February 11, 2009 5:58 PM

Bush 'Taken Aback' By Musharraf Claim

(CBS/AP)  President Bush said Friday he was "taken aback" by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's contention that the U.S. threatened to bomb Pakistan back to the Stone Age if it did not cooperate right after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Musharraf said in an that Richard Armitage, who was then deputy secretary of state at the time, told a Pakistani official that the United States would attack Pakistan if it didn't back the war on terror.

Musharraf wouldn't comment on his statement, saying he has a book coming out and that he's promised the publisher he wouldn't talk about it.

Mr. Bush accepted that answer and told reporters to "buy the book," CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller reports.

Musharraf's book will be published by Simon & Schuster, which is part of CBS Corp.

Appearing at a joint White House news conference, Mr. Bush praised Musharraf for being one of the first foreign leaders to come out after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to stand with the United States to "help root out an enemy."

Musharraf said a peace treaty between his government and tribes along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border is not meant to support the Taliban.

He said news reports had mischaracterized the deals. "The deal is not at all with the Taliban. This deal is against the Taliban. This deal is with the tribal elders," Musharraf said.

Said Mr. Bush: "I believe him."

He said that Musharraf had looked him in the eye and vowed that "the tribal deal is intended to reject the Talibanization of the people and that there won't be a Taliban and there won't be al Qaeda (in Pakistan)."

In the CBS interview, Musharraf told Steve Kroft that after the Sept. 11 attacks, Armitage told Pakistan's intelligence director that the United States would bomb his country if it didn't help fight terrorists.

"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age,'" Musharraf said.

Armitage has disputed the language attributed to him but did not deny the message was a strong one. The former senior U.S. official told Associated Press Radio on Friday: "There was no military threat, and I was not authorized to do so."

"It did not happen," Armitage said.

Asked about the report, Mr. Bush said, "The first I heard of this is when I read it in the newspaper. I guess I was taken aback by the harshness of the words."



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 66 Comments
by ronniehm September 24, 2006 4:25 PM EDT
... and yet you believe it. Perhaps you should stop believing the most unreasonable explanation of things.
Reply to this comment
by androb25 September 24, 2006 2:29 PM EDT
I cant believe there are so many people that have been brainwshed by this president
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 24, 2006 1:10 AM EDT
""It just doesn't make sense that we'd spend all this money and put so much at risk without a good reason.""

Since you took it out of context, the "it" which just doesn't make sense is the left's claim that we'd spend all this money and put so much at risk without a good reason. Either you didn't understand the quote, or you're disagreeing with yourself.
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 23, 2006 11:26 PM EDT
So Bush told Armitage who told a translator who told an intelligence director who told Musharraf that we would bomb him back to the stone age. Yeah, I'm sure it's an exact quote.
Reply to this comment
by link2maxim September 23, 2006 1:20 PM EDT
Well, at last President Musharraf has started to confess some hard lines, so called truth against Bush. Either he is in polital game against his support for the anti-Jihadi policy as his Islamic trustiness is getting questioned days after days by local & international Muslim communities/critics or, he is prepared to go back to the Stone Age.

It would be very interesting to see next five years what more aggressions will come from US. No matter how much he (Musharraf) try, everybody understands Musharraf-Bush relation (friendly) can't be long-last when Pakistan is the one the biggest suspect to form/link these Muslim terrorist community.
Reply to this comment
by drgoodwin12 September 23, 2006 9:53 AM EDT
To ShutupMurtha you are correct about the majority of people commenting here on both sides though.If you want solutions I will give you several first crack down on the Iraqi goverment and military who obviously some of which has ties to the insurgency,militias and terrorist.Second subpoena all the records of the Bush adminstration,why lets find out why this president 11 days into office called for a battle plan for Iraq and after 9/11 told Richard Clarke to find a way to balme it on Saddam(sources:"AGAINST ALL ENEMIES,THE COST OF LOYALTY) both written by republicans and never rebuked.Nor did the media pursue either book with many allegations with vigor.If true then let's impeach the president.Finally let us have some real campaign finance reform that would not allow corporations,lobbyist or so called non political entities(Moveon,swiftboat and various others) from contibuting. Then let us make sure that no person/party can spend more than the other on any election.On top of that let us make it where the news organizations,TV,print or internet cannot run a ad for any candiate without validating the contents.Now everyone wants out of Iraq but we do not want to see it fall apart. Stay the Course is a bad C&W song with no ideaology for solving the situation. Here is a course crack down on the Iraqi gov.,military and police and purge those with affilations to the militias,insurgents and terrorist.
Reply to this comment
by lesb35 September 23, 2006 6:28 AM EDT
I've tried to find one intelligent reason the left can give for us going to Iraq and it's always the same old drum, oil,vendetta,stupidity,etc. None of them add up. It just doesn't make sense that we'd spend all this money and put so much at risk without a good reason. It's real people. wake up. We're there for a very important reason and that is the safety and security of the world. The third world is is actively trying to acquire WMD's.
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm September 23, 2006 12:00 AM EDT
"OMG did anyone notice the brand new stupid George
W Bush, "Bushism" that Bush "was taken aback" by
it?" - Sandy

Let me guess. You think it should be "taken back."
Reply to this comment
by stoceman11 September 22, 2006 11:33 PM EDT
I don't like war, "but" this is what everyone wanted him to do when they attacked us, and now we have a bunch of cry baby anti American jackasses saying our President shouldn't be doing what he has been. Bush is a hard nose President and that is what we need right now. If he is not elected again to finish the job that we wanted him to do , as any real American would, all we can hope for is someone that would carry on in his foot steps, if not, GOD helps us, mark my words, they will take our way of life and destory it.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat September 22, 2006 10:55 PM EDT
Merry Ramadan and Shana Tovah for all foes in life. Wish The CREATOR bring peace upon the population of the world.
Reply to this comment
See all 66 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook