HARTFORD, Conn., Oct. 11, 2006
Shays Invokes Chappaquiddick
Congressman Mentions Sen. Kennedy's Fatal 1969 Incident While Defending House Speaker In Foley Scandal
-
Play CBS Video Video Hastert On Foley Ethics Probe CBS News RAW: House Speaker Dennis Hastert discusses the Mark Foley case and subsequent probes. He promised to dismiss anyone on his staff found to have been involved in a cover-up.
-
Rep. Chris Shays, R-Conn. brought up Sen. Edward Kennedy's 1969 Chappaquiddick incident in defending House Speaker Dennis Hastert's handling of a congressional page scandal. (GETTY)
-
Interactive Campaign 2006 Complete coverage and analysis of Senate and key House races, plus gubernatorial elections.
"I know the speaker didn't go over a bridge and leave a young person in the water, and then have a press conference the next day," the embattled Connecticut congressman told The Hartford Courant in remarks published Wednesday.
"Dennis Hastert didn't kill anybody," he added.
Shays' comments recalled the 1969 Chappaquiddick incident, when Kennedy's car ran off a Massachusetts bridge, killing his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne. Kennedy did not immediately report the tragedy and later pleaded guilty to leaving the scene of an accident.
Last week, Kennedy campaigned for Democrat Diane Farrell, who is locked in a bitter fight with Shays that could help determine whether Democrats recapture the House after 12 years of GOP control.
"This is symptomatic of Chris losing his composure in a tight race," Farrell said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press on Wednesday. "Chris just seems to be lashing out in anger."
Farrell said the scandal, which polls show could hurt the GOP's bid to hang onto control, has affected her because her 19-year-old daughter Margaret was a Senate page when she was 16.
"My first reaction to this whole scandal had nothing to do with politics," she said. "It was as a parent who had a child participating in the program."
Shays cited Chappaquiddick in an interview Friday when he was asked about Farrell's call for him to return money raised by Hastert. The speaker has been under fire for his handling of disgraced former Rep. Mark Foley's sexually explicit messages to young pages.
Farrell has called for Shays to return any money raised for him by Hastert. She and other Democrats have called for Hastert to resign.
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 26 CommentsTo bring it all back now only gives hartache to those who loved John kennedy and Mary Jo Kopechne.
Shays just gave himself a black eye.
What is equally disturbing is how many of the GOP faithful were perfectly willing to accept it as consenting *** rather than sexual exploitation of a minor.
The only honorable thing was that congressman Foley resigned. However, I wonder if it was because he knew that it was about to become public knowledge.
Its too bad were cannot do anything about those immoral democrats since they out of office, with the exception of Kennedy. However, we can do something about the current immoral congress.
I quess that means were better off voting for a democratic majority.
Simple problem and a simple solution.
Sorry, but an affair with an adult woman is not even remotely as sick and heinous as *** with a child. Not to mention that *** with a child is also a felony... I believe adultry is now only illegal in Texas (where art is also illegal ;-).
You have to draw the line somewhere...evidently the GOP thinks *** with children is okay.
YUUUUKKKK! VOTE THE CROOKS OUT!! 11/7/2006 BE THERE!!
OK, so thirty seven years later....
I shouldn't be surprised that Kennedy is brought into it. After all, Republicans only have themselves to blame for all the reprehensible mistakes made in the last six years, since as we know Bush has had a Republican congress from the start of his first term.
So what's a Republican to do when his party is neck-deep in a scandal involving a 52-year-old man soliciting minors for *** in the House of Representatives, with Republican leaders running around denying involvement? Same as always, dig into the history books for what Democrats did way back when, instead of doing the right thing (as Fordham has done) and condemn Hastert, Reynolds, Alexander and Boehner for covering this up.
What the Republican party is doing to cover this up now means that 37 years from now, some annoying Democrat is going to be pointing a finger back and digging up the Foley scandal. Just so y'all keep that in mind.
To all pieces of straw which may now be floating on water. Use extreme caution. Reports abound of nervous and scared US politicians clutching for you!
Just puke and deal with it, liberal.
"...Kennedy's car ran off a Massachusetts bridge..."
WRONG!
Kennedy DROVE HIS CAR OFF A BRIDGE!
See, the Dems get away with murder just by the way the MSM spins the facts to the public.
Why don't you demand responsibility from your party, Dems?
Oh, yah? Let's talk responsibility. Let's talk about "Dirty Harry" Reid, then. Why was he hiding his income from a land deal when he didn't even own the property?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061011/ap_on_go_co/reid_land_windfall
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 26 Comments