British Terror Plotter Gets Life In Prison

Prosecutor Says Dhiren Barot Was Caught Just In Time, Before Attacks Started

(CBS/AP)  A confessed al Qaeda operative's plans to attack British targets had progressed to their final stages, a prosecutor said Tuesday during the sentencing hearing in the most sweeping terror indictment in Britain since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Dhiren Barot was then sentenced to life in prison, of which he must serve at least 40 years in prison.

"You have chosen to use your life to bring death and destruction to the Western world," Judge Neil Butterfield said as he passed the sentence. "You planned to slaughter hundreds, if not thousands, of wholly innocent men, women and children,"

Butterfield described the plans as determined, sophisticated and deadly.

"You were planning to bring indiscriminate carnage, bloodshed and butchery — first in Washington, Newark and New York — and then London," Butterfield said.

Prosecutor Edmund Lawson said Barot had received approval from his superiors to strike as part of a plot to unleash a "memorable black day" of terror. Lawson said that "the uncontradicted evidence suggests the conspiracy was in its final stages."

The British believe they arrested Barot just before he was about to begin his terrorist campaign, reports CBS News correspondent Larry Miller. He's also wanted in the U.S. and Yemen.

Barot plotted to bomb the New York Stock Exchange, the World Bank and landmark London hotels in the most sweeping terror indictment in Britain since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Barot, 34, also planned a series of synchronized strikes in Britain — including a plan to blow up a subway car as it passed through a tunnel below the River Thames — as part of a plot to unleash a "memorable black day" of terror, prosecutors said.

The former airline ticket clerk and Muslim convert pleaded guilty last month to conspiring to commit mass murder on both sides of the Atlantic.

Judge Neil Butterfield is expected to sentence Barot on Tuesday at London's high-security Woolwich Crown Court.

Britain's Home Office said Barot would be temporarily transferred from his prison cell to the United States to face a four-count indictment, which includes a charge of conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction. Officials could not confirm when he was expected to land in the U.S.

Barot began plotting, in 2000, to attack a host of financial industry targets in the United States while also planning to detonate limousines packed with explosives in the underground parking lots of famous London hotels and train stations, prosecutors said.

Prosecutor Edmund Lawson said Barot and seven alleged accomplices had proposals to use a radioactive "dirty bomb," ramming it into a high-profile British target.

In a dramatic exchange Monday, Lawson showed clips of a reconnaissance video taken by Barot during a 2001 visit to New York.

The shaky footage — shown on large screens in the courthouse — zoomed in on the World Trade Center's towers as an unseen man mimicked the sound of an explosion.

"It is memorable for its macabre prophecy," Lawson said, explaining that Barot was not believed to have had prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 terror attacks that killed an estimated 3,000 people.

Starting in 1995, Barot trained at terrorist camps in Pakistan, Kashmir, Malaysia and the Philippines — crisscrossing the globe to refine skills with weapons, bomb-making and chemicals, Lawson said.

He became quickly inspired to plot a "memorable black day for the enemies of Islam," Lawson said, quoting a passage from Barot's notebook.

Barot's plans were designed to kill "hundreds if not thousands of innocent people without warning," Lawson said.

He said computer files recovered by police detailed a plan to explode three limousines crammed with gas cylinders, explosives and nails after leaving them in underground London parking garages.

London hotels such as The Ritz and The Savoy, and railway stations such as London's Waterloo, Paddington and King's Cross were identified as targets, Lawson said.

The documents also contained details of a plan to attack a subway train as it traveled through a tunnel under the River Thames.

A powerful explosion would "cause pandemonium ... explosions, flooding, drowning," Barot wrote, according to a document handed to the court.

Barot made two reconnaissance trips to the United States in August 2000 and March 2001 — visiting an aunt in New Jersey on both occasions, Lawson said.

A 1-hour, 20-minute New York reconnaissance film was later discovered in London spliced into a video tape copy of "Die Hard With A Vengeance."

Lawson said the camcorder footage of buildings on New York's Broad Street and Wall Street was shot in 2001, when Barot also took two helicopter trips across Manhattan.

Prosecutors said Barot's U.S. targets included the World Bank headquarters and the International Monetary Fund, both in Washington, the Citigroup buildings in New York and the Prudential building in Newark, New Jersey.

Discovery of the plots led President Bush to raise the U.S. terrorism threat level.

Under the alias Issa al-Britani, Barot was named in the report of the U.S. commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, as an associate of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged Sept. 11 planner.

The Associated Press, The British Broadcasting Corp., and Times Newspapers Ltd. successfully challenged a court ruling that threatened to prevent news media reporting details of Barot's sentencing hearing.

Butterfield had ruled that publishing details of the case could prejudice trials of Barot's seven co-defendants, scheduled to take place in London next year.

[winsors1]

And now every knows what his plans were.
Why do we publish such details? Couldn't this information now be used by someone else?

[random_radar]

Imprisoning people for thinking about committing crimes. Reminds me of the movie "Minority Report." It used to be that we were innocent until proven guilty. Now we can be guilty without actually perpetrating the crime. The thought police are keeping us safe. At least they "believe" they are, as the article states.

[brianp55]

No, let's arrest them and because they haven't yet killed hundreds of people, give them a stern lecture and then turn them loose. The stake are too high with terrorist attacks and you can't wait for the crime to be committed (that should be obvious to anyone with an IQ above 10). Therefore, you HAVE to make it a crime to PLAN such attacks and lock these guys up.
r-radar....you are nuts.

[random_radar]

brianp55,

Hitler would be proud of you. The stakes are so high that you freely give up your liberty and take away mine as well. I suppose that since you think I am nuts, you would like the government to put me in prison too. Maybe you would like to put me to death because I am a threat.

I can live with "crazy" freedom lovers like me, but I will die at the hands of sane people like you. Totalitarian states kill anyone and everyone that even acts suspiciously. We are witnessing the descent of western civilization into the tyranny of a police state.

Enjoy the gulag when you get there because they will come for you after they come for me.

[random_radar]

In America it is a felony to purchase any item that could be used to make a bomb. This law is used to arrest Arabs for buying cell phones because the battery could be used to make a bomb. Right now this seems okay to most people because it can stop terrorists.

But the law could be used to arrest anyone (most people have cell phones). Today the government is arresting "suspected terrorists," but tomorrow it could be you getting arrested because you supported the losing candidate in the election or spoke out on an environmental issue that powerful corporate interests found inconvenient.

We need to think about how the anti-terrorist laws can and will be used against us in the future. Ordinary people who believe the government is protecting them is naive--the government is owned and controlled by the wealthy and it serves their interests. The war on terror is a war against your civil liberties.

Yes, terrorism is a threat and acts of terrorism are horrible. But allowing the government to convict people of thought crimes is a recipe for an Orwellian police state. The odds of me getting blown up by a terrorist are remote, but the odds of me being oppressed by a police state are 100%. I would rather take my chances in a free society and be free.

[random_radar]

brianp55,

Implying that your opponents have a low IQ and that they are insane are examples of ad hominem attacks. That is where a person attacks his opponents character and intelligence because he is incapable of mounting a rational argument about the issue. I am sure you are possessed of intelligence and rational thought, but perhaps you should consider using some civility in your communications. I feel guilty for saying that Hitler would be proud of you and I apologize for stooping to the same startegy.

ciao.

[brianp55]

mmm hmmm. I think we've heard this drivel before.

[brianp55]

OK, I apologize too. I am incensed because it is precisely the philosophies enunciated in your initial message that weakens our ability to effectively deal with this threat and will get people killed. This type of political correctness or fanciful hypothetical drivel has very little, if any, basis in reality and is completely impractical in dealing with this issue.