Oct. 22, 2006

Nancy Pelosi: Two Heartbeats Away

Lesley Stahl Profiles The Woman Who Could Become the Next Speaker Of The House

  • Play CBS Video Video Two Heartbeats Away

    Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi could become the first female Speaker of the House if Democrats win a majority in the upcoming midterm elections. She talks to Lesley Stahl about her style of leadership.

  • Video Reporter's Notebook: Stahl

    Only On The Web: Lesley Stahl discusses her interview with House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and the possibility of Pelosi becoming the first female Speaker of the House.

  • Video Pelosi On Joy, Leadership

    Lesley Stahl speaks with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi about the joy of being a mother and grandmother, and how it has influenced the way she rules.

  • Rep. Nancy Pelosi Photo

    Rep. Nancy Pelosi  (CBS)

  • Interactive Campaign 2006

    Complete coverage and analysis of Senate and key House races, plus gubernatorial elections.

  • Interactive Election Briefing Book

    Info on the races, voting statistics, and more from the CBS News Election & Survey Unit.

  • Interactive The 109th Congress

    Meet the leaders and follow the action in the House and Senate.

(CBS) 

"You don't talk about those big liberal issues you used to fight for up here," Stahl remarks.

"I've never walked away from any of my positions. I take pride in them," the congresswoman replies.

Asked about gay marriage, Pelosi says, "Well, that's an issue that is not an issue that we're fighting about here."

One issue that she is fighting about here is Iraq. She opposed the war from the start and now, like her, most Democrats support a phased withdrawal of troops beginning later this year.

"Does that not open you up then to that charge of cutting and running? This is just what they're saying," Stahl asks.

"The issue is them. The issue is the war they got us into," Pelosi replies. "If the president wants to say the war in Iraq is part of the war on terror, he's not right."

"Do you not think that the war in Iraq now, today, is the war on terror?" Stahl asks.

"No. The war on terror is the war in Afghanistan," Pelosi says.

"But you don't think that the terrorists have moved into Iraq now?" Stahl continues.

"They have," Pelosi agrees. "The jihadists in Iraq. But that doesn't mean we stay there. They'll stay there as long as we're there."

Asked what she would say to Republicans, who have said that Pelosi and the Democrats do not understand the serious nature of the threat, the congresswoman says, "I, as a mother and a grandmother, 14 years on the intelligence committee. Don't tell me I have any underestimation of what the threat is to our country. So, if you want to justify your failed policy by saying we don't understand the threat, clearly you didn't understand the situation you got us into."

The Democrats think Iraq is a winning issue for them, and so Pelosi fires away as she campaigns for different candidates almost every day, from toney towns in Connecticut to Minnesota's farm country.

Pelosi’s Capitol Hill office is the one once used by Tip O’Neill when he was Speaker 20 years ago.

"Here's a picture when I was a little girl, when I swore my father in when he became Mayor of Baltimore," Pelosi says, showing Stahl the photo in her office.

Nothing prepared her for power more than growing up in Baltimore, the daughter of Tommy D’Alessandro, an old school Democrat. She learned the secrets of political organizing, when she used to help keep track of favors owed her father during his 12 years as mayor.

"I was pampered in the fact that I had five older brothers, which I highly recommend to anyone," she says.

Nancy was the youngest of six children, and the only girl, in a strict Catholic family.

"I wanted to be independent. And they were always, you know, 'Oh, you can't do this, you can't do that.' Telling me all the things I couldn't do," Pelosi recalls.

Asked whether she ever rebelled, Pelosi says, "No. It wasn't even an option. This is the 50s."

But she did admit that she did sneak out. "Don’t tell anybody," she told Stahl, laughing.

At college, she met her husband Paul Pelosi, now a wealthy San Francisco investment banker. In fact, she’s the eight richest member of the House. He says he doesn’t give his wife advice, except for one thing: he picks out her clothes. "Well, she hates to shop," he explains.

Paul Pelosi says that for years, a career in politics was the farthest thing from his wife's mind. "It wasn't even on the table. It wasn't even part of the discussion," he says. "Nothing in her personality – it was never going to happen."

So what happened?

"Well, we end up in San Francisco. We raise our five children and when the children were in school all day, then she started doing volunteer stuff," Pelosi recalls.

Pelosi had five kids, born in six years and one week, and was pregnant for a good portion of the 1960s.

Christine, the second oldest of four daughters and one son, says, her mother was the disciplinarian and drill sergeant in the family then, as she is in Congress now.

"We were always expected to make sure our homework was done; and that we were prepared for what we did. She would always say, 'Proper preparation prevents poor performance,'" Christine remembers.

Continued



Produced by Karen Sughrue
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 119 Comments
by trepika33 October 22, 2006 8:29 PM PDT
Pelosi is no different than the other caustic party leaders. She should be more respectful to the President. There are politicians on both sides just like her. They all show disrespect to their offices.
Reply to this comment
by elobb October 22, 2006 8:41 PM PDT
Pelosi turned a lot of people off from her comments this evening. She does not deserve to be the next speaker - she needs to go back to California. She came out in the interview as arrogant, know-it-all woman, and yes, thick skinned. I am disgusted and disappointed with her views.
Reply to this comment
by meadowman October 22, 2006 8:48 PM PDT
why feature any politician who forgets why they were elected and whose goal in life is to oppose "anything coming from the Whitehouse", and to punish any Democrat who votes with Republican - no matter the value of the legislation to the people?
Reply to this comment
by subwaysong October 22, 2006 8:50 PM PDT
I'm not sure impeachment is off the table, and it's misguided and premature for Pelosi to say so. Henry Waxman and John Conyers have multiple investigations pending of what may turn out to be serious criminal activity, and impeachment may turn out to be a natural consequence of an oversight process that is long overdue. It didn't have to happen this way. Republicans could have governed with integrity and honesty, but they chose their sleazy path instead. Perhaps when all is said and done, the Bush/Cheney crime syndicate will be forced to resign in disgrace after just a few months.

That would make Nancy Pelosi President by default, and I hope she chooses Howard Dean as her VP. I'm The Subway Serenade and I approved this comment.
Reply to this comment
by duffyn October 22, 2006 10:16 PM PDT
Nancy Pelosi is awesome. And I give her credit for having the guts to call Bush exactly what he is. Any one who doesn't like Nancy is just repeating what the republicans want them to. She is certainly NOT going to be pampering terrorists and all the other *** they say about her. Take 15 minutes and go to her website and read the bills she is responsible for. More armour for the troops is one of them. I am sick of the name calling on her. Give me a break!
Reply to this comment
by October 22, 2006 10:29 PM PDT
Unbelievable interview by Leslie Stahl - she apparently can't believe that Pelosi has the temerity to speak her mind and shoot staright from the hip. Go home and bake cookies, Stahl seems to be saying. Play nice or don't play at all. What a load of ***.

Stahl has really disappointed me tonight.
Reply to this comment
by duffyn October 22, 2006 10:33 PM PDT
Not ready for San Francisco values. I guess you like the bush/republican values? Gee, let's go off on an illegal, preemptive war and lie about all the reasons because we need to get the war going now while we can. Turn the country into a living hell with thousands of people dead. Oh yeah, there's some values. Or, maybe go off into pedophile land with the pages. Are we in touch yet? Nancy out of touch, I don't think so. She's right in the middle of the mess and has the guts and know how to straigten it out.
Reply to this comment
by duffyn October 22, 2006 10:39 PM PDT
Stahl really is full of it. Voting no on tax cuts. What tax cuts? The one's for the super rich. That's all bush & people ever put through and THE REST OF US ARE PAYING FOR THOSE TAX CUTS - WE'RE IN DEBT BABY!!!! We all we pay for all those tax cuts with interest! Tax cuts are nothing but buying votes in my mind. Stahl uses complete hogwash in a vain attempt to put down a decent honorable woman.
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 October 22, 2006 10:45 PM PDT
President Pelosi...

Lookss like you will be taking over when Cheney and Bush are impeached and JAILED for their War Crimes.

There is an undeniable abundance of hard evidence that Cheney/Bush LIED us into the needless, horrific War On Iraq -- about as high a "High Crime and Misdomeaner" as you can get! A few (or several) hundred thousand innocent Iraqi civilians dead, nearly 2,800 US troops dead, thousands and thousands more maimed for life, not to mention $300 Billion (so far).

In addition to the Horror of War foced upon our troops and the Iraqi people, these Neocons are responsible for expoliting 9-11 to start their War of Agression, which has radicalized the next generation of young men in the Middle East, leaving us far less safe.

So, welcome President Pelosi -- and good luck, for you have inherited a TOTAL DISASTER.


Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 October 22, 2006 10:48 PM PDT
I wish people would stop talking about just impeaching Bush and Cheney...

We should all be talking bout what sort of JAIL TIME they should get for their crimes.
Reply to this comment
by tanja_d-2009 October 22, 2006 11:11 PM PDT
I have never written into a show, newspaper, etc. - ever. I never have because I feel like I should be absolutely certain of something before I'm vocally critical. But I was so disgusted by Lesley Stahl's interview I had to register and post a comment. I usually respect 60 Minutes and its reporting but I hope to never see another Lesley Stahl interview. And if I do - I only hope that she grills those in power who are responsible for the most unforgivable kind of policies that have divided the nation, that have shocked the world with their hypocrisy, literally killed thousands of innocent people and American soldiers, increased the hatred/resentment of terrorists and innocent people in the Middle East, have neglected all Americans except for their rich friends, have encouraged the dangerous mix of religion and politics in gov't, and on and on and on the way she did Nancy Pelosi. If Lesley Stahl considers holding those accountable for the destructive policies, lies, hypocrisy, etc. "revenge," than I am truly ashamed that she is American. Getting to the truth, holding corrupt politicians accountable, then helping the country heal and unite is the best thing that could ever happen to our wonderful country and restore its standing in the global community.
Reply to this comment
by steveoreno2 October 22, 2006 11:23 PM PDT
Pelosi rules! I'm glad SOMEBODY has the guts to stand up for AMERICAN values (freedom, equal rights for all) and denounce the Bush/Cheney LIES for what they are. She's feisty at 66 -- being an over-50 baby-boomer myself, that gives me hope to carry on. Thanks, Nancy!! You go girl!



Reply to this comment
by the74blaster October 22, 2006 11:25 PM PDT
The issue regarding Iraq is not a question of cutting and running from conflict. It%u2019s an issue of bearing the cost of keeping an American military presence with little international participation.

The comment about making Bush and Caney lame ducks is right on and this election should be a referendum on the GOP's approval rating.

Restoring the stability in Iraq is something the United States cannot do by itself. We need international participation from Iraq%u2019s neighbors to share the burden and to show the Arabs we are not going to occupy their country for oil. However, the total loss of credibility on the international level will make it difficult for Bush to build any alliance to stabilize Iraq.

It is even possible the upcoming election is a measure of the GOP%u2019s credibility and Nancy Pelosi will probably become the new speaker of the house.

