Nov. 26, 2006
Gen. Abizaid On Stabilizing Iraq
U.S. Commander Talks To Lara Logan About Iraq, Iran And Stability In The Middle East
-
Play CBS Video Video Abizaid Discusses Iraq Lara Logan talks to the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East, Gen. John Abizaid, about the chaotic and violent situation in Iraq.
-
Video Logan's Reporter's Notebook Lara Logan talks to the top U.S. military commander in the Middle East, who offers his ideas about stabilizing the situation in Iraq.
-
Video Abizaid: Not Enough Troops On Capitol Hill, Gen. John Abizaid said that the U.S. armed forces do not have enough troops for a build-up in Iraq. David Martin reports.
-
Gen. John Abizaid, testifying on Capitol Hill. (AP)
-
Interactive Military 101 Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
-
Interactive Iraq: 4 Years Later The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
The general doesn’t grant many interviews, but he agreed to talk to correspondent Lara Logan last week for the first time since that appearance on Capitol Hill. While Logan and Gen. Abizaid came to talk about Iraq, the 60 Minutes was struck by how much the general had to say about Iran.
Logan met Gen. Abizaid at his headquarters in Tampa, Fla., as he was preparing to leave on one of his frequent trips to the Middle East.
"Three years into this war, close to 3,000 American soldiers killed and more than 20,000 wounded. A lot of Americans are wondering how it is that we got to this point. I mean, they still remember the president saying, 'Mission Accomplished,’" Logan remarks.
"Nobody's more mindful of the sacrifices of our troops than those of us that command them," Abizaid says. "And I know that the losses have affected many, many lives. But the enemy that we fight is a tough enemy. The enemy can’t be walked away from easily. We have to stabilize Iraq and the broader regional dynamic in order to make the region less conducive to extremism because if we don't, the extremist values will become mainstream and we will have a much worse security situation develop in the future."
According to a U.S. intelligence report on Iraq declassified in September, that’s already beginning to happen. It found the war in Iraq is "shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders" and becoming a "cause celebre … for jihadists."
"Exactly on that point, a national intelligence estimate said it appeared that extremism was emboldened and strengthened by this war. So, how do you think we're doing on stopping those ideas taking root in the region?" Logan asks the general.
"I would tell you that there are parts of the extremist agenda, especially the al Qaeda extremist agenda that remains very dangerous, very deadly. I'd also tell you that there hasn't been an attack on U.S. soil since 9/11. That has a lot to do with our willingness to be forward and fighting there," Abizaid says.
But fighting the war on terror there has made life for many Iraqis unbearable. It's something Abizaid understands: He speaks their language. His fluency in Arabic makes him a military rarity. He's the grandson of Lebanese immigrants and a highly decorated combat veteran who understands the dynamics of this volatile part of the world and the consequences of failure in Iraq.
Asked what his greatest fear for Iraq is, Abizaid says, "My greatest fear is that neighboring countries like Iran and Syria decide that they will destabilize the country more, as opposed to help it come together."
Asked what that would mean for the U.S. if that were to happen, the general says, "If Iraq destabilizes and moves to civil war, it will be a point where Shiite extremists and Sunni extremists will be emboldened and will achieve safe haven, and it will create a problem not only for us but for everybody in the region. That will only lead to more conflict, not less."
But the conflict has already reached a level of violence that many Americans find unacceptable. October was the deadliest month since the war began for Iraqis, and in almost two years for U.S. troops. Snipers are now a constant threat, and roadside bombs continue to claim American lives.
They’re dying, the general says, at the hands of both Sunni extremists and Shiite militants, which he told Logan are backed by the Iranian government's special forces, the Revolutionary Guards Qods Force, who are pouring weapons and money into Iraq.
"At the same time that the government of Iran is talking about stabilizing Iraq, these Revolutionary Guard Qods Force people are supporting the Shia death squads of some of the various splinter…," Abizaid explains.
"So, aren't we already at a war with Iran through its proxies in Iraq?" Logan asks.
"No. We're not at war with Iran through its proxies. We are in a period of making it clear to the Iranians that they need to move to help stabilize Iraq and not destabilize it," Abizaid says.
Produced By Harry Radliffe and Max McClellan
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 62 CommentsAre their plans for a counter-insugency to defeat the death squads?
How much influence is Syria having in supporting the death squads in Iraq? What should be done?
As a Lebanese-American you have insight into the culture of the Middle-East. Is restraint seen as weakness in the culture? Should stronger and more brutal action be taken in the Sunni Triangle against the death squads?
Violence in Iraq seems to peak with American and Iraqi elections. Did the Democratic victory in Congress give hope to the death squads? Do our allies in the Iraqi Army feel that they will be abandoned now that the political climate has changed in Washington away from Bush's vision?
This would have distinguished her and would have been what most Americans would have asked the General themselves. Americans are not Europeans or South Africans. They are not interested in magaging defeat. They are interested in victory over the enemy and how to go about it; Which is exactly why Europe and South Africa after the Cold War are free nations today.
After watching this interview and hearing the questions asked, I am reminded why I avoid network news.
However, being a gentleman, General Abizaid tried to explain without being condecending that death squads with various loyalities using terrorist tactics can cause much havoc but does not constitute a defeat except for a few "courageous" journalists standing on a balcony in Baghdad talking about how defeated the soldiers protecting them are.
Sorry CBS; good luck in your search for your own Anderson Cooper to drag the 20 somethings away from the blogs and back to network news.
I think news consumers are looking for serious inquiry and not someone who supposedly speaks for the US public. If your viewers want the usual DNC talking points of "Mission Accomplished" and "defeat" but the obligatory "support for the military" they can go elsewhere.
Posted by patriotic9 at 11:43 AM : Nov 27, 2006
Yea, really.
I totally agree with you but we shouldn't use those bombs in IRAQ where are troops are deployed.We should use them in IRAN which seems to be very close to become a RADICAL ISLAMIC EMPIRE from IRAN itself in the EAST to LEBANON in the WEST(Thanks to the RADICAL CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES who made us see that day),in SYRIA(To stop the flow of SUNNI INSURGENTS in AL ANBAR PROVINCE),NORTH KOREA(before they sell their nukes to OSAMA BIN FORGOTTEN to use them against us in the next possible terrorist attack),and most importantly in those places of PALESTINE where the EUROPAN INVADERS IN PALESTINE live who are the main cause of HATRED,TERRORISM,9/11 and stealing of our tax dollars every year for us being GOD-NEGLECTED and them being GOD-CHOSEN.
She's South African - please don't lump her as a Brit!
Mark (A Brit)
"Her bias was fully apparent from early in the interview of Gen. Abazaid"
She is not biased.She has spent more time in IRAQ then anybody posting messages on CBS.com
She has risked her own life doing her job.She knows the REALITY ON THE GROUND and that's why she asked those questions to Gen. Abizaid.Gen Abizaid had to be polite because he knows how much she knows about the war.I don't know why people want to be in the STATE OF DENIAL.
Oh, by the way bushisrock-headed or whatever you call yourself, I'm glad you're happy that old Bushie is "resolute" in his stubborness in dealing with the reality of the disaster in Iraq. Because while he's "resolute", young men and women continue to die for nothing. Maybe you SHOULD send your son over there. When he dies after his third or fourth tour, you can see if you still admire Bushie's "resoluteness". And if you do, then, well, you're an idiot too, along with your commander-in-chief. Now there's something to be proud of. Continued resolution while conmstantly failing, in direct denial of the facts, isn't something to be proud of, it's idiotic and dangerous.
Sincerely
Henry Alkin
Thanks so much.I really apreciate it.You made everything so clear in your comments.I totally agree with you.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 62 Comments