Al Qaeda May Be Plotting Holiday Attacks
Exclusive: Holiday Travel Season Violence In Europe Would Target Trains, Planes, Al Qaeda Suspects Say
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Europe As A Terror Target
Suggestions have been made that al Qaeda is targeting Europe. Sheila MacVicar reports that hundreds of al Qaeda-trained fighters are on the move out of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
-
Video
New Alleged Al Qaeda Tape
A new audiotape allegedly from al Qaeda's leader in Iraq has surfaced. He claims 12,000 fighters in Iraq and calls President Bush "the most stupid president in U.S. history." Drew Levinson reports.
-
Video
Expert On Terror Threat
John Brennan, former head of the National Counterterrorism Center, speaks with Katie Couric about possible terror threats to Europe and the United States.
-
Photo
(AP / CBS)
-
Special Report
War On Terror
Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
-
Interactive
Trans-Atlantic Terror Plot
Scheme to blow up U.S.-bound aircraft is foiled in U.K.; aviation security ratcheted up.
-
Interactive
Assault On Al Qaeda
The manhunt on the Afghan-Pakistan border.
Intelligence agencies have been warned that al Qaeda may be planning to attack air and rail travel in Europe in actions that may occur during the busy holiday travel season, CBS News has learned exclusively.
In separate interviews with Arab and other intelligence sources, CBS News has been told that the warnings come from interrogations of al Qaeda suspects who recently left Afghanistan and Pakistan.
"One suspect said plans for repeating the Heathrow attempt (a reference to the failed 'liquid bomb' plot interrupted in August) were all prepared. It is now a matter of taking action," said one Arab official who asked not to be named because he is not authorized to speak to the media. "Al Qaeda's strategy appears to be raising the pressure in Europe."
In a move that has been puzzling intelligence agencies, al Qaeda has been withdrawing well-trained Arab fighters from the mountains and battlefields of Afghanistan.
In detailed interviews with Arab diplomats, intelligence sources and Pakistani and western officials, Arab members have been leaving Afghanistan for the past six months while handing over its militant activities in Afghanistan to that country's resurgent Taliban movement.
The new information helps to shed fresh light on a key mystery at the heart of al Qaeda's decision, first reported by CBS News in September, to withdraw its Arab members, fighters and logisticians from Afghanistan.
Rohan Gunaratna, head of terrorism research at Singapore's Institute for Defense and Strategic Studies, and the author of "Inside Al Qaeda; Global Network of Terror," said "We have seen that several hundred, perhaps five to six hundred al Qaeda members who were located on the Afghan-Pakistan border, have now left."Read an exceprt of Katie Couric's interview with counterterrorism expert John Brennan about CBS News' report.
Gunaratna adds that these al Qaeda members have returned "to their own home countries, particularly to Iraq, and also to other Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and Yemen. We have seen a shift in Al Qaeda's thinking, in strategy."
Some of those who returned to their native countries in the Arab world and were caught have told investigators that the orders only specified al Qaeda's decision for the Arabs to depart Afghanistan.
The choice of a route was left to al Qaeda's local commanders in Afghanistan, according to information given by arrested suspects to their interrogators.
There is no consensus on the approximate numbers of Arabs who remain in Afghanistan, though Arab diplomats with responsibilities of tracking al Qaeda said, they suspect the number of active Arab fighters to run in the several hundreds in spring this year.
"Now, maybe there are a couple of hundred people left in Afghanistan, maybe a bit more or a bit less," said one unnamed Arab diplomat, who says it was "impossible to tell the numbers accurately. But there's enough information to say that al Qaeda's Arab component in Afghanistan is very scaled down."
The first indication of Afghan-based al Qaeda Arabs beginning to leave for Iraq came almost two years ago in deep background briefings given by Pakistani intelligence officials selectively to senior journalists. However, the movement had been long considered voluntary and more an act of choice by individual fighters or small groups of militants than a decision by Al Qaeda's high command.
A senior Arab diplomat said intelligence officers in his country thoroughly interrogated a group of men in their 20s and 30s who were caught earlier this summer after they returned from Afghanistan.
"The standard answer was: We don't know why we were told to leave. The orders were very specific — leave Afghanistan now without wasting much time." The diplomat spoke on the condition that neither his identity nor that of his country would be revealed.
Intelligence analysts and security sources say one reason why al Qaeda might feel confident in leaving the battlefield in Afghanistan largely in the hands of the Afghan Taliban is that the Taliban have shown new skill and ferocity in fighting U.S. and coalition forces.
"As you can see, the increasing ferocity of these attacks has put the spotlight more on the Taliban," said one western diplomat. "When we speak of Afghanistan these days, we talk mostly of the Taliban. In the Afghan context, al Qaeda is now talked about infrequently. Does this not tell you something about a trend, that maybe al Qaeda as we saw it once being led by its Arab fighters in Afghanistan, has become less of a reality as time goes by?" he asked.
"There is very little al Qaeda Arabs can do today in the Afghanistan/Pakistan theater," said Gunaratna. "Firstly, they will be spotted and they will be killed or captured. Second, today in Afghanistan Arabs are not really required to fight the coalition and U.S. forces, because the Taliban are very well trained and very well motivated."
Al Qaeda Arabs did provide suicide bombers — until now, a role Afghan Taliban were unwilling to undertake. In recent months, however, as Taliban propaganda videos have shown, Afghans have signed wills and undertaken suicide missions.
"There are two ways of looking at what is going on between the Taliban and al Qaeda," said a Pakistani security official who asked not to be named. "Either it's the case that the Taliban have become so strong by virtue of sharply rising ethnic 'Pushtoon' support to their cause that al Qaeda is overshadowed and wants to leave Afghanistan.
"Or it's a matter that al Qaeda sees its work for certain being carried forward by the Taliban and has therefore decided to leave. Whatever the motive, the fact is, al Qaeda's Arab wings seem to be leaving," the Pakistani official said.
By Farhan Bokhari and Sheila MacVicar
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Read


- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 136 CommentsOf course they will as long as we are still stepping on their land in IRAQ and Afghanistan. Lets get outta there.
This is nothing new; France has already had Arab youths torching 200 cars every night in Paris for the last year.
Things are only going to get worse for Europe if they don't start fighting terrorism with an iron fist.
Deporting Muslim rights groups from Europe would be a good start.
You can never appease terrorists.
How naive you are.
So, let's see, BellaL thinks the people of Iraq don't have moms and dads, One_American thinks grazinggoat is naive for making the same connection our intelligence agencies made about our interference in Iraq making the situation worse, and FARTKNOCKER2 thinks Muslim intentions are "cleat".
The sweeping generalizations about anything and everything that doesn't fit into y'all's preconceptions about the rest of the planet including your fellow Americans should be dismissed outright would be funny, if it wasn't so depressing.
I for one believe that we never should have pulled out of Afghanistan before the job was done, leaving Osama Bin Laden alive and well, and a lot of others in the US believe the same way. I'm hoping that with some balance in the US government now, Bush will work with the armed forces to implement a military policy that assures us security while minimizing interference. And hopefully we'll reinstate the group Bush closed down that was searching for Bin Laden and bring him to justice.
1. They(the terrorists) honestly believe that we should die because we are not muslim.
2. They are funded by nations states,most notably Iran and Syria,whom not only think as they due, but aid them in whatever ways they can.
3. They do not care, and are not more or less likely to attack us, by a change in party control in either white house are congress. Anyone whom believes that the democrats are our saviours in the war on terror are just as foolish as those whom believed the same in the republicans.
4. The believe they are at war with us, and they conduct themselves as such. Despite the loss of so many americans on our own soil, we still dont conduct ourselves in that way.War is war, and if we want to win, and by that i mean survive as a nation and a society, then we must silence partisanship for now, for real, and due as a nation those things that make for winning a war,whatever that may be.
Definitely absolutes, you're right vessius. So for example, you believe that the "12,000 Terrorists" described in this article have any chance of destroying the US as a nation and a society? If so, how?
Also, "whatever that may be" is pretty ominous. I keep hearing these sort of phrases and I wonder. If we do exactly the same things they do, that is "level the playing field" as the hawks say, where's our moral high ground? How do we then say we're better than they are? I don't want to die, but I also don't want to stay alive if it means abandoning the principles that made me and America strong in the first place. Nor do I believe for a second the terrorists can possibly take over the US.
Bush this, Bush that, before him it was Clinton this, Clinton that.
The hatred they demostrate, in MURDERING EVERYONE THEY CAN, will not simply go way if we rollback taxcuts for the wealthy, or if we impeach the president, or ban gay marriage, or affirm its right, or whatever your favorite liberal, or conservative battelcry might be.
i ASSURE YOU, AND IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, THAT AN al-quaeda TERRORIST WOULD NOT ASK FOR FOR YOUR DNC LAPEL PIN, OR YOUR RNC MONEY-CLIP, BEFORE HE PROCEEDED TO SEPERATE YOUR HEAD FORM YOUR SHOULDERS.
i Say again, we.... are..... at War.
Where, in the history of man, can you find an enemy more absolute, to all of civilzation.
19 terrorist.... 3000+ dead. do the math.
So pull your head from the sand and start looking around to see there are other nations on earth and there are other beliefs and way of viewing life. Learn from the past, that to be arrogant never pays off on the long run.
America HAS BEEN BUILT with just blood sacrificed in Just causes. The last cause of IRAQ invasion, is fricking far from just. So get out of there. Time will tell and this adminstration will bear this shameful part of Human history.
And for sure GOD BLESS A JUST AMERICA (a majority of Americans actually see it)
GOD BLESS AMERICA, as long as Amercia is not bullying the world, as long as long America is not driven by some nasty guys such as the ones we just kicked out of the House, Congress, etc...
As long as America is not causing destruction and desolation. As long as America is looking forward to be indulgent with other other nations who are pulling out of misery.
Stop telling and (bullying) the American people, by pretending, you, army guys are paying the price of freedom. Stop saying you are granting the freedom Americans are enjoying. Freedom is given by God to every Human on earth. It's all written on the United Nations Charter of rights. This is a natural and innate right granted by the Creator of all Humans, to all Humans... not only to Americans, Europeans, or Westerners.
See continued please...
I see...
Here is an example of semantics to serve a point of view.
Does anyone here doubt the wnat to kill us.
Does anyone here truly believe Irane would not want to see us destroyed..( Numerous exacting quotes from thier leadership affiRm this.)
they attacked us under Clinton... and again under Bush..
What, i asked you would have happened to Britain circa 1940, or isreal in any of the nurmerous wars of annihilation that have been efforted against them, if they called such attack "GROSS GENERALIZATIONS"
so munich 1972, beirut 1982 wtc 1993 cole 2000 of course after all ALL OF THESE WERE THE FAULT OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION,
enough they attacked us not because a republican was in office.... or a democrat...THey simply hate us and wish us dead,, and those whom would have tried to rationalize, and find by that i mean find opportunity for appropriate partisan blame, with say the nazis, or the Huns, or the crusaders, still suffered the same deaths...
Wow, you actually believe 12,000 terrorists are going to infiltrate the US and kill 300 million people?! With 150,000 of the worlds best troops, all we've done in Iraq is make the problem worse. And you think 10% of that amount could kill all Americans?!
Sorry, I can understand fear and frustration - and I for one would love to see us get back to Afghanistan and get Bin Laden. But if you're actually going to stick to your belief that somehow a bunch of terrorists are going to be able to literally kill all Americans, yeah, that's a little far out. Logistically alone, you'd need to completely destroy our civil infrastructure, which would require decades of infiltration, our government in its entirety, requiring a plan at least 10x that of 9/11, all our major cities, every citizen living in the US (because I like you would be out there shooting back)....
Your argument is untenable.
i feel i should clarify .. for hundreds of years, islam existed without an overwhelming need to destroy every infidel that lives. Islam, is like other major faiths, benign, philanthropic, charitable, and peaceful. these leaders want power and glory, tow things that have caused death long before religion did and will seek even if every american soldier is brought home from everywhere on the globe.
Sorry, I can understand fear and frustration - and I for one would love to see us get back to Afghanistan and get Bin Laden. But if you're actually going to stick to your belief that somehow a bunch of terrorists are going to be able to literally kill all Americans, yeah, that's a little far out. Logistically alone, you'd need to completely destroy our civil infrastructure, which would require decades of infiltration, our government in its entirety, requiring a plan at least 10x that of 9/11, all our major cities, every citizen living in the US (because I like you would be out there shooting back)....
all well said.. and no i did say they would kill all americans, just that they wanted to/ but so they only kill 40,000 thousand or so.. hmmm from a war stand point not so bad..
i think you get my point.
forgive me Lord.
Besides the typos, this is clearly a gross generalization.
That's right I disagree. "They" don't want to kill "us". Most of "them" being farmers, truck drivers, police, whatever, would rather just be left alone to live out their lives without constant US interference in their sovereignty.
This is EXACTLY THE POINT!!! we rationalize thier hatred and they wont, ever.
We as a nation have caused problems, yes, but those that believe that WE HAVE GIVEN GOOD REASON to kill us, because something happened 53 years ago, perhaps should go tell the terroist in person, im sure they will perfectly safe in doing so.
Your point being that you're prescient and know that 40,000 people are going to be killed. Somehow.
And for the record, you said we're in a fight for survival "as a nation and as a society". Anything less than the complete toppling of the USA cannot lead to the destruction of our nation and society.
By the way, terrorism is not a new thing, we're not facing a new enemy, just that it's new to us - kind of. And terrorism is done to achieve terror. If you give into the "Us vs Them" mentality you've already won. That's precisely what they're trying to do.
One, a burglar isn't a terrorist, two the burglar is in MY house, while WE are in the Iraqi houses, three if there WAS a burglar in my house I wouldn't immediately bomb all the houses in his neighborhood just because they lived near him....
"This is EXACTLY THE POINT!!! we rationalize thier hatred and they wont, ever."
Yeah, that's why we're better than they are, and when we help the REGULAR PEOPLE out there in these places we pull the rug out from the idealogues feet and they lose power and support. Look at what Hezbollah does in Lebanon - why do the Lebanese not rise up against them? because they do good for the people. If Israel had offered to help rebuild, it might have been less of a complete failure.
"because something happened 53 years ago"
So, there's a statute of limitations on patriotism? You think that the people who suffered and died in the Shah's and the Khomeini regime should "get over it?"
that says all that is needed.. so if i have lost someone, a friend, to hezbollah. or in 9/11
then it is because we were the evil one, and they(THE TERRORISTS) were patriots.
soooo it is okay for terroist like hezbollah to kill if the do good for the people.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 136 Comments