Considering the total collapse of GOP credibility and the record of failure, I can live with the change. The only reason people are mentioning %u201CSan Francisco Values%u201D is to generate fear and divide the growing ballot that wants to change the direction
Reply to this comment
by dellarose2 October 22, 2006 11:35 PM PDT
Why did Leslie Stahl use precious airtime in her interview of Nancy Pelosi to comment on Pelosi's clothing - Armani here, boots there, and the fascinating information that possibly the next speaker of the house ate two (count em) two pork chops. Gads...can you imagine commenting on a male representative's clothing and what they ate at a public function? Please, Leslie, tell me what you're wearing right now.
Reply to this comment
by dellarose2 October 22, 2006 11:43 PM PDT
Nancy Pelosi wore Armani in one public appearance and cowboy boots in another; and not only that, she ate two (count em) two pork chops. Gosh - I wonder what the male representatives of Congress had on their backs. Such critical info to have about the next Speaker of the House. I would have expected better of Lesley Stahl. And by the way, Lesley, what are you wearing right now.
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 October 22, 2006 11:45 PM PDT
Winstrv

This election is not about electing Nancy Pelosi. It's about putting an end to the the corruption, incompetance and failed policies of Bush and the GOP.

As for Viet Nam comparrisons to Iraq. Iraq already is a new Viet Nam. Like Viet Nam this administration didn't have the political will to send enough troops and not strategicly competant enough to win. Like Viet Nam the distruction and carniage has been apocoliptic. At least half a million Iraqis have been killed in three short years. Nearly three thousand Americans have been killed and tens of thousands more seriously wounded for life. Like Viet Nam, the soldiers on the ground aren't clear who is friend and who is enemy. Like Viet Nam the American public have lost confidence in the leaders who got us into it. Just like Viet Nam this war began on a lie and continues on a lie. Just like Viet Nam history will look back on Iraq as a huge mistake and huge waste of life and treasure for nothing. Hopefully, the big difference will be that we will get out before we waste any more of either.

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 October 22, 2006 11:57 PM PDT
I wonder if Pelosi is a good choice for speaker. Though I happen to agree with much of what she says, she's a very polarising a figure. She's from an extremely liberal area and may be too driven by the politics of that constituency and thus alienating to people who are more to the center of the political spectrum. She will give conservatives a lot of amunition to shoot up the Dems. The GOP will try to make her the face and voice of the party and until the Dems take back the White House that's exactly what she'll be. I think that the speaker of the house should be strong figure with a more centrist aproach.
Reply to this comment
by breezy501 October 23, 2006 12:06 AM PDT
I was so disgusted by Leslie Stahl's interview with Nancy Pelosi that I registered so I could comment on Stahl's terrible performance. Stahl characterized candor as incivility. Calling Bush incompetent based on his performance in Katrina is not incivility; it is candid. Stahl's interview was sexist throughout. Pelosi's remarks which were discussed in the interview were not personal. A personal remark against Bush might be something like "he's ugly or stupid." Commenting on his obvious poor performance is simply candor. Stahl need look no further than Bush's own party for plenty of other similar comments.

Perhaps the lowest part of the show was Stahl's remarks about Pelosi's wardrobe. Would Stahl have worn sandals to walk around that Iowa field? Undoubtedly cowboy boots were the order of the day in Iowa, but not appropriate in Connecticut. What would Stahl have remarked had Pelosi worn boots in CT and Armani in Iowa?

Send Stahl into retirement quickly. She is embarrassing CBS.
Reply to this comment
by ejl1123 October 23, 2006 12:37 AM PDT
Tonight's 60 Minutes (10/22/06) IMPRESSED ME AS A PITCHED BATTLE, OR AT LEAST A CONFRONTATION, between Nancy Pelosi vs. Lesley Stahl. My mind did not receive any clarification of possible facts bearing on Nancy's performance as a peoples representative. I heard Lesley's challenging questions as to the efficacy of demos opposition. This strikes me as a mind-set of the media to maintain the corporate power that created our current monsters in the administration. Skeptical criticism is the function of journalism, not projecting the least common denometer that will placate the restless people. If CBS is to compete in the field of informing the public, you are going to have to sharpen your pencils. Perhaps a new reading of H. L. Mencken. Due to the media failue we have an ignorant population that is easily Goebbelized. Farewell noble experiment!
Reply to this comment
by ejl1123 October 23, 2006 1:15 AM PDT
Allowing Comment No. 2: Briefly, past events prove current affairs and analyzing the past relative to the present gives us insight for the future. Media has never given the public an objective observation of recorded history but has repeated popular preferences to maintain an audience for advertising dollars. Last stroke: Lesley asked Nancy for a pledge that there would be no impeachment; are demos to lie down and cower in the face of our national humiliation? Impeachable offenses are always in order, failure to do so is to destroy the principles left in the constitution. Without impeachment, the misconduct becomes a model for future tyrants.
Reply to this comment
by lied2 October 23, 2006 1:56 AM PDT
Gee, you sure wooda thought CBS would be a little more in Pelosi's court. After all, Bush IS incompetant. The repubs are criminals. We learned as much on where? -SIXTY MINUTES!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by gerrihc October 23, 2006 2:29 AM PDT
I was dismayed in part by Leslie Stahl's interview with Nancy Pelosi, and in part, I was disgusted. That Ms. Pelosi feels that President Bush is incompetent is not a "personal attack" or a lack of civility. It is her rightful opinion. It is the same as an employer saying that an employee was incompetent at his or her job. Ms. Stahl's conclusion about the lack of civility was wrong, but her gratuitous inclusion of references to what Ms. Pelosi was wearing for her various interviews absolutely floored me. Such references are the essence of sexist reporting in which a woman's appearance or wardrobe or hair color is mentioned, but a man's are not. Maybe Ms. Stahl does not consider such references to be sexist, but is she also lacking in the intelligence sufficient to know that such references to a woman's clothing or appearance have no part in a story about a woman%u2019s political political or other professional activities? The references were demeaning to Ms. Pelosi and to all professional women, and it will take me a long time to get over hearing them in today's program. Do other CBS reporters show such lack of awareness or respect for women?? Time will tell, I suppose, if I watch any more CBS news programs . . .
Reply to this comment
by ajrule1 October 23, 2006 4:15 AM PDT
I have always respected Leslie Stall and her professionalism. That is until I had the displeasure of seeing her in action on tonight%u2019s 60-minutes interview with Senator Nancy Pelossi.

I was awe-struck by her un-professionalism, rudeness and out-dated questions. This was actually one of the more important interviews of her career since she was interviewing the soon-to-be newest speaker of the house. Despite that, her interview was nothing more than what I might have expected from the Ladies Home Journal, circa 1960. She focused on trivial and trite matters like what she wore, ate, and her designer clothing for Pete's sake. WHO CARES!

She starts out with this insulting comment: ""I mean, you're one of the reasons we have to restore civility in the first place," Stahl remarks. Looks like CBS needs to restore civility to 60-minutes by removing Leslie from the show. That's certainly an opinion she should have kept to herself.

Later, she comments that Nancy was pregnant while she was working, and then makes Nancy's poor daughter defend on-camera that they were amazingly still %u201Cfed and clothed%u201D while Nancy worked. How sexist and outdated is that line of questioning?

Her biased editorial comments, patronizing attitude and obvious sexism, un-professionalism and discriminatory manner, make it clear to me, CBS needs to hire a REAL PROFESSIONAL to deliver unbiased, un-editorial commentary. I'll take 60-minutes off my tivo until Leslie is gone.
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 October 23, 2006 5:44 AM PDT
"Asked about gay marriage,Pelosi says, "well, thats an issue that is not an issue that we're fighting about here."

"here" is more important than the rest of the nation? I do not trust people who slither out
of dealing with things.

"14 YEARS on the intelligence committee". Why didn't Pelosi speak up BEFORE the war?
Isn't it the question of the failure of "inteligence" that is one of the most serious conundrums now? (a guy from Iraq area said, Oh yes,Sadam HAD weapons of mass destruction, he just hauled them accross the border to the neighbors.)

WHEN did Pelosi know about Foley?

Leslie Stahl did a fine job.
Reply to this comment
by mjv2944 October 23, 2006 7:32 AM PDT
Might be a nice lady, but still a part of the corrupt House of Representatives. The country didn't get this messed up by repubs alone, though they were the leaders, dems had their fingers in the pie also, but maybe covered their tracks a little better. Folks, their all a bunch of thieves.
Reply to this comment
by janeymcgreev October 23, 2006 8:36 AM PDT
MJV,

Appreciate your honesty.

You vote Democratic, you get this.
You want it? Then don't cry to me when you see ILLEGALS clogging up our emergency rooms and schools even more so. Or get a higher tax bill BUT with LESS Defense. And don't forget the next terrorist attack. There were a half-dozen on Clinton's watch, but remember, he was too busy with Bimbos and Bombing Belgrade.

You vote Pelosi you get a Plastic Princess who is more concerned about how she looks than what she will do for the people. Hate Republicans, but remember that the *** Democratic Neo-Fascists like Nancy and Fruitcake Lamont are certainly much worst.

And anyone who brings up Foley again, just remember you gave us Clinton, Jim McGreevey, Barney Frank, and the dead reptile Studds. You may rightfully cry foul with pervert Mark but you cheered on your own Perverts.
Reply to this comment
by janeymcgreev October 23, 2006 8:40 AM PDT
Those blasting Stahl need to remember that ol' Lesley is herself a Liberal. So, bring out dem manure buckets. Maybe drop them on yourselves???

Look at Pelosi. This thing with her plastic surgery wants to be 40 years old rather than 66. There is absolutely NO substance here, just a plastic nothing full of lies. But hey, that's what you get if you vote Democratic.

As far as the President being "incompetent" I don't hear Plastic Princess saying the same about his predecessor - the Pervert and Draft Dodger who played with Bimbos while Bin Laden was planning 9/11.
Reply to this comment
by cathaleen October 23, 2006 8:45 AM PDT
I watched the interview with Nancy Pelosi last night. She seemed sincere until at the end
of the interview Leslie Stahl as her about the Dems going after Bush and trying to impeach him. She said it was off the table but you could tell she was lying thru her teeth. The Dems can't wait to get at Bush. Unfortunately, it's the last thing this country needs right now - another fiasco. We need someone to unite this country and bring our men and women home from Iraq. No one talks about that - it's all about themselves.
Reply to this comment
by wwawallstreet October 23, 2006 9:01 AM PDT
Pelosi shows her REAL nature with two comments, (1) "Bush is an incompetent" followed by (2) "we're both professionals". Typical political double-speak. This woman is one of the most liberal Democrats from one of the most liberal districts in the nation and hardly reflective of the nation as a whole. Her agenda, "just say no to everything" is irresponsible and does not move the nation forward. We're still waiting to hear the Democrat alternatives to the current economic boom, low unemployment, no new terror attacks, and record federal tax receipts (even after the evil Bush tax cuts). Pelosi says she has already achieved her goal in life--to be a grandmother. The country needs REAL leaders in Congress, not grandmothers.
Reply to this comment
by herebythesea October 23, 2006 9:03 AM PDT
I just wish we knew the truth about SOMEBODY. All we have are smear campaigns and cover-ups. Nobody says "This is what I believe," and shows proof of their own record to prove it.
Reply to this comment
by b4815 October 23, 2006 9:23 AM PDT
u dems should be proud of this ol San fran lib.
Reply to this comment
by ademeyer October 23, 2006 9:47 AM PDT
The same people who deride Pelosi are silent on the tactics that brought Republicans to power and the people who used them: Rove and his robo calls, DeLay the "Hammer," keeping Republicans in line in the House, Harris and her success in stopping the Florida recount, the Texas House and gerrymandering, ad nauseum.

What is Pelosi in comparison to this? A little opinionated? I'll take opinionated over fascist any day! Pelosi says Bush is incompetent? He IS incompetent! She is hardly undermining an administration that has brought its self down, with the help of a Republican Senate, and House and Supreme Court. The Republicans have harmed this country, not Pelosi and her friends, and now its time for democracy to do its thing and swing the pendulum.
Reply to this comment
by tallerone October 23, 2006 10:13 AM PDT
In Pelosi's biographical sketch it was said that as a little girl she kept track of the favors owed her father, the mayor of Baltimore. That doesn't sound like the kind of political training I want for my elected officials. In order to be owed favors one must do favors for others.
Reply to this comment
by mike12sf October 23, 2006 10:15 AM PDT
Did Lesley Stahl and Nancy Pelosi get a room together after the interview? What a sickening interview
Reply to this comment
by grumpas October 23, 2006 10:20 AM PDT
Hey Janey! Haven't you moron's figured out yet Bin Laden doesn't have to plan another 9/11? All he has to do is set in his tent with his wives and watch George W Bush doing his dirty work for him! This country is crumbling under the massive weight of the incompetent leadership we have! So why should he hit us again? It's a moot subject anymore! Bush played right into his hands when he invaded Iraq! He couldn't find a better poster boy for the cause of terrorism if he tried than good ole Georgie! George has proven himself to be a old school fascist through and through! He has done everything humanly possible to see that terrorist's multiply and grow at alarming rates! With someone like Georgie at the helm who needs any enemies????
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 23, 2006 10:41 AM PDT
To everyone here let JaneMcCreev rant and rave.She obviously has not read the Washington Post or Times lately.They ran a story on the anger factor affecting the outcome of the elections,moderate republicans,independents and conservative democrats were abandoning the GOP for the democratic party.The arrticle was quite in depth and offered polls to support it.If those polls are correct and all the other polls then we will have a democratic sweep in both houses.She (McCreev)has never offered a single solution in any of her post besides vote Republican.Where was she when the IDIOT president of Iran was saying that Israel would disappear and a large number of posters were in agreeance with the Idiot.Here is the post Jane if you really are an American regardless of political affilation you will take these morons on.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006
/10/20/world/main2110011.shtml
So lets see if you are an American first or just an angry,lonely,desparate woman filled with venom.Now is your chance to be bipartisan
Reply to this comment
by octopibingo October 23, 2006 11:16 AM PDT
She says she'll bring civility back to Washington? She couldn't even do it in this interview. Liberals are always bemoaning the hate speech of politics, but of course that's only political posturing. I've never heard so much hatred as I have from this person.
Justify away.
Reply to this comment
by cbgb31 October 23, 2006 11:20 AM PDT
I think that marble ceiling has already been broken by Condoleezza Rice.
Reply to this comment
by amsjoe October 23, 2006 11:37 AM PDT
She's happy to be a Grandmother. So sweet.
Please ask here about her views on abortion and the killing she allows into the third trimester next time libby Stahl!
Reply to this comment
by amsjoe October 23, 2006 11:49 AM PDT
Well said Janey!!
Its laughable reading these liberal rants
Moron Bush Idiot Bush on and ond
Nothing of substance Nothing!
If you have facts you pound the facts
If you have nothing you pound the podium

Pro Abortion and cut and run cowards


Sheehan and Baldwin and Penn Great group

Reply to this comment
by dwsuwf October 23, 2006 11:57 AM PDT
The piece will undermine the Republican efforts to demonize Pelosi somewhat. It is almost laughable the extent to which some bloggers and columnnist will go to scare voters about Pelosi "two heartbeats away."

Well, in case nobody noticed, we have a much scarier prospect "two heartbeats away" - Denny Hastert. Why anyone would think that Pelosi is scarier than Hastert in that role is beyond me. Hastert is more partisan, more divisive, and completely corrupt. At least Pelosi does not need to earmark taxpayer funds for a "highway to nowhere" to drive up the value of property and sell for a profit as Hastert did.

http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/10/third-in-line.html
Reply to this comment
by dwsuwf October 23, 2006 11:58 AM PDT
The piece will undermine the Republican efforts to demonize Pelosi somewhat. It is almost laughable the extent to which some bloggers and columnnist will go to scare voters about Pelosi "two heartbeats away."

Well, in case nobody noticed, we have a much scarier prospect "two heartbeats away" - Denny Hastert. Why anyone would think that Pelosi is scarier than Hastert in that role is beyond me. Hastert is more partisan, more divisive, and completely corrupt. At least Pelosi does not need to earmark taxpayer funds for a "highway to nowhere" to drive up the value of property and sell for a profit as Hastert did.

http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/10/third-in-line.html
Reply to this comment
by dwsuwf October 23, 2006 11:59 AM PDT
The piece will undermine the Republican efforts to demonize Pelosi somewhat. It is almost laughable the extent to which some bloggers and columnnist will go to scare voters about Pelosi "two heartbeats away."

Well, in case nobody noticed, we have a much scarier prospect "two heartbeats away" - Denny Hastert. Why anyone would think that Pelosi is scarier than Hastert in that role is beyond me. Hastert is more partisan, more divisive, and completely corrupt.

http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2006/10/third-in-line.html
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 23, 2006 12:09 PM PDT
to amsjoe You ask for facts okay when 9/11 occurred Bush ask then terrorsist czar Richard Clarke(a republican) in front of four witness to find a way to blame it on Saddam (source:AGAINST ALL ENEMIES)and 11 days into his presidency at a cabinet meeting with members of the military present asked for a battle plan for Iraq (source:THE PRICE OF LOYALTY)then treasury secretary Paul O'Neil stated again a republican.Neither of these books have been rebuked or denied.Shall I go on to Woodward's book or Powells neither of which has been rebuked except for the first lady's pr office.She herself has not rebuked the statements.
Reply to this comment
by dwsuwf October 23, 2006 12:13 PM PDT
oops. I guess I hit the publish key too many times. Could someone at cbs delet the duplicates.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad October 23, 2006 12:22 PM PDT
Pelosi would be a better President than the one we have now, almost anyone would. Be Ever Vigilant. Bush and Rove will do anything to stay in power up to an including flooding key districts with fake absentee ballots tampering with electronic voting machines, and bussing in voters who are not from the districts to vote, or even starting another war and suspending civil liberties postponing the mid term vote.
Reply to this comment
by imright1 October 23, 2006 12:27 PM PDT
I saw the interview - nice puff piece intended to make Mrs. Pelosi look good. I was startled when she said that the only reason the bad guys are in Iraq is because we're there (like it's a bad thing). Does she think that they'd just disappear if we left? I think that they'd follow us home.

My campaign slogan - "The woman can't even dress herself - do you really want her as Speaker of the House?"
Reply to this comment
by nadeau4201 October 23, 2006 12:29 PM PDT
No Pelosi is not a hateful person just ask NAMBLA an organization that she took contributions from. She loves everyone including grown men who sleep with little boys. Need I say more. jh6379 get a clue.
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy October 23, 2006 12:30 PM PDT
amsjoe,

Care to guess how many people might be saved with stem cell research? How many disadvantaged Americans die because of inadequate health care? Are there differences in infant mortality rates among the different economic classes in America? How many more have died in the workplace because you guys lowered safety standards? Is that just "tough luck" in your view? And how many will die in Iraq today?
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad October 23, 2006 12:32 PM PDT
Be Ever Vigilant. Bush and Rove will do anything to stay in power up to an including flooding key districts with fake absentee ballots tampering with electronic voting machines, and bussing in voters who are not from the districts to vote, or even starting another war with and suspending civil liberties postponing the mid term vote. There is a great possibility for this administration to tamper with the electronic voting machines to the point that very subtle differences will take place in Key races just enough to tip the vote in their favor but not enough to cause a full scale American Revolution leaving some doubt, but just enough to throw key races in the Republican Favor. Watch out for this election coup.
Reply to this comment
See all 119 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
60 Minutes RSS Feed