AP/ February 11, 2009, 5:53 PM

Army Plans Iraq Troops Through 2010

The U.S. Army has plans that would keep the current level of troops in Iraq — about 15 brigades — through 2010, the top Army officer said Wednesday.

The Army chief of staff, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, cautioned that people not read too much into the planning, because it is easier to pull back forces than to get units prepared and deployed at the last minute.

"This is not a prediction that things are going poorly or better," Schoomaker told reporters. "It's just that I have to have enough ammo in the magazine that I can continue to shoot as long as they want us to shoot."

His comments come less than four weeks before congressional elections, in which the unpopular war in Iraq and President Bush's policies there are a major campaign issue.

Mr. Bush acknowledged in a news conference Wednesday that "these are tough times" in Iraq, where sectarian violence has surged recently. But, he added, "it is in our interests that Iraq succeed."

President Bush defended his Iraq policy, saying that he had adjusted tactics to reflect changing conditions on the ground.

He was asked about a recent comment by the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. John Warner, that Iraq was drifting "sideways" and that the U.S. should consider major changes if the Iraqi government doesn't get the violence under control within the next few months.

"I appreciate Sen. Warner from going over there and taking a look," said Bush. "I completely agree."

Still, he insisted, "We're constantly changing tactics."

Last month, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East, Gen. John Abizaid, said the military would likely maintain or possibly even increase the current force levels through next spring. There are 141,000 troops in Iraq, including about 120,000 Army soldiers.

In recent months the Army has shown signs of strain, as Pentagon officials have had to extend the Iraq deployments of two brigades in order to bolster security in Baghdad and allow units heading into the country to have at least one year at home before redeploying.

Meanwhile, a controversial new study contends nearly 655,000 Iraqis have died due to the war, suggesting a far higher death toll than other estimates.

Within hours, the president dismissed the study.

Mr. Bush told reporters at a White House news conference: "I don't consider it a credible report."

"Neither does General Casey, neither do Iraqi officials," President Bush added.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
exusmcsgt says:
perception5-

The day we are reduced to getting the truth from government officials instead of a free press we are indeed, in deep $%^#.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mstiger71 says:
I think President Bush is really hurting this country in so many ways. I cannot wait until he is OUT!! I am really feeling sorry for our troops and their families. That is sad what is going on in the WAR. Which I also think was something President Bush wanted more than needed!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
alandowney says:
Sorry, Perception5. The "Liberal MSM" is a hoax. There's no such thing. Just another lie perpetrated by the Republicans and their Conservatve friends at Fox News and Rupert Murdoch.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
caphondo says:
BUSH SUCKS!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
perception5 says:
Hello everyone.......... one thought ... if our corrupt liberal MSM worked as hard at supporting our efforts against worldwide terrorism as much a they spend hating Bush and contamiating the American people with phony stories, doctored photos, and lying book deals.......we'd wrap this situation up alot faster since this is mostly a war of propaganda..... and right now our corrupt liberal dominated MSM is CLEARLY rooting for the terrorists.....(because they hate Bush more). if it looks like a duck, walks and sounds like a duck it's a DUCK........
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pakaal says:
Sad to think that while North Korea was building up their nuclear capability we were busy destroying a country that posed no imminent danger to us. Bad call, President Bush, really bad call.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
xfredmenzies says:
Well of course the US is going to keep troops there, they spent all of that money to build military bases. This assumes that we remain on friendly terms with the Iraq government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bluestardad says:
It is sad that those of us who have served, children serve, have bled, and lost family members making this country free have to put up with elected officials we would not trust to bring us coffee.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bluestardad says:
GOD bless you Grannysue
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
grannysue1 says:
I believe we heard the same thing over and over in Vietnam, "don't read anything into this", yea right. How about we send Jenna and Barbara Bush to Iraq and give them a gun and the same equipment as our soldiers then you will see how fast they bring our military home. Bush skipped Vietnam because he was too drunk, so he figured if Chenney and Rummy were willing to invade Iraq and refight "Vietnam", as Chenney said to Rummy, "Let's do it right this time", so Bush's bravado, bring it on, mission accomplished is such an insult to our military who are being killed and maimed daily. In addition to hundreds of thousand of Iraqi's. Bush/Chenney/Rummy/Rice/Rove/Bremer/Wolfwitz and every one of the generals who looked the other way for another star should all be tried for treason! What a group of low lifes. If the Democrats get in in November and they don't do their jobs they should be gone too! Thanks Grannysue
reply
See all 14 Comments