Dad Found Guilty Of Genital Mutilation
Ethiopian Immigrant Convicted In Circumcision Of 2-Year-Old Daughter
-
Photo
Khalid Adem wipes away tears while testifying in Lawrenceville, Ga., in an Oct. 27, 2006, photo. Five days later, a jury found the Ethiopian immigrant guilty of the genital mutilation of his 2-year-old daughter. (AP)
-
Interactive
Crime Beat
Statistics and specifics on crime in America.
-
Interactive
FBI Crime Statistics
Explore the latest information on U.S. crime, from acts of violence to property damage.
Khalid Adem, 30, was convicted of aggravated battery and cruelty to children. Prosecutors said he used scissors to remove his daughter's clitoris in his family's Atlanta-area apartment in 2001.
The child's mother, Fortunate Adem, said she did not discover it until more than a year later.
During her father's trial, the girl, now 7, testified on videotape while clutching a teddy bear that her father "cut me on my private part."
Federal law specifically bans the practice of genital mutilation, but many states do not have a law addressing it. Georgia lawmakers, with the support of Fortunate Adem, passed an anti-mutilation law last year, but Khalid Adem was not tried under that law since it did not exist when his daughter's cutting allegedly happened.
During the trial, Khalid Adem testified he never circumcised his daughter or asked anyone else to do so. He said he grew up in Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, and considers the practice more prevalent in rural areas.
The Adems divorced three years ago, and attorney Mark Hill suggested that the couple's daughter was coached to testify against her father by her mother, who has full custody of the girl.
Khalid Adem, who cried throughout the trial and during his testimony, was asked what he thought of someone who believes in the practice. He replied: "The word I can say is 'mind in the gutter.' He is a moron."
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, using figures from the 1990 Census, has estimated that 168,000 girls and women in the U.S. had undergone the procedure or were at risk of being subjected to it. Since 2001, the State Department estimates that up to 130 million women worldwide had undergone circumcision.
Knives, razors or even sharp stones are usually used, according to a 2001 department report. The tools often are not sterilized, and often, many girls are circumcised at the same ceremony, leading to infection.
The report estimated that 73 percent of women in Ethiopia had undergone the procedure, based on a 1997 survey.
The practice crosses ethnic and cultural lines and is not tied to a particular religion. Activists say the practice is intended to deny women sexual pleasure. In its most extreme form, the clitoris and parts of the labia are removed and the labia that remain are stitched together.
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



What gives the U.S. the right to tell others in the world how they should pracitce their customs.
Just more Euro-American centricism.
Bumbee0 , I have heard of this called "female circumcision" many times. I guess it's the best way they can describe it although I agree with you that in some cases that is really inadequate to describe what these poor girls are put through. It is really horrific to hear about. And to think there are now men out there that are complaining about being circumcised when they were babies because they had no choice in matter. I believe what they go through is rather mild compared to this.
What gives the U.S. the right to tell others in the world how they should pracitce their customs.
Just more Euro-American centricism."
Posted by processor2 at 04:31 PM : Nov 01, 2006
Just because this custom has been in practice for centuries doesn't make it right. And this guy was living in the US at the time - not Ethiopia.
No one in the west calls genital mutilation the cutting the foreskin of kocks here in America.
We have some rabbis in THIS COUNTRY ritualistically cutting the kocks of baby Jewish boys, and then sucking on it.
If that Jewish practice is not the grossest and a most deviant and disgusting homosexual behavior to perform on a child, I don't know what is.
Yet the 'chosen people' are not even questioned for their deviance; but we hypocritically wail on the gentiles for performing a similar ritual circumcision? Tsk-tsk.
NO THEY HAVE NOT been prosecuted!
Go do a search of the New York news papers. I wouldn't know where to find the link now.
Like the perverted churches of sodomy in THIS COUNTRY that have been seeing to the sodomizing children for generations, religious people in the west get away with unspeakable acts without anyone labeling them!
What gives the U.S. the right to tell others in the world how they should pracitce their customs.
Just more Euro-American centricism.
The Catholic church or the Branch Davidians, any religion that breaks our laws, do get prosecuted. Priest after priest has been put in jail, even their superiors who cover for them are sentenced too. They have been prosecuted, and if Orthodox Jewish rabbis haven't been prosecuted, they should be. Just because one person gets away with something, doesn't mean everyone should get away with similar crimes. Are you suggesting we ban all religions?
Neither one of you naturally are able to address my hypothetical question about how I would be treated in a Muslim country if I voluntarily flaunt their laws.
Surely you are not implying that we act like maniac muslims do in their countries? LOL
The point is that ritualistic cutting of young genitalia is done IN THIS COUNTRY!
So we are behaving as usual like ignorant and arrogant hypocrites in these instances, and with the nonsense talk of 'mutilation'.
Why is AMERICAN CIRCUMCISIONS not called 'genital mutilation'?
I'll tell you why; America's racist and cultural bigotry, that's why!
I dare you or anyone to wail on the Jews for cutting young kocks and sucking on them, a most disgusting practice for those of us here in the west. Tsk-tsk
Have you read up about circumsising a boy? Taking off the skin will numb the ***** and the pleasure will NOT be the same as a man with skin!! I did a lot of research on this subject when I was deciding what to do when my son was born. I decided it wasn't my decision unless it was medical need why change what you were born with!!
I don't know all of the details of the Jewish faith, but I have never heard of them "sucking" circumcised foreskins. Could you elaborate as much as this forum will allow you to? This absolutely sickens me! I would NEVER let anyone do such things to my daughter. I would kill whoever tried or die trying! These barbarians are going to have so much to answer for when they meet their, MY, maker!
Ritual mutilation should be limited to consenting adults, IMO. And I'm certainly happy that this case had its day in court - more people should take a stand against this backwards practice.
Your question has already been answered. It is moot! It is irrelevant!
The practice of circumcision goes way back.
Circumcision predates the insane islamic and judeo-christian ideologies/cultures.
And of course that man has to practice his ritualistic cutting on his daughter at home; since this biased and hypocritical society is only allowing judeo-christian cutting of kocks.
And it matters not how many Jewish sects are allowed to cut and suck tiny kocks.
That fact is it has been allowed in America!
By the way, the ONLY reason that the rabbis were cautioned against cutting and sucking the tiny diks was of concern that certain diseases may have been transmitted to a few children from the cutting and sucking on the tiny kocks.
There was otherwise NO outrage over the practice or any attempt to label it as 'genital mutilation'.
What nonsense you write, Snickers?
Female circumcisions are almost always done by females as part of their rites of passage.
To their credit, some of the alert females take it upon themselves to exercise some self-control.
We are unlikely to see them spreading without dignity their private parts all over the Internet porn sites.
"Advocate sharia in America"? You are laughable. Ha ha.
Are the Jews practicing your 'sharia in America' when they do their circumcision and even suck on young kocks in the process? LOL
Circumcision has nothing to do with your sharia. Circumcision is a far more ancient practice.
As you have bragged about your so-called judeo-christian tradition, you should know that cutting of children's genitalia have been going on in America and the west for the longest time by those who have copied Jewish practices.
The point I'm making is that it is just ignorance, hypocrisy and cultural bigotry why circumcision is done in judeo-christian culture, but is maligned and mislabeled when practice by others.
I have never witness any American or western outrage when rabbis cut little kocks and suck on them, a **** practice that is even more gross than merely cutting ***.
You act as if they're giving little babies blow jobs. They're are sucking a bit of blood from the wound. It's medical, not sexual, moron. Are you that homophobic that you turn everything into a gay sexual encounter? Do you think when a doctor grabs your balls and asks you to cough that he's trying to fondle you? No moron, he's doing his job.
-
by agnim
November 2, 2006 6:53 PM EST
- "You act as if they're giving little babies blow jobs. They're are sucking a bit of blood from the wound. It's medical, not sexual"
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 44 CommentsMedical my arse!
If anything, that deviant practice is worse than cutting cl!ts!
Yet we have never heard Americans getting bent out of shape over these romeo rabbis.
And you know what, I for one care little about these 'strange' cultural practices one way or another.
However, we need to be consistent to appear credible; otherwise we come across as ignorant cultural bigots because we unable to bend our stiff little minds around reasonable practices with which people have been quite comfortable for centuries.
Some cultures prefer that their women behave with more dignity.
Other cultures don't mind if their women spread out their privities like beasts on porn sites for all the world to see.