ATLANTA, Nov. 22, 2006

Cops Defend Shooting 92-Year-Old Woman

Elderly Atlanta Woman Dies After Shootout With Cops, Who Say She Shot At Them First

  • Play CBS Video Video Cops, 92-Year-Old Trade Shots

    Atlanta police say a 92-year-old woman shot at three plain clothes officers who went to her home to serve a drug warrant Nov. 21. The cops shot back and the woman later died at a hospital.

    • A family photo of Kathryn Johnston.

      A family photo of Kathryn Johnston.  (AP)

    • Atlanta Police Det. J. Owens, left, steps over the police tape as Det. C. Faircloth follows at the home of Kathryn Johnston Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006 in Atlanta.

      Atlanta Police Det. J. Owens, left, steps over the police tape as Det. C. Faircloth follows at the home of Kathryn Johnston Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006 in Atlanta.  (CBS)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Guns In America

    State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.

  • Interactive Crime Beat

    Statistics and specifics on crime in America.

  • Interactive FBI Crime Statistics

    Explore the latest information on U.S. crime, from acts of violence to property damage.

(CBS/AP)  A police official said narcotics officers were justified in returning fire on a 92-year-old woman they shot to death after she shot them as they tried to serve a warrant at her house.

Neighbors and relatives said it was a case of mistaken identity, but Atlanta police say there was no mistake concerning the address of the house, reports CBS Radio News' Pete Combs.

Police added that the woman, identified as Kathryn Johnston, was the only resident in the house at the time and had lived there for about 17 years.

"I'm mad as hell! The neighbors know where the drugs are — ask the neighbors!" Johnston's niece, Sarah Dozier, shouted to reporters.

"My aunt was in good health. I'm sure she panicked when they kicked that door down," Dozier told WAGA-TV, adding that there were no drugs in the house. "There was no reason they had to go in there and shoot her down like a dog."

Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they were justified in shooting once they were fired upon.

As the plainclothes Atlanta police officers approached the house about 7 p.m., "as we have it right now, the female opened fire on the officers. The officers returned fire, and struck and killed her," Dreher said.

One of the police officers was hit in the arm, another in a thigh and the third in a shoulder. The officers were taken to a hospital for treatment, and all three were conscious and alert, police said.

"They killed her, they shot her down like a dog, and I'm upset," Dozier said. "Somebody is going to answer to it, 'cause I'm going to sue like hell! I'm going to sue like hell! Let Atlanta know that."

Rev. Markel Hutchins, a civil rights leader, said Johnston's family deserves an apology.

"Of the police brutality cases we've had, this is the most egregious because of the woman's age," Hutchins said.

Hutchins said he would try to meet with Atlanta Police Chief Richard Pennington and would also meet with lawyers.

©MMVI CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 536 Comments
by cantshutup November 25, 2006 5:11 PM EST
USAwatchman...

Why do bureaucrats and politicians want the American borders open?
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 November 25, 2006 4:57 AM EST
Maybe the reason that old lady got so many shots off is because those cops REALLY did not want to shoot her. Maybe they gave her every benefit of the doubt. How many other people are dead because of the drugs sold out of that place? What kind of a neighborhood is it anyway that an old lady thinks she needs a gun? Most old people are interested in where they are going to find their teeth in the morning, not a gun!
Reply to this comment
by mike826_1999 November 24, 2006 9:42 PM EST
What a shame. It sounds like the police had the right to shoot the 92 year old woman; however, they shouldn't have. What a shame.
Reply to this comment
by mike826_1999 November 24, 2006 9:41 PM EST
What a shame. It sounds like the police had the right to shoot the 92 year old woman; however, they shouldn't have. What a shame.
Reply to this comment
by trurose421 November 24, 2006 6:20 PM EST
'Police contend they obtained a so-called no-knock search warrant for the Neal Street house after buying drugs Tuesday afternoon from a man inside the home.

The no-knock warrant is frequently used in suspected drug cases because police believe their suprise entry into a home prevents drug dealers from flushing away or destroying the evidence. In this case, the warrant did not name a person, referring only to a "John Doe, aka Sam," the standard reference when a person's name is not known, police said'

So all you ***** who kept repeating yourselves saying the police knocked, are full of it. Full Of It. No Knock Warrant. Quote that.
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 24, 2006 5:17 PM EST
FYI - the DRUG SMUGGLER who was given IMMUNITY by the US ATTORNEY
to testify again the BORDER AGENT

When it came time for trial and the drug smuggler was to show up in Court
to testify against the BORDER AGENT..

the DRUG SMUGGLER got caught AGAIN
trying to SMUGGLE DRUGS into the country...

and AGAIN the US ATTORNEY gave the DRUG SMUGGLER IMMUNITY
to testify against the BORDER AGENT..

REMEMBER PEOPLE

THEY (Bureaucrats / Politicians)
want the BORDERS OPEN...

ONLY THE PEOPLE
WANT THE BORDER CLOSED

Who works for who???
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 24, 2006 5:05 PM EST
gramto11

Let us just say for the argument,
that someone else was selling drugs from her house..

Here in TEXAS, we have a LAW called

RECKLESS INJURY OF INNOCENT THIRD PARTY

in TEXAS, I would think the POLICE had the RESPONSIBILITY to make sure
the INNOCENT THIRD PARTY wasn't killed in her own house...

YES, the police the police should be searching records to find out who owns the house

ALSO, on the subject of land speculators
YES, these people go into these old neighborhoods
buy up everything for chump change
after they bought most of what they can buy
they start putting up rows of 1/2 million $$$$ townhouse
then everyone who hasn't sold, property taxes start going up...
then they have to sell because they can't afford taxes...

THESE OLD PEOPLE WHO LIVED FAR LONGER THAN THEIR BANK ACCOUNT
some times resort to selling drugs to pay for taxes....heart medicine..

but like I said in a earlier post
there isn't a JURY in this COUNTRY that was going to CONVICT HER
and
SHE HAD THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY

Last, as you see from previous post how concerned the FEDS are interested in KEEPING THE DRUGS OUT OF THE COUNTRY..
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 24, 2006 4:48 PM EST
At 7 pm chances are good that she wasn't sleeping, but then maybe she is reincarnation of Annie Oakley and could shoot while asleep. Posted by gramto11 at 07:38 AM : Nov 24, 2006

gramto11 LISTEN TO YOURSELF

you don't seem to know much about old people either
my mother 78, goes to bed many nights a soon as it gets dark
my father before he died not only took a nap mid day,
he went to bed at dark.. slept 10-12 hr

SO, if they came in after she went to bed
her house is dark , she wakes up to a loud noise (someone tearing down her front door)
she still in bed, she may not have time to put her hearing aid in the dark
(it took my father 30-min to put his in ( he could not think in reverse at that age))
my mother is getting more and more hard of hearing now
she doesn%u2019t have a hearing aid and her PRIDE is keeping from getting one...


So the 92 year old woman wakes up
and see flash lights coming down her hallway
hears some thing like POULUSSE, WA HUVLA SUCHWLANMT
she get her gun from her night stand and she shoot the CRIMINAL (FLASHLIGHT)
she sees..

SHE DOESN'T SEE VEST THAT SAY
POLICE
BECAUSE IT IS DARK...

after the first officer is shot he falls back and starts to shoot his gun wildly into the dark room
so does the other behind them, once someone is hit in the face they loose track of what way is which, and the cops start shooting at each other...
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 24, 2006 4:42 PM EST
Her gun was evidently a sixshooter, she fired 5 times. So she was not out of bullets.
Posted by gramto11 at 07:38 AM : Nov 24, 2006

gramto11 LISTEN TO YOURSELF

six-shooter...she wasn't out of bullets(???)

you don't seem to know much about guns
FYI, older guns don't have a safety transfer bar, thus they have a fire pin on the hammer
A lot of times people can't tell the safety position for the hammer
and instead of taking a chance of missing the safety position and having the fire pin on the bullet primer (chance of accidental fire when dropped) people only load 5 rounds with the hammer sitting on an empty round...

gramto11, I read the links to Atlanta newspaper posted by RonnieHM
did you think you are the only one who can read the other posts?
but thanks for being so near sighted to think I wasn't informed of what was going on...
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 November 24, 2006 10:39 AM EST
Look at more than one SOURCE, even.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 November 24, 2006 10:38 AM EST
USA, Agnim, and FeelFree,
Is CBSnews the only site you can access on your computers? If not, why don't you look at more than one course to see if you can get a more complete picture of the events before you start yapping?

Her gun was evidently a sixshooter, she fired 5 times. So she was not out of bullets.
The police waited long enough AFTER they knocked, which the warrant said they didn't have to do because of the drugs bought earlier, and after they got inside, for her to pull off FIVE shots. They didn't start firing immmediately or she couldn't have gotten more than one and possibly not even that one.
The area she lived in is a known drug area so I doubt any land speculator wants it badly enough to steal it under eminent domain or drug seizure.
At 7 pm chances are good that she wasn't sleeping, but then maybe she is reincarnation of Annie Oakley and could shoot while asleep.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 November 23, 2006 8:06 PM EST
The apologists for the murderous cops are missing the obvious.

-If this woman were, in fact, a druggie, she would not be 92 years old. Why? Because people who use hard street drugs don't live to be 92.

-The idea that this 92-year-old was intentionally shooting it out with men that she thought to be law abiding cops, is ridiculous to say the least. I can only imagine what her "getaway plan" might have looked like.

