BAGHDAD, Oct. 31, 2006

Iraqi P.M. Lifts 2 U.S. Military Blockades

Al-Maliki Flexes Political Muscle By Winning U.S. Agreement To End Checkpoints

  • Video U.S. Troops May Stay Longer

    Donald Rumsfeld said he is comfortable with U.S. forces having to stay longer in Iraq to make sure Iraqis can handle their own security. David Martin reports.

  • Video Deaths Continue In Iraq

    It was another deadly day for Iraqis - more than 80 were killed across the country. U.S. soldiers inevitably get caught in the war between the two ethnic groups. Lara Logan reports.

    • Jubilant Iraqis carry poster of radical anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr after U.S. troops dismantled checkpoints around Baghdad's Shiite enclave of Sadr City, Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2006.

      Jubilant Iraqis carry poster of radical anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr after U.S. troops dismantled checkpoints around Baghdad's Shiite enclave of Sadr City, Tuesday, Oct. 31, 2006.  (AP)

    • A U.S. soldier operates a checkpoint set up around the Karrada neighbourhood in central Baghdad, October 31, 2006.

      A U.S. soldier operates a checkpoint set up around the Karrada neighbourhood in central Baghdad, October 31, 2006.  (Getty Images/Sabah Afar)

    • Iraqi civilians run for cover as smoke rises in the distance from a car bomb blast in central Baghdad, October 31, 2006.

      Iraqi civilians run for cover as smoke rises in the distance from a car bomb blast in central Baghdad, October 31, 2006.  (Getty Images/Ahmad Al-Rubaye)

    • Saddam Hussein listens to a testimony during his trial Oct. 31, 2006.

      Saddam Hussein listens to a testimony during his trial Oct. 31, 2006.  (AP Photo/Scott Nelson)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

  • Interactive Religion In Iraq

    An interactive guide to Iraq's religious, ethnic and ideological mix.

  • Who's Who Iraq Insurgency

    More on the militant groups behind the insurgency in Iraq and their motivations.

(CBS/AP)  Exploiting GOP vulnerability in the Nov. 7 elections, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki flexed his political muscle Tuesday and won U.S. agreement to lift military blockades on Sadr City and another Shiite enclave where an American soldier was abducted.

U.S. forces, who had set up the checkpoints in Baghdad last week as part of an unsuccessful search for the soldier, drove away in Humvees and armored personnel carriers at the 5 p.m. deadline set by al-Maliki.

The American checkpoints disappeared within hours of Malikis order, reports CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan, and along with them, American hopes of stopping their missing soldier being transported out of Baghdad — if he is even still alive.

The U.S forces' departure set off celebrations among civilians and armed men in Sadr City, the sprawling Shiite district controlled by the Mahdi Army militia loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Small groups of men and children danced in circles chanting slogans praising and declaring victory for al-Sadr, whose political support is crucial to the prime minister's governing coalition.

Prime Minister al-Maliki is desperate to show he's not America's man in Iraq, after what he sees as undue pressure form the United States in recent weeks, reports Logan.

Al-Maliki finds himself in a maze of conflicting political pressures. After the Bush administration unveiled a plan last week for Iraq's government to adopt timelines for progress, especially in curbing violence, al-Maliki accused Washington of infringing on national sovereignty. There was no doubt he was talking tough to show both the Americans and his political base that he would not be pushed around.

The prime minister has further said that he feels stanching bloodshed might be better handled by Iraqi forces, although the argument does not wash given the present state of his military.

Sen. Jack Reed, a member of the Armed Services Committee, said al-Maliki was yielding to sectarian pressure and undermining U.S. efforts to curb attacks. "Today, the critical issue in Iraq is whether the Maliki government can muster the political will to confront those who use violence to destabilize Iraq," Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, said in a statement.

Al-Maliki's move Tuesday came three days after his closest aide, Hassan al-Suneid, said unabashedly that the prime minister was trying to capitalize on American voter discontent with the war and White House reluctance to open a public fight with the Iraqi leader just before the midterm election. Much of the discontent is fueled by soaring death tolls among U.S. troops and their inability to contain raging sectarian violence 3 ½ years after the ouster of Saddam Hussein.

The U.S. military announced the deaths of two soldiers in fighting in the Baghdad area Monday, one from small arms fire, the other from a roadside bomb. The October death toll stood at 103, the fourth highest monthly figure of the war.

More than 40 Iraqis were killed or found dead across the country Tuesday, including 11 Shiites who perished in a suicide car bombing at a wedding on the north side of the capital. Four of those killed at the bride's home were children, and among the 21 wounded were several youngsters with burns over much of their bodies.

In other developments:

  • Prime Minister Tony Blair narrowly avoided a damaging defeat in Parliament on Tuesday as lawmakers rejected a proposal for an immediate inquiry into the role of coalition troops in Iraq. Following their first major debate on the military action since 2003, lawmakers voted 298 votes to 273 against a motion put forward by Welsh and Scottish nationalists, who had demanded a swift examination of the deteriorating security situation in Iraq.

  • The families of seven soldiers who died in Iraq or Afghanistan were given incorrect or misleading information about the deaths, the Army has concluded after a review of war casualty reports. The best-known was Pat Tillman, the former pro football player, whose family was initially informed that he was killed unintentionally by gunfire from his fellow soldiers. The issue of inaccurate casualty information resurfaced last summer when Army officials revealed that two California National Guardsmen were murdered in June 2004 by the Iraqi civil-defense soldiers they were training, not in an enemy ambush.

  • CBS News national security David Martin has learned that Gen. George Casey, the U.S. commander in Iraq, is expected to recommend the size of Iraqi security forces be increased by up to 100,000. This comes just as the U.S. military is about to reach its long-stated goal of training and equipping 325,000 Iraqis to take over the fighting from American troops.

  • President Bush is on the campaign trail, sharpening his rhetoric to fire up the Republican base with a message that tries to make the unpopular war a positive, reports CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante. "Their approach comes down to this: The terrorists win and America loses," the president said at one stop Monday. "The Democrat goal is to get out of Iraq. The Republican goal is to win in Iraq."

    (AP Photo/Scott Nelson)


  • A witness at Saddam Hussein's genocide trial has testified that he survived a massacre by feigning death when Iraqi soldiers shot at Kurdish detainees lying at their feet, during the 1988 crackdown on Kurds by Saddam's regime.

    Continued



    ©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Share:
    • Share
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • Mixx
    Add a Comment See all 68 Comments
    by patriotic9 November 2, 2006 9:19 AM EST
    J-whitman
    Thank you so much.I highly appreciate this important point you raised.Saudi Arabia is the country of which 15 out of 19 hijackers were from and is the country which has been benifited the most as a result of IRAQ WAR in the form of high OIL PRICES.We don't have to forget that BIN LADEN is also from SAUDI ARABIA.We don't know whether SAUDI govt which acts like it has no relation with BIN LADEN is trust worthy or not.
    2days before the last PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,Bin Laden had released a video tape in which he was talking against BUSH.It was obvoius,when the worst enemy of USA was talking against BUSH,people of USA were supposed to vote BUSH which BIN LADEN actually wanted.
    I don't know if BIN-LADEN had wanted BUSH to win the election because he know how bad BUSH is for USA or they also have some business ties.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman November 2, 2006 3:10 AM EST
    Patriotic,,,, Yes, & Bush has close personal contacts with Saudi Arabia & Communist China also.
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 November 1, 2006 4:28 PM EST
    We MUST get our people out of Iraq, ASAP. They are being slaughtered. How could this have happened?
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotic9 November 1, 2006 11:57 AM EST
    The only solution I see now(eventhough because of the worng policies of NON-SENSE CONSERVATIVES and memebers of 700 CLUB,it may not be perfect anymore)is to bring our troops from Iraq and deploy them to Iran.Iran is the main source of all the HATRED,TERRORISM and FINANICIAL CAPITAL FOR TERRORISTS against the west.If we control Iranian regime,Iraqi PM won't be able to do anything against our troops and our people.Iraqi PM is not only getting MORAL SUPPORT from the Iranian regime,but is taking our WEAPONS and MONEY on the name of REBUILDING IRAQ and SECURITY, and giving them to his RADICAL BROTHERS world wide.After the weapons were missing in Iraq,it's very clear how HIZBOLLAH was so well armed while fighting this year.
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotic9 November 1, 2006 11:36 AM EST
    nikosk1
    Iraqi PM is an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC RADICAL with close ties to ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN.What was the purpose of removing SECULAR SADDAM from power and to bring a RADICAL ISLAMIC EXTREMIST into power .If we leave his country on him,don't forget the geography of Iraq.On it's EASTERN BORDER is IRAN and it's WESTERN BORDER is SYRIA.From Iran on east to Lebanon on west,it will be like one big OIL RICH COUNTRY,ruled under those AYATOLLAHs who call us GREATEST SATAN.
    The only sensible people I see in United States are some OPEN-MINDED,INTELLIGENT people in HOLLYWOOD like ROSIE O'DONNEL,MARTIN SHEEN,etc.If we would have listened to what JEANINE GORAFALLO had warned us in the begining,UNITED STATES would not have be on the track of getting DOOMED.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt November 1, 2006 10:58 AM EST
    "Much of the discontent is fueled by soaring death tolls among U.S. troops and their inability to contain raging sectarian violence 3 = years after the ouster of Saddam Hussein."

    And we never will......
    Reply to this comment
    by peterbaldwin-2009 November 1, 2006 10:36 AM EST
    The VC and NVA also has diagrams of our firebases from mamasans let in to clean up the hooches.
    Reply to this comment
    by peterbaldwin-2009 November 1, 2006 10:29 AM EST
    The turning point of the war was when Bush retreated during the first assault on Fallujah, handing the insurgency a spellbinding victory. Soon thereafter the insurgency's numbers swelled. They were rejoicing in the streets then, and they are rejoicing now. Bush has thrown in the towel. Al-Sadr played him like a violen, even extracting a billion dollars from Rumsfeld and a committment to allow Maliki to have full control of the Iraqi forces, who are walking around with AK-47s. The 101st caught them using US issued armaments against our soldiers (see Lara Logan video).





    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad November 1, 2006 10:19 AM EST
    STAY THE COURSE?
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad November 1, 2006 10:18 AM EST
    Vietnam we had to clear Artillery firing data thru headquarters and the provincial leadership who told the VC. Does this sound anything like what we are doing now in Iraq?
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotic9 November 1, 2006 2:13 AM EST
    I might be very HARSH in saying what I am saying,but this harshness is because I care about my country and my fellow Americans.We were supposed to attack RADICAL ISLAMIC IRAN but we instead had attacked a SECULAR IRAQ and turned into a RADICAL ISLAMIC STATE.Iraqi Prime Minister is nothing without the support of Iranian govt and AYATOLLAHs.If we want stability in Iraq and want to see TERRORISM FREE MIDDLE EAST,we have no other option but to confront RADICAL IRANIAN REGIME.If we need to use Military power,we should to use it,if we need to NUKE any of the IRANIAN CITIES,we gotta do what we gotta do.If anybody thinks we can do something else to protects our troops in Iraq and our citizens in USA,please give your suggestions.Your suggestions may be helpfull for our CHRONIC ALCOHALIC BRAIN DEAD LEADERS.
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotic9 November 1, 2006 12:45 AM EST
    Now we are in this situation about which those CONSERVATIVE,RADICAL,BACKWARD CHRISTIANS who were supporting Bush's invasion in Iraq because it would help the second coming of CHRIST,never thought of as this situation was not described in BIBLE.Now we have removed a SECULAR Saddam Hussain from power and brought those SHIA RADICALS into power on the name of DEMOCRACY who are taking our TAX PAYED MONEY for establishing a RADICAL ISLAMIC GOVT based on the hatred of WEST.When Jeanine Gorafalo had warned in the very begining of the Iraq invasion"If United States sends it's troop in the Middle of Arabia,United States will be doomed",all the NON-SENSE CONSERVATIVES were making fun of her.We will be really INSANE if we expact a RADICAL ISLAMIC like MALIKI,not to support his RADICAL BROTHER SADR and his real BOSSES AYATOLLAH SISTANI and IRANIAN PRESIDENT,in their hatred and fight against Americans.All the NON-SENSE CONSERVATIVES need to understand one simple thing.For all the RADICAL MULSIMS whether it's BIN LADEN,IRANIAN PRESIDENT or IRAQI PRIME MINISTER,we AMERICANS are INFIDELS and they will never leave a single chance to harm us.The only person who was good for our interest was a SECULAR DICTATOR named SADDAM.
    Reply to this comment
    by trueprogress October 31, 2006 10:56 PM EST
    We have won. Let's go home.
    Reply to this comment
    by trueprogress October 31, 2006 10:54 PM EST
    What we are learning is that we must confront the evil in the Arab world, with power of our own. We should leave if that is the vote of their people, but until then, we should not be pushed around.
    Reply to this comment
    by rharrin1 October 31, 2006 10:21 PM EST

    one-american so liberals are cowards then you must be saying bush and cheney are liberals because they both turned their backs on their country during vietnam
    Reply to this comment
    by ohioman4 October 31, 2006 10:16 PM EST
    It's beginning to sound like our troops are taking orders issued by an Iraqi. Is George Bush going to turn full control of the U.S. military in Iraq over to Iraqi's?
    Reply to this comment
    by drgoodwin12 October 31, 2006 10:15 PM EST
    And the bombs and killings go on ,yea the bombs and killings will go on The new Rovette song chorus nothing original here.
    Reply to this comment
    by peterbaldwin-2009 October 31, 2006 10:01 PM EST
    And on top of it, Rumsfeld said he will give Maliki another billion dollars to built up his Mahdi Army so they can kill more American troops.
    Reply to this comment
    by peterbaldwin-2009 October 31, 2006 9:47 PM EST
    It's happening. As Iraqi forces stand up, American forces can stand down. Unfortunately, the Iraqi forces standing up are the Mahdi Army.

    This is a significant development, because Maliki was able to call off an intense search for a captured American soldier without Bush making a peep (the irony is Bush now criticizing Kerry over a careless remark that pales in comparison to abandoning a missing soldier on the battlefield). The Mahdi Army, who has been taking potshots at our troops, is now in full control of Sadr City (2.5 million).

    If this isn't hoisting the white flag, then I don't know what is.
    Reply to this comment
    by ohiosurf October 31, 2006 9:07 PM EST
    So the PM wants us to remove our troops from the checkpoints?

    Easy enough, muster your troops to take over then. Don't ask them to stop in the middle of an operation.

    Let them finish, then complain about them doing it.

    www.gosyro.com
    Reply to this comment
    See all 68 Comments
  • Exclusive Webshow

    Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

    • MOST POPULAR
    Discussed
    1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

      (471 recent comments)

    Latest News
    News in Pictures
    Scroll Left Scroll Right
    Connect with CBS News

    Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: