Ney Pleads Guilty, Plans To Resign
First Lawmaker To Confess Crimes In Abramoff Lobbying Scandal
-
-
Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, arrives at the federal courthouse, Friday, Oct. 13, 2006, in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari)
-
Jack Abramoff is cooperating with federal investigators while awaiting sentencing on tax evasion and wire fraud charges. (AP)
-
-
Interactive Wheeling & Dealing Learn more about the scandals involving former lobbyist Jack Abramoff
-
Interactive The 109th Congress Meet the leaders and follow the action in the House and Senate.
-
Interactive Political Scandals Politics can be a strange and dirty business. Check out some of the biggest missteps and mishaps in recent history.
Standing before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle, Ney pleaded guilty to conspiracy and making false statements. He acknowledged taking money, gifts and favors in return for official actions on behalf of Abramoff and his clients.
Ney did not immediately resign from Congress, but said in a statement that he will step down "in the next few weeks." Republican and Democratic leaders quickly vowed to expel him if he doesn't. The White House also called for Ney's resignation.
Beleaguered Republican leaders, struggling to overcome fallout from a separate scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley and teenage male pages, said they would make Ney's ouster the "first order of business" in a session after the Nov. 7 elections.
The scandal is likely to reinforce Democrats' contention in the campaign leading up to the elections that the ruling Republicans are corrupt and do not deserve to retain control of the House of Representatives and the Senate. There also could be difficulties for Republican candidates in Ney's home state of Ohio.
"I never intended my career in public service to end this way, and I am ashamed it did," Ney said in a written statement issued moments later.
The 52-year-old lawmaker faces a maximum of 10 years in prison. Huvelle said prosecutors had agreed to recommend a term of 27 months, and said federal guidelines suggest a fine of between $5,000 and $60,000.
As to why he's not resigning now, several officials have said the congressman is financially strapped and needs his $165,200 annual paycheck and benefits as long as he can continue to receive them.
Ney's lawyer, Mark Touhey, told the judge he would resign before sentencing on Jan. 19. The House Republican leader, Dennis Hastert, and other Republican leaders said he would be gone far more quickly than that.
Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader, called Ney's guilty plea "further proof that the Republican culture of corruption has pervaded Congress."
Ney is the latest in a string of once-influential men convicted in a scandal that so far has caught several lobbyists and two members of the Bush administration.
Abramoff, the Republican super-lobbyist, admitted guilt in January after secretly cooperating with prosecutors for weeks.
Two former aides to Tom DeLay, the former House majority leader, have also pleaded guilty, as has Ney's former chief of staff.
Additionally, Roger Stillwell, a former Interior Department official, pleaded guilty in August to a misdemeanor charge for not reporting tickets he received from Abramoff.
And former White House official David Safavian, who had been the Bush administration's top procurement official, was convicted of covering up his dealings with Abramoff. He is scheduled for sentencing on Oct. 27.
Ney confessed his wrongdoing in a federal courthouse a few blocks from the Capitol building, where until recently he wielded a committee chairman's gavel.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- Well stated! I have nothing but respect for those who have served our country without asking why.
- Reply to this comment
- put him in jail take away his retirement
- Reply to this comment
- If you have never registered for the draft nor served in the military your credibility is suspect. Those who support this administration and its war policies the loudest have done neither. For those of us that have served, lost family members making our country great, and who%u2019s children have served in these bungled military campaigns deserve more than party line spin from people who don%u2019t even have the courage to step up to the plate when their country calls.
- Reply to this comment
- the74blaster-
A simple answer to your question-as any good defense attorney knows, if your guy is guilty as sin you have to put everyone else on trial..... - Reply to this comment
- Excuse me but there%u2019s an obvious pattern that needs mentioning. The GOP faithful are very good at following the party lead by bringing up democratic scandals that occurred up to 37 years ago. However, is there anything we as voter can do about these scandals? The answer is nothing with the exception of Kennedy who keeps getting reelected.
However, why is it that the GOP keeps sweeping their glowing record of accomplishments over the last 6 years under the rug and chooses to bring up pre historic scandals that have no meaning in this election? I have asked this question before and it has gone unanswered by every one of my conservative friends and acquaintances.
Is it because the GOP has nothing positive to show for the last 6 years and cannot afford to talk about the failures associated with foreign policy, a sky rocketing federal debt, the Iraq war based on false pretenses and the federal response to the natural disaster caused by hurricane Katrina?
As an independent I have to ask those questions because frankly I do not believe the lack of performance by the GOP majority deserves another chance. - Reply to this comment
- This is absurd,"Despite his admission of criminal activity, Ney, 52, is entitled to collect a congressional pension." in addition why is it that all politicians get light sentences to white collar jails?If an average citizen had done the same they would be serving a tougher sentence in a regular prison.That is where Ney and any other congressman,president or V.P. should receive and I am being kind due to the fact that they were elected to abide by the laws of our country.Actually life imprisonment in a not so cozy prison,no library,no athletic activities just a bed and three meals a day is all any prisoner deserves.
- Reply to this comment
- To CINDALU1 you claim that democrats are liberal and the republican party is consevative.First some facts,the log cabin lincolns would not be considered conservative in your world as they are homosexual republicans,fact two the consevative party is supposed to embrace family values such as honesty and god.Well take a look at all the recent news and the vast majority of those who have been caught are republican.They all have tried to deny the allegations only to later plead guilty.That is not honesty.Finally consevatives beleive in fiscal soundness,take a look at the nation's debt which did have a surplus prior to Iraq.And there are enough lies spilled out from three stooges in regards to Iraq.Now I a independent/democrat beleive in fiscal soundness,honesty,the death penalty and a great many other things that do not fit the word liberal.Alot of us ordinary citizens who vote democrat beleive the same way.This is a off base charge you are giving and has nothing to do with the story.However to my fellow democrats I want to give you a warning if the democratic party does indeed take control of both houses they better follow through on their campaign promises or in 2008 they will be fed to the wolves.
- Reply to this comment
- Ney admits his guilt yet refuses to resign. What more need be said?
- Reply to this comment
- It is amazing how short memories the Democrats have!! Remember Wayne L. Hays (D) representative for the same district! Remember Dan Rutkowski(D - representative from Chicago)? Or that 4 of the 5 senators involved in the Keating Five were Democrats? Let us get real! Neither the Republicans or the Democrats have the corner on corruption! Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones. Can you honestly name ANY Politican is a STATESMAN? The U.S. is going to hell in a handbasket. But this is nothing new. The common citizen has been saying this since the country was founded.
- Reply to this comment
- newster1 said-- "a8m3h; there was an attempt to eliminate Presidential term limits, there was actually a BILL with a number making it's way around about 2 years ago to do just that- to allow the BUSH regime to remain in power!
This guy and his regime has ZERO respect for the Constitution..."
----
Here is another startling character revelation about Bush, confirmed by witnesses, but which was ignored by most of the MSM--
In November, 2005, in Washington, DC, Bush, facing an assembly of party members critical of his NSA spying program, bristled like a teenager caught drinking after curfew-- "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It just a GD)((#@*! piece of paper!"
------
Is this figure, who claims to be president of the United States, the same who pledged an oath to "protect, preserve and defend" the document he calls a "GD)((#@*! piece of paper"?
Any administration which lies to its people deserves what it gets-- the basic element of any political/social contract is trust in the honesty of leadership.
In contrast to those of his party who at least confessed their own lies, we have a pressing crisis for regime change with a lawless opportunist named Bush, who never admits a mistake or confesses a lie. Bush makes a mockery of the rule of law and American values, deceiving America about Iraq and a host of other issues in order to continue abusing the public trust. - Reply to this comment
- CINDALU1 said-- "The Democrats have never gotten over LOSING the last election. Still call it "election fraud". It all comes down to one thing, its simple..."
--------
Actually, it was, and still is called election fraud, and the GOP is all set to do more of the same in 2006 and 2008. Do you find that so hard to believe, as the 20th major GOP figure is embroiled in political corruption charges?
Probably, you understand a valid grievance can and does occur in some elections. But apparently you know little of the evidence on which Democrats challenged the outcome of the 2000 Florida primary. And you know even less about the evidence on which Democrats challenge the electronic voting system, using machines which are essentially black boxes whose essential mechanisms are shielded from bipartisan review.
As you state, "It's simple... vote Republican."
But what is simple, ignorance?
As long as you are content to wallow in ignorant simplicity, ignoring the debacle in Iraq, the moral bankruptcy of the Bush regime at home and abroad, and utter failure of its policies-- if Iraq even could be termed a "policy"-- you will embody the very moral decay you claim to oppose. - Reply to this comment
- The Democrats have never gotten over LOSING the last election. Still call it "election fraud". It all comes down to one thing, its simple. Are you for a CONSERVATIVE or LIBERAL government. KNOW the difference and know what each party stands for. LOOK into the BACKGROUND of both parties and you might change your mind. Be a Conservative and,
VOTE REPUBLICAN, GOD BLESS AMERICA.
"SHALLOW MEN BELIEVE IN LUCK--STRONG MEN BELIEVE IN CAUSE AND EFFECT." Ralph Waldo Emerson - Reply to this comment
- i can steal...i can lie...i can cheat...i guess i finally am qualified to be a republican...
- Reply to this comment
- Here cindalu1: from Wkipedia in part;
The most famous debt clock, located in Times Square in New York City, was created by eccentric estate mogul Seymour Durst.
Durst's clock was deactivated in 2000 when the debt began to decrease.
However, following large increases, the clock was reactivated a few years later,
(Interestingly, some "man on the street" interviews showed that some people felt that the sign's deactivation meant that the debt had been eliminated, though it remained at roughly $5 trillion.)
According to Durst the National debt is now increasing at such a rate that his clock will be obsolete (for lack of digits)
when the debt reaches:
the $10 trillion mark, expected in the next two years.
U.S. public debt on 30 December 2005 was $8,170 billion (or $8.1 trillion)
The debt equates to $28,412 per head of the U.S. population, or $58,390 per head of the U.S. working population
In 2003 $318 billion was spent on interest payments servicing the debt
Our money is backed up only by a tiny fraction in gold;
U.S. official gold reserves are worth $160 billion - Reply to this comment
- observantX:
Will Rogers...same fellow who claimed he never met a man he didn't like. - Reply to this comment
- part 2
one TRILLION is just the beginning little lady, I did not include the cost of bringing back or REPLACING all that junk we took to Iraq thathas been ground into the sand and desert, repaired, patched and abused- planes, tanks, vehicles, equipment, helicopters, communication devices, you name it. I also did not add the $50,000 electronic limbs we will be replacing every few years on every vet whose legs were blown off, or their lifelong costly medical care. THIS is what the repubiCONS have brought us! so you vote and you vote for MORE of the same and watch the US economy go bankrupt. The us debt has DOUBLED fro 5 to almost 10 trillion in just the 6 years BUSH has been in office.
So Cindalu1- you be sure and vote repubiCON like you said so we get more of this!
At least with Clinton his affair was with an ADULT consenting woman. AT least with Clinton we had a good economy, the debt was going down, the deficit was too, he funnelled money into the SS system and every dime of this was squandered by BUSH, go read the financial deficit/debt charts for each presidential year, CLinton's were dropping downward, then immediately when BUSH came in you can see the scale shoot up, starting with his massive $300 "tax rebate" per person boondoggle that everyone was warning was a bad idea (it was) - Reply to this comment
- Cindalu1 said; "A vote for a Democrat is a vote for the Liberal Kennedy concept, give the store away at the expense of us the taxpayers, and you dont have to work--- the government will give you welfare."
I'd rathe rhave the liberal Kennedy "concept" whatever THAT is, than another half a TRILLION dollar addition to our NATIONAL DEBT over a craphole country like Iraq and the ILLEGAL war started by BUSH. His own committee report and many others said Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 and NO wmd, but he insists on staying there, and now the military is planning for four MORE years there!
At $2B a week, 4 more years is another half a trillion dollars the repubiCONS have thrown in the trash for corrupt contractors, Haliburton, Bush cronies and others.
one trillion dollars could have found cures for cancers, heart disease, built schools HERE instead of in a craphole halfway around the globe, it could have built homes for the families living on the streets because they lost their JOB and cant find one. - Reply to this comment
- I mean this is dissapointing.....What happened to the days of Clinton and Gerry Studds when the government *** scandals actually included....***? So far there has been no criminal sexual behavior, Bill and Gerry are dissapointed im sure, They know they set the standards higher than this. The only guy Foley actually had *** with, from what I have heard was 21 and the text messages were to an 18 year old so this is pretty lame.
- Reply to this comment
- Four prominent Republican congressmen have resigned or been convicted because of corruption or unethical behavior in just this session alone. Republicans have supeona power and the Dems don't. But the party of "personal responsibility" would rather blame Dems than live up to it's hollow campaign slogans. If there is "sweeping under the rug" going on it's on the GOP side. The scandals that have come out are just the tip of the iceburg. That is, they are so blatant, they could not ultimately be ignored even though they desperately tried to. It just proves the old addage that absolute power corrupts absolutely. That is the real lesson here.
- Reply to this comment
- newster1, Actually...the democrats are the ones persecuting the homosexuals at this point not the republicans....think about it.
Now they want to investigate all the homosexuals in the government. Yes this is the Democ-RATS not the republi-CONS, so who is really more accepting of ***? I also used to think it was the good ole dems, but it seems the tables have turned...unfortunatley. - Reply to this comment




