Unlikely Terrorists On No Fly List

Steve Kroft Reports List Includes President Of Bolivia, Dead 9/11 Hijackers

(CBS)  And there is not much they can do about it. Right now their only recourse is to apply to get on another list of people who shouldn’t be on the list. Donna Bucella of the Terrorist Screening Center says the inconvenience is regrettable, but it’s a price society and anyone named Robert Johnson has to pay for security.

"Well, Robert Johnson will never get off the list," Bucella states.

And she acknowledges that the inconvenience won't go away. "Well, they're gonna be inconvenienced every time they try to go to the kiosk or try to do a curbside check-in because they do have the name of a person who's a known or suspected terrorist," she says.

But not all suspected terrorists are on the government’s No Fly List. Joe Trento, while researching his book “Unsafe at Any Altitude” about airline security found what he thought was an obvious omission.

"Now Dawud Sallahuddin, real name David Belfield, lives in Tehran. He carried out the first assassination in Washington on behalf of Ayatollah Khomeini. Dress up as a mailman and shot somebody. He's allowed to fly," Trento says.

And neither are the original eleven British suspects recently charged with plotting to blow up ten commercial airliners with liquid explosives, even though they had reportedly been under surveillance for more than a year. A subject that Kip Hawley, the director of the Transportation Security Administration wanted to avoid.

Asked if the suspects were they on the list, Hawley tells Kroft, "I’m not going to get into all of the investigation or related to that investigation except to say that. With absolute confidence that anyone turned up in that investigation would not be allowed to actually get on an aircraft."

"The British say these people have been under investigation, surveillance for more than a year. But we managed to get a copy of the No Fly List for March, and none of these people were on the list," Kroft states.

"Well, I’m not going to confirm is and who isn’t," Hawley replies.

What Kip Hawley wouldn’t tell 60 Minutes is that some of the some of most dangerous terrorists never even end up on the No Fly List, because the intelligence agencies that supply the names don’t want them circulated to airport employees in foreign countries for fear that they could end up in the hands of the terrorists.

Cathy Berrick, the Director of Homeland Security and Justice Issues for the General Accounting Office told Kroft that the lists that the airlines get have been sanitized of the most sensitive information.

"They're not given all of the names for security reasons because the government doesn't want to have that information outside of the government," Berrick says.

"But if the point of the system is to keep dangerous people from getting on airplanes, why would you leave some of the potentially most dangerous people off the list?" Kroft asks.

"Yeah, it's a concern. And I think if you talk with the Department of Homeland Security they would agree with that," Berrick says.

The Transportation Security Administration has been trying to fix some of these problems for the past three years with a program called "Secure Flight." It would take the job of screening passengers on the No Fly List away from the airlines and place it in the hands of TSA employees with the necessary security clearances.

"Secure Flight" would also make available more information on suspected terrorists so screeners could tell the difference between 14-year-old Susan Becker and a Bader Meinhof terrorist who uses the same name as an alias but is really named Susanne Albrecht. And between Robert Johnson the convict and the Robert Johnsons 60 Minutes interviewed in New York.

But Cathy Berrick says things are not going well. "So it’s three years later and the program still isn’t fielded," she says.

She says an estimated $144 million has been spent on Secure Flight. Asked what taxpayers got for their money, Berrick says "nothing tangible yet."

"If you look at the perfect world we're not there. But if the fundamental thing is to be able to say to the people who fly: 'Is the government letting people on my plane who they know is a terrorist, who, who is a bad guy?' And the answer is 'No,'" Kip Hawley says. "All of these other issues -particularly on convenience for people with the same name as terrorists, that is unfortunately where we are. That's the down side of it the upside is that two million passengers are not flying with a terrorist."

---

After Kroft's story aired, Kip Hawley told Congress he would review all 44,000 names and cut the list by half. Meanwhile, the FBI announced that Bolivian President Evo Morales and Lebanon's Nahbi Berri are not on the current list. As for Donna Bucella, she has left the FBI for a job in the private sector.

[dvpotter1]

This problem can be easily solved for people on the list it is called a finger print and picture. Wwith the technology we have today just scan their prints and let them go it they have cleared before. I dont mind the taking off of shoes and searching of carry ons, and metal detectors. Give these guys a break!!!

[lorang79]

The idea of releasing a list to the most critical point of national security is a good one, but this is a joke! Our own government is spitting in our faces, and calling it intelligent. It's an attitude that defines the difference between sociallism and democracy. It's an abuse of power and money, more then likely for either more power or money. In other words, the purpose of this list could not be for national security. It's either a front for access to allocated money into something else, or a political device used to belittle someone else. Whatever the actual purpose, it's abuse. I think we're seeing more and more of this sort of attitude, and I think it contridicts everything we have thought to stand for. Law is replacing common sense, and the purpose of the law is being exponged and replaced with blind obedience. We are becoming more like the enemies we have fought in the past, and less like the beacon of freedom we are thought to be.

[boudread]

I catch the last part of your report and to me the best news you reported was that, "As for Donna Bucella, she has left the FBI for a job in the private sector." As I saw your report it could be seem easily that person like Donna have been receiving their HIGH salaries and NOT getting the job done. I have worked with computer over 25 years and know systems can do better jobs. What we probably have is what I would call, "To many hands in the POT." Just an off the wall sujection is to take that pictured database that you were showing who was the real terrorist. and have it placed into each individual AIRPORT computer systems. Then have each airline access that 1 single database to see if the person is that one BAD person.

[alpha56-2009]

I am terrorist David Nelson:
Am I a terrorist? Of course not, but I am a threat to the American Transportation Industry.
I am a "Whistle Blower"
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/Pre_96/September95/520.txt.html
When I filed the first suit on behalf of the people, CSX had me put on a (at that time)Transportation High Security watch list, in an effort to discredit my allegations of fraud. After 9-11 I was dumped into the TSA computer, which involves all transportation.
I filed a second False Claims suit in 2001 when CSX and John Snow refused to stop the "white collar crimes". I was a part of a criminal and civil investigation on CSX and John Snow (U.S. Attorney Generals Office and USDOT,OIG)at, the same time Snow was nominated and accepted as the U.S. Secreatary of Treasury.
The information I have, prevents the Feds and states from working to improve the (privatized) rail system infrastructure, in order to get the Asian products to the American market place.
So much for FREEDOM!

[lobot6]

Being involved in law enforcement and maintaining records on individuals contacted by four different agencies the first thing that crossed my mind in watching the "No Fly List" Commentary is "Why on earth don't they just post the photos of these individuals whose names are posted." The second thought is why can't those individuals who have been cleared receive some sort of "Clearance Identification" stating that they are not the party designated as a threat. Holy Cow we have Driver's Licenses, and all sorts of Personal identifications with Photos on them why does the government have to continuously stop these legitimate people and take up so much of their time. Oh that's right it's the GOVERNEMENT and God forbid we haven't spent enough of our taxpayers money on idiotic surveys, professional opinions and recommendations.

[cmovinc]

Our company has been trying to work with TSA (DHS) for over three years in trying to develop a national database for truck drivers. This database would have been the proto-type for "REAL-ID". The bottom line is that all the problems displayed in your story would have been solved with our database solution. Simply put, TSA would have been able to review a picture of the person on the list of questionable characters and determined when to do further checking and when to simply let someone go. This is not the only quick check that is available using our system, but is certainly an improvement over the current "pathetic" excuse that is in use by TSA today. In addition our system is dramatically less expensive.

[jjp735i]

Why do we, the tax payers, continue to get shafted like this?

True people of risk are not even added to the list for security reasons? I thought the no fly list was enabled for security reason.

It is 2008 yet? Lord help us we need a change in leader ship!

[mcvet]

The Bush Administration and the Republican Party in General are nothing but a bunch of Cowards. That is why they have failed so badly in defending this nation. You can't defeat Terrorist by doing what they have, by giving the people who want to make you scared, who want you afraid of everyone, what they want. If everyone will think back to the decade of the 60's when college students and blacks took on the established terrorist in the South, a folks these people were just as bad if not worse than the Taliban, you can understand how we should be taking on radical Islam. The NAME of the Religion isn't important, the METHOD IS!! When we understand that the MODERATES and the average guy in the Middle East is the key. When we understand that we MUST take away the weapon of Terrorist, the FEAR, then we start to defeat it. Being a Southern Fascist, a COWARD? That's not going to solve anything. Sieg Heil Y'all.

What are we all complaining about?

I for one am very glad that people who have been dead for ten years will have to face questioning should they ever try to board a flight.

It makes me feel so much more safer.

And heck, I never want to sit next to Osama (or Usama) Bin Laden should he ever board a flight.

Goodness gracious me - whatever would we talk about?

His suntan? His camels? His view of desert from his cave?

Thank god the Bush Admin is on top of all this terrorism business.

[bobrc51]

I travel for business every week and I'm on the no fly list. I was in the US Navy for 13yrs, so I have served for my country. I have to add another two hrs onto my arrival before flight time. What is most irritating is the counters are using electronic kiosk. They point me to them;I explain to them that it won't work but they insist. 10 minutes later process, it kicks me out and says I have to see an attendant. Once I get to the counter the questions begin. My check-in time to get a ticket is 3x longer as a non-no fly list member. I still have to get through security which at times can get stressful. I asked questions and submitted my paperwork(4 times with no response). I see myself standing in line and I see others get through so easily. Makes me wonder why I volunteered to defend this country. I understand that we have to protect our borders why does it have to be at the expense of our innocent. When I hear somebody who complains about our country. My question to these people is did you serve? 9 of 10 times the answer is no, so I tell them until you do you don't understand. I just wish I had a chain of command to go to that can give me a valid response; why I can't get my name off this list. My question to you is the ones that made this list are they on it?

[gregorio12-2009]

I do not believe there is such a thing as an unlikely terrorist.
They either are or are not.
And... You don't know until they do something. The consequences far out weigh the time of inconvienience spent on extra security.

[bichondog]

The following email was sent to the TSA in January 2007 reg the terrorist watch list and has been ignored: 1/26/07National Security Concerns. Please read carefully
My boarding was delayed for the first time today, in my Department of Defense related travels from Denver to Alb, NM, apparently because I am now on a terrorist watch list. You should be aware of the following:1) I am a scientist with TOP SECRET DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CLEARANCE AND HAVE BEEN DOING WORK FOR THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FOR MY ENTIRE CAREER OF NEARLY 30 YEARS. In fact, today I flew to New Mexico to give a talk to Government Scientists on my work. I nearly missed the flight because you have just seen fit to add me to your watch list;2) My name is not John Smith or some other common name that may be used by someone of real interest to you. There is only one Jeffrey ... in the United States.I deserve a non-form-letter reply on why my future travels will be delayed. If you believe that I may have some terrorist connection, then you MUST CONTACT THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, IMMEDIATELY, AND ADVISE THEM TO TAKE AWAY MY TOP SECRET CLEARANCE. You cannot have a scientist helping his Government develop laser weapons and also put that person on some no fly watch list. (I have also received Q-clearance from the Department of Energy)

[smc1941]

This reinforces my belief that Americans have book learning but no common sense.

[tsamfr]

Is it really that much of an inconvenience to be detained for 5 or 6 minutes to go through extra screening? It never killed anyone to be detained for 5 minutes so don't act like it is the worse thing that could happen to you. Think about the alternatives if someone got on the plane that wasn't checked who had the same name of a terrorist and didn't get extra screened. Would you want them on your plane? So get over it and let TSA do there jobs. They are doing what they are told to do so don't take it out on the screeners like some of you people like to do. How would you like to be in there shoes and get hastled by passengers for 40 to 50 hours a week. So people just move on with your lives and get over it.

It is for your own good. It might help to go tho the TSA website and see the latest restrictions so it will speed your process of getting through the checkpont faster.

[exploder750]

I'm sorry, but as I was listening via radio to your reporter on this story tonight, he sounded whiny and vindictive when asking the government official "how do you account for this?" in reference to the 14 dead 9-11 highjackers being on the no fly list. Just as whiny & vindictive about asking about the President of Libya being on the list. This reporter's tone reminded me of the whiny reporter on the GM Goodwrench commercials; "If you love Mr. Goodwrench, why don't you marry him?" LOL Has investigative journalism dropped that low? Lately with the tone of the "new school" guys on 60 minutes it seems to have done that!! Scot Thayer, Cottage Grove, Mn.

[dvpotter1]

This list is a sham. My Dad who was in the military, retired civil servent with a top security clearence, worked on Patriot,stinger and other missles and security for the goverment is on the list. He went to renew his drivers liscence and couldn't because he was on the terrorist list. He is 75 years old!! Had to bring in his birth certificate in order for them to over ride the list. Plans are a nightmare!! How does a man with so much military and civil service end up on the list. Maybe we should replace some of the nuts making the list.

[lukemccain12]

Interesting how the first to respond are the trolls. Wonder who they work for? The No Fly List Story shows just what a joke the U.S. has become. No, it is not just an inconvenience for the people falsely on the list. It is harmful, hurtful, wasteful and wrong. It is worse than not doing anything about terrorism. The bureaucrats interviewed use the excuse that it is necessary and that you just have to get used to it. These comments showed their lack of moral character and amoral behavior. We need real, reasonable safety measures. Not this Kafkaesque nonsense. The TSA has failed. It should be abolished. Of course, the real bottom line of such policies is to limit the freedom of movement by American Citizens.

[nfangus]

You know that if the officials - police and homeland security - could identify the race and age of the suspects alot of the confusion regarding identity would be cleared up.

[donnie900]

There are firefighters? Cops? Probation officers? Civil servants? Garbage men? And now there are PUBLIC AIRLINE SECURITY SERVICES! Funded by your's truly: Uncle Sam.

[donnie900]

Al Pacino? F you! Robert De'Niro? F you. De Supranos? F you! Its de "age'a de geek".