Scroll Left Scroll Right
February 11, 2009 5:42 PM

Gen. Abizaid On Stabilizing Iraq

By
Daniel Schorn
(CBS)  When it comes to the war in Iraq, no other military man has a job more important than Gen. John Abizaid, the four-star commander of all U.S. forces in the Middle East. He was the first person Congress turned to earlier this month for answers, after American voters demanded a change in course, frustrated by a war that seems to be going nowhere and grows more violent every day.

The general doesn't grant many interviews, but he agreed to talk to correspondent Lara Logan last week for the first time since that appearance on Capitol Hill. While Logan and Gen. Abizaid came to talk about Iraq, the 60 Minutes was struck by how much the general had to say about Iran.



Logan met Gen. Abizaid at his headquarters in Tampa, Fla., as he was preparing to leave on one of his frequent trips to the Middle East.

"Three years into this war, close to 3,000 American soldiers killed and more than 20,000 wounded. A lot of Americans are wondering how it is that we got to this point. I mean, they still remember the president saying, 'Mission Accomplished,'" Logan remarks.

"Nobody's more mindful of the sacrifices of our troops than those of us that command them," Abizaid says. "And I know that the losses have affected many, many lives. But the enemy that we fight is a tough enemy. The enemy can't be walked away from easily. We have to stabilize Iraq and the broader regional dynamic in order to make the region less conducive to extremism because if we don't, the extremist values will become mainstream and we will have a much worse security situation develop in the future."

According to a U.S. intelligence report on Iraq declassified in September, that's already beginning to happen. It found the war in Iraq is "shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders" and becoming a "cause celebre … for jihadists."

"Exactly on that point, a national intelligence estimate said it appeared that extremism was emboldened and strengthened by this war. So, how do you think we're doing on stopping those ideas taking root in the region?" Logan asks the general.

"I would tell you that there are parts of the extremist agenda, especially the al Qaeda extremist agenda that remains very dangerous, very deadly. I'd also tell you that there hasn't been an attack on U.S. soil since 9/11. That has a lot to do with our willingness to be forward and fighting there," Abizaid says.

But fighting the war on terror there has made life for many Iraqis unbearable. It's something Abizaid understands: He speaks their language. His fluency in Arabic makes him a military rarity. He's the grandson of Lebanese immigrants and a highly decorated combat veteran who understands the dynamics of this volatile part of the world and the consequences of failure in Iraq.

Asked what his greatest fear for Iraq is, Abizaid says, "My greatest fear is that neighboring countries like Iran and Syria decide that they will destabilize the country more, as opposed to help it come together."

Asked what that would mean for the U.S. if that were to happen, the general says, "If Iraq destabilizes and moves to civil war, it will be a point where Shiite extremists and Sunni extremists will be emboldened and will achieve safe haven, and it will create a problem not only for us but for everybody in the region. That will only lead to more conflict, not less."

But the conflict has already reached a level of violence that many Americans find unacceptable. October was the deadliest month since the war began for Iraqis, and in almost two years for U.S. troops. Snipers are now a constant threat, and roadside bombs continue to claim American lives.

They're dying, the general says, at the hands of both Sunni extremists and Shiite militants, which he told Logan are backed by the Iranian government's special forces, the Revolutionary Guards Qods Force, who are pouring weapons and money into Iraq.

"At the same time that the government of Iran is talking about stabilizing Iraq, these Revolutionary Guard Qods Force people are supporting the Shia death squads of some of the various splinter…," Abizaid explains.

"So, aren't we already at a war with Iran through its proxies in Iraq?" Logan asks.

"No. We're not at war with Iran through its proxies. We are in a period of making it clear to the Iranians that they need to move to help stabilize Iraq and not destabilize it," Abizaid says.


Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 60 Comments
by rob10001 November 29, 2006 3:13 PM EST
Anyone can complain about Ms. Logan but let me try to help by offering some questions she should have asked the General.
Are their plans for a counter-insugency to defeat the death squads?
How much influence is Syria having in supporting the death squads in Iraq? What should be done?
As a Lebanese-American you have insight into the culture of the Middle-East. Is restraint seen as weakness in the culture? Should stronger and more brutal action be taken in the Sunni Triangle against the death squads?
Violence in Iraq seems to peak with American and Iraqi elections. Did the Democratic victory in Congress give hope to the death squads? Do our allies in the Iraqi Army feel that they will be abandoned now that the political climate has changed in Washington away from Bush's vision?

This would have distinguished her and would have been what most Americans would have asked the General themselves. Americans are not Europeans or South Africans. They are not interested in magaging defeat. They are interested in victory over the enemy and how to go about it; Which is exactly why Europe and South Africa after the Cold War are free nations today.
Reply to this comment
by rob10001 November 29, 2006 1:27 AM EST
It is worth mentioning that the only reason I even heard of this interview was because it was linked by a conservative blog site. I certainly do not watch CBS or regularly visit the website.
After watching this interview and hearing the questions asked, I am reminded why I avoid network news.
Reply to this comment
by rob10001 November 28, 2006 11:54 PM EST
What an embarresing interview.
However, being a gentleman, General Abizaid tried to explain without being condecending that death squads with various loyalities using terrorist tactics can cause much havoc but does not constitute a defeat except for a few "courageous" journalists standing on a balcony in Baghdad talking about how defeated the soldiers protecting them are.
Sorry CBS; good luck in your search for your own Anderson Cooper to drag the 20 somethings away from the blogs and back to network news.
I think news consumers are looking for serious inquiry and not someone who supposedly speaks for the US public. If your viewers want the usual DNC talking points of "Mission Accomplished" and "defeat" but the obligatory "support for the military" they can go elsewhere.
Reply to this comment
by lestb35 November 28, 2006 1:22 AM EST
She has risked her own life doing her job.She knows the REALITY ON THE GROUND and that's why she asked those questions to Gen. Abizaid.Gen Abizaid had to be polite because he knows how much she knows about the war.I don't know why people want to be in the STATE OF DENIAL.
Posted by patriotic9 at 11:43 AM : Nov 27, 2006

Yea, really.
Reply to this comment
by mugrut November 28, 2006 12:50 AM EST
I'm disappointed every time I see Lara Logan on 60 Minutes. Her interview with Gen. Abizaid was a case in point. She used the emotionally charged word "defeat" to describe the option of ending the war. It isn't a defeat if you do the right thing and leave. It's a victory for common sense. I understand CBS and 60 Minutes need to represent youth in their news department, but come on, you can find some better quality news interviewing than that. Hint: Don't look for a pretty face, look for someone who has high standards, and a semblance of objectivity.
Reply to this comment
by tinker3478 November 27, 2006 8:35 PM EST
Bushie is a nut-bucket too so it is a shame he is unable to do more than paste. His comments might be worthwhile.
Reply to this comment
by patriotic9 November 27, 2006 7:37 PM EST
heresmy2cent
I totally agree with you but we shouldn't use those bombs in IRAQ where are troops are deployed.We should use them in IRAN which seems to be very close to become a RADICAL ISLAMIC EMPIRE from IRAN itself in the EAST to LEBANON in the WEST(Thanks to the RADICAL CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES who made us see that day),in SYRIA(To stop the flow of SUNNI INSURGENTS in AL ANBAR PROVINCE),NORTH KOREA(before they sell their nukes to OSAMA BIN FORGOTTEN to use them against us in the next possible terrorist attack),and most importantly in those places of PALESTINE where the EUROPAN INVADERS IN PALESTINE live who are the main cause of HATRED,TERRORISM,9/11 and stealing of our tax dollars every year for us being GOD-NEGLECTED and them being GOD-CHOSEN.
Reply to this comment
by abe25425-2009 November 27, 2006 7:27 PM EST
I count on 60 Minutes to teach me something I don't know. This interview with Abizaid was uncharacteristically epidermal and soft hitting. Nothing asked or responded in the piece shed any new light on the situation nor presented some 60 Minutes-esque choregraphed opinion. We can read any paper or watch any news show to tell us the situation sucks in Iraq, Iran's our enemy, our soldiers are getting killed more and more each day, Iraqi police need to take over, etc. Don't just be happy you scored Abizaid, use the opportunity by asking things like, "if all US troops were out of Iraq by Jan 1, walk us through the likely chain of events Iraq would encounter." Or, "In your recent testimony, you said we need stability in 4-6 months. Can we get there that soon? If not, what then, US troop phased withdrawl?" He knows no way we get there in 4-6 months, he would have to say that. Once he concedes that, then if he also concedes we would need to get out after the 4-6 months, then you ask, "if we can't get stability in 4-6 months, and you feel militarily we need to get out after that if we don't see it, then why don't we get out now and save American lives?" I don't know this new reporter, and how much she is responsible for the content of this interview, so I can't comment whether it would have been best left in the hands of a more experienced 60 Minutes prodder. The show itself should be making sure we viewers get something fresh out of each story. Here we got nothing.
Reply to this comment
by heresmy2cent November 27, 2006 6:01 PM EST
How 'bout we "stabilize" Iraq with a hydrogen bomb?
Reply to this comment
by qatopboy November 27, 2006 4:41 PM EST
"This stupid woman, Lara Logan - British accented biased stupidity"

She's South African - please don't lump her as a Brit!

Mark (A Brit)
Reply to this comment
See all 60 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook