February 11, 2009 5:54 PM

Allen Fails To Disclose Stock Options

Sen. George Allen, R-Va., listens to testimony by Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 19, 2006 regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Sen. George Allen, R-Va., listens to testimony by Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 19, 2006 regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

(AP)  Sen. George Allen, locked in a tight re-election race, still holds stock options from his time as director of a high-tech company, but has failed to disclose them to the Congress and the public the past five years.

The Virginia Republican also asked the Army to help another business that gave him similar options.

Congressional rules require senators to disclose to the Senate all deferred compensation, such as stock options. The rules also urge senators to avoid taking any official action that could benefit them financially or appear to do so.

Those requirements exist so the public can police lawmakers for possible conflicts of interest, especially involving companies with government business that lawmakers can influence.

Allen's stock options date to the period from January 1998 to January 2001, when Allen was between political jobs and had plunged into the corporate world. At least twice during his corporate service, companies told the SEC that Allen had failed to promptly file required reports on insider stock transactions.

In March 1999, Commonwealth reported to the SEC that Allen failed to "timely file" a report showing an initial statement of beneficial ownership in the company and a single acquisition of stock. The transactions were subsequently reported, it said.

In April 2000, Xybernaut told the SEC that Allen and all but one of his fellow directors failed to file statements of beneficial ownership in a timely way.

The SEC makes it the responsibility of directors, not their companies, to file insider stock notifications. Those who file them late can face civil penalties.

Allen's office said he considered it the companies' responsibility to file the reports and the SEC never contacted him or took action against him.

In interviews, Allen and his staff sought to play down his corporate dealings, saying they were a good learning experience but did not lead to extraordinary riches — except for a quarter-million-dollar windfall from Com-Net Ericsson stock.

Allen's office said he sold his Xybernaut stock at a loss and has not cashed in his Commonwealth options because they cost more than the stock is now worth. The senator also said he saw no conflict going to work for companies shortly after assisting them as governor.

"I actually got no money out of Xybernaut. I got paid in stock options which were worthless. Commonwealth Biotech asked me to be on their board. Glad to do it. I learned a lot on their board and enjoyed working with 'em, and they seem to be doing all right, I guess," Allen said.

Allen's office said he did not report his Commonwealth options on his past five Senate disclosure reports because their purchase price was higher than the current market value. Allen viewed them as worthless and believed in "good faith" he did not have to report them, aides said.

Allen disclosed the options once — on an amendment to his 2000 ethics report filed three months after the normal filing period ended. He excluded the options from subsequent reports.

"As an ethical matter, it's irrelevant whether the exercise price of those stock options is above or below the current market price of the stock," said Kathleen Clark, a Washington University of St. Louis law professor, former prosecutor and former Democratic congressional aide.

"If he owns stock options, he does have such a financial stake, whether the exercise price is above or below current market value."

Lawyer Marc Elias, who represents Democrats in ethics cases, said the conflict issue is even clearer because Commonwealth gets federal contracts.

"Unlike some other controversies that have come up from time to time, this is a situation where the underlying asset is in a company that has business before Congress," Elias said.

Allen's office acknowledges he has met socially over the years with company executives and his office has granted "routine courtesy meetings" from company lobbyists "to hear their opinion on legislation and issues before the federal government."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by pakaal October 11, 2006 3:57 AM EDT
George Allen: "What does 'congressional requirements' mean?" It means just follow the rules of disclosure and everything will be fine. How hard is that? The great thing about this story is it's another gift that keeps on giving. Go Senator Allen! Don't give in to that conniving Liberal conspiracy! Just keep refusing to disclose the options - that we all now know about anyway. That's sure to win you the ethical vote!
Reply to this comment
by rbird8728 October 10, 2006 3:42 PM EDT
Here we go again! Anyone who does not agree with me must be involved in a liberal bias. What about a Bible-thumping conservative bias! It plays both ways, you know. People who are in elective office (of both parties) seem to feel that God has reached out and blessed them and, consequently, they are immune to any kind of law that they don't agree with. Ugh! Same song, different verse.
Reply to this comment
by usawatchman October 10, 2006 3:09 PM EDT
Do worry people we have a DUEL JUSTICE SYSTEM
One for the Government & one for the people
POLITICIANS and BUREAUCRATS are IMMUNE to
COMMIT CRIMES against the People
====
== 10/05/06
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
James B. Veasaw v. Cari M. Domingues,et al.
No: 05-1467
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari was denied
http://search.access.gpo.gov/supreme-court/SearchRight.asp?ct=Supreme-Court-Dockets&q1=05-1467&x=31&y=26
=====
The court RULED by NONFEASANCE
that the POLITICIANS and BUREAUCRATS are IMMUNE to
COMMIT CRIMES against the People
without the fear of RETRIBUTION in the COURTS
2) FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS
are WORK PROGRAMS designed
to give CRONIES and BUREAUCRATS high paying Jobs
3) Citizens of this country must PASS LITERARY TESTS
in order to receive PROTECTION in the COURTS
(i.e. say the "MAGIC WORDS" for justice)
(i.e. put the "MAGIC WORDS" on " MAGIC PAPER ")
4) FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS EXEMPT FROM ALL LAWS
(including the great Government EXTORTION MACHINE "" EEOC "")
5) THE US SUPREME COURT IS CORRUPT
6) Apparently THE PETITIONER can GET MORE JUSTICE WITH A $10 BOX OF AMMO, THAN WHAT CAN EVER BE FOUND IN ALL THE CORRUPT UNITED
STATES COURT ROOMS.?
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy October 10, 2006 12:30 PM EDT
Sure BCS is at fault for reporting this story. Why don't they stop their liberal bias and report on something that affects America like Fox does... a missing, blond co-ed or lacross rape scandal. Hey everybody, Paris and Nicole are back together!!!
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th October 10, 2006 5:36 AM EDT
If he didn't get any money out of it he's dumber than he looks or maybe he should say he hadn't gotten his money out of it yet or maybe you guys should get Ann Coulter on this and blame the 9/11 widows or get that junky Rush Limbaugh to explain why John Kerry is at fault here. Your loosing control of Congress boys- get over it.
Reply to this comment
by aristotle11 October 10, 2006 3:27 AM EDT
He didn't make a profit off the stock, but he intervened to prevent the stock from losing more value. So he really did try to profit, in a way, since he tried to stop losing more money off the stock.
Reply to this comment
by whight October 10, 2006 12:16 AM EDT
Another GOP ***. What has happened to this country. We are being ruled (ruined) by a bunch of Idiots.
Reply to this comment
by energyecon October 9, 2006 10:07 PM EDT
Repeat after me - Senator Webb!

Allen is such a poster child for GOP excess and hypocrisy you could not make this stuff up!
Reply to this comment
by pakaal October 9, 2006 8:02 PM EDT
Allen's response to illegal behavior: "I actually got no money out [of the deal]".

What part of "Did not follow congressional requirements" doesn't he get? All Allen needed to do is say "Oops, I made a mistake, let me clear this up". So many Representatives and Senators misfile, underfile, overfile, omit, mislabel, etc. This shouldn't even BE a story! So why is it? Because Allen refuses to say "I made a mistake", the absolute least he needs to do to have this all die down.

Good timing, Senator Allen, I'm sure your contemporaries are really happy there's yet another scandal going on just before midterms, I'm sure that really helps Republican chances in November.
Reply to this comment
by diamtool October 9, 2006 7:34 PM EDT
ooo --doggy this guy now instantly qualifies for a top level Bush administration appointment. He shouldn't even have to run, he just fits in so good with what they got up there already!
Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook