February 11, 2009 5:49 PM

U.K. Report: Warming Will Destroy Economy

(CBS/AP)  Unchecked global warming will devastate the world economy on the scale of the world wars and the Great Depression, a British government report said Monday, as the country launched a bid to convince doubters that environmentalism and economic growth can coincide.

Britain hired former Vice President Al Gore, who has emerged as a powerful environmental spokesman since his defeat in the 2000 presidential election, to advise the government on climate change — a clear indication of Prime Minister Tony Blair's dissatisfaction with current U.S. policy.

Blair, President Bush's top ally in the Iraq war, said unabated climate change would eventually cost the world between 5 percent and 20 percent of global gross domestic product each year. He called for "bold and decisive action" to cut carbon emissions and stem the worst of the temperature rise.

"It is not in doubt that, if the science is right, the consequences for our planet are literally disastrous," he said. "This disaster is not set to happen in some science fiction future many years ahead, but in our lifetime."

The report emphasized that global warming can only be fought with the cooperation of major countries such as the United States and China, and represents a huge contrast to the Bush administration's wait-and-see global warming policies.

Sir Nicholas Stern, the senior government economist who wrote the report, said that acting now to cut greenhouse gas emissions would cost about 1 percent of global GDP each year. He recommended a "low-carbon global economy" through measures including taxation, regulation of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon trading.

Pay now or pay a lot more later — that's the report's stark conclusion, reports CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips.

President Bush kept America — by far the biggest emitter of carbon dioxide and other gases blamed for global warming — out of the Kyoto international treaty to reduce greenhouse gases, saying the pact would harm the U.S. economy. The international agreement was reached in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997 and expires in 2012.

Blair made his displeasure with U.S. environmental policy clear when he signed an agreement this year with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to develop new technologies to combat the problem. The measure imposed the first emissions cap in the United States on utilities, refineries and manufacturing plants in a bid to curb the gases that scientists blame for warming the Earth.

The prime minister and the report also said that no matter what Britain, the United States and Japan do, the battle against global warming cannot succeed without deciding when and how to control the greenhouse gas emissions by such fast-industrializing giants as China and India.

Stern's 700-page report said evidence showed "that ignoring climate change will eventually damage economic growth."

"Our actions over the coming decades could create risks of major disruption to economic and social activity, later in this century and in the next, on a scale similar to those associated with the great wars and the economic depression of the first half of the 20th century," he said.

The British hope this new economic argument can do what environmental arguments haven't: convince skeptical governments in China and the United States to act now as well, reports Phillips.



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by leifholmberg October 31, 2006 7:45 AM EST
"bold and decisive action" to cut carbon emissions and stem the worst of the temperature rise.

As far as I know, the carbon and SO2 emmissions are artificially transformed into acids H2co3 and H2so4 by sprinkling a liquid soap inside all the factories "chimneys" high above the ground. The acids then go down through an outlet pipe together with the soap bubles to the accumulation tank and then they can be used for technical purposes or demolished. If instead of the soap bubles to place into the ascending SO2/CO2 hollow plastic spheres like ping-pong balls the balls would be dancing within them somewhat like they do inside a lottery drum. Only they should be molded from special plastic in a special way. Then if to sprinkle some water on their surface with the aim to increase the surface of contact for H2o and Co2/so2 then the durable plastic spheres would work more efficently then short life soap bubles. The technology of molding such hollow plastic spheres was patented in 1960-es in London, Great Britain by Mr. Leif Holmberg from Denmark (dead now). The method proved to be very sufficient. With kind respect, Vladimir.
Reply to this comment
by london_lee October 30, 2006 10:00 PM EST
sharncedar please go away and educate yourself on what global warming and runaway greenhouse effect does..Hawaii?..try Venus for our Descendants
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar October 30, 2006 8:52 PM EST
"The "scab lands" out west in the US are a perfect example of rapid and devastating events in nature that are weather based."

I'm not familiar with this science that says global warming will become global cooling, interesting if reasonable and not hype. But the naive interpretation is that global warming will be warming the climate, not cooling it, and generally an earth with more CO2 and warmer is a more fertile and pleasant earth for biology and life. Probably also wetter on land, it sounds like a pretty good climate. Like Hawaii everywhere, warm, nice, wet, pleasant and green. We can go back to a more idyllic human lifestyle perhaps, or who knows what, but generally change is good -- go with it, lose the fear.

As some economist said, in the long run everyone is dead anyway. For now, hey, greenery, heat, like one big Miami! alright!
Reply to this comment
by london_lee October 30, 2006 8:02 PM EST
ANGRYliberal you seem to be the type of person that agreed with our countries descision to invade Iraq based on the "possiblility" they had and were supplying WMDs..sure, i can understand that.. thats call erring on the side of caution with very little evidence

..would you not agree that we should err on the side of caution this time around when it comes to global warming?..after all there is just a "little" bit more evidence that global warming is indeed happening and is being caused by us and if indeed true presents atleast as great a threat
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 October 30, 2006 7:44 PM EST
ANGRYliberal, you are too emotional to talk to. You let your fear run away with you. No one ever said gw had jack *** to do with attacking the trade center. Did he ignore warnings? emphatically yes! did he plan it? NO.

All I am saying is that gw is using any and all means he can to keep the country stirred up in a lather of fear so he can keep control of congress. Because he knows *** well that if he loses one or both houses of congress, his free ride is over and he will be answering a lot of uncomfortable questions.

His political survival is at stake here, not to mention his legacy. Look through the BS. It is all smoke and mirrors.
Reply to this comment
by angryliberal-2009 October 30, 2006 7:32 PM EST
Houser123, Actually nuclear global warming by means of Akmedenhajad unleashing nukes into Manhattan concerns me more than "global warming". And I am more "worried" about Fetus slaughter and gay marriage than global freezing i mean warming (freezings is what liberals preached in the 60's).So the democrats are gonna get in office and what......global warming is gone??? Yep, because the media will stop talking about and all of you moment driven liberals we be happy.
Reply to this comment
by troodon0352 October 30, 2006 7:29 PM EST
Global warming. Its a no brainer!! Politicians deny its existence (Bush and his boys and girls) because it suits his agenda.
Reply to this comment
by angryliberal-2009 October 30, 2006 7:27 PM EST
I mean just because you want to believe that there are not people evil enough in the world to commit mass genocide (i.e. Sadaam, Osama Bin Laden) and preach hatred doesnt mean they dont exist. Juyst because you deny something exists doesnt mean it doesnt exist
Reply to this comment
by angryliberal-2009 October 30, 2006 7:27 PM EST
I mean just because you want to believe that there are not people evil enough in the world to commit mass genocide (i.e. Sadaam, Osama Bin Laden) and preach hatred doesnt mean they dont exist. Juyst because you deny something exists doesnt mean it doesnt exist
Reply to this comment
by angryliberal-2009 October 30, 2006 7:24 PM EST
clestes, HEy everyone the strike up the twighlight zone music Celeses is in the building. What a massive undertaking to fool the whole world. So not only did dubya fool all of the world about Sadaam so he could get oil, he also drove the planes into the WTC, What else Celeses? Did dubya fake the nukes in North Korea? What does he want there? Did dubya get all the kurds to lie and say sadaam killed there families with chemical weapons? Hmmmm, celeses you show me precisley why liberals cannot be trusted in the.....well any where actually...lol.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook