February 11, 2009 5:52 PM

Woman Sues Over Anti-Bush Car Sticker

(AP)  A woman who was ticketed for having an obscene anti-President George W. Bush bumper sticker filed a lawsuit in federal court Monday against a county in the state of Georgia and its officials.

Denise Grier, 47, of Athens, Georgia, got a $100 ticket in March after a police officer in DeKalb County, which is in the suburbs of Atlanta, spotted the bumper sticker, which read "I'm Tired Of All The BUSH--."

Although a DeKalb judge threw out the ticket in April because the state's lewd bumper sticker law that formed the basis for the ticket was ruled unconstitutional in 1990, Grier is seeking damages for "emotional distress" against the county, according to the lawsuit.

Grier also seeks a declaration in federal court that her bumper sticker is considered protected speech under the constitutional right to free speech because she is "uncertain and insecure regarding her right to display her bumper sticker in DeKalb County," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia.

"This type of sarcasm in relation to political figures is as old as the country," said her attorney, Frank Derrickson. "We think this bumper sticker is just the latest example of this. We want to be assured that not just Ms. Grier but anyone who wants to have fun with the powers that be should be able to do that under the First Amendment."

DeKalb County spokeswoman Kristie Swink said she could not comment on pending litigation.

Grier, a nurse who works at Emory University and other hospitals, also is seeking punitive damages against the DeKalb police officer who gave her the ticket because he "acted with reckless disregard" of her rights, the lawsuit said.

The state law prohibited lewd or profane stickers and decals on vehicles.

Derrickson said Grier still has the anti-Bush bumper sticker on her car.

"I think she's got better ones than that, at least the ones that I saw," he said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by huskerarmy October 18, 2006 12:28 PM EDT
"Just saw a guy walking down the street yesterday with a t-shirt that said, "I may not be Mr. Right but I will f*** you until he comes along." Yes, the word was spelled out. Isn't that special! Is this a first amendment right? The right of the one to offend outrules the rights of the many not to be offended. Way to go ACLU!"

The GOP has flourished on just this kind of bait and switch. The sticker in the story does not use profanity but rather alludes to it. Nevertheless, where do we draw the line? Who decides what is offensive? If one truely believes in a market place of ideas, then let the public decide. If no one wants to buy this kind of merchandise, they won't. People can buy the smut if they choose but the majority will reject it. This is not something for Big Brother to decide. You can not legislate all things to be nicey nice. Unfortunately, for some, living in a free society means having to endure the presence of those who are different, sometimes distastful and often disagree with you.
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy October 18, 2006 12:16 PM EDT
Fascism - A government or party lead by a dictator emphasizing aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Such a party would be opposed to the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act. Such a party would invade another country with little to no support from the world community. Such a party would out a CIA agent, wiretap without a warrant or lie to go to war if it were in their view good of the state. Such a party would enhance the rules to give every advantage to the elite. Any idea why the Bushies might want to throw that label around so much? Is that projection perhap?
Reply to this comment
by thekjb-2009 October 18, 2006 4:11 AM EDT
I love how anybody that doesn't get on their knees and worship at the love muscle of George W. Bush and his pals is somehow a "neo-fascist". A cop who is an obvious Bush supporter pulls over someone for no other reason that having an obvious difference of political opinion and snaps out a $100 ticket. I'd like to see how many tickets he wrote to people sporting "obscene" stickers about Clinton. Yet somehow the woman getting the ticket is a fascist. I guess all the rape victims were asking for it by wearing those tight clothes and going out in public being all enticingly female. This doesn't need an ACLU lawsuit but it deserves more than just an apology from the cop. It is a classic example of misuse of authority and the guy should lose his job. As citizens, we need to take this kind of abuse VERY seriously and those who abuse the public trust should be dealt with VERY harshly. He shouldn't be able to police more than the parking lot of the 7-11.
Reply to this comment
by sc1958 October 18, 2006 12:16 AM EDT
The ticket was wrong. The law suit is also wrong. Get an apology from the cop and call it a day. Just saw a guy walking down the street yesterday with a t-shirt that said, "I may not be Mr. Right but I will f*** you until he comes along." Yes, the word was spelled out. Isn't that special! Is this a first amendment right? The right of the one to offend outrules the rights of the many not to be offended. Way to go ACLU!
Reply to this comment
by janemcgreeve October 18, 2006 12:05 AM EDT
typical democratic neo-fascist crybaby.

Will someone please get Missy Grier a warm bottie?
Reply to this comment
by pakaal October 17, 2006 11:21 PM EDT
Optimas2, you're correct in saying that Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus. What you forgot to mention was that the Supreme Court ruled that unconstitutional. As true then as it is now....
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy October 17, 2006 8:58 PM EDT
Optimus,

There are many of us waiting and hoping for the day that our country truely lives up to it's promise of a free and open "marketplace of ideas." The fact that we have yet to do so is a defective argument against doing so...
Reply to this comment
by osidebear October 17, 2006 7:30 PM EDT
Optimas2 makes a dangerous argument when he defends the government for showing up at a protest rally. He urges people not to protest publicly so as to avoid government notice. When we start censoring our expression, privately or publicly, for fear the government may listen AND THEN RETALIATE, we have truly lost our freedoms.

That said, I have no issue with the woman filing this lawsuit. I'm sure she suffered emotional distress at the hands of a politically-motivated overzealous police officer. Perhaps this lawsuit, especially if it should prove successful, will motivate police departments to educate their employees on what constitutes protected political speech.
Reply to this comment
by chaoszen October 17, 2006 4:32 PM EDT
Agnim,

So now I am to believe that anyone who utters a four letter word or displays one in public is the product of a deranged mind? And that the excercise of personnel freedom is "pushing your luck". And then to invoke the spectre of "contamination of children" as some sort of twisted reason to suspend freedom of speech? This is completely unreasonable. And the reason why people of conscience should always be aware of those who would take us down the path of fascism.
Reply to this comment
by agnim October 17, 2006 4:12 PM EDT
Nikosk1

You made good observations, but bad conclusion.

It is because we the adults have invented the profanities for the children that we need to cease and desist in order to bring more dignity and more civility to our children. We might just get less danger from them in their schools.

And, it is this foolish and puny woman is 'making an example' of her insane self, if she is 'emotionally distressed' over wanting to feel free to do her chitting in public and continue the contamination of the children.

Also, it wasn't like her case wasn't thrown out ..... unfortunately? But that victory was not enough for this undignified broad. She wants to show that she has 'balls' by pushing her luck.

Now, if this new judge have any common sense with this frivolous law suit, this 'emotionally distressed' woman would be made to get professional help for her obviously deranged mind.
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook