News Corp. Nixes O.J. Special, Book
Rupert Murdoch Calls Simpson Interview An 'Ill-Considered Project'
NEW YORK, Nov. 20, 2006 | by Amy Bonawitz
(CBS/AP) O.J. Simpson's book and TV special were canceled Monday, an astonishing end to an imaginary confession that had sickened the public as the very worst kind of tabloid sensation.
"I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project," said Rupert Murdoch, whose News Corp. owns both Fox Broadcasting and publisher HarperCollins. "We are sorry for any pain that this has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson."
"If I Did It," in which Simpson was to have described how he would have killed his ex-wife, had been scheduled to air as a two-part interview Nov. 27 and Nov. 29 on Fox. The book was to have followed on Nov. 30.
HarperCollins spokeswoman Erin Crum said some copies had already been shipped to stores but would be recalled, and all copies would be destroyed.Murder In Brentwood
Celebrity Mug Shots
"I think News Corp. finally stepped up, admitted they made a mistake and did the right thing," said Jonathan Polak, the lawyer for Fred Goldman, Ron's father. "This is everything we have been asking News Corp. to do for the past two weeks. We want to thank the American people for helping make this happen."
CBS News correspondent Sandra Hughes asked Fred Goldman what his reaction was to News Corp.'s decision.
"Frankly, it's about time," Goldman said.
Simpson's attorney, Yale Galanter, told The Associated Press: "We had known for three or four days that this was a possibility."
Galanter said he did not know whether the deal between Simpson and News Corp. was contingent on a TV interview being shown or a book arriving in stores.
"There are only three possible reactions: anger, happiness or indifference. He's totally indifferent about the fact that it's been canceled," said Galanter, who added that he didn't know if Simpson was paid upfront.
Any hopes of commercial reward were quickly overwhelmed by near universal revulsion to last week's announcement — from those who knew Goldman and Brown, from booksellers and advertisers, even from Fox News Channel personality Bill O'Reilly.
A dozen Fox network affiliates had already said they would not air the two-part sweeps month special, and numerous stores had either declined to sell the book or had promised to donate any profits to charity.
"I really don't think there would have been very many advertisers who would have been willing to participate in this show," said Brad Adgate of the ad buying firm Horizon Media.
With little advertising, Fox would miss the chance to profit from the show. If there were no advertisers, the show wouldn't even be rated by Nielsen Media Research — so the number of people watching would have done nothing to help Fox's season average, he said.
The cancellation was a stunning setback for ReganBooks — an imprint of HarperCollins — and Judith Regan, who had labeled the book and interview Simpson's "confession." She insisted that she had done it not for money, but as a victim of domestic violence anxious to face down a man she believed got away, literally, with murder.
ReganBooks is known for gossipy best-sellers such as Jose Canseco's "Juiced" and Jenna Jameson's "How to Make Love Like a Porn Star."
The Simpson interview also was a low for Fox, which has long tested viewers with risky reality programming dating back to "When Animals Attack."
O'Reilly had urged a boycott of any company that advertised on the special.
Simpson was acquitted in 1995 of murder in a case that became its own TV drama. The former football star, announcer and actor was later found liable for the deaths in a wrongful-death lawsuit filed by the Goldman family.
The TV special was to air on two of the final three nights of the November sweeps, when ratings are watched closely to set local advertising rates. It has been a particularly tough fall for Fox, which has seen none of its new shows catch on and is waiting for the January bows of "American Idol" and "24."
The closest precedent for such an about-face came when CBS yanked a miniseries about Ronald Reagan from its schedule in 2003 when complaints were raised about its accuracy. It was seen on CBS' sister premium-cable channel, Showtime, instead.
One Fox affiliate station manager said he wasn't going to air the special because he was concerned that, whether or not Simpson was guilty, he'd still be profiting from murders.
"I have my own moral compass and this was easy," said Bill Lamb, general manager of WDRB in Louisville.
Numerous books have been withdrawn over the years because of possible plagiarism, most recently Kaavya Viswanathan's "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life," but removal simply for objectionable content is exceptionally rare. In the early 1990s, Simon & Schuster canceled Bret Easton Ellis' "American Pyscho," an exceptionally graphic account of a serial killer. The novel was released by Random House Inc., and later made into a feature film.
Sales for "If I Did It," had been strong, but not sensational. It cracked the top 20 of Amazon.com last weekend, but by Monday afternoon, at the time its cancellation was announced, the book had fallen to No. 51.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Sarah Palin To Resign As Alaska GovernorAt Hastily Convened Press Conference Says She Will Not Run for 2nd Term, Mum On Future Plans
E-Mail Story
Print Story
Sphere
Share




Murder In Brentwood
Back To Top
Gov. Sarah Palin Resigns
Day In Pictures
"Transformers" Triumph At The Box Office
Comments [ + Post Your Own ]
Now you're in the public comment zone. What follows is not CBS News stuff; it comes from other people and we don't vouch for it. A reminder: By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
I will pick none of the above. You can't stop people from having opinions.
You voted on a "justice system" that you think works. Either get satisfied with it or stop participating in it. You don't get to go both ways. Having it, using it and then disregarding it and condemning it also.
You people sound and behave as though you are whacked. I wouldn't want you to be on any jury I would have to rely on.
If he is guilty, then don't you have to admit there are serious flaws in your system of perverted justice?
If he turns out, miraculously, not to be guilty---don't you have to stop your behavior and shut your mouths?
Why don't all of you pick one of the above and go for it---while you are shutting up at the same time...
Thank you. I know it cost you a huge chunk of money to do the right thing. In the future, I would ask that you make sure nobody in your organization tries to hold another meatheaded and distastful event like this.
I find you GUILTY of trying to make blood money off two brutal murders, GUILTY of distorting the facts, GUILTY of manipulating a public all too eager for every prurient detail, GUILTY of believing your own lies, GUILTY of besmirching the memories of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, GUILTY of once again forcing the Brown and Goldman families into the limelight to fight for the ones they loved.
Your sentence? You have to live with yourselves and what you have done - because deep in those cold black hearts, you know the truth and it is haunting you beyond all reason. A more cosmic punishment awaits, and if there is a God, you will meet Him soon. Karma is a boomerang, ***.