freeSpeech: Eugene Robinson

(CBS)  Something like 85 percent of African-Americans disapprove of President Bush. As regular readers know, that includes me.

Yet the most visible, and maybe at the moment the most powerful member of the Bush administration is an African. It's safe to say that Condi Rice provokes passionate feelings among black Americans, both pro and con — mostly con, in my case. But not always.

I've tried to get over the fact that a woman who grew up in Jim Crow Alabama is so loyal to a president for whom black America has so little love. I realize that black conservatives have the same right to be wrong as any other conservatives. She should be judged on foreign policy, not on whether or not she thinks like most African-Americans.

OK, fine, I think the war in Iraq is a disaster, I think this administration has created more anti-American feeling in the world than we've seen in my lifetime, and I look forward to the day when they have to pack up and go home. And that certainly includes Condoleezza Rice.

That's the way I feel — until I hear some commentator describe her as, quote, articulate, which is code for a black person who speaks standard English. Excuse me, you were expecting the Secretary of State to be inarticulate?

That's when I get this involuntary twitch and I want to defend Condoleezza Rice — when she's patronized, the way black pioneers in all walks of life have been patronized. Look, it may be wrongheaded foreign policy, but Condoleezza Rice is making it.

Condoleezza Rice is a major, major player in this administration. So call her whatever you want, but don't call her a token or a puppet. And please don't call her "articulate."


Eugene Robinson, an associate editor of The Washington Post, writes about politics and culture. His column appears on Tuesdays and Fridays.

[cbsurv]

It is astounding that one in five Americans and one in two Southerners are trying to label Barack Obama in a way that would justify his assassination.
I am sure that we all would agree that there are some things that are worth fighting for -- our freedom and human rights, the lives of our loved ones, our strongest, highest beliefs. And if someone or some power were trying to steal these things, we might all feel that that would be worth fighting against.
People who hate what progress our country is proudly making know that these things are held sacred. All they have to do is make some nut out there believe the threat to their country and to their family is real, and one of them might feel justified to take action to mitigate it by trying to KILL OUR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!
It is a known fact that before harm is done to someone they are first labeled. The labeling of our president started with "......he's got a chip on his shoulder." " ......he's an Arab" and "he pals around with terrorists", now "........he's a racist", and "he hates white people". Then he is "trying to steal your health insurance and kill your elders in the process along with your job and your future". To show he is truly a threat that needs to justifiably be dealt with, he is "not even an American citizen" so he is the ultimate illegal alien that has stolen the highest American job! This despite the fact that he HAS submitted proof. Now he and his administration are the new Nazis. This is directed at those who would act to "protect" this country from someone who would try to harm it!!!!!!!
Those who propagate this labeling want someone, somewhere in this country, to be so driven by the fear of the above ideas that they feel justified to actually take a step to kill him. We stood by and watched it happen to doctors that performed legal abortions. That we cannot accept, and we cannot stand by and watch it happen again. Good people must stand up against the continued attempts to character-assasinate, and even worse, to encourage real assassination attempts on our President.
I hope you can use your position to shine light on this psychological scheme before it is too late.

[willyeli]

Mr. Robinson..

Are you reading any of these ?

Please respond accordingly...

Do you have the courage ?

[nynative1340]

I rarely hear the terms 'Irish-American', 'Italian-American', or 'German-American' anymore. My friends from Bulgaria just became U.S. citizens, but they don't refer to themselves as 'Bulgarian-American'. They are very proud to be 'Americans' just like the rest of us.

'African-American'. 'Mexican-American'. How will 'hyphened-Americans' ever be integrated into main stream American society if they refuse to identify themselves as Americans? How can Mexican-American citizens expect to be integrated into main stream America when they march in protest to our (immigration) laws and show their loyalty to Mexicao by waving Mexican flags?

I know a lot of people who are very 'articulate.' (Generally, reporters and journalists aren't among them.) What really impresses me is someone whose master of our language is 'impeccable' in spite not living in this country since birth.

[papagresh]

"Articulate" is a patronizing term when applied to blacks? According to who? You? Don't look now -- but your codswallop is showing.

Your stereotyping of blacks as generally unable to speak standard English (since you suggest that "articulate" blacks like Rice are recognized as such only in condescension) is a disgraceful ruse even a child could see through.

I am shocked at the level to which you will apparently stoop in order to harvest fresh pettiness and offendedness with which to crudely fashion new race cards for your aging and worn out deck.

You're pretty articulate yourself, by the way -- but alas, it does little to mask your ignorance.

[willyeli]

Sir....

Exacatly what words would be acceptable to you when a white person wishes to compliment a person of color / african american when they believe this individuals performance merits some type of notation in the public forum ?

Im no fan of Bush, but this person is throttling the cowboys love of ordinace with what appears to be reasoned logic.

You sir are just another african american who is completly enrolled in the polarizing non - sense that controls both political parties.

[broswall]

Mr. Robinson,

I keep mulling this over and now have my own conclusion of this issue as it applies to you.

As I stated in a previous post: "I have read your columns and seen you on panel discussions and more than once have thought that you were well spoken, articulate, even eloquent."

My conclusion is: A person that is "well spoken, articulate, even eloquent" need not be intelligent.

[a013024]

Bush has made the world a more dangerous place? Condi has done the same? How can people be so blind to the hate for America regardless who's in office from many of the Crazies around the world? Hostages were taken on Carter's watch. Cuban Missile crisis on Kennedy's watch. Vietnam on Johnson's watch. Why can't rational American's see that it is ideology that is at stake. Making IRAQ an democracy or some form of Republic regime is part of the key to a long term peace in the region. Why are people ashamed of being American and being successful. Our enemies want to be America. If they cannot have it they would just as well destroy it. Bush nor Clinton nor Carter nor Nixon started America's success. American's did. The Governments role is to assure its continuation for all Americans which, in turn, benefits the entire world. Yes, even our enemies.

[falkenstein1]

This tirade was so rediculous that I am shocked that CBS would air it. This commentator is a (reverse) racist and is as bad as any KKK member spewing their garbage. Whites appreciate being refered to as "articulate" why on earth would someone with dark skin ? I dont think this commentator has a clue how stupid and devisive his comments really are.
Im not going to be watching CBS news because CBS is shallow and short sighted by allowing this type of commentary on air.
To bad because I had planned to follow Katie to the evening news. Oh well, I guess my evening choice will be Brit Hume instead of hear this rediculous insipid rhetoric !!
Goodbye CBS and your goofball commentator
Eugene Robinson --------

[paszabo]

Mr. Robinson,
After watching your commentary about Condolezza Rice last night, I certainly understood your point about using the word "articulate", however some thoughts sprung to mind when you said: "Excuse me, you were expecting the Secretary of State to be inarticulate?" - I thought to myself: "okay that's true, but how about our president? I would never descibe this guy as articulate, and he's our highest elected official."

Anyway, I do understand your point (I think) that describing Condi as "articulate" is revealing in terms of how the our society may perceive african americans..

[broswall]

Mr. Robinson,

I have read your columns and seen you on panel discussions and more than once have thought that
you were well spoken, articulate, even eloquent.
I now know that I should not have had these thoughts and would like to apologize to you.

Sincerely,
Broswall