February 11, 2009 5:52 PM

Going Green Goes Mainstream

By
Caitlin A. Johnson
(CBS)  Father Charles Morris spends many afternoons on the roof of the rectory where he sounds more like an electrical engineer than a man of the cloth. He has taken his rectory in Wyandotte, Mich. off the power grid and installed high-efficiency light-bulbs and special sun-blocking screens over the windows of his church.

"What we have right here are eight 80 watt Kyocera solar panels. And a 400 watt Southwest air wind turbine," he told Sunday Morning correspondent Russ Mitchell. "We estimate that we are saving about $20,000 a year in terms of utility bills."

Whether it's because of high fuel prices, or worries about global warming, environmentalism seems to be going mainstream. Wyandotte is a Detroit suburb of 28,000 — not the most likely place for a green revolution. But Wyandotte, like a lot of places, is beginning to change.

For example, the town is trying to make its grimy, noisy power plant a little greener by mixing shredded used tires with coal.

"We burn close to three million tires a year," said Melanie McCoy, the General Manager of the town's Municipal Services. "It is a cheaper source of fuel, and it burns cleaner than coal."

McCoy has plans to for even cheaper, cleaner power. She's wants to put up wind turbines along the Detroit River, like these in nearby Bowling Green, Ohio.

"For the city, it'll give us two megawatts for each wind tower, and for every two megawatts we'll be supplying over 700 homes with electricity, cutting back on our emissions and being able to supply 'em with cheap power," she said.

Across town, Mary Lynne and Stan Rutkowski are using less gas. In the past couple of years they've traded in two SUVs for fuel-efficient hybrids — cars now so popular that many buyers have to get on waiting lists. They said that with their SUVs, they were getting 13 miles per gallon of gas. Now they get about 45 miles per gallon of gas with their Toyota Priuses. The Rutkowski's switch to cars made in Japan has raised eyebrows in Wyandotte, a town built partly on the American auto industry. In fact, Mary Lynne says she was in her car one day, when a driver in an SUV yelled she was costing American autoworkers their jobs. She held her tongue, even though she had a ready answer.

"I was gonna say, 'Well, you're the reason the ice caps are melting,'" she said.

A hybrid driver on the TV show "South Park" wasn't so shy. The character driving a Prius pulls up next to SUV and said: "You know, the emissions from a vehicle like yours causes irreparable damage to the ozone. I drive a hybrid, it's much better for the environment. Thanks."

Al Gore's film about global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," is the 3rd highest-grossing documentary in history. A recent CBS News/New York Times poll finds that two-thirds of Americans now believe global warming is having a serious impact. Three out of four believe it's necessary to take steps right away to counter its effects. Businesses like Ford and GE are responding and are trying to show they're environmentally friendly.

See The Results Of The CBS/New York Times Poll
"People are learning how to make their profit by helping nature rather than by destroying nature," said Kevin Danaher, one of the organizers of Green Festival, which is going on this weekend in Washington and is billed as the world's largest environmental expo. "We're seeing capital shift toward the green economy. Toward an economy where there's two greens, this green, and the environmental green. Where you can make better profits protecting nature and saving nature and saving resources, than you can destroying the environment. And that's a seminal shift, we're going into a different kind of economy. "


Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment
by gaye5 October 17, 2006 11:26 AM EDT
Perhaps some could look up...
http://www.intellicast.com/DrDewpoint/Library/1210/
Despite billions of dollars and millions of propaganda headlines, the global warming prophesied by the climate modelling industry is not scientifically real, see
http://www.oism.org/news/s49p1523.htm
A group of climatologists, scientists, professors and other experts in climate change on Tuesday pointed out two "misconceptions" on global warming see.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=%5CNation%5Carchive%5C200409%5CNAT20040915c.html
Then we have ...Scientists Debunk 'Fairy Tale' of 'Global Warming' on...
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/14/161152.shtml
Record low temperatures in seven states - 14 Oct 06
This should have been front page news. But did you see it mentioned in your newspaper? I doubt it.
See Record Low Temperatures across the United States
.
Winter hits Canadian plains a month early - 12 Oct 06
See what's happening in other parts of the world
.
Glaciers are growing around the world, including the United States
See Growing_Glaciers

Click here for many more
Recent Great Links.. If these come up have a good read, these are just a few of many... but these guys are not the ones getting money out of scaring people...


Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 October 17, 2006 1:08 AM EDT
Gaye5 said-- "Thank goodness there Appears to be a growing backlash of Americans rejecting what they see as climate scare tactics ... "
-------

Is "backlash" a matter of science, or politics? The current (and growing) consensus of the scientific community in the US and abroad supports the global warming hypothesis, coupled with further research and prudent policy countermeasures to measurable crisis in environmental norms. It is a crisis not merely because such warming seems unusual, but because the role of human activity is highly suspect, with foreseeable and severe long-term consequences if ignored.

Though it may surprise you, the world's scientific community is rarely unanimous on any topic, since scientists are driven by only the body of evidence and independent verification and reasonable interpretation-- not by daily radio harangues, as from on high, to "make this issue clear for you people".

While you point to seeming ambivalence in two scientific journals, this position is not tantamount to a disproof, and these are but two of dozens of relevant journals. Likewise, the position of the (US) National Academy of Science counts as one voice among many, internationally.

While you note lack of unanimity among scientists (as some of your associates find with even the theory of evolution, itself), others point to a constant editorial theme from the tribe bringing us the term "Islamofascism"%u2013 whose principal concern is keeping capitalism safe from democracy and science.
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 October 16, 2006 11:35 AM EDT
sorry, that address for Click Here To Watch or Read Full Speech from Monday Debunking Global Warming Hysteria was
http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&id=263759
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 October 16, 2006 11:26 AM EDT
thankgoodness there are still some people who think...
The National Academy of Sciences report reaffirmed the existence of the Medieval Warm Period from about 900 AD to 1300 AD and the Little Ice Age from about 1500 to 1850. Both of these periods occurred long before the invention of the SUV or human industrial activity could have possibly impacted the Earth%u2019s climate
In addition, something that the media almost never addresses are the holes in the theory that C02 has been the driving force in global warming. Alarmists fail to adequately explain why temperatures began warming at the end of the Little Ice Age in about 1850, long before man-made CO2 emissions could have impacted the climate. Then about 1940, just as man-made CO2 emissions rose sharply, the temperatures began a decline that lasted until the 1970%u2019s, prompting the media and many scientists to fear a coming ice age. Let me repeat, temperatures got colder after C02 emissions exploded. If C02 is the driving force of global climate change, why do so many in the media ignore the many skeptical scientists who cite these rather obvious inconvenient truths? 60 scientists wrote:

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/story.html?id=3711460e-bd5a-475d-a6be-4db87559d605
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 October 16, 2006 11:23 AM EDT
Click Here To Watch or Read Full Speech from Monday Debunking Global Warming Hysteria

Over the last century, the media has flip-flopped between global cooling and warming scares. Both the journals Science and Nature have published studies recently finding %u2013 on balance %u2013 Antarctica is both cooling and gaining ice. The fact is that in the Arctic, temperatures were warmer in the 1930%u2019s than today.

the National Academy of Sciences and many independent experts have made it clear that the Hockey Stick%u2019s claim that the 1990%u2019s was the hottest decade of the last 1000 years was unsupportable.

Thank goodness there Appears to be a growing backlash of Americans rejecting what they see as climate scare tactics, and alarmist keep using the well worn tactics from their guidebook -- warning of heat waves, our Children in Danger, wildfires, droughts, melting glaciers, mass extinctions unless mankind put itself on a starvation energy diet and taxed emissions.

Reply to this comment
by dbmash October 16, 2006 1:08 AM EDT
An encouraging report. People will make significant changes in their life when they realize the importance of the situation. More and more folks are finally realizing that we our facing the most important fight in the history of man. I don't think you can overstate the problem. Our planet is in serious trouble. It is imperative that everything possible be done to convince those who believe that profit at any cost is no longer acceptable. Who better to take the lead in this fight than our spiritual leaders. Father Morris has shown us that one man can make a difference. The CBS news story has shown us that he is not alone. Imagine what can be accomplished when we all work to fix this problem. There will always be the naysayers. But then, some folks still think the world is flat.

Reply to this comment
by sharncedar October 15, 2006 9:12 PM EDT
Sorry, environmentalism is simply not compatible with capitalism and growth. Sorry, its just not. No, its not. Not compatible. Yes, I understand it would make your little small brain feel better if you could feel you were doing some good by being a mindless tool, but you are not. No you are not. You are destroying the environment. Sorry, you are.

Ok little corporate nothing? All clear now? What part of "growth" do you not understand? The part where more people use more water ... is that the part .. where more profit means faster consumption which means, brace yourself, even more destructive consumption.

There is no possible rapproachment between our system and environmental stewardship. Our system is predicated on interest ( and now even interest on interest, such as derivatives) and without a steady increasing rate of consumption of natural resources, the whole monetary system collapses.

Interest means capitalism. That is why in all Western religions, interest on moneylending is a sin.

Sorry. Wouldn't it be nice if we could all say the words "environment" three times and somehow interest would not be a sin anymore? Too bad natural law is sooooo stuborn. ***.
Reply to this comment
by lightnin38 October 15, 2006 6:14 PM EDT
I wonder what the environmental implications of cremation are? Green or not, that's how I'm goin' down................L
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 October 15, 2006 3:06 PM EDT
Well done.
Reply to this comment
by sue2982 October 15, 2006 1:36 PM EDT
Excellent story. Ordinary people doing extrordinary things. Now the corporations need to follow suit. CEO's need to earn less to enable the lower levels to buy green products.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook