Oct. 30, 2006
In A Rush To 'Swift-Boat' Fox
The Nation: Limbaugh Ignores Fact, Crusades Against Ailing Actor
-
Play CBS Video Video Full Michael J. Fox Interview CBS News Exclusive: Watch Katie Couric's extended interview with Michael J. Fox. They discussed Fox's medical condition, his stem cell research advocacy and the Rush Limbaugh controversy.
-
Video Fox Reacts To Limbaugh Jab Michael J. Fox responds to Rush Limbaugh's remark that Fox was "exploiting" his illness. Fox is campaigning in Wheaton, Ill., for Democratic candidate Tammy Duckworth. Mike Puccinelli reports.
-
Video Celebrities In Political Ads A senate race in Missouri is suddenly the talk of the nation because of a TV ad featuring Michael J. Fox. Cynthia Bowers reports that more celebrities are backing candidates.
-
Actor and Parkinson's disease advocate Micheal J. Fox, left, and conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh. (CBS/AP)
-
Video Archive Down 'N' Dirty Watch the hard-hitting attack ads of Campaign 2006
-
Interactive Stem Cell Research Follow the debate, and learn how and why the cells are harvested.
Rush Limbaugh is not just making an issue of Michael J. Fox's campaign ads for Democratic candidates who support stem-cell research. The conservative talk-radio personality is making it the issue of a fall campaign that gets stranger by the day.
While it may be hard to figure out why anyone with Limbaugh's political pull and national prominence would declare war on the guy who played Alex P. Keaton — one of television's most outspoken, if eccentric, conservatives — in the series "Family Ties," there is no denying the intensity of the assault.
For the better part of three hours each day this week, the radio ranter has been “Swift Boating” the television and film star for daring to do what Limbaugh — who freely admits that he is an entertainer — does every day.
In Limbaugh's warped assessment of the political process, it's fine for him to try and influence the votes of Americans. But woe be it to anyone else who attempts to do so.
Since Fox began speaking up in favor of candidates who support science over superstition, the television and film star who suffers from Parkinson's disease has been accused by Limbaugh of "exaggerating the effects of the disease" in campaign commercials in which he points out that Democratic candidates for the Congress and governorships in the battleground states of Missouri, Maryland, Illinois, Wisconsin and now Iowa favor a serious approach to stem-cell research while their Republican opponents do not. Limbaugh was relentless in his assault on Fox. "He's moving all around and shaking and it's purely an act," the conservative commentator says. "This is really shameless of Michael J. Fox. Either he didn't take his medication or he's acting." After it was pointed out to Limbaugh by everyone, literally everyone, who knows anything about Parkinson's disease, Limbaugh declared, "Now people are telling me they have seen Michael J. Fox in interviews and he does appear the same way in the interviews as he does in this commercial. All right then, I stand corrected…So I will bigly, hugely admit that I was wrong, and I will apologize to Michael J. Fox, if I am wrong in characterizing his behavior on this commercial as an act."
That should have been the end of it.
But Limbaugh wasn't backing off. His new theme became: "Michael J. Fox is allowing his illness to be exploited and in the process is shilling for a Democratic politician."
One problem with that line of attack is that Fox was the one who volunteered to cut the ads, with the express purpose of helping voters see beyond the spin and recognize the stark choices that they will be making on November 7. Another problem is that, two years ago, Fox cut an ad supporting a top Republican, Pennsylvania U.S. Senator Arlen Specter, who supports embryonic stem-cell research. But the biggest problem is with Limbaugh's emphasis on the Fox's physical appearance, as opposed to what the actor is saying in the ads? Why blather on and on about whether Fox, an actor, might be acting?
Because it is easier to criticize the way that Michael J. Fox looks than it is to criticize the content of his message.
Fox's ads are fact-based. They reference the voting records, public statements and policy initiatives of the Democratic and Republican candidates he is talking about.
That being the case, beating up on the "Back to the Future" kid would not seem like a smart political strategy. And it certainly is not going to help Limbaugh soften his image as a partisan hit man who knows a little too much about what it means to be on or off particular medications.
By John Nichols
Reprinted with permission from The Nation.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 63 CommentsI Quote him "If you study hard, do your homework, try and learn as much as you can, you will be allright, otherwise you will end up in Iraq".
That's your Democratic leaders for you !! Trashing our men and women in harms way. Trashing the men and women that are dead and gave him the freedom to say---- What a bunch of dummies or words to that effect.
it's unfortunate that most people listen to the "Shock Jocks" than to the FACT based media for their information. Pwerhaps, someday, this will change.
sanctimonious, pompous, opinionated blowhard.
So what else is a Rush Limbaugh? And, why does anyone even care what his opinion is? Stop for a moment and think people. Use the God given talent of thought to make up your own mind of what is right and wrong in this world then tell Mr. Limbaugh to start writing dime novels.
Who cares what that clown thinks?
He used to shake just like fox when he was going into withdrawl.
Rush Limbaugh's commentary on Michael J. Fox is beyond outrageous. The question I have though, is why would he do such a thing? What is it about Limbaugh and others of his ilk that possess them to say such outrageous things about people? The sad part is that many ditto heads will actually swallow the toxic waste which spews from Limgaugh's mouth.
So why did Rush say such things about Michael J. Fox? The answer is simple...those who are drunk on power simply have no sense of ethics or morality. They do and say what they want without regard to the damage it causes others. This is the basis of egomania and its shirt-tail cousin megalomania. Historically Adolf Hitler is viewed as a classic example of megalomania. And the ditto head followers of Rush Limbaugh are no different than the mindless automatons who were hypnotized by the bigoted ranting of Adolf Hitler. Could history repeat itself? Remember Jasper Texas! And that is just the tip of the iceberg. The chariots of bigotry, driving our world into chaos, are guided by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Pat Robertson. Without a doubt, the fires of chaos and hell are fueled by the tongues of bigots.
http://whiskey-springs.blogspot.com/
"I'm assuming you wouldn't want the president of Exxon telling you about all the benefits of drilling for oil in Alaska. Is this different?"
Hmm. Let's see: on the one hand, we got your basic filthy-rich dude trying to make himself richer through persuasion.
On the other, we got your basic dying guy trying to get stupid people to allow doctors to find a cure for what ails him.
Oh, yeah, the two are *exactly* the same! Like fire and water!
Very astute, RonnieHM.
We wanted you to know how much we appreciate your stout support of the Republican Party. You are truly a blessing to the Republicans and conservatives everywhere. Please continue to do everything you can to help the Republicans. God bless you, Rush, and the big help you give the Republican cause.
Love,
The Democratic Party
I don't condone what Rush did, but however I am not going to elevate MJF to sainthood because he made a political endorsement ad that wasn't necessarily completely honest.
While I can appreciate that every extremist has apologists, such as has been your response to every article that attacks the far right, I will directly answer your question.
Doesn't bashing Limbaugh put us on the same field as Limbaugh bashing MJF? Absolutely not. For one thing, Limbaugh made unqualified assertions for effect and to display MJF as a quack. Not only were his allegations completely without foundation and based solely in the ignorance to which he appeals to his audience, but the were purposefully meant to be inflamatory - as is his job as a radical-right shock-jock.
Limbaugh is a hypocrite. This is not up for debate. The only thing that is up for debate is whether he is as big of an unmitigated jack@ss as the media is treating him.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 63 Comments