Sept. 27, 2006
Is The U.S. A Rogue State?
American Prospect: America Not Leading By Example On Torture Issue
-
Play CBS Video Video freeSpeech: Natan Sharansky Human-rights advocate Natan Sharansky says those who equate abuses like Abu Ghraib with the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany or Saddam Hussein's Iraq have lost their sense of moral clarity.
-
Video Red Shirts Protest Torture CBS News Raw: During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on proposals to limit Guantanamo detainees' access to habeas corpus, protesters display a message (No T-O-R-T-U-R-E) on red shirts.
-
Video Senators On Interrogation Senators Carl Levin, Arlen Specter and Lindsey Graham on what can be done to solve the torture definition debate.
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Who's Who Terror Transfer A glimpse at the 14 suspected terrorists transferred from CIA custody to Guantanamo Bay.
-
Interactive Gitmo Tribunals Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.
-
Interactive Abuse At Abu Ghraib Investigation timeline, the chain of command, POW rules, global mistreatment of prisoners and video reports.
"The United States is committed to the world-wide elimination of torture," George W. Bush explained in a June 2003 speech, "and we are leading this fight by example." Oh, the irony!
Intriguingly, at the time he seemed to have a good grasp of the relevant issues. "Freedom from torture," he said, "is an inalienable human right." True. "The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, ratified by the United States and more than 130 other countries since 1984, forbids governments from deliberately inflicting severe physical or mental pain or suffering on those within their custody or control." Also true. And lastly, a straightforward recognition of who the torturers of the world are, and why they do it: "Yet torture continues to be practiced around the world by rogue regimes whose cruel methods match their determination to crush the human spirit."
Last week, we learned that among those spirit-crushing rogue regimes was the government of the United States of America, which is now "leading by example" in the field of hair-splitting and wink-nod authorizations of torture. Thanks to the recent "compromise" between the hard-core torturers in the Bush administration and "moderate" Republican torture opponents, we continue to live in a country that does not officially endorse the infliction of "severe pain." That would be torture, you see. "Serious pain," however, is fine. That's merely cruel and degrading treatment. (The president used to be against that, too, but, well, things change.)
The interesting thing, as David Luban points out, is that the compromise defines "serious pain" as "bodily injury that involves … extreme physical pain," so the ultimate significance of this distinction between serious and severe might be called into question. More to the point, the law simply shreds the very concept of law, as Jack Balkin explained with this rundown of the components:
Eliminating the writ of habeas corpus, denying anyone the right to invoke rights guaranteed by Geneva in judicial actions, prohibiting the use of any foreign sources in construing the meaning of the Geneva Conventions, proclaiming that the president is the authoritative source of the meaning of Geneva with respect to the War Crimes statute, amending the War Crimes statute with language that allows the president to continue to engage in torture-lite (after all, he is now the authoritative source of its meaning), and finally, making all these amendments retroactive to November 26, 1997.Other countries, of course, practice torture in violation of international law. As has now been clear for a while, we have been in their company for some years. The latest twist, however, is that we now won't show any shame about it. Rather than simply violating the laws to which we have agreed to adhere, we're repudiating them, simply denying that the standard by which civilized nations operate apply to us.
The problems here will be widespread. One of the strengths of democracies on the international scene is precisely that it's much harder for liberal states to violate agreements. Dictatorships can say one thing and do another with ease. Democracies feature free presses, free speech, the rule of law, independent judiciaries, legislative oversight, and other measures to ensure that laws and treaties are followed. This is, to the conservative mind, a weakness. In their view, cheating is a good thing, and America's historical difficulty in cheating constitutes a problem. They're dead wrong. Cooperation is a good thing — the best ticket to prosperity, security, and international peace. Democracies can cooperate with other countries — and especially with other democracies — more credibly and effectively, and that's one of the reasons the world's democratic block is so much stronger and more prosperous than the rest of the world.
But the rule of law is now off the table as far as Bush is concerned. What's more, insofar as national-security policy is at issue, the United States increasingly doesn't look like much of a democracy. As the congressional Republicans march in lockstep behind the White House's torture agenda, they don't even know what that agenda's composed of. The Boston Globe
Consequently, the United States now presents itself as what amounts to the globe's largest and most powerful rogue state — a nuclear-armed superpower capable of projecting military force to the furthest corners of the earth, acting utterly without legal or moral constraint whenever the president proclaims it necessary. The idea that striking such a posture on the world stage will serve our long-term interests is daft. American power has, for decades, rested crucially on the sense that the United States can be trusted and relied upon, on the belief that we use our power primarily to defend the community of liberal states and the liberal rules by which they conduct themselves rather than to undermine them.
An America prepared to casually toss out the most fundamental principles of international humanitarian diplomacy, along with basic human decency and the rule of law as side helpings, is not a country others are going to want to cooperate with. It will constitute a threat to their own interests and values. Nor will it be a country blessed with a lot of accurate intelligence. As Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky has pointed out, an intelligence service shot-through with demands that it torture people "degenerates into a playground for sadists," the service itself "an army of butchers" skilled at terrorizing its victims but hardly capable of unraveling complicated investigations.
It's a grim future brought to us by grim and deranged men — by people who seem to have developed an unhealthy level of admiration for America's enemies. (They want the country they run to transform itself into a facsimile of its evil adversaries.) It's a future in which it may become increasingly hard for decent citizens of this country to say truthfully that they're proud to be Americans.
Matthew Yglesias is a Prospect staff writer.
By Matthew Yglesias
Reprinted with permission from The American Prospect, 5 Broad Street, Boston, MA 02109. All rights reserved.
| The American Prospect is America's leading liberal magazine of politics, a blend of essay, criticism, investigation,commentary, and in-depth analysis. |
More From Opinion
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
Our republic is a long way down the road to the corrupt end it deserves unless we, the people, decide to change it. I'm not encouraged by what I see though. Very depressing. If I were younger I'd do what my immigrant forefathers did and leave this country for civilization in New Zealand.
Now even our own intellignece agencies admit that Bush policy of HATE, LIES, FEAR and WAR have led to dramatically increased terrorist recruitment.
This Bush regime is a Total Disaster, yet the corporate-run mainstream media and the spineless Dems are too afraid to do anything about it. We can only hope that the American Sheeple wake up, turn off CBS and tune into alternative news sources that are substantive, factual and relevant.
Hey Katie, whats Paris Hilton doing today? How about a in-dpeth interview with Paris to help enlighten us?
This Republican dictatorship has done more in 5 years to destroy: the U.S., our economy, the middle class, the environment and the world, than any so-called evil empire anywhere on the globe.
We have seen the enemy, and he is us...
Time for change... vote the Neocon bums out.