Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
February 11, 2009 5:55 PM

Fed: Baby Boomers Will Strain Economy

(AP)  Unless Social Security and Medicare are revamped, the massive burden from retiring baby boomers will place major strains on the nation's budget and the economy, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Wednesday.

"Reform of our unsustainable entitlement programs" should be a priority, he said in remarks to the Economics Club of Washington. "The imperative to undertake reform earlier rather than later is great," Bernanke added.

It marked the Fed chief's most extensive comments to date on the challenges facing the United States with the looming retirement of 78 million baby boomers.

In his remarks, Bernanke did not offer Congress and the Bush administration recommendations on how the massive entitlement programs should be changed. Efforts by the administration to overhaul the Social Security program — once a centerpiece of President Bush's second-term agenda — sputtered last year, meeting resistance from Republicans and Democrats alike.

As the population ages, the nation will have to choose among higher taxes, less non-entitlement spending by the government, a reduction in spending on entitlement programs, a sharply higher budget deficit or some combination thereof, Bernanke said.

Government spending on Social Security and Medicare alone will increase from about 7 percent of the total size of the U.S. economy to almost 13 percent by 2030 and to more than 15 percent by 2050, he said.

Bernanke declared: "The fiscal consequences of these trends are large and unavoidable."

The government recorded a budget deficit of $319 billion last year. This year's red ink is projected by the White House to total around $296 billion.

Financially shoring up Social Security and Medicare will involve difficult choices by lawmakers and other policymakers, Bernanke said.

For instance, if the government tried to finance projected entitlement spending entirely by revenue increases, the taxes collected by the federal government would have to rise from about 18 percent of the total size of the economy to about 24 percent in 2030, he said.

If the government attempted a fix through spending cuts, spending for programs other than Social Security and Medicare would need to be cut sharply — the equivalent "to a budget cut of approximately $700 billion in non-entitlement spending," he said.

As the aging population collects Social Security and Medicare benefits, Bernanke warned: "The coming demographic transition will create severe fiscal challenges, as the cost of entitlement programs rises sharply."

In his speech, Bernanke did not discuss the future course of interest rates.

During a brief question and answer period afterward, he said a "substantial correction" was taking place in the housing market, which will be a drag on the economy's growth. He estimated that the housing slowdown would trim about one percentage point off growth in the second half of this year.

Some of the fallout from the now cooling housing market, however, should be cushioned by other positive factors, including good job creation and income growth, Bernanke added.

The housing cooldown, after a five-year boom, holds important implications for consumer spending and overall economic activity. "How far will this correction go? It is very difficult to tell, is the honest answer," Bernanke said.

The Federal Reserve meets next on Oct. 24-25, and many economists believe the policymakers will leave rates unchanged for the third meeting in a row.

With the economy slowing, the central bank in early August decided to halt — for the first time — a two-year long campaign to boost interest rates to fend off inflation. Policymakers suggested that the cooling economy would eventually lessen inflation pressures.

There's been relief on the inflation front as once-surging energy prices have settled down. Gasoline prices, which had topped $3 a gallon in the summer, have slid and are now averaging $2.31 a gallon nationwide, the Energy Department says.

Bernanke called the recent drop in energy prices welcome, but said Fed policymakers, while continuing to believe that slower economic activity will eventually lessen inflationary pressures, will keep a close eye on inflation. Inflation, Bernanke said, "is still above what we would consider price stability."

On other matters, Bernanke said he and his colleagues would work together on ways to improve the central bank's communications to Wall Street and Main Street. The Fed's efforts on this front are a "work in progress," Bernanke said.

Bernanke took over the Fed helm in February, succeeding long-time chairman Alan Greenspan. When asked about his eight months on the job, Bernanke, a respected economist who spent much of his professional life in academia, replied: "It is a sobering experience."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment
by random_radar October 5, 2006 2:38 PM EDT
Let me summarize what Mr. Bernanke is telling babyboomers: "There isn't enough money to fulfill the governments empty promises. Work or starve!"

Don't be surprised when the government implements euthanasia programs to reduce expenses. We already liquidate unwanted offspring, so eliminating unproductive elderly is just one more step in the march of progress.

OSHA already decides whether to enforce safety standards based upon the value of a workers life versus the cost of enforcement. That's right--there is a table where you can look up the government's value of your life based upon the job you do! I can tell you how much they value your life if you don't produce and cost them money: zero.
Reply to this comment
by book54552134 October 5, 2006 2:22 PM EDT
dollybaird, Those were all stopgap measures implimented mainly for political reasons & not intended to solve the problem overall. Both sides, Republicans & Democrats knew that the only way to stop the bleeding of Social Security funds was to stop spending that money for general revenue purposes & to put it aside in interest bearing accounts. But to do that would have put other political pressures on them to increase taxes & cut spending & both sides were unwilling to take those necessary steps. Consider the fact that your retirement money was spent to build & launch spy satellites, for recurring foreign aid, to pay the salaries of Congressional Aides, military largess, everything imaginable. Basicly, our government has done the same thing to the general public as companies who raid pension funds without any intention of paying the money back.
Reply to this comment
by dollybaird October 5, 2006 12:34 PM EDT
I thought the changes made to Social Security and the implementing of the new Medicare Gap was supposed to help save money for all of us %u201CBaby Boomers%u201D so that we were assured our collecting SS when we hit of age; and hasn%u2019t the age of retirement been increased to also assure us this? The money that is being spent now on prescriptions once anyone has reached the Gap is outrageous, I know, my husband is on SSDBL and relies on life saving drugs but were not senior citizens yet (but 55) so if all of the above was supposed to help and now there still talking about %u201Cnot having enough money%u201D for us baby boomers why was all of the put in place?
Can anyone answer me that.
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 October 5, 2006 12:27 PM EDT
I have never been able to see how a global market or free trade was good for the economy, but I am yet to understand as to whose economy it helps and it doesnt seem to be ours. I can understand that by buying cheaper from overseas that it makes it easier on our young people to get what they want in the short run... BUT... which helps them as they cant get jobs now because all their jobs have gone off shore...

No one can tell me that buying products overseas which we already grow, manufacture or produce here is good for our economy, it just means that our productivity, manufacturing is destroyed or goes over seas so as they can compete which in turn causes unemployment to our own people, oh sorry we have tourism now because we have been sending all manufacturing over to their countries so as they can get jobs to become rich to be able to travel to our country, so nice of us... however what happens when that country goes to war, has a disaster or has a massive recession and we cant obtain any of these goods anymore??? and what do we feed the people with we import all our food....
Oh well our overseas deficit will be so large from buying these products from overseas, (these products that we once produced, manafactured or grew ourselves, which gave our people employment) that because we owe them so much money they will then own us... Yep sure sounds like common sense economic policies to me, and one has to wonder why it is happening in all the western countries, hmmmm..
Reply to this comment
by megan328 October 5, 2006 12:23 PM EDT
Yeah - here we go (NO surprise), the Boomers who paid in so very many $ in taxes over the years and who were/are the now quickly disappearing middle class that kept this country going for so many decades are going to have to bend over and take it in the shorts. BTW, people have this idea that all Boomers are well to do - NOT! many are in dire financial straights, having lost pensions, investments, savings, & jobs due to the shenanigans of the REAL greedy ones who have to get richer at whatever cost. - And if you are over 50 just try getting a job once you've been dumped. - not so easy in a society that worships youth and companies are afraid anyone of boomer age might mess up their insurance bottom line - ugh!
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 October 5, 2006 11:58 AM EDT
From about 1950 to about 1980 the governments here in OZ and New Zealand took from every persons pay about one cent (or penny) in every dollar to put towards our retirement. Many of us have paid our way in retirement however the left wing got into government and all that money just disappeared into revenue, now we are also being told we will strain the economy and be a burden on the government, it is no wonder they don't stop people wanting to push euthanasia...and it is no wonder that they push the flu injection for the elderly??? hmmm!!!!
Reply to this comment
by mjv2944 October 5, 2006 10:45 AM EDT
More conservative Republican b-llsh-t! This stock market will crash again and very soon. And when it does a very large group of people will lose what retirement money they have managed to acquire. All the big shots make their money on a down market, at the little guys expense. All the jobs that have left the country, will come back to haunt corporate America. Whose going to be able to buy their products? Its already hammering the automotive industry, all in the name of profit, they have killed what made America great, the working middle class, its gone, but they better figure a way to get it back.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar October 5, 2006 1:47 AM EDT
So again we have the masters of America's downfall telling us the problem with our country is that people have too many luxuries. Our problem is old people not eating dog food or dying of heat in their apartments. The biggest blame that Americans want to live too long, the greedy bits.

So, they must crush our economy, remove any hope for the aging, bring us to poverty and pain, this is FOR OUR OWN GOOD, LUCKY US to have such masters ruling our world.

Because, Americans salaries are too high, and they have too much health care, and they live too long past their USEFUL WORKING AGE.

Never fear, the corporations will correct this little problem for us. How sweet of them. The Fed will help as usual, if they have time from pumping $1,000,000,000,000 into the Chinese economy to destroy America's future FOR OUR OWN GOOD.
Reply to this comment
by book54552134 October 4, 2006 9:53 PM EDT
It is not the fault of Baby-boomers that as they are approching retirement age, the government does not have the retirement income they were promised via Social Security. Baby-boomers have paid their Social Security as required by law, & thus have paid for their retirement & then some. It is the US Government which is reneging on it's promise to provide a minimal income to these people when they retire because over the years, the US government has spent all the Social Security funds on general revenue spending, (military, roads, Congressional salaries, everything imaginable,) with no plan to repay that money with appropriate interest. The US government must do whatever is necessary to keep it's promise to up & coming Baby-boomer retirees.
Reply to this comment
by manner6 October 4, 2006 8:34 PM EDT
Well here it is - the first rumblings of the Bush legacy. And Bernanke hasn't the foggiest about what the solutions might be to the years of unconscionable tax cuts and out-of-this-world spending. Any suggestions out there?
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook