October 8, 2009 1:00 PM

Unlikely Terrorists On No Fly List

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  This segment was originally broadcast on Oct. 8, 2006. It was updated on June 7, 2007.

Anyone who has passed through an airport in the last five years and has been pulled aside for extra screening knows that the government and the airlines keep a list of people they consider to be security threats. Every time you check in at the ticket counter your name is run through a computer to make sure you are not on something called the "No Fly List." It's part of a secret government database compiled after 9/11 to prevent suspected terrorists from getting on airplanes. As correspondent Steve Kroft reports, if your name is on the list or even similar to someone on the list, you can be detained for hours.



It began as a project of the highest priority. In 2003, President Bush directed the nation's intelligence agencies and the FBI to cooperate in creating a single watch list of suspected terrorists. A version of that list is given to the airlines and the Transportation Security Administration to prevent anyone considered a threat to civilian aviation from boarding a plane. The government won't divulge the criteria it uses in making up the list or even how many names are on it. But in the spring of 2006, working with a government watchdog group called the National Security News Service, 60 Minutes was able to obtain a copy of the No Fly List from someone in aviation security who wanted us to see what the bureaucracy had wrought.

The first surprise was the sheer size of it. In paper form it is more than 540 pages long. Before 9/11, the government's list of suspected terrorists banned from air travel totaled just 16 names; today there are 44,000. And that doesn't include people the government thinks should be pulled aside for additional security screening. There are another 75,000 people on that list.

With Joe Trento of the National Security News Service, 60 Minutes spent months going over the names on the No Fly List. While it is classified as sensitive, even members of Congress have been denied access to it. But that may have less to do with national security than avoiding embarrassment.

Asked what the quality is of the information that the TSA gets from the CIA, the NSA and the FBI, Trento says "Well, you know about our intelligence before we went to war in Iraq. You know what that was like. Not too good."

"This is much worse," Trento argues. "It's awful, it's bad. I mean you've got people who are dead on the list. You've got people you know are 80 years old on the list. It makes no sense."

60 Minutes certainly didn't expect to find the names of 14 of the 19 9/11 hijackers on the list since they have been dead for five years. 60 Minutes also found a number of high profile people who aren't likely to turn up at an airline ticket counter any time soon, like convicted terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui, now serving a life sentence in Colorado, and Saddam Hussein, who at the time was on trial for his life in Baghdad.

One person who was not surprised is former FBI agent Jack Cloonan, who was retiring from the bureau's al Qaeda task force just as the list was being put together.

"I did see Osama bin Laden on the list both with an "O" in the first name and a "U" in the second name. I was glad to see that. But, some of the other names that I see here, you know, I just have to scratch my head and say, 'My good, look what we've created,'" Cloonan says.

Intended to be a serious a serious intelligence document, Cloonan says the No Fly List soon became a "cover your rear end" document designed to protect bureaucrats and make the public feel more secure.

"I know in our particular case they basically did a massive data dump and said 'Ok anybody that's got a nexus to terrorism, let's make sure they get on the list,'" Cloonan explains. "And once that train left the station, or once that bullet went down range. There was no calling it back. And that is where we are."

The person who oversaw the project is Donna Bucella, who has run the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center since it began operations in 2003. Her group is responsible for evaluating the information submitted by the various intelligence agencies and actually compiling the list.

Asked if she is confident that the list is complete and accurate, Bucella says, "It's like painting a bridge. Once you finish one end, you gotta come back. So we endeavor to get the list as current and accurate and thorough as possible."

"We got a look at the No Fly List from March. And included on that list were 14 of the 19 September 11th hijackers. How do you explain that?" Kroft asks.

"Well, just because a person has died doesn't necessarily mean that their identity has died. People sometime carry the identities of people who have died," she says.

"What you are saying is that you have no information that this person is alive and poses a threat. It's just a name in the database," Kroft asks.

"In order fort the name to get in the data base there has to be information that they are a known suspected terrorist," Bucella says.

"So you are saying it's just a coincidence that there are 14 names in the computer that match the names of 9/11 terrorists. I mean, how do you account for that?" Kroft asks.

Bucella asked how recent this watch list was. When told it was from March, she said, "For some reason the agency might not necessarily want to have taken the name off the list. I can't explain that."

"Also on the list is Francois Genoud, who was a Nazi sympathizer and financier of Arab terrorism. Been dead for ten years," Kroft remarks.

"Well, when you said his - this is what we're doin' a quality review on our watch list," Bucella replies.



Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 59 Comments
by GyanGhana June 14, 2010 12:27 AM EDT
My brother-in-law has been on the no-fly list for years, and has no hope of getting off it. He is an Air Force veteran named Fred Smith. There are probably lots of people with that name, so I don't worry about compromising his identity by saying his name.

