WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2006

Novak Slams His Source On CIA Agent

Columnist: Richard Armitage's ID Of Valerie Plame Wasn't Done Casually

  • Robert Novak, left and Richard Armitage

    Robert Novak, left and Richard Armitage  (AP)

  • Interactive The Leak

    People and events surrounding the leak of a CIA officer's name.

(CBS/AP)  Syndicated columnist Robert Novak has turned on his own source. Novak says Richard Armitage, the man who told him Valerie Plame was a CIA agent, didn't disclose her identity in a casual manner, and instead urged him to make her a column item.

"Armitage did not slip me this information as idle chitchat, as he now suggests. He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column," Novak wrote.

Armitage gave a different version of events to CBS News. The former Bush administration deputy secretary of state said he disclosed Plame's CIA status in response to an "offhand question" from Novak.

"I didn't put any big import on it and I just answered and it was the last question we had," Armitage said.

Plame and her husband, Joseph Wilson, filed a lawsuit in July against Vice President Cheney, Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Karl Rove, claiming that they had violated her constitutional rights and discredited her by disclosing that she was an undercover CIA operative.

Armitage was added to the lawsuit on Wednesday, following news that Armitage was Novak's initial source for a column he wrote identifying Plame as a CIA officer.

Armitage told CBS News correspondent David Martin last week that he was sorry for what he characterized as an inadvertent disclosure.

"I feel terrible every day," Armitage said, "I think I let down the President. I let down the Secretary of State. I let down my department, my family, and I also let down Mr. and Mrs. Wilson."

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has investigated the leak of Plame's name for years and has not charged anyone with intentionally leaking her identity. Libby is under indictment; he's charged with lying to authorities about his conversations with reporters.


©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
by buddyandmom September 17, 2006 8:52 AM EDT
Novak says "He made clear he considered it especially suited for my column". Come on ! So Novak allows others to tell him what should be in his column ? Does he really think we are that dumb to swallow this line of *** ? It wouldn't surprise me that he does. And why not ? Our president sure does ! A suggestion for Novak's column tomorrow: I resign !
Reply to this comment
by agnim September 17, 2006 8:38 AM EDT
This clear and unambiguous breaking of the law is getting stinker by the moment as the canaries sing their arses off.

The BIG QUESTION is, "Why the hell isn't Novak being persecuted and prosecuted? Did he and his evil editor not know (or should have known) that leaking the identity of an agent is illegal?

That cowardly and treasonous traitor, Novak, did nothing to plug the leak, and mitigate the threat to the nation's security!"

Why are these *** getting away with so much serious high crimes and misdemeanors, while a guy couldn%u2019t even lie about PRIVATE ***, which did not threaten the nation and was of concern only to the families of those involved?

Are Americans still so freaking asleep?
One would have thought that 911 woke up Americans for them to attend to things that are of clear and present DANGER to our existence, no?
Reply to this comment
by thompaine2 September 17, 2006 4:26 AM EDT
The critical element to charging anyone with blowing Plame's cover is whether they KNEW she had classified/covert status. Armitage claims he doesn't remember seeing the symbol for "secret" at the start of the paragraph containing the information about Plame. It is very difficult to believe that a man as smart and accomplished as Armitage could overlook or forget something so important. And lying about the circumstances in which he revealed the information can reasonably be regarded as showing consciousness of guilt.
Reply to this comment
by darjon38 September 16, 2006 1:57 PM EDT
Why is it that news media (Novak) think they have a "duty" to report everything they hear, whether it is top secret or just gossip? Is getting the "scoop" so obscenely important that they don't consider national security? Did Novak have to report the "plame game" before he considered the consequences, or do news reporters think they are above the laws of morality, decency and common sense?
Reply to this comment
by generey September 15, 2006 5:40 PM EDT
She was serving her country and this is what she got? Wake up people; she could have been killed over this had somebody not pulled her out. Somebody needs to answer for this.
Reply to this comment
by debbiemeadow September 15, 2006 4:38 PM EDT
"You guys are all crazy!! This was a dem smear Bush campaigh from the beginning. Lets have some hearings and run Shumer up for questioning. Oops I forgot this was a get Bush Chaney deal"

Are you saying NOVAK was in on a democrat smear campaign?? ROFL!!! NOVAK is more republican than...well...than Bush and Chaney!! How funny! That's NeoConservative psychobabble
Reply to this comment
by evatt1 September 15, 2006 2:43 PM EDT
You guys are all crazy!! This was a dem smear Bush campaigh from the beginning. Lets have some hearings and run Shumer up for questioning. Oops I forgot this was a get Bush Chaney deal
Reply to this comment
by roydewitt September 15, 2006 11:37 AM EDT
Mr. Novak is a smug republican worm who for years took pleasure in his connections with top republican administration staffers. Now like a typical crook being caught in his evil doing, squeals like a trapped pig. If our so-called "rule of law" worked, Rove, Armitage, Novak, Cheney, and Bush would be indicted with making a CIA agent's name public. Mr. Cheney wrongly argues that he can declassify any information he pleases, even an agent's name. All the president's men are sneaky cowards. Unfortunately, there are no republicans with the backbone to defend our laws and seek justice against this evil administration.
Reply to this comment
by averra-2009 September 15, 2006 4:04 AM EDT
What I still don't get is why Rove, who confirmed Plame's CIA position to Novak after he heard it from others, wasn't prosecuted. As a therapist, if someone said to me "I know so-and-so's your client," it would be a total violation of my client's confidentiality to say "Ah! You're right! And since you've already heard it elsewhere, it's okay for me to confirm that." I can't imagine why the CIA standards would be any less than those for therapists and other professionals.
Reply to this comment
by getcentered September 15, 2006 2:07 AM EDT
I pretty much agree with every comment bellow. It's amazing actually! The CIA leak case I thought might have been forgotten.

Our intelligence gathering systems are one of the most important tools in overcoming terrorism. To politicize CIA agents and reveal names makes the tool useless.
Punish all involved.
Politics weakens the usefulness of intelligence!
Reply to this comment
by r_harbison September 14, 2006 11:41 PM EDT
Clearly Novak is saying that he was encouraged by Armitage to publish the name of a covert CIA agent in his column, for political reasons. Novak should be charged with treason, and Armitage should be charged with violation of secrecy acts and treason as well. The US Attorney General's selective prosecution of crimes have further politicized our legal system allowing political appointees to escape prosecution for what are very clearly crimes, committed for their Party's political agendas.
Reply to this comment
by September 14, 2006 10:20 PM EDT
Armitage should face a court hearing - and be punished appropriatly for revealing Plame as a CIA Agent.

If it can be proved that this was done with Bush and/or Cheneys knowledge, or if they became aware of it and held back on revealing Armitage as the source, then they should also be punished.

Reply to this comment
by nynative1340 September 14, 2006 9:44 PM EDT
Let's not forget that Bush and his cabinet were planning this war ten days after he took office. He was briefed in Aug 2001 that an al queida attack was immenent but did nothing. Sadly, 9/11 was the excuse he needed to go to war with the wrong country/people, and the Valerie Plame affair was just another distraction.
Reply to this comment
by lisadudley September 14, 2006 9:12 PM EDT
Why did Novak reveal information that he knew was illegal to reveal? Did he play right into the hands of a President he supported? What ever happened to an independant press in a free democracy? I grieve for this country and our consitution.
Reply to this comment
by drgoodwin12 September 14, 2006 8:53 PM EDT
Hey scottshipm not so fast with your misquoted half truths.First off Wilson was sent on a mission by the C.I.A. to investigate the claims of Iraq buying uranium nitcrate as corroborated by the released MI5 intelligence that also claimed the whole story of Iraq buying uranium was baseless and politically motivated.Fitzgerald is not finished with his case,so who knows who will be indicted.An Armitrage was a non partisan diplomat that was appointed by the Bush adminstration as deputy secratary of state.The press only reported what it new after Novaks collumn was published. Novack by the way is a hard line republican true to his party regardless of if they are right or wrong.Sounds a little to cozy here, Novack,Armitrage(Powells surrogate)Libby,Rove, and Cheneys own letters to let them have it(discredit Joe Wilsons story).I am an independent and I smell a rat all the way to the White House. take the time to read Richard Clarkes book "Against all Enemies" and paul O Neils "the Price of Loyalty" neither have been disputed long enough for the ones who did dispute them to do an about face and reaffrim what both books say.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 September 14, 2006 7:57 PM EDT
Don't be gulliable people! Of course Bush and or Cheney blew the cover of Valerie Plame and Bush is paying off Armitage for this. The only reason Armitage is coming out now is because Bush/Cheney are scared they are going to lose Congress come Nov and they want to cover Bush's *** incase impeachment procedings are brought up for lying.

I knew that as soon as I heard this silly story. Don't believe a word of it. This peon never knew who she was and sure as hell didn't say anything if he did. He knows *** well it is a federal offense to blow an agents cover. Someone much higher up than Armitage engineered this boo-boo and figured they could get away with it.

Bush pulled the same stunt with Geo Tenent. When no WMD were found he paid Tenent off with a medal of freedom and a big thank you because Tenent and the CIA took the fall for the lack of finding any WMD. Tenent was willing to say, "Our intelligence was faulty" get the medal and then retire.

CIA agents have said all along, they warned Bush about the lack of evidence about WMD, so did the UN. Bush just ignored everyone and now is caught in the middle of a disaster everyone told him would happen.

Reply to this comment
by dakotanews September 14, 2006 7:57 PM EDT
If it is against the law to reveal the identity of CIA agents, how come no charges have been brought against Novak? He is the one responsible for publicizing the fact that Valerie Plame was an agent for the CIA. I think he should be held legally accountable for his arrogant stupidity.
Reply to this comment
by nynative1340 September 14, 2006 7:05 PM EDT
Well, now I know not to use MS Word to compose my comments...
Reply to this comment
by nynative1340 September 14, 2006 7:03 PM EDT
%u2026in addition, Novak should be hung by his cahones, but he doesn%u2019t have any. He%u2019s just another opportunist who lacked the courage to do the %u2018right%u2019 thing and not reveal %u2018sensitive%u2019 information about the CIA personnel, not to mention he AIDED AND ABETTED ARMITAGE BREAKING THE LAW!

Reply to this comment
by nynative1340 September 14, 2006 6:56 PM EDT
The Armitage story smelled rotten from the start. Bush is a liar and it stands to reason that he is surrounded by liars. But what would you expect from a man who was an alcoholic for most of his adult life.

Politics is a cut-throat business and these greedy b******s will do absolutely anything to stay in power.

Case in point: my rep, Duncan Hunter, is the poster child for term limits. He's still there after more than 20 years, doing nothing, representing himself and his best interests instead of the best interests of his constituents. He hasn't done very well for the military man/woman either, although he's been on the Armed Forces committee for years.



Reply to this comment
See all 34 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • The Fall Of The Berlin Wall The Fall Of The Berlin Wall

    Looking Back at the Wall that Once Divided Germany On the 20th Anniversary of Its Collapse

  • Patricia Clarkson Patricia Clarkson

    Television and Film Actress, Yale School of Drama Graduate and Academy Award Nominee

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Andre Agassi Andre Agassi

    Former Top-Seeded Tennis Star, Gossip Column Favorite and Philanthropist

  • Yankees Victory Parade Yankees Victory Parade

    The Yankees Celebrate Their 27th World Series Championship with a Ticker-Tape Parade Up Broadway

  • Orlando Office Shooting Orlando Office Shooting

    A Gunman Opens Fire at the Offices of an Engineering Firm Where He Once Worked

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: