Nov. 3, 2006

Nuclear Lab Breach Could Be 'Devastating'

CBS News Exclusive: Data Found In Drug Raid Contains Weapons-Design Secrets

  • Play CBS Video Video Security Leak At Los Alamos

    Sharyl Attkisson reports on another security leak at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Officials say an employee may have removed secret material.

  • Video Lab Security Breach Details

    Sharyl Attkisson has details on how classified nuclear weapons documents were stolen from Los Alamos, the main U.S. laboratory for nuclear research.

  • Video Los Alamos Security Breach?

    Police conducting a drug raid may have found classified materials taken from the nation's nuclear weapons facility. Sharyl Attkisson reports.

  • Interactive Nuclear Armed World

    The world's nuclear weapons powers, missile defense and a history of the nuclear weapons age.

  • Interactive Crime Beat

    Statistics and specifics on crime in America.

(CBS)  The recent security breach at Los Alamos National Laboratory was very serious, with sensitive materials being taken out of the facility — possibly including information on how to deactivate locks on nuclear weapons, officials tell CBS News.

Officials say there is no evidence the information taken from Los Alamos was sold or transferred to anybody else, but there is no way to be sure right now.

As CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson was the first to report, secret documents apparently taken from the lab were found during a drug raid at a Los Alamos-area home last month. The FBI was called in to investigate.

Multiple sources now tell CBS News that the material includes sensitive weapons-design data.

A federal official who has been briefed on the issue said at least three USB thumb-drives were involved. Those small storage drives contained 408 separate classified documents ranging in importance from Secret National Security Information (pertaining to intelligence) to Secret Restricted Data (pertaining to nuclear weapons).

All of the information came from the classified document video media vault inside the Lab. Federal officials also found 228 pages — printed front and back — of classified documents in the drug trailer during their investigation.

Los Alamos claims to have done a careful and comprehensive analysis of the materials that it believes have been compromised as part of this matter, and has determined that "the majority of the material was classified at the lowest levels and was twenty to thirty years old."

"None of the documents in question were classified Top Secret," read a statement released by the lab. "None of the materials included any of the most sensitive nuclear weapons information."

But one federal official recently briefed on the issue says "It's devastating." If a nuclear weapon were stolen, the information "would tell the terrorists everything they need to do to get a weapon to fire."

Sources say she also had something called Sigma-15 clearance allowing her to access to documents explaining how to deactivate locks on a nuclear weapon.

The woman believed to have taken the information — Jessica Quintana, 22, who owned the trailer — worked in three classified vault rooms across Los Alamos:

  • Safeguards and Security (relating to strategic nuclear material control and accountability)
  • X-Division (top secret)
  • Physics P-Division.

    She also had top secret "Q-clearance" with access to all the U.S. underground nuclear test data. Quintana has not been arrested or charged. Her attorney says she took the material home to work and then forgot about it.

    For example, if a terrorist steals an American nuclear weapon, he could not detonate it due to the special access controls. This woman is authorized to read the reports that tell how to get around those safety controls.

    Only the FBI will be able to tell for sure what's on the thumb drives, but British security officials are worried that design plans for Trident nuclear weapons are among the stolen documents. They are making inquiries of U.S. officials. Britain used to test its nuclear weapons in the United States, and data on those tests may have been held at Los Alamos.

    Los Alamos has a history of high-profile security problems in the past decade, with the most notable the case of nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. After years of accusations, Lee pleaded guilty in a plea bargain to one count of mishandling nuclear secrets at the lab.

    In 2004, the lab was essentially shut down after an inventory showed that two computer disks containing nuclear secrets were missing. A year later the lab concluded that it was just a mistake and the disks never existed.

    But the incident highlighted sloppy inventory control and security failures at the nuclear weapons lab. The Energy Department then began moving toward a five-year program to create a so-called diskless environment at Los Alamos to prevent any classified material being carried outside the lab.

    "We are currently taking decisive actions to further enhance our existing security measures that protect classified information employing both administrative and engineering controls," the lab said in a statement.


    ©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    Video and Galleries from U.S.

    Add a Comment See all 98 Comments
    by wardparkway2 November 3, 2006 4:07 PM PST
    OK, so the Republicans want my vote because they are tough on terror and the Democrats will be the end of us all.

    From today's reports we have seen a Republican Congress bully National Intelligence departments into releasing classified data, finally resorting to a Republican President issuing an executive order forcing the release. The Republican's then post this information, including instructions on how to make an atomic weapon, on the World Wide Web. These documents are in Arabic, by the way... the native language of many groups resorting to terror.

    Also today, we find that classified documents have traversed in and out of a nuclear (nu-klee-ur) facility by a person under investigation for drug charges.

    I'm not feeling really confident in the Republican stance on terror right now... of course, it's Al Gore's fault because he invented the Internet!

    Reply to this comment
    by talkingham November 3, 2006 4:24 PM PST
    Remember how the republicans originally blamed this breach on a Clinton and Chinese scientist working at the facility?

    They continually blame everyone except themselves. They're worse than a bad little league coach.
    Reply to this comment
    by wardparkway2 November 3, 2006 4:25 PM PST
    I forgot... it's FDR's fault for placing the Los Alamos lab so close to an unsecured border... and the Democratic minority's fault for not building a fence or having enough INS agents on the border so they have to call in National Guard, which of course are in Iraq serving as an INTER-National Guard because "they voted for it based on the bad information we fed them, they should have known better!"
    Reply to this comment
    by mitchm11741 November 3, 2006 4:34 PM PST
    Hey, by the way, when is someone going to tell our idiot president how to pronounce the word "nuclear."
    Reply to this comment
    by saraity100 November 3, 2006 4:43 PM PST
    Stupid government. Everything is getting worse during Bush administration.
    Reply to this comment
    by wardparkway2 November 3, 2006 5:00 PM PST
    mitchm11741... I gave them a Huked-on-Fonix pronunciation guide in a previous post... not that they are reading here, because:

    (a) this is "blue" CBS News that's liberally biased unlike the "red" Fox News Network that is Fair & Balanced
    (b) they can't read

    Reply to this comment
    by theanchores November 3, 2006 5:11 PM PST
    Right...this stuff only ever happens to idiot president's like Bush. Although Wen Ho Lee happened during the Clinton administration...oh, yeah...forgot.
    Reply to this comment
    by siddin-2009 November 3, 2006 5:23 PM PST
    Can't detonate it? Since when, let me think here... take it apart, put it in a different case.... oops.
    Reply to this comment
    by pkidwell2 November 3, 2006 5:46 PM PST
    I think Los Alamos should be closed since we cannot secure the place. Besides we keep giving the keys back to the idiots that were running it the last time it was compromised...
    Reply to this comment
    by November 3, 2006 5:50 PM PST
    An earlier CBS report states: "Officials arrested a 20-year old man on drug charges along with his girlfriend and the female owner of the trailer. Officials are also checking out reports that one of the women may have had secret clearance to work at the lab in the so-called Dynamic Experiments Program." This report does not clarify why the owner of the trailer was originally arrested, since the report does not clearly state that she was present at the time of the raid. Moreover, the CBS report does not ask how much background checking the FBI performs before issuing a "Q" clearance. All-in-all, the reporting on this matter needs to dig a little deeper. The security at Los Alamos is clearly a problem that needs attention from Congress.
    Reply to this comment
    by rharrin1 November 3, 2006 5:51 PM PST

    As long as george keeps saying not on my watch I feel a lot safer
    Reply to this comment
    by November 3, 2006 5:52 PM PST
    An earlier CBS report states: "Officials arrested a 20-year old man on drug charges along with his girlfriend and the female owner of the trailer. Officials are also checking out reports that one of the women may have had secret clearance to work at the lab in the so-called Dynamic Experiments Program." This report does not clarify why the owner of the trailer was originally arrested, since the report does not clearly state that she was present at the time of the raid. Moreover, the CBS report does not ask how much background checking the FBI performs before issuing a "Q" clearance. All-in-all, the reporting on this matter needs to dig a little deeper. The security at Los Alamos is clearly a problem that needs attention from Congress.
    Reply to this comment
    by November 3, 2006 5:54 PM PST
    An earlier CBS report states: "Officials arrested a 20-year old man on drug charges along with his girlfriend and the female owner of the trailer. Officials are also checking out reports that one of the women may have had secret clearance to work at the lab in the so-called Dynamic Experiments Program." This report does not clarify why the owner of the trailer was originally arrested, since the report does not clearly state that she was present at the time of the raid. Moreover, the CBS report does not ask how much background checking the FBI performs before issuing a "Q" clearance. All-in-all, the reporting on this matter needs to dig a little deeper. The security at Los Alamos is clearly a problem that needs attention from Congress.
    Reply to this comment
    by wollefs November 3, 2006 5:55 PM PST
    Los Alamos has been a national disgrace for the past decade. They simply do not take national security seriously. Now, they are jeopardizing me and my family by leaking all of the nation's nuclear secrets.

    Close Los Alamos. Now. Execute the person who leaked this information (Remember the Rosenbergs?). Set an example. Send a message. Do whatever it takes to change the culture so they take our national security seriously.
    Reply to this comment
    by corvinator November 3, 2006 5:58 PM PST
    Hmmmmm... I seem to have lost my keys. *** that George Bush!

    Seriously folks, you can't blame our President for everything. There are imperfect human beings, Republican and Democrat alike, who run these facilites and work in our government, some more incompetent than others. Some are simply criminals. Incompetence and criminality fall on the shoulders of the individual, not our president. So the next time you get a speeding ticket or burn the roof of your mouth on hot pizza, blame yourselves, ok?
    Reply to this comment
    by rharrin1 November 3, 2006 5:59 PM PST

    Harry Truman said the buck stops here
    bush says not me it's his fault over there

    Harry Truman said if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen
    bush it's time for you to quit and get out of the kitchen
    Reply to this comment
    by peterbaldwin-2009 November 3, 2006 6:02 PM PST
    This is incredible. What is this information doing on flash drives?

    You can get 1GB flash drives at Comp USA for about $45 with more than enough memory to store oodles of text. A $10 flash drive would probably be adequate. Somebody had to really know what they were doing because you have to download the data onto the flash drive storage device from a computer. For $50, you can have five copies of all the documents downloaded lickity-split.

    They have no idea how many copies were made. A flash drive can be mailed anywhere in the world practically overnight. These drug dealers were probably moonlighting in the sale of top secret data to our ememies. And our enemies probably got if for a few grand, if that.

    This is just another cover-up.
    Reply to this comment
    by fortylashes November 3, 2006 6:08 PM PST
    Yes, but was it Republican or Democrat methamphetamine?
    Reply to this comment
    by joelaterdayz November 3, 2006 6:14 PM PST
    The DOE bureaucracy is going to remain the same no matter who is in office. This isn't a partisan issue, it's a management issue. You're taking a group of scientists and academics who are accustomed to sharing ideas and putting them in a secure/restricted environment. It's a big culture change. If they haven't done so already, they need to do the following:

    1. Implement random searches of personnel entering and leaving the facility.

    2. Conduct a multi-discipline vulnerability assessment (have folks emulate bad guys trying to infiltrate the lab, and exfiltrate data) and use the results to focus their security efforts.

    3. Implement a paper free environment, no printed documents whatsoever.

    4. Eliminate the use of magnetic media (thumb drives, floppies, etc).

    5. Pull clearances of personnel violating security rules.

    6. Improve Operations Security education of Lab personnel.
    Reply to this comment
    by bp4466 November 3, 2006 6:22 PM PST
    And where is King George?? But of course, out on the campaign trail to insure that his powerful reign will remain in power.
    Reply to this comment
    by toolmaker8 November 3, 2006 6:34 PM PST
    How come the question of weather the person that took the information from Los Alamos was a Democrat or Republican wasn't asked, this is important. It seems to bash bush for everything that goes wrong is rampant. How many of you want to take the responsibility for what your grown kids do? They get convicted, you do the jail time?
    Reply to this comment
    by lestb35 November 3, 2006 6:55 PM PST
    Why hasn't she been charged or arrested?
    Reply to this comment
    by bernardlewis November 3, 2006 7:01 PM PST
    I couldn't believe how poorly written this piece was. Just because an article is posted on the Internet does that mean it's okay if it looks like it was written by some hack?
    Reply to this comment
    by olebd November 3, 2006 7:03 PM PST
    What a bunch of bumbling idiots. Are we de-evolving back into apes?
    Reply to this comment
    by Wesley_Mouch November 3, 2006 7:08 PM PST
    The scalar weapon technology invented by Nikola Tesla was confiscated by the FBI when he died in 1943 and was given to the Soviets in 1984 by Aldrich Ames. These weapons were used by the CIA to implode the Twin Towers on 9/11 (so that Bushitler would have a pretext for invading Iraq), by the Russians to intensify and steer Hurricane Ivan in 2004 (a near miss) and Hurricane Katrina (a direct hit) in 2005 (note that both storms were cynically given Russian names), and more recently used by Halliburton to cause the Sumatran earthquake (and tsunami) in 2004 and the Pakistani earthquake in 2005.

    The unintended consequence of abusing this terribly awesome scalar technology is being manifested not only in the changes in the interior of the earth, but is also responsible for the increased solar activity as well as what is happening to the other planets. Are you naive enough to believe that it's 'just a coincidence' that all these changes are happening to our solar system just when scalar weapons are being used on a massive scale for the first time?

    You don't have to take my word for it. Any fool with only half a brain can easily prove these facts to his or her satisfaction by researching this on the internet:

    http://science.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1135042.php/Strong_2012_sunspot_cycle_is_forecast
    Reply to this comment
    by marcelde November 3, 2006 7:17 PM PST
    BRITISH BELIEVE BUSH IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN KIM JONG-IL

    By Julian Glover
    The Guardian UK

    Friday 03 November 2006

    US allies think Washington threat to world peace. CONSIDER THE RECENT SECURITY BREACH AT LOS ALAMOS!

    Only bin Laden feared more in United Kingdom. BUT DON%u2019T WORRY AS HE PROBABLY DID NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO LOS ALAMOS.

    The survey has been carried out by the Guardian in Britain and leading international polls.

    It exposes high levels of distrust. In Britain, 69% of those
    questioned say they believe US policy has made the world less safe
    since 2001, with only 7% thinking action in Iraq and Afghanistan has
    increased global security.

    The finding is mirrored in America's immediate northern and southern
    neighbours, Canada and Mexico, with 62% of Canadians and 57% of
    Mexicans saying the world has become more dangerous because of US
    policy.

    Voters in three of the four countries surveyed also overwhelmingly
    reject the decision to invade Iraq, with only Israeli voters in
    favour, 59% to 34% against

    In Britain 71% of voters now say the invasion was unjustified, a view
    shared by 89% of Mexicans and 73% of Canadians. Canada is a Nato
    member whose troops are in action in Afghanistan. Neither do voters
    think America has helped advance democracy in developing countries,
    one of the justifications for deposing Saddam Hussein. Only 11% of
    Britons and 28% of Israelis think that has happened.

    Reply to this comment
    by marcelde November 3, 2006 7:22 PM PST
    The Energy Department then began moving toward a FIVE YEAR PROGRAM? FIVE YEARS? to create a so-called diskless environment at Los Alamos to prevent any classified material being carried outside the lab.
    PROGRAM?

    "We are currently taking decisive actions to further enhance our existing security measures that protect classified information employing both administrative and engineering controls," the lab said in a statement.

    BUT BUSH'S APPOINTEE, NEGROPONTE, HAS ASSURED US THAT THE DEMOCRATS WILL NOT ALLOW A 5 YEAR PROGRAM OF ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED NUCLEAR DOCUMENTS!
    Reply to this comment
    by qazxswqwer November 3, 2006 7:31 PM PST
    A lot of you people are really dumb. Five year to implement a diskless system at LANL would be on the low end. Obviously none of you have ever been there and know about it size and complexity. Also, who ever posted the comment about the lack of background checks for a Q clearance has no knowledge of the process. It takes about 6 months to one year to get a Q clearance.

    Also, DOE has nothing to do with Bush. It is a government organization and Bush does not run DOE. Congress is the one who makes laws concerning national labs.

    So all you people need to learn your facts before you say stupid things. Get actual facts and stop saying stupid things.
    Reply to this comment
    by qazxswqwer November 3, 2006 7:32 PM PST
    A lot of you people are really dumb. Five year to implement a diskless system at LANL would be on the low end. Obviously none of you have ever been there and know about it size and complexity. Also, who ever posted the comment about the lack of background checks for a Q clearance has no knowledge of the process. It takes about 6 months to one year to get a Q clearance.

    Also, DOE has nothing to do with Bush. It is a government organization and Bush does not run DOE. Congress is the one who makes laws concerning national labs.

    So all you people need to learn your facts before you say stupid things. Get actual facts and stop saying stupid things.
    Reply to this comment
    by pakaal November 3, 2006 7:41 PM PST
    qazxswqwer, I'm wondering. First, doesn't this have anything to do with Homeland Security (which I assume it would, since Los Alamos has a whole bunch of highly sensitive and I assume classified materials)? Where do they fit into securing Los Alamos?

    Also, the DOE is a department of the US government, and while I don't expect George Bush to personally oversee every aspect of the day to day running of the government - no single human possibly could - the President is most certainly the overseer / administrator of government. That's why his branch of office is called "Executive". And like any President, he certainly IS part of the law-making process. That's why we hear so much about "signed into law" and "vetoed" coming in news stories regarding him and legislation coming from Congress.
    Reply to this comment
    by alphaa10-2009 November 3, 2006 7:49 PM PST
    qazxswqwer said, "Also, DOE has nothing to do with Bush. It is a government organization and Bush does not run DOE. Congress is the one who makes laws concerning national labs."
    ---
    That said, a GOP congress has oversight and not once, but twice has had LANL reeking with security scandal and each time left the contract with U of CA. On a matter of this gravity, that is very hard to explain-- no matter how long a security check is supposed to take.
    Reply to this comment
    by kdwalker1326 November 3, 2006 7:53 PM PST
    This is bad, but I just gotta comment on the moonbat, black helicopter idiot who posted here,
    wesley_mouch.

    God! I hope you are just joking and don't really believe the completely moronic, idiotic *** you posted here! Do they keep you in a padded room and on heavy meds? Jeezz!! And to think people like you are actually allowed to vote!! scary...
    Reply to this comment
    by calscientist November 3, 2006 7:53 PM PST
    DOE is a cabinet agency and is ultimately under Bush. It is ludicrous for whoever posted earlier to suggest otherwise.
    Reply to this comment
    by lily_ayanami November 3, 2006 7:54 PM PST
    Geez, those people at Los Alamos need to get their *** together.
    Reply to this comment
    by calscientist November 3, 2006 7:55 PM PST
    DOE is a cabinet agency and is ultimately under Bush. It is ludicrous for whoever posted earlier to suggest otherwise.
    Reply to this comment
    by roach9703 November 3, 2006 8:21 PM PST
    It is tempting to call for the closing of Los Alamos Nuclear Facility. However to do so would prove extremely complex from both an organizational and physical standpoint. An in depth F.B.I. investigation of this matter seems urgent. The moving of sensitive operations and materials to other place also seems required. Los Alamos should be phased out over time to a purely academic research facility. Each step of this process must be carefully controlled. Every person in this facility must be re-investigated.
    Reply to this comment
    by billathanas November 3, 2006 8:28 PM PST
    We're missing the point. We gave the Russians the ability to safeguard their weapons with interlocks in the early '60's to prevent rogue commanders from launching. If terrorists get old weapons, the tritium depletion may make them fusion and fission inert, but the codes to disable the safeties may allow the terrorists to access the nuclear material and create dirty bombs. This material could allow the terrorists to access stolen Russian weapons for their primary and secondary cores. Not a good thing.
    Reply to this comment
    by marcelde November 3, 2006 8:31 PM PST
    "This is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

    Posted by george2221 at 07:47 PM : Nov 03, 2006"

    CORRECTION:

    "This is probably just the tip of the" MUSHROOM!
    Reply to this comment
    by marcelde November 3, 2006 8:31 PM PST
    "This is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

    Posted by george2221 at 07:47 PM : Nov 03, 2006"

    CORRECTION:

    "This is probably just the tip of the" MUSHROOM!
    Reply to this comment
    by marcelde November 3, 2006 8:34 PM PST
    "This is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

    Posted by george2221 at 07:47 PM : Nov 03, 2006"

    CORRECTION:

    "This is probably just the tip of the" MUSHROOM!
    Reply to this comment
    by jaguar0 November 3, 2006 8:37 PM PST
    Why the hell, is it taken so long for this kind of info, to get out about the labs? From what my sources told me, "YEARS AGO" this kind of stuff have been going on for years? I just wonder if the real truth, will ever get out. I hope not?
    Reply to this comment
    by duffyn November 3, 2006 9:02 PM PST
    Boy. Computer technology is great. But it is getting wild now. I think you can get 8 gigabyte on one teeny weeny flash drive on your key chain!!! That's an incredible amount of information!! It still gets down to trusting people though and there will always be one that is not trustworthy - but so easy for them to steal data.
    Reply to this comment
    by wolf563 November 3, 2006 9:05 PM PST
    who the hell would permit sensetive nuclear weapons information to be taken home to work on and not know it was not returned . since when did our nuclear arms sites turn into a grade school format .was that scare with the football stadiums a trial run ? should we be worried that this info is now in IRAN or maybe BINLADIN has it? who the hell is securing this nation ? MICKEY MOUSE & GOOFY ? Do the job of securing the nation . Not cleaning up the messes from the mistakes .
    Reply to this comment
    by mdktnt November 3, 2006 9:10 PM PST
    Who give a security clearance to someone living in an apparently drug infested trailer park?
    Reply to this comment
    by mdktnt November 3, 2006 9:12 PM PST
    That's gives no give dummy!
    Reply to this comment
    by mdktnt November 3, 2006 9:13 PM PST
    that's not insted of no dummy!
    Reply to this comment
    by stevex47 November 3, 2006 9:14 PM PST
    While this administration has been out perverting itself, it's allowed all it proclaims to hold securely to be looted recklessly. The scale of incompetence and hypocrisy of this administration is costing us infinite future tragedy.
    Reply to this comment
    by henry_cabot November 3, 2006 10:17 PM PST
    Nice of Bill Clinton to relax the requirements for security clearances. Used to be, drug use disqualified you. Now, it's just any use in the past few years. Now, surprise!, our nuclear secrets end up in the hands of a drug dealer. Democrats are completely not to be trusted with national security.
    Reply to this comment
    by stevex47 November 3, 2006 10:24 PM PST
    Says Cheney: "What's news is if there's bad news, and that gets coverage," he said. "But the good news that's out there day after day after day, doesn't get as much attention."

    Um, Richard(ha), Giving away nuclear weapons "secrets" may tend to get a little air time. Especially, when on the same day, it comes to light, you've received money froma drug using deviants who profess to be a moral majority, and donations from Tom Noe(R)from Ohio who resigned today.

    Richard's played W like a puppet. Poor George, he wasn't in the same league.
    Reply to this comment
    by stevex47 November 3, 2006 10:30 PM PST
    Henry,
    I admire your staying the course with blaming Clinton. Guy, he was 6 years ago. It's time to put the blame where it belongs. After your friend W is out, do you have any idea how long we are going to blame him for the world's problems like you do Clinton? Because, um, he's caused a bit of a mess,
    Reply to this comment
    See all 98 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs