A Nation Of Pill-Takers
Americans Swallowing Drugs For Relief And Peace Of Mind
-
(CBS/iStockphoto)
-
Quiz Medical Exam Give your brain a checkup with these health quizzes.
How's this for a startling statistic: the United States makes up just a measly 5 percent of the world's population, but it accounts for a whopping 42 percent of the world's spending on prescription drugs — more than $250 billion just last year.
"The great three words in American life are go, go and go. So you want to wake up and swallow something and be fixed," historian Douglas Brinkley tells CBS Sunday Morning contributor Susan Spencer.
For example, hard-charging advertising executive Jerry Della Femina chugs down nearly a dozen pills each day for a variety of ailments — problems he actually has and problems he just worries about.
"You don't know how sick you'd be if you didn't take it," Della Femina said.
His forefathers would understand, Brinkley said.
"If you look back at American history, you'll find time and time again the old medicine shows. They travel around the country, people would say, you know I've got arthritis or you have a sore throat or a headache, I'll take the magic bullet the magic pill," Brinkley explained.
It's more than just culture, says Dr. Marcus Reidenberg of Weill Cornell Medical College. After all, these drugs do tend to work.
"If the individual is troubled enough by the problem, knows what the risks are of the medicine, (including the fact that these new medicines — we don't know what all the risks are), and still feels that the benefit is worthwhile — I don't have a problem with it," Reidenberg said.
But critics of the pharmaceutical industry have big problems with it, worried that Americans are running to their doctors demanding the latest pill for the latest diseases based on the latest information they got on television.
The average TV viewer is bombarded with an estimated 10 prescription drug ads a day.
Only viewers half the globe away, in New Zealand, get to share this experience. Prescription drug ads are banned everywhere else.
At Brand Institute, Inc., a Miami marketing firm, naming, or re-naming, syndromes for drug companies is 20 percent of the business.
The key, says company president Jim Dettore, is a name that describes the symptom in a nice way, making it OK to seek help, with, preferably, the client's drug.
"These acronyms allow them to communicate more effectively with less pressure," Dettore said.
It works — every dollar spent on advertising, produces more than $4 in sales.
Ad man Jerry Della Femina, who has no pharmaceutical clients, said just look at what's happened with cholesterol.
"People discuss their cholesterol count on their first date. They go out and, 'Hi. My cholesterol count is 150.'
"Well mine happens to be 175. The more they see something on television, the more they react to these commercials, the more that they will sell. And, then you'll start to see everyone is taking it," Della Femina said.
But New York University clinical psychologist Leonore Tiefer sees real risk in all of this pill taking.
"There is no drug trial in the world where anyone is taking five drugs simultaneously and they are looking at the interactions. So why is it a bad idea? I don't want to be part of some experiment," Tiefer said.
Its "disease mongering" Tiefer calls it, and just to sell drugs.
Dettore explained that companies like his are simply responding to the needs of consumers.
"Baby boomers are saying, 'I wanna live. I don't wanna sneeze. I don't wanna cough. I don't wanna run around with a runny nose. I want — I wanna be perfect,'" he said.
"As long as there's innovation there will be brands. And as long as there's brands there will be syndrome names," Dettore said. "And yes, there will be sales."
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 22 Comments"The average TV viewer is bombarded with an estimated 10 prescription drug ads a day. Only viewers half the globe away, in New Zealand, get to share this experience. Prescription drug ads are banned everywhere else."
I beg to differ with you here. We are bombarded with many more than 10 ads per day. I counted the commercials once watching the evening news. There were 12 ads: two were for the news, two were for foods with medicinal qualities, and eight were for pharmacies and pharmeceuticals. And that''s only in a half an hour.
I would love to see these ads outlawed in the US, but then who would pay for the news programs?
;)
Do you not see any irony in this? CBS is complicit in this misdeed.
Gary Klinga.
Americans are, by continuing to be privatized, subsidizing medical care to the rest of the world. This allows for better care for the human race generally. However, it does mean that every year, we get worse and less care for a larger and larger segment of our own country that can''t afford it. Isn''t that an odd thing?
It''s a SHOCK additionally, to come home to the UTTER ridiculousness of restless leg syndrome (and not surprisingly, a brother-in-law who suddenly suffers from it!!!). It''s like they are just making things up.
Our bodies are designed to two things we know for sure: to heal themselves of most ailments, and to wear out and waste away eventually. Trade pills for healthy lifestyle choices (YES, you do have a choice to walk instead of drive. YES, you do have a choice to eat local organic veggies and free-range, pasture-raised meat instead of junk.)
Oh, and as a side note, I recommend just turning off the stupid TV and reading more.
All the best,
Elizabeth
blogatelizabethhowarddotnet
Of bigger concern to everyone- at least it SHOULD be - is that doctors are allowed to receive very very substantial "gifts" or awards for prescribing certain drugs.... the number of scripts they write for certain drugs can get them posh vacations, etc. - the sky is the limit on these awards. Does no one understand the term "CONFLICT OF INTEREST"??? They teach this in any business class. They understand all right, it works very well for the drug companies. Go figure, money''s influence on politicians.
But, how much has our health as a nation improved as a result of the our ability to "communicate more effectively with less pressure"?
Sadly, that was not addressed in the segment.
But let's face it - what we have in the US is a "SickCare System" - NOT a Healthcare System! How sad that "sick" pays better than "health".
Everyone has heard people say: "If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself!" It's about time that insurers start to listen to those people and focus more dollars on preventive care. The whole picture might suddenly become a lot rosier. Heaven knows, we could all be a lot healthier - if we could afford to take better care of ourselves.
I'm afraid everyone is getting desensitized by story after story on OBESITY, and do we really need endless "big belly video spots" to prove this is a "HUGE PROBLEM"?
ENOUGH ALREADY!! Isn't it time we took this bull by the horns? Much to everyone's amazement, we managed to stop "Big Tobacco", so let's do the same to "Big Snack-o"!!!
FYI, anyone living in Canada who subsribes to cable/satellite tv are also bombarded by an estimated 10 prescription drug ads a day. We are still on the same globe aren't we?
I'm sorry, but I didn't get the "take" on the story that you obviously did. My "take" is that we are bombarded with "ask your doctor" ads for everything from sleeping pills to viagra.
I remember a day when the doctor told you what meds you needed, not the other way around.
Look at ritalin, for example. How my generation managed to get through childhood without being drugged was just some kind of miracle, I suppose.....
"There is no drug trial in the world where anyone is taking five drugs simultaneously and they are looking at the interactions." Ummm....then how do they come up with those 'Adverse Interactions' lists on every drug package insert? Did she mean that the interactions lists are just made up? Idiot.
Oh, and how about 'as long as there are syndroms, there will be syndrome names' instead of ******** about them being named close to the drug that treats it? I bet it makes it easier to remember. And still, I don't see a drug called "Asperger's Syndrome", which is one of the most common syndromes among children today. I guess that didn't occur to them either. What a pack of ninnies.
This was really fishing for a story, and sadly, there are plenty of important things that could ahve been written about instead.
yes, SJU the old traditional one..
Thank Heaven there are medications to help!
How did this happen? Who gave the pharmaceuticals this power?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 22 Comments