What Ben Stein Thinks Bush Should Do
It Is Time For Rumsfeld To Go And For The President To Admit That Iraq Is A Mess, Says Stein
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Ben Stein On The War In Iraq
Former presidential speechwriter Ben Stein weighs in on the situation in Iraq. He makes some suggestions as to what President Bush should say to the American people.
-
Photo
Ben Stein said he thinks that President Bush needs to apologize to the country for the quagmire in Iraq and replace Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. (AP)
Times are very tough in Iraq and if I was still a speechwriter for the President, like I was for Mr. Nixon and Mr. Ford, this is what I would suggest he say:
My fellow Americans, I have some sobering news. It is my duty, above all, to protect the nation. I sincerely believed I was doing that when I ordered the invasion of Iraq. I still believe Saddam Hussein was the most dangerous man in the world. But it is clear to me now that things are not working out well in Iraq. Despite the incredible confidence, bravery and sacrifice of our men and women on the ground there, Iraq is still a violent, largely out of control nation. We may be making more terrorists than we destroy. "Quagmire" comes sadly to mind. It is clear that change must be made. Therefore, I have this morning accepted Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's resignation with sincere thanks for his service to the nation. He will be replaced by a truly heroic American, Senator John McCain of Arizona.
Despite my best intentions, I made mistakes in Iraq and mine is the responsibility. Good men and women died and hard-earned tax money was lost. Fine young men and women are crippled and disabled, which is a tragedy. It is time for a change. Therefore, I am convening an official, national, bi-partisan, blue ribbon commission composed of Democrats, Independents and Republicans, civilian and military, to start meeting at once and give me a recommendation in one month as to what our Iraq policy should be. All options are on the table. All.
I want to close with this thought. I am just a man. I have no miraculous powers. I have no special pipeline to God. Like all presidents from Jefferson and Lincoln onwards — and believe me, I know I'm not in their league — I make mistakes and sometimes good people die because of them. I am deeply sorry. As we re-examine our policy, I would ask that you all pray for us to make the right decision. May God continue to bless us all. Thank you.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Sunday Morning
- Latest in Sunday Morning
- Design for Living
- Rediscovering Henry Hudson
- Some Educated Opinions on Pundits



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 CommentsOut of the park!
gov.shore@cox.net
Phillip Hanley
Elmhurst, IL 60126
p.f.hanley@comcast.net
The answer to this question is that we leave no more dead or maimed American Soldiers, family members, contractors, nor journalists. We take with us our two Billion TAX Dollars a week back to America and put it to use in America. Leaving the forty plus billion tax dollars still unaccounted for behind in Iraq to be used as those who took them see fit. We leave the Iraqi people who are currently fighting each other to fight. There will be no more need for (IED) Improvised Explosive Devises because we would have removed all our lightly armored Hummers and equipment. Halliburton will have to renegotiate their contract with the Iraqi leaders. So you see we can disengage from Iraq without any %u201CImmediate Threat%u201D of harm to the American People and without the fear of them coming after us with a mushroom cloud, yellow cake, or chemical weapons. It is a %u201CSlam Dunk%u201D that there are currently people at the Rand Corporation, Harvard Business School, Ohio State University, Virginia Military Institute, at most American High Schools or other businesses, that if ask, can come up with a operational plan to disengage from Iraq and bringing our troops and equipment home safely to America.
CBS: will you PLEASE make Sunday Morning available via InnerTube, or atleast post video clips of the commentaries such as this?
For anyone else, I can't find this on YouTube, can anyone post? While the words are deep, the delivery is poetic.
I'm a lifelong Democrat, but I was truly impressed and won over by Mr. Schwarzenegger's apology to California in which he said, 1) I never should have held the special election, costing Californians so much time and money, 2) I learned I need to work closer with both sides of the aisle in order to get things done, and 3) the people of California don't want to legislate these complex issues; they want their elected reps to do it.