Our government is terminally stupid, and terminally expensive.
Reply to this comment
by dvpotter1 June 11, 2007 11:51 PM EDT
This problem can be easily solved for people on the list it is called a finger print and picture. Wwith the technology we have today just scan their prints and let them go it they have cleared before. I dont mind the taking off of shoes and searching of carry ons, and metal detectors. Give these guys a break!!!
Reply to this comment
by lorang79 June 11, 2007 5:18 PM EDT
The idea of releasing a list to the most critical point of national security is a good one, but this is a joke! Our own government is spitting in our faces, and calling it intelligent. It's an attitude that defines the difference between sociallism and democracy. It's an abuse of power and money, more then likely for either more power or money. In other words, the purpose of this list could not be for national security. It's either a front for access to allocated money into something else, or a political device used to belittle someone else. Whatever the actual purpose, it's abuse. I think we're seeing more and more of this sort of attitude, and I think it contridicts everything we have thought to stand for. Law is replacing common sense, and the purpose of the law is being exponged and replaced with blind obedience. We are becoming more like the enemies we have fought in the past, and less like the beacon of freedom we are thought to be.
Reply to this comment
by boudread June 11, 2007 5:15 PM EDT
I catch the last part of your report and to me the best news you reported was that, "As for Donna Bucella, she has left the FBI for a job in the private sector." As I saw your report it could be seem easily that person like Donna have been receiving their HIGH salaries and NOT getting the job done. I have worked with computer over 25 years and know systems can do better jobs. What we probably have is what I would call, "To many hands in the POT." Just an off the wall sujection is to take that pictured database that you were showing who was the real terrorist. and have it placed into each individual AIRPORT computer systems. Then have each airline access that 1 single database to see if the person is that one BAD person.
Reply to this comment
by alpha56-2009 June 11, 2007 3:54 PM EDT
I am terrorist David Nelson:
Am I a terrorist? Of course not, but I am a threat to the American Transportation Industry.
I am a "Whistle Blower"
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/Pre_96/September95/520.txt.html
When I filed the first suit on behalf of the people, CSX had me put on a (at that time)Transportation High Security watch list, in an effort to discredit my allegations of fraud. After 9-11 I was dumped into the TSA computer, which involves all transportation.
I filed a second False Claims suit in 2001 when CSX and John Snow refused to stop the "white collar crimes". I was a part of a criminal and civil investigation on CSX and John Snow (U.S. Attorney Generals Office and USDOT,OIG)at, the same time Snow was nominated and accepted as the U.S. Secreatary of Treasury.
The information I have, prevents the Feds and states from working to improve the (privatized) rail system infrastructure, in order to get the Asian products to the American market place.
So much for FREEDOM!
Reply to this comment
by lobot6 June 11, 2007 3:17 PM EDT
Being involved in law enforcement and maintaining records on individuals contacted by four different agencies the first thing that crossed my mind in watching the "No Fly List" Commentary is "Why on earth don't they just post the photos of these individuals whose names are posted." The second thought is why can't those individuals who have been cleared receive some sort of "Clearance Identification" stating that they are not the party designated as a threat. Holy Cow we have Driver's Licenses, and all sorts of Personal identifications with Photos on them why does the government have to continuously stop these legitimate people and take up so much of their time. Oh that's right it's the GOVERNEMENT and God forbid we haven't spent enough of our taxpayers money on idiotic surveys, professional opinions and recommendations.
Reply to this comment
by cmovinc June 11, 2007 2:34 PM EDT
Our company has been trying to work with TSA (DHS) for over three years in trying to develop a national database for truck drivers. This database would have been the proto-type for "REAL-ID". The bottom line is that all the problems displayed in your story would have been solved with our database solution. Simply put, TSA would have been able to review a picture of the person on the list of questionable characters and determined when to do further checking and when to simply let someone go. This is not the only quick check that is available using our system, but is certainly an improvement over the current "pathetic" excuse that is in use by TSA today. In addition our system is dramatically less expensive.
Reply to this comment
by jjp735i June 11, 2007 11:29 AM EDT
Why do we, the tax payers, continue to get shafted like this?

True people of risk are not even added to the list for security reasons? I thought the no fly list was enabled for security reason.

It is 2008 yet? Lord help us we need a change in leader ship!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet June 11, 2007 10:31 AM EDT
The Bush Administration and the Republican Party in General are nothing but a bunch of Cowards. That is why they have failed so badly in defending this nation. You can't defeat Terrorist by doing what they have, by giving the people who want to make you scared, who want you afraid of everyone, what they want. If everyone will think back to the decade of the 60's when college students and blacks took on the established terrorist in the South, a folks these people were just as bad if not worse than the Taliban, you can understand how we should be taking on radical Islam. The NAME of the Religion isn't important, the METHOD IS!! When we understand that the MODERATES and the average guy in the Middle East is the key. When we understand that we MUST take away the weapon of Terrorist, the FEAR, then we start to defeat it. Being a Southern Fascist, a COWARD? That's not going to solve anything. Sieg Heil Y'all.
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 5:27 AM EDT
What are we all complaining about?

I for one am very glad that people who have been dead for ten years will have to face questioning should they ever try to board a flight.

It makes me feel so much more safer.

And heck, I never want to sit next to Osama (or Usama) Bin Laden should he ever board a flight.

Goodness gracious me - whatever would we talk about?

His suntan? His camels? His view of desert from his cave?

Thank god the Bush Admin is on top of all this terrorism business.
Reply to this comment
See all 59 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook