Sept. 26, 2006
Bill Clinton Strikes Back
The Nation: Former President Shoots Back At The 'Drive-By' Media
-
In this handout photo provided by Fox News Sunday, former President Bill Clinton responds to Chris Wallace. (AP Photo/Fox News Sunday, M.Simon)
-
Interactive William Jefferson Clinton Follow the ups and downs of President Clinton's years in office, see photos and learn about his life before and after the presidency.
-
Interactive Bin Laden & Al Qaeda Where al Qaeda operates, who's been caught, how they're financed and a timeline of attacks on Americans.
-
Interactive Hunting Bin Laden See the Bin Laden tapes and follow the manhunt.
Wallace finally asked: "Do you think you did enough, sir?"
Clinton replied: "No, because I didn't get him."
Wallace chirped, "Right."
Clinton countered, "But at least I tried. That's the difference in me and some, including all the right-wingers who are attacking me now. They ridiculed me for trying. They had eight months to try and they didn't. I tried. So I tried and failed. When I failed, I left a comprehensive anti-terror strategy and the best guy in the country: Dick Clarke. So you did Fox's bidding on this show. You did your nice little conservative hit job on me. But what I want to know…
Stung, Wallace was again interrupting. But Clinton held firm. "I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you've asked this question of. I want to know how many people in the Bush administration you asked ‘Why didn't you do anything about the Cole?' I want to know how many you asked ‘Why did you fire Dick Clarke?' I want to know…"
"We ask plenty of questions of…" sputtered Wallace.
"Tell the truth…" Clinton shot back, before revealing that he had Wallace's number.
"You set this meeting up because you were going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers because (Fox owner) Rupert Murdoch is going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers for supporting my work on Climate Change. And you came here under false pretenses and said that you'd spend half the time talking about (climate change). You said you'd spend half the time talking about what we did out there to raise $7 billion plus over three days from 215 different commitments. And you don't care."
Truer words have rarely been spoken on a nationally-televised "news" program.
When a beaten Wallace tried to cover for himself "... all I can say is, I'm asking you in good faith because it's on people's minds, sir. And I wasn't..." – Clinton nailed him: "There's a reason it's on people's minds. That's the point I'm trying to make. There's a reason it's on people's minds because they've done a serious disinformation campaign to create that impression."
Love Bill Clinton or hate him, but understand that his appearance on Fox New Sunday was one of those rare moments in recent American history when a target of our drive-by media shot back.
By John Nichols
Reprinted with permission from National Review Online.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 27 Commentssnip
The January 25, 2001, memo, recently released to the National Security Archive by the National Security Council, bears a declassification stamp of April 7, 2004, one day prior to Rice's testimony before the 9/11 Commission on April 8, 2004. Responding to claims that she ignored the al-Qaeda threat before September 11, Rice stated in a March 22, 2004 Washington Post op-ed, "No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration."
Two days after Rice's March 22 op-ed, Clarke told the 9/11 Commission, "there's a lot of debate about whether it's a plan or a strategy or a series of options -- but all of the things we recommended back in January were those things on the table in September. They were done. They were done after September 11th. They were all done. I didn't really understand why they couldn't have been done in February."
snip
Clarke asked on several occasions for early principals meetings on these issues, and was frustrated that no early meeting was scheduled. No principals committee meetings on Al Qaida were held until September 4th, 2001.
snip
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB147/index.htm
RICE: I believe the title was, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/08/rice.transcript/
There's something mighty Freudian about that...
And we still have two more years of Moe Howard in the Oval Office. God, help us!
1. Start fight with father over hitting trash can while drunk;
2. Get drunk;
3. Stay drunk for 20 years;
4. Join Texas National Guard to avoid Vietnam duty;
5. Leave Texas National Guard early to avoid completion of obligation;
6. Get drunk;
7. Start failing businesses using Daddy's friend's money;
8. Sell stocks early (Harkin business failing) and get slap on wrist from SEC for insider trading (sound familiar);
9. Get drunk;
10. Successfully run for gov of Texas so he can screw up Texas;
11. Unsuccessfully run for US President so he can screw up the US;
12. Get bailed out by brother Neal's state and right-wing supreme court and be appointed as president;
13. Plan a war with Iraq to avenge father's failings;
14. Act like a moron who can't read or speak proper English;
15. Ignore warnings that allow al Qaeda to attack US;
16. yada yada yada...
1. Confabulate with Monica
2. Confound Congress
3. Cuckold Hillary
4. Conspire Cover-up
5. Contrive Plausibilty
6. Contraindicate Culpability
7. Collect Contributions
8. Cancel Capitolism
9. Concoct Contrition
10. Capture Bin Laden
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 27 Comments