February 11, 2009 5:50 PM

U.S.: Iraqis Can Take Control In 1-2 Years

(CBS/AP)  U.S. officials said Tuesday that Iraqi leaders have agreed to develop a timeline by the end of the year for progress in stabilizing Iraq, and Iraqi forces should be able to take full control of security in the country in the next 12 to 18 months with "some level" of American support.

Even as October marked the deadliest month for U.S. forces in Iraq this year, the top U.S. commander in Iraq said he felt the United States should continue to focus on drawing down American forces in the country.

Gen. George Casey's rare joint-appearance with U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad was designed, many in Iraq believe, to reassure the American public, both ahead of midterm elections and amidst continuing violence in Iraq, reports CBS chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan.

On Tuesday, the military announced the deaths of four more U.S. troops, raising the month's toll to 91. At least 2,801 members of the U.S. military have died since the war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

Regardless, Casey said he would not hesitate to ask for more troops if he felt they were necessary.

He appeared with Khalilzad in the heavily fortified Green Zone in Baghdad, though a power failure briefly cut off the broadcast of the remarks.

"We are about 75 percent of the way through a three-step process in building those (Iraqi) forces," Casey said. "It is going to take another 12 to 18 months or so till I believe the Iraqi security forces are completely capable of taking over responsibility for their own security that's still coupled with some level of support from us."

Generals such as Casey genuinely believe that success in Iraq is still possible, reports CBS national security correspondent David Martin. But now they also believe that failure is possible, Martin adds — and with each passing day of increasing violence, failure looks a little more likely.

But even if the administration wanted to make a major change in Iraq policy, to do so before the Nov. 7 election would be "political suicide," reports CBS chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod.

In other developments:

  • A U.S. military spokesman said earlier Tuesday there had been no word on the fate of an American soldier reported missing the day before in Baghdad. Troops carrying photos of the missing soldier continued door-to-door searches while Army Kiowa reconnaissance helicopters circled overhead in the central Karradah district.

  • The U.S. military on Tuesday announced the deaths of four U.S. service members in fighting in Iraq. A Baghdad-based soldier died from wounds received when his patrol was struck by a roadside bomb in central Baghdad, the military said. Earlier, the military said a sailor and two Marines were killed during combat in the insurgent stronghold of Anbar province in fighting on Monday.

  • The latest deaths raised to 91 the number of U.S. forces killed in October, the highest toll for any month this year and on course to surpass the October 2005 total of 96. Before that the deadliest months were January 2005, at 107; November 2004 at 137 and April 2004, at 135.

  • National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley said Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the fledging new democratic government are trying to quell the rising sectarian violence and move the country toward and peace. "I think they've got to do more and they've got to do it faster," Hadley said in a radio interview at the White House. "And I think if you talked to Prime Minister (Nouri) al-Maliki, he would say to you the same thing."

    With violence continuing in Iraq, the United States is battling on both the military and political fronts to tame growing chaos in regions where Sunni insurgent violence now is compounded by sectarian killing.

    Khalilzad said the Iraqi government had agreed by the end of the year to develop a timeline for progress. At the same time, he declared, the United States needed to redouble its efforts to succeed in Iraq.

    "Iraq leaders have agreed to a timeline for making the hard decisions needed to resolve these issues," Khalilzad said. :Iraqi leaders must step up to achieve key political and security milestones on which they've agreed."

    Details of the milestones were not spelled out, but Khalizad mentioned several areas in which progress would be measured, including devising a system to share the country's oil wealth among all religious and ethnic groups.


  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
    by bluestardad October 25, 2006 12:14 PM EDT
    Each time one of this administrations lies comes apart they spin another one now another year we are now creating another artificial deadline and building a democracy when we were once looking for the chemical weapons we supplied them in the 1980-1989 no troop withdrawal promise or time frame just a political ploy to bring in some of the straying neo-con sheep.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman October 25, 2006 4:05 AM EDT
    Drgoodwin,,, You're correct,, deja vu. I think they said the same thing the year before that also... kinda like the way genocide in the was deliberatly ignored by our White House,, Iraq's civil war also.. Deliberate ignoring of Sudan's genocide also gave our CIA time to help radical Muslem rebels take control of the government,, the same rebels that harbored Bin Laden for 5 years,, for what?? Oil & old tidbits of selective intell on Bin Laden. Much worse than what these same socalled patriotic Republicans did in Central America.
    Reply to this comment
    by mh4cbs1 October 25, 2006 4:02 AM EDT
    Can you believe this! Must be election time!

    Bush running away from "Stay the Course"! Now they are trying more lies, like they have some Nixonian "Secret Plan to End the War". How convenient.

    Face it. Bush and Co. is not leaving Iraq without the Oil. They could care less how many have to die. US/Iraqi dead and maimed are just not a priority in their NeoCon quest for Global empire (just read it in their own words in the PNAC papers of 1998).

    Don't be a Bush CHUMP. Lets put him and Cheney in JAIL where they belong.

    Reply to this comment
    by drgoodwin12 October 25, 2006 3:41 AM EDT
    If memory serves me correctly around spring of this year the Iraqi goverment(Prime Minister)was saying essentially the same thing.At about the same time General Pace was saying then that the Iraqis would be able to take control of security in 12-18 mths. only to turn around and deploy more troops.This type of wishful thinking has been going on for awhile and Iraq has continued to slide into civil war.This is a little to close to the election for me.Sounds,smells and talks like a false October surprise.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman October 25, 2006 3:03 AM EDT
    Patriotic,, Sorry I didn't respond earlier,, I was watching the news. You should try it sometimes.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman October 25, 2006 3:01 AM EDT
    Patriotic,,, Then we have to look at this administrations total lack of deplomacy, today Condi Rice still insists on calling them the "Axis of Evil",, how much does that help us in deterring other nations from proliferation of nuclear weapons? Bush himself won't sign on to Nuclear Non-Poliferation Agreements. For 6 years Bush/Rice has made the situation much, much worse. They not only damage our NATIONAL SECURITY with these policies, but, also severly damage our NATIONAL SECURITY with thier domestic & trade policies.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman October 25, 2006 2:50 AM EDT
    Patriotic,, Don't forget, it was our White House who exposed the secret CIA front company that actually was tracking WMD's.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman October 25, 2006 2:48 AM EDT
    Patriotic,,, First off what makes you think he wants to kill all Americans? Secondly what makes you think he can get nuclear weapons? Thirdly, what makes you think he's got the capability or know how to deploy them?? One more question for you, how can you listen to the same terrorist propaganda he uses,, actually the GOP propaganda is much more of a terrorist type of a threat than he uses.,,, IT'S OUR FOREIGN POLICIES,, NOT OUR FREEDOMS.
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotic9 October 25, 2006 1:57 AM EDT
    j-whitman
    If you read the book written by Gen.Tommy Franks,when Osama Bin Laden was in Tora Bora in Afghanistan,he easily escaped because we didn't have enough troops on the ground since President Bush was only worried about sending maximum troops to Iraq which had nothing to do with 9/11.Osama Bin Laden had released a video tape 2 days before the last Presidential election talking against Bush.It was obvious if Number 1 enemy of USA was talking against Bush,people of USA were supposed to vote Bush which he wanted.Please tell me,if Osama Bin Laden again attack us with Nuclear Bombs this time before the next election,how will we be able to save our selves when most of our National Guard troops are deployed to fight an UNSEEN ENEMY who loves to sacrifice his life and his children's life for killing us.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad October 25, 2006 12:00 AM EDT
    I told you don%u2019t expect any type of serious policy change, redeployment of troops, ending of the Iraq war, shifting troops to Afghanistan or anything that remotely resembles common sense from this Administration%u2019s review of Iraq policies or the Baker Commission the proof is in %u201CWHAT REALLY HAPPENS%u201D not what they say is going to happen. Time and time again the American people have held out hope that this Administration will do the right thing and time and time again we have been let down. From Afghanistan, Iraq to Louisiana this administration%u2019s policies are not based on common sense or the will of the people who elected them. President Bush has been described that "He's not somebody who gets jumpy at polls." That translates to %u201CI do not care what the People who elected me think%u201D. But that is OK now too because he has exposed his true self to the American People and we are going to dethrone this administration and those who supported it
    Reply to this comment
    See all 45 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook