting on his pasting post.

[getcentered]

YES!

We need NEW people, NEW ideas, NEW levels of tolerance, NEW understanding if America is going to once again lead the world.

The last 6 years have been a disaster for the USA and it is all to blame on very few people who are or were our leaders and a completely complicit voting public that let the GOP/Republican party rule for FAR TOO LONG.

If you vote for Republicans, it's time to take the blinders off; cause all the Republicans care about is MONEY and maybe the HORSES.

[bluestardad]

The Iraq Study Group is touted as a bipartisan 10-member commission led by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, IS NOT CREDIBLE. This study group is buying time for a failed policy. These politicians who reference it's upcoming findings as reasons for not taking the voter mandated immediate changes in Iraq policy, are purchasing time on a failed "Stay the Course" policy at the cost three American soldiers Lives and millions of tax payer dollars a day for their inaction. Remember James Baker III is an old Bush family friend who defended the Saudi Government in court against the Survivors of 911. His motives are questionable at best as he is hardly an American Statesman with the lives of the American Soldiers at the forefront of his interest. This commission will not make any recommendations that will call for the immediate or phased withdrawal of our troops as there are currently permanent American Military bases being built in Iraq.

[abbe7]

ainttaken:
"Saddam was already contained with no fly zones".
Better even:

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/061030/nym224.html?.v=44

[blarma]

California is a good example of how the country should be run as a whole. They have the checks and balances with a Replubican governor which the U.S. should have had from 2000 on. Global warming and foreign energy dependence are issues that California is dealing with that the U.S. as a whole has not addressed because of Republican domination.
Along with all the other commentary about Iraq: I can't believe that the "War on Terror" could not have been fought in a much smarter way. For a fraction of the cost Saddam could have been contained (The Soviet Union was contained for 50 years) while all the money spent could have bought much needed energy independence to the U.S. I DON'T believe that Isreal is more than 20% of the problem with the Middle East - the problem is oil. An independent America could have much more leverage with Iran, but now Iran has a big energy weapon in oil that we are doing nothing about. Sooner or later people are going to see that politicians who are stooges of Big Oil are really traitors to the U.S. (as Mark Rich was whom Clinton pardoned) and ultimately world peace. I don't blame oil companies, but I do blame politicians who work with their lobby to grant them everything they wish.
Teddy Rosevelt stood up to Big Oil - that's why he was a great president (even though I'm a Democrat I admire him). Bush is no Teddy Rosevelt - he's an oil man through and through.