I now have the feeling that Arnold actually listens to both sides of issues, that he's learned to work and compromise with people with whom he disagrees in order to achieve progress. Our president is devoid of these personality or character traits. He's a born again, not only religiously, but politically. He's an ideologue: his opinions are based on a faith that his "ideals" are right; he is brittle and unchangeable. not the brilliant mind that could call for a bi-partisan commission. He's hasn't even recognized that Rumsfeld is one of the biggest problems on the planet.
I have no hope that your suggestions will be taken up by this calcified and unwise man. And part of me is glad to think that he would never do that. It would cause a groundswell of popular public support that could lead to a Republican victory in 2008, and I certainly would not like to see that.
His arrogance is mind boggling to me.
It could go a long way but now I have to be honest so close to election time I think it may be a little too late. But it sure could start the healing non the less.
Let's bring our men and women home!
Your's continues to be a voice of reason, though I don't always agree with you.
What are the chances that Pres. Bush would even consider such a broad, thoughtful, even handed and inclusive proposal.
Would you consider running for president, as a democrat!!?
Your's continues to be a voice of reason, though I don't always agree with you.
What are the chances that Pres. Bush would even consider such a broad, thoughtful, even handed and inclusive proposal.
Would you consider running for president, as a democrat!!?
Wow! how perfectly and eloquently stated. I stood up in my living room and clapped at the end of your speech. I hope President
Bush was watching and copies your speech verbatim and presents it tomorrow night during primetime!
Good job!
We need to remember that phrase of the 1960s, which is "Power to the People". Before such a pullout, we should hold a plebicite in Iraq . And have it monitored by internationals including asking Germany (who refused to send troops for the last Iraqi election ! ). Perhaps the Iraqi they would vote for a federation, or surprise us with what is best for them. It is very difficult to get the real story here, as our reporters are huddled in bars and hotels in the Green Zone, but the oil output is far above prewar, cell phones are everywhere, free Iraqi TV news, rebuilt schools, and multiple newspapers are sold on the street.
I say, a bold move is needed, but let the Iraqi decide !
I agree with one post: Bush is too ignorant to admit to his mistakes and too weak to correct them. Well said.
Now, if this upcoming election would just turn our country around and change the face of Congress, Bush could start "quacking" now!
president@whitehouse.gov
vice-president@whitehouse.gov
we could embrace regarding the Iraq nightmare. I wish President Bush had the wisdom to employ Mr. Stein's talents. A straightforward and honest speech from President Bush would be a welcome change. Unfortunately, it is difficult to
envision the administration listening instead of talking.
Indeed his invasion of Afganistan is reallly good and a nice move.
Senthee
How are Republicans supposed to scare anyone into voting for them if they tell the truth? And how could the Republicans survive a 180 on how the Democrats deal with terrorism -- from the Dems being responsible for helping the terrorists to being accepted at a table to talk about what to do?
Such a speech by W. would be the ruin of the Republican party.
I'm amazed at how quickly you right-wing radicals throw your own kind under the bus. Ben Stiller has been a respected conservative for generations. Suggesting he is working propaganda for the terrorists shows your immense ignorance and/or anger. I'm just alarmed that your type seems to be running the country (for the moment, at least).
Ben STEIN, not Ben Stiller.
Sorry.....
Mr. Stein I read your speech to bad President Bush will never deliever it
Everyone seems to be missing the point accourding to what I have read and heard the Iraqi's did not fly planes into the WTC. Soddam
was contained we knew everything he was doing.
You go after the people or nation who invaded your country and killed over 3000 U.S. citizen, not turn 360 and go after a nation which did not have WMD. Mistake No 1.
When Japnn attacked Pearl Harbor the U.S. went after Japan. FDR knew what to do.
All the voters who voted for the President and relected him should take time out and think did we make the right choice.
This is a President who does not listen he has painted himself in a corner and can't get out his father did the same. Mr. Stein your speech was great but to bad it will never be delivered
This war will not be settled until Mr. Bush is out of office and it will be up to the next president whoever he or she is to resolve this catastrophy.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 Comments