-This woman was alive at a time when black people were routinely murdered and exonerated, just for being black, often by racist, dangerous, and abusive cops. Some would argue that not much has changed. It is perfectly understandable that she might seek to protect herself from potential predators like this.

-If this woman was not the target of the cops, then they failed miserably to consider the potential danger to innocent bystanders, as they all to often do. This level of incompetence is a public liability, not an asset.

-Cops who don't see anything wrong with this, and with similar situations are less than worthless, in my opinion. They pose an unacceptable threat to public safety, and should seek other employment opportunities.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 November 23, 2006 6:51 PM EST
Both parties need to get representation for investigating this situation.

One party is already dead. Representation won't do the 92 year old lady much good now. Now we just get to hear one side. Problem solved, I guess.
Reply to this comment
by agnim November 23, 2006 6:28 PM EST
ONTARIOCDA at 01:21 PM : Nov 23, 2006

Anaconda, you can wait for answers to your 'unanswered questions'.
We will just go ahead and deal with the answered questions we know: A bunch of bungling bigoted cops violently invaded a home with a Black senior citizen, scared her into defending herself, and then murder her because they can always get away with murdering Black people! And over mere drugs at that, as they claimed! Tsk-tsk
Reply to this comment
by ontariocda November 23, 2006 4:21 PM EST
there are a lot of unanswered questions in regards to this article. Before passing judgement on the police or the victim - wait for all the facts to come in. Both parties need to get representation for investigating this situation. Yelling, pointing fingers, and screaming doesn't get anyone - anywhere.
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 23, 2006 4:14 PM EST
people, have NO DOUBT we had to get rid of Saddam..
but what this administration did afterwards is down right CRIMINAL
all they need to do was secure the borders after the initial invasion...
but no, they left the entire country open for anyone who want to fight the USA

"" THEY WANTED TO LEAVE THE BORDERS OPEN ""
WHERE have we heard this???
GUESS WHAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE PLANNED FOR US..

Where is the money to pay for the fence??

===============

OUR GOVERNMENT and OUR COURTS are CORRUPT

The TROOPS are DYING IN-VAIN for a LIE

ALL of these people who think they are fighting for AMERICA
the AMERICAN WAY
for FREEDOM, and LIBERTY

it is a LIE

The TRUTH IS IT all comes down to the COURTS and
COURTS are CORRUPT

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
James B. Veasaw v. Cari M. Domingues,et al.
No: 05-1467

the U.S. SUPREME COURT COVERED UP GOVERNMENT CRIME
even when the CRIMES showed up
on paper in the COURT RECORD..!

I guess we have a DOUBLE STANDARD JUSTICE SYSTEM
you know
ONE for the GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
(Bureaucrats / Politicians)
and
ONE FOR THE PEASANTS
(The People)..!
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 23, 2006 4:11 PM EST
THE WAR ON DRUGS MARCHES ON??
BLACKS MUST REMAIN SECOND CLASS CITIZEN??
The government sells drugs in your back yard, your neighborhood,...
and anyone is surprise when their teenagers get hooked on drugs...

IF YOU ASK ME
the reason these BORDER AGENTS were PROSECUTED
was it INTERFERED with the GOVERNMENT ORGANIZED CRIME
It is called RACKETEERING...(RICO) 18 USCA $1962

===============

2 Border Patrol agents face 20 years in prison
Officers prosecuted %u2013 wounded drug trafficker
given full immunity in exchange for testimony

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51417

Convicted border agent tells his story
http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4141562

THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
'Shadow' agency to issue N. American border passes
Mexico, Canada to join U.S. department, government documents show
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52170
Reply to this comment
by agnim November 23, 2006 3:28 PM EST
USAwatchman at 12:17 PM : Nov 23, 2006

Dam straight! LOL

What were those criminal cops doing with guns on the old lady's property? LOL

We are amazed that the cops is ALLEGED to have bought drugs, intended to violently invade, and didn't know that a very senior citizens would have been in harms way.
And over drugs at that!
Killing an old woman over freaking drugs! Tsk-tsk

Since the white injustice system is intent on arrogantly defending these murderous and puerile police, then they will have to be dealt with by other means.
Reply to this comment
by agnim November 23, 2006 3:20 PM EST
SharnCedar at 08:40 AM : Nov 23, 2006

Well said.

The beastly wild wild west mentality, which disrespects humanity, is too alive and well in uncultured America.
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman November 23, 2006 3:17 PM EST
...And what is she doing sitting there with a gun...
Posted by snickers440 at 12:27 AM : Nov 23, 2006

she was probably IN BED sleeping,
had the gun under her pillow or on the night stand
and for your information, it is her RIGHT to be sitting with a gun
anywhere on her property..
she can even had it strapped to he hip if she wanted...
Reply to this comment
See all 536 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: