Blair Pushes For Broad Mideast Strategy
British PM Tells Iraq Study Group That End To Israel-Palestinian Conflict Necessary For Iraq Peace
-
Play CBS Video Video Bush On Iraq Study Group Only On The Web: Bill Plante reports President Bush sat down with the Iraq Study Group, which is exploring new ideas.
-
Video Mass Kidnapping In Iraq Armed men stormed a government research facility and kidnapped up to 150 people in Iraq. Elizabeth Palmer reports from Baghdad.
-
Video Expert Discusses Plan For Iraq Michael O'Hanlon, a foreign policy analyst and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, chats with Hannah Storm about the U.S. approach in Iraq and rectifying security issues.
-
British Prime Minister Tony Blair urged the international community to engage Iran and Syria to advance the peace process in the Middle East at the Lord Mayor's Banquet at the Guildhall in the City of London on Nov. 13, 2006. (Getty Images)
-
Interactive Battle For Iraq The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
-
Interactive Bush Presidency The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
-
Fast Facts United Kingdom Learn about the people, economy and history.
Speaking privately via video link to the Iraq Study Group, Blair set no timetable for the withdrawal of British or other coalition troops from Iraq, the spokesman said, but had stressed the importance of what he called in a speech Monday a “whole Middle East strategy” to counter militancy around the region.
The British prime minister, President Bush's closest ally in Iraq, emphasized the importance of a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which he said was “important in its own right, but also to take away the issue that was most exploited by extremist elements around the region,” Blair said, according to the spokesman, who discussed Blair's comments on customary condition of anonymity, in keeping with government policy.
Blair said a positive strategy for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would help Britain and the U.S. win the support of moderate Muslims and increase pressure on Iran and Syria to work for peace, the spokesman said. He told the group he believed Iran was “a strategic threat to the region,” his spokesman said.
“The only way to deal with Iran, he said, was not to back down on our demands, but to take away their ability to exploit Muslim opinion and to confront both it and Syria with the strategic choice of whether to be supportive of the solution, or face isolation,” Blair said.
The isolation of Iran and Syria would likely have harsh repercussions for their economies, he said.
He said Blair had listed three key areas in which Britain, the United States and their allies should give support to the Iraqi government.
Blair told Baker's panel the Iraqi government needed support to distribute funding fairly across the country, to root out sectarianism — particularly within the police — and to “better equip the Iraqi army,” the spokesman said.
“He said he believed the Iraqi government increasingly wanted to take control of its own affairs and to do so in a way which brought together the country as a whole,” Blair's spokesman said.
Mr. Bush and senior White House officials met Monday with members of the panel, which is led by Republican and Bush family friend James A. Baker III and former Democratic Rep. Lee Hamilton.
Baker's group, which aims to deliver recommendations on strategy in Iraq to Bush by the end of the year, also has interviewed outgoing Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
On Monday, a pair of Democrats publicly called for some form of troop withdrawal from Iraq.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., who will likely take over the Senate Armed Services committee, called for U.S. troops to be redeployed over the course of four to six months.
Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a Vietnam war veteran and outspoken critic of the Iraq war told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric he wants a "complete redeployment of our troops out of Iraq over a period of time. And give the Iraqis the incentive to take over their own destiny."
Americans are hoping the report will offer a more effective policy on Iraq, an issue that cost Republicans heavily in last week's midterm elections and put Democrats in charge of Congress.
About 7,200 British troops are based in southern Iraq, and Blair repeated to Baker's group that they would stay there until local forces could take on security responsibilities, his spokesman said. A total of 125 British troops have died in Iraq.
Blair's comments to the panel echoed his speech Monday, when called on Iran to cease support for extremists and comply with demands to suspend its uranium enrichment program.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





Iran feels threatened so they are after the bomb.
Palestine I think should give up Israel. They should not take land that has been the subject of bloodshed.
Iran should give up the bomb, and Israel should stop its military intervention.
In that sense we will take it ;)
Other than the oil, who cares about Iraq, you won't even see it in the news once the oil is pumping. Sad but true.
The imposing constitution of Iraq cannot satisfy the 3 kinds of people there. It will be torn down sooner or later. It is not worth for U.S. to spend so much money and lives to mind others%u2019 business. The following steps can solve Iraq problems and reduce U.S. burden.
1. Iraq can be disintegrated into 3 countries, Sunni Arab, Shiite Arab, and Kurdish. Each country will have its own government, police, and military. United Nation can help to maintain the peace talk.
2. The oil development right can be owned by a company formed from these 3 countries. The right can be divided into lots of stock shares and some of them can be sold to private companies. The 3 countries can still hold major part of their stock shares.
3. All the projects within these 3 countries should be managed by their own governments.
4. United Nation, World Bank, and IMF can loan money to help the construction for the 3 countries.
With the above, U.S. does not need to spend so much money and lives. Each country will set up its own political institution stably. U.S. will not be tagged as an empire by imposing its own way to others and wants to grab resources like oil from other countries.