February 11, 2009 5:44 PM

35M In U.S. Had 'Food Insecurity' In 2005

(AP)  The number of people struggling with hunger in the United States fell in 2005, the first such decline in six years, the Agriculture Department said Wednesday.

Last year, 35 million people suffered food insecurity, meaning they didn't have enough money or resources to get food. The number was 38 million in 2004.

The department had waited until after Election Day to issue the annual report, prompting accusations from Democrats that the Bush administration was playing politics with hunger.

Despite the positive news, the report is still drawing criticism, this time because analysts decided not to use the word "hunger" to describe how hungry people are.

Changing the wording "is a huge disservice to the millions of Americans who struggle daily to feed themselves and their families," said the Rev. David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, an anti-hunger group.

"We should not hide the word hunger in our discussions of this problem, because we cannot hide the reality of hunger among our citizens," Beckmann said.

The report found:

  • There were more people with very low food security — those who are worst off. The number was 10.8 million, up from 10.7 million in 2004.
  • There were 24 million people with low food security, down from 27.5 million in 2004.

    The group doing the worst, whether measured by food insecurity or poverty, "isn't being helped enough to start shrinking, even though the economy keeps growing," said Jim Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an anti-hunger group.

    Weill said the overall drop in food insecurity shows the effectiveness of programs like food stamps and school meals.

    "But it's not cause for anybody letting up — it's just a sign that these programs work, and we need to redouble our efforts to get them to more people in need," Weill said.

    In the report, the terms "low food security" and "very low food security" replace the old descriptions of "food insecurity without hunger" and "food insecurity with hunger." The change was recommended by the National Academies, which advise the government on science and medical issues.

    Among the states, Hawaii saw the biggest drop in the number of hungry people, from 12.9 percent in 1998 to 7.8 percent in 2005. South Carolina saw the biggest increase, from 11 percent in 1998 to 15.5 percent in 2005.

    The hunger report is based on Census Bureau data on poverty, which stopped climbing in 2005.
  • © 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
    by lestb35 November 17, 2006 4:08 AM EST
    If anyone in America is hungry why can't they find the nearest food bank, social service office or church to seek assistance. If they cannot walk or drive the meals on wheels will deliver.
    Reply to this comment
    by catt42701 November 17, 2006 12:59 AM EST
    With this "great economy" there should be no food insecurity or is someone telling us lies again like the economy isn't great. A three million drop is like a rain drop. Not anything to brag about. And the rich get tax breaks and the poor get poorer. Did you know that South Africa kept their natives down by not feeding them a balance diet? That kept the children's brains from developing so adults didn't function as well as they should have. Could that be happening here?
    Reply to this comment
    by pakaal November 16, 2006 7:14 PM EST
    C'mon, this story can't be true! The stock market is at it's highest ever, President Bush is touting wonderful job numbers, consumer confidence is up....

    Or could it be that all the success stories we keep hearing about are mostly focused on the top 1% of America's economic scale, who currently earn 16% of America's wages, and own most of the stocks.

    Keep in mind that folks like Jon Tester are bringing economic issues to the table come January, and with the ever-growing wage disparity between rich and poor, the vast majority of not-rich people here are with them in wanting these issues addressed.
    Reply to this comment
    by usawatchman November 16, 2006 6:50 PM EST
    That old N***** with a Lexus is pretty much a stereotype. Poverty, hunger, and disease are being fueled by state and national government.
    Posted by Tinker3478 at 12:13 PM : Nov 16, 2006

    Tinker3478
    You are the one who introduced RACE
    12:13 PM : Nov 16, 2006
    YOU ARE THE RACIST..!

    when did I come to the board..
    Posted by USAwatchman at 12:16 PM : Nov 16, 2006
    Reply to this comment
    by cbgb31 November 16, 2006 5:46 PM EST
    The vast majority of people on food stamps are on them because they can't afford food - period.
    Posted by oleander8 at 12:42 PM : Nov 16, 2006

    But they CAN afford lottery tickets, cigarettes, and alcohol.
    Reply to this comment
    by usawatchman November 16, 2006 4:54 PM EST
    need I say more PEOPLE..!
    Reply to this comment
    by tinker3478 November 16, 2006 4:50 PM EST
    You're right for the first time: I am a Bureaucrat! And lunch is over, gotta go back to work trying to get poor hungry people some food and medical treatment. Have a great day, nut bucket!
    Reply to this comment
    by usawatchman November 16, 2006 4:47 PM EST
    Tinker3478
    I noticed you posted that message after I had corrected it
    That is the THIRD time you have ATTACKED me...
    Tinker3478, you are a BUREAUCRAT aren't you..?
    =
    People this the kind of people we have running OUR GOVERNMENT...
    The COURTS and GOVERNMENT are CORRUPT
    GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES and FRIENDS
    are EXEMPT from the LAWS that we PEASANTS have to live UNDER
    =
    You know someone facing charges
    you know someone in jail
    you know someone who isn't ONE of the above ELITE...!
    when the people are before the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
    That is the LAST PLACE a government gives a people a chance for justice..
    and
    a case where the government employees COMMITTED CRIMES
    in order to gain the upper hand in the COURT ROOM..
    They didn't see any VALUE of such a case
    So they called it a DOG and went on to more important matters
    We may have to take up ARMS and
    run those CRIMINALS out ONE BUILDING AT A TIME
    and
    WE NEED IMPEACHMENT OF SOME OF THESE JUDGES
    in the SUPREME and other US COURTS
    UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
    James B. Veasaw v. Cari M. Domingues,et al.
    No: 05-1467
    Securities and Exchange Commission was giving away and/or selling Govt. jobs, and Government employees commit CRIMES against the
    people
    Government employees (SEC DOL EEOC) commit CRIMES
    in order to GAIN the upper hand in the Court room
    Perjury, mail/wire fraud, conspiracy, obstruction of justice,
    tampering with evidence...etc and the COURTS
    (US SUPREME COURT!) were helping them it COVER UP..!
    Reply to this comment
    by tinker3478 November 16, 2006 4:44 PM EST
    Who's attacking whom here? The only person I've seen displaying racism is you. The only person making pseudo-foul remarks is you. You are the person who wants poor people to eat rice and beans.

    Do I think you're weird? You betcha.
    Reply to this comment
    by tinker3478 November 16, 2006 4:29 PM EST
    You have to be about the last person I would want to "attach." And you didn't answer the question.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 36 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook