Oct. 23, 2006
Conservative Apathy Threatens Homeland
Weekly Standard: Democrats Don't Understand Terror Risks, Must Not Take Power
-
Play CBS Video
Video
A Loss Of Faith
David Kuo was once the deputy director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. But Kuo says religious leaders were manipulated for political gain. Lesley Stahl reports.
-
Video
Reporter's Notebook: Stahl
Only On The Web: Lesley Stahl discusses her interview with former Bush aide David Kuo, who accused the administration of manipulating religious leaders for political gain.
-
Video
'Values Voter' Turnout
Evangelical Christians flocked to the polls during the last election, but these "value voters" may not be as enthusiastic this time around. Lee Cowan reports from Columbus, Ohio.
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Campaign 2006
Complete coverage and analysis of Senate and key House races, plus gubernatorial elections.
-
Interactive
Eye on Religion
Find out more about the beliefs, practices and history of some of the world's major religions.
-
Interactive
America On Guard
The Homeland Security Department, the terror alert system, preparedness quiz and more.
David Kuo, once an official of President Bush's faith-based initiative, published a book this month that attacks the White House for privately ridiculing evangelical Christians while cynically manipulating how they vote. The book arrived, cynically enough, just in time for the midterm election — an election Kuo says Christians should boycott. Meanwhile, the mainstream media, like sportswriters cheerleading for the home team, is predicting a landslide in the interest of promoting one. Their home team, of course, is the Democrats. As for Republican efforts to spur a big turnout on November 7, the press frowns on such cheap tactics. "GOP Aims to Scare Up Big Voter Turnout" was the headline on a Washington Post story last week.
If you suspect there are forces eager to suppress Republican turnout, you are right. Rarely has the press echoed Democratic themes as relentlessly as it has in the closing weeks of the 2006 campaign. And the main theme is that Republicans are about to be blown away. The question now is whether this message will persuade Republican voters to stay home on Election Day. It shouldn't, so long as Republicans — and especially conservative Republicans — act like adults, not like petulant children angry over one thing or another that didn't go their way.
Yes, the Republican performance in the last two years has been disappointing. The Iraq war isn't going well. President Bush and the Republican Congress have spent too much of the taxpayers' money. They got nowhere on overhauling Social Security and only part of the way — beefed-up border security — on immigration reform. The list goes on. Still, the reasons given for staying home on Election Day are pathetically disconnected from the realities of politics and political power.
The president and Republicans need to be taught a lesson: We hear that a lot from conservatives. And maybe Bush and company do. But allowing Democrats to take over Congress won't achieve that. It won't lead to a Republican course correction any more than losing the 2000, 2002, and 2004 elections taught Democrats to move to the right. Politics doesn't work that way, and it never has. Losing simply hurts a political party. A landslide loss in 2006 would merely weaken the Republican Party. And, for the foreseeable future, the Republican Party is the only vehicle through which conservatives and moderates can accomplish their goals.
Would Democrats join with social and religious conservatives to curb abortion and block same-sex marriage? Never in a million years. Would Democrats please small-government conservatives by cutting taxes and limiting spending growth? Not a chance. Would they thrill libertarians by pursuing privatization of Social Security or by resisting the demands of the global-warming faddists for a full-blown regulatory state? Don't bet on it. Would they satisfy moderates by compromising with conservatives? Only under duress. Rather, the prerequisite for attaining any of these goals is a Republican Congress. It's as uncomplicated as that.
The other ballyhooed reason for not showing up on Election Day is that Democrats, once in power again, will misbehave so egregiously that Republicans will roar back in 2008, stronger and more conservative than ever. No doubt Republicans thought this in 1954 when Democrats won back both houses of Congress. But that was followed by 40 years of Democratic control of the House and 26 years of Democratic rule in the Senate. And for most of those years, Democrats held on to power in defiance of a rising conservative tide in the country. They know how to keep power once they get it.
National elections are always important. But they are supremely important when America is at war. In Islamic jihadism, we face a foe that is eager to kill Americans in large numbers and as ruthless as it was on 9/11. The difference now is that Democrats no longer want to carry on a real war against terrorists.
In speech after speech, President Bush has evoked the famous words of Winston Churchill in the dark days of February 1941. Churchill declared: "We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire. Neither the sudden shock of battle, nor the long-drawn trials of vigilance and exertion will wear us down. Give us the tools, and we will finish the job."
Today, Democrats would deny the president the tools. They would weaken, if not eliminate, the Patriot Act. They would halt the tough but entirely legal interrogations of terrorist leaders that have proved so successful in uncovering and thwarting plots to strike America a second time and perhaps a third or a fourth. They would constrain the National Security Agency from eavesdropping on terrorist phone calls to and from America.
In short, Democrats don't take the terrorist threat seriously. They wince when Bush brings up 9/11. They regard his war on terrorism as more a political strategy for winning elections than a necessary plan to wage an offensive battle against terrorists around the world.
Conservatives in particular should know better. They claim to be the grownups of American politics. They understand what's at stake in the struggle against Islamist terrorists. For them to skip out on their obligation to vote in this election over a petty grievance — or, for that matter, over a not-so-petty grievance — would mark them as politically childish.
Kuo, by the way, has been embraced by the media, welcomed everywhere from 60 Minutes to the Colbert Report. His tale of White House hypocrisy in dealing with religious conservatives is bogus. We know this from the number of religious conservatives in high positions at the White House: Bush himself, Mike Gerson, Karen Hughes, Peter Wehner, Tim Goeglein, and that's just for starters. Colbert asked Kuo why he wrote the book. "Because I think someone had to point out that Jesus and George W. Bush are different people," he said. Who knew?
Fred Barnes, for the Editors.
By Fred Barnes
© Copyright 2006, News Corporations, Weekly Standard, All Rights Reserved.
| "Arguably the most influential opinion journal at the White House" - The New York Times For more information and to subscribe, click here. |




well, it IS refreshing occasionally to hear from the Kool aid producers rather than just the consumers of their product. Although it is incredible that these neocons are not in hiding , as thoroughly discredited as they are. This gentleman, for one, would have bet everything BUT his or his kid's life that there were WMD in Iraq. Ah! But that was a couple of years ago, and by now we have surely forgotten how wrong they all were. NOT!
True, Democrats are far from perfect, but there is absolutely NO chance that anybody could be as consistently and stubbornly wrong as these people.
God Bless Our Troops
God forgive George Bush and the neocons!
I'm a moderate Republican and I wouldn't trust the "conservatives" of today to wipe their own butts correctly let alone run the country. The party has been hijacked by religious kooks and wackos like the guy that wrote this tripe.
Stick to your Neocon base and pseudo Christian war mongers (yeah right, Pro Life... what BS) and leave us moderates out of the nightmare you've created. You wan't people to move to the right? You guys need to move back to reality before I'll ever consider myself a Republican and vote that way again. The Republican party has gone nuts and only a fool or a zealot would follow them over the cliff.
Your article is not even worthy of a reply.. What a crock of hypocritical, bigoted, one sided clap-trap.... but then... whatever would one expect from a far right wacko claiming to be religious... every one of your views goes directly contrary to the teachings of God..
Love, tolerance, acceptance, humility... yea right...
A few not-so-petty grievances...
Started an unneccesary war with very little international support.
Let Osama slip away.
Embarrassed America worldwide with Abu Ghraib and Gitmo.
Bankrupted the budget surplus and left a burden for our grandchildren.
Catered to oil companies and other large corporations at the expense of the middle class.
George Bush comparing himself to Churchill.
OK well maybe the last one IS petty, but I could go on. Had enough? Me too!
God Bless Our Troops
God forgive George Bush
When Kerry got swift boated, people said he had it coming for making his war service a centerpiece of his campaign. Well, Bush has been parading his "christian" creds for a long time now - which makes it big news when it turns out faith based initiatives got 20 million FEWER dollars under Bush than they did under Clinton. I say, a politican who uses religion to gain votes, has to answer when his actions belie his words.
Oh, but that's small potatoes, Mr. Barnes says. That's no reason for conservatives to stay home.
OK, how about this: the billions of dollars wasted on the invasion of Iraq that could have been spent building a fence along the border? The tax cuts given to the wealthy while the working class sank deeper into debt? The mismanagement, incompetence and cronyism exhibted in every area of government from the EPA failing to protect workers at ground zero to to the military DEMOTING the accountant who questioned the no-bid contracts awared for Iraq re-construction.
If conservatives can't bring themselves to vote for Democrats, then, please God, let them stay home and lest the rest of us do that disgusting duty.
THE PRESIDENT SAYS HE IS WORRIED ABOUT EMBOLDENING THE ENEMY ...BUT STAYING IN IRAQ IS DOING JUST THAT.. IF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION REALLY CARED ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY THERE WOULD BE A COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY POLICY TO REDUCE OUR USE OF FORIGEN OIL..WHO IS THE LARGEST FUNDING SOURCE FOR TERRORISM? ITS US !!(AMERICANS)THE AVEREGE AMERICAN JUST DRIVING TO WORK FUELS THE TERRORISTS..WE NEED A MANDATE TO PRODUCE GREEN RENEWABLE ENERGY HERE IN THE US (WHICH WILL PUT AMERICA TO WORK ALSO) WHAT IM SAYING IS WE ARE STARVING FOR LEADERSHIP..AMERICA IS IN GREAT NEED OF SOLID LEADERSHIP ON ENERGY POLICY THAT WILL MAKE US SAFER...
I don't believe Republicans are better at defense, actually their record in the last 6 years is a poor one.
THE REPUBLICANS OF TODAY ARE NOT REPUBLICANS. My family has always been swing voters. We know what Republicans are supposed to be.
The GOP/Republicans of today I find a little disgusting.
And it is tooooo late to worry about it now. You Rep should have forced Shrub and co to do something about Iraq before now. The Rep congress has fallen down on the job and probably going to be made to pay at the voting booth.
Kuo is just saying what everybody knows- the GOP big shots play the fundamentalists as patsies and take them for a ride on their morality roller coaster...
It came out in the Abramoff scandal as well.
Nancy Reagan sitting around the White House making fun of Right to Life.
Santorum has openly gay staff for gee whilickers sake all the while beating on the Bible...
If these people finally get a clue how they've been had there's lot of indications besides that book- like for example how about the GOP performance and record for example...
Didn't Bush say it would be up to the next president?
The Republicans have done NOTHING in 6 years to enhance homeland security. The Ports are an open invitation to dirty bombs, Airlines cannot screen cargo adequately, our borders are porous, and any terrorist could outfit an army by walking into their neighborhood gun shop. In Iraq, Bush Inc. have increased the number of highly trained terrorists 10-fold since his totally stupid, bungling of this war. With the rewrite of the Geneva rules on prisoners, all Bush as done is label Republicans as war criminals.
Karl Rove has sent his fear mongers out into the populace. Why don%u2019t conservative columnists and commentators forced to acknowledge the are paid for by the RNC and giving talking points directly from the White House. These are illegal gifts and campaign contributions to the Republican Party that must be acknowledged.
Democrats are not unpatriotic, are not soft on homeland security, and are not %u201Ccut and run%u201D terrorist enablers. They realize to win this battle you must not only kill the enemy, but also win the hearts and minds of their potential converts and recruits. This takes more intelligence than the Republican Party and their Conservative columnists can ever hope to possess. Ignorance, Intolerance, and Greed is the only message the worn out, corrupt Republican Party has left to offer Americans.
I and others I know are sick to death of this term and it's use by the current administration in their attempt to recast this county's laws, self image and even centuries old interpretation of the Constitution for their own ends. I call upon this publication and all other media to abstain from using this term.
Our Constitution is titled "Constitution of the United States" Not the "Constitution of the Homeland"
We are "AMERICANS" not "Homelandians", let's use the correct and proper name for our nation.
VOTE these crooks and liars out.
really mattered to the government. They were used
by the Republicans because they're so vulnerable
in believing the bs that George Bush is a right wing christian fanatic. It was all a sham.
"Would they (Democrats) satisfy moderates by compromising with conservatives? Only under duress" Please tell me the last time that the GOP satisfied moderates by compromising with liberals? For me, this is one of the most dishearening aspect of the Bush presidency. When he came to power in 2000, I supported Bush over Gore because he claimed to be 'a uniter, not a divider'. But his true colors came out after the election. He does not aim to compromise at all: it's His Way or The Highway. He misrepresented himself in order to get elected.
I will certainly be voting Democratic in the coming election, for no other reason than that if the Legislative and Executive branches are controlled by different parties, it will be that much more difficult for them to mess up our lives. It's time that the rampage of ill-considered conservative policy stop.
On another note, Democrats have been saying Iraq has gone amuck. However, I have not seen a detail action plan from the Left for Iraq.
One thing not mentioned as a sucess for the current administration.... Dow Jones over 12,000
How did that get over looked?
John D Summers Jr, Raleigh NC
Oh hell no! I will not be put in check by some fake news pumped out by the neo-cons:
"Arguably the most influential opinion journal at the White House" - The New York Times
I don't care what these fools say about taxes, defense or the economy.
The GOP/Republicans do not have anything of meaning to say.
THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT REPUBLICANS, they are something else. I do not know what that is but I do know what Republicans are supposed to be.
Republicans do not help my way of life. Tax breaks for corporations and the rich do NOT help the little person. I do not care about anything a neo-con theorist has to say about it, because the bottom line is always going to be affected by the greedy penny pusher.
I would rather have a Democrat wasting a billion on helping the poor or disabled or uneducated, than have a neo-con Republican blow a billion on killing tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi and thousands of US service men and women.
To hell with anything closely resembles a Republican. They are not prepared to govern a world power.
I hope your right.
Isn't it ironic that most of the decorated war heroes are in the Democratic party but people like Karl Rove and other non military serving liars have managed to convince the Christian conservatives that our brave men of valor are %u201Ccut in run cowards%u201D. GO Figure! Better yet, go learn something or ask GOD to allow you to use your mind to think.
I%u2019m proud to say that I stand with my GOD fearing fellow countrymen who weren%u2019t afraid to put their country before life%u2026
Jim Webb, Senator John Kerry, Representative Charles Rangel, Former Senator Max Cleland, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), Representative Leonard Boswell (D-IA) and Wesley Clark, Democratic Presidential Candidate
to name a few
Let%u2019s make America strong and respected again.
Luv America
We so seldom get to hear from genuine dunces.
What we need are new people with fresh ideas, with honesty, with genuine concern for the rights and safety of all Americans.
People that will unite, not divide us.
Vote out the incumbents, Dems and Repubs, those that have been feeding at the public trough for years.
Vote for term limits when possible.
What was most obvious was that Mr. Barnes did not deny that Bush, et al had failed the conservative cause miserably. Also obvious was the glaring omission of any proposal to correct the current sad state of affairs in American government.
Instead, Mr. Barnes chose to play the same old trumpet: no matter how bad things are under the current regime, FEAR greatly what may arise if it is replaced by democrats. Mr. Barnes, you, like the Republican Party, seem to have missed the point: true conservatives in this country are tired of bandstand politics, "sound bight" conservatism, twisted truth, arrogant attitudes, and entrenched, corrupt and inept politicians who think that as long as they pay lip service to an issue to which they are not truly endeared, eventually it will go away.
As a true conservative, I am offended that the you would ask that I support a party that represents an interest different than my own. MJV2944 and rchilcoa are absolutely correct: what we need is a strong 3rd party and term limits. Neither the Democratic nor Republican parties are inclined or equipped to represent the interests of most Americans -- what good is tenure and experience among those who are arrogant, most concerned with re-election, corrupt, or devoted to the fringe.
Keep it up, pal!
I absolutely agree. Both Congress and the President have demonstrated they totally lack connection to the pulse of most Americans.
I will be truly impressed when Congress and the President lower their salaries to the average earned by most Americans, then eliminate their own pensions and replace it with a 401K plan where their employer's (the American people)contribution is limited to matching 50% their own contributions up to the first 6% of their paychecks.
This would be generous compensation, consider what they get accomplished.
That would go a long way to restoring trust.
-
by kaliveotin
October 24, 2006 11:11 PM PDT
- I dont know why evangelicals would be suspect of the administration. They signed on to oppose abortion and gay rights, but what they've got was a pro-War, pro-torture, administration. I dont think Jesus was much of a pro torture advocate but I'm sure Rush Limbaugh and Carl Rove could point out how I'm misinterpreting the Bible.Fred Barnes is often an entertaining talking head, too bad its empty. He has no empathy for what it means to be a true American, who supports the constitution including the BILL OF Rights. The meek shall eventually inherit the government. Barnes, your kinds days are numbered.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 46 Comments