Armitage On CIA Leak: 'I Screwed Up'
CBS Exclusive: Interview With Man Who 'Outed' CIA Agent Valerie Plame
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Plame Leaker Breaks Silence
Richard Armitage was the diplomat who leaked undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity to columnist Robert Novak. He speaks to David Martin for the first time about the subsequent firestorm.
-
Video
Eye To Eye: Armitage Opens Up
Only On The Web: Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage tells CBS News' David Martin why he didn't come forward after leaking the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame.
-
Video
Plame Sues Over CIA Leak
CBS News RAW: Valerie Plame and her husband Joe Wilson discuss a civil suit they filed against Vice President Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby and Karl Rove.
-
Photo
Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage (GETTY)
-
Interactive
The Leak
People and events surrounding the leak of a CIA officer's name.
"Oh I feel terrible. Every day, I think I let down the president. I let down the Secretary of State. I let down my department, my family and I also let down Mr. and Mrs. Wilson," he says.
When asked if he feels he owes the Wilsons an apology, he says, "I think I've just done it."
In July 2003, Armitage told columnist Robert Novak that Ambassador Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, and Novak mentioned it in a column. It's a crime to knowingly reveal the identity of an undercover CIA officer. But Armitage didn't yet realize what he had done.
So, what exactly did he tell Novak?
"At the end of a wide-ranging interview he asked me, 'Why did the CIA send Ambassador (Wilson) to Africa?' I said I didn't know, but that she worked out at the agency," Armitage says.
Armitage says he told Novak because it was "just an offhand question." "I didn't put any big import on it and I just answered and it was the last question we had," he says.
Armitage adds that while the document was classified, "it doesn't mean that every sentence in the document is classified.
"I had never seen a covered agent's name in any memo in, I think, 28 years of government," he says.
He adds that he thinks he referred to Wilson's wife as such, or possibly as "Mrs. Wilson." He never referred to her as Valerie Plame, he adds.
"I didn't know the woman's name was Plame. I didn't know she was an operative," he says.
He says he was reading Novak's newspaper column again, on Oct. 1, 2003, and "he said he was told by a non-partisan gun slinger."
"I almost immediately called Secretary Powell and said, 'I'm sure that was me,'" Armitage says.
Armitage immediately met with FBI agents investigating the leak.
"I told them that I was the inadvertent leak," Armitage says. He didn't get a lawyer, however.
"First of all, I felt so terrible about what I'd done that I felt I deserved whatever was coming to me. And secondarily, I didn't need an attorney to tell me to tell the truth. I as already doing that," Armitage explains. "I was not intentionally outing anybody. As I say, I have tremendous respect for Ambassador. Wilson's African credentials. I didn't know anything about his wife and made an offhand comment. I didn't try to out anybody."
That was nearly three years ago, but the political firestorm over who leaked Valerie Plame's identity continued to burn as Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald began hauling White House officials and journalists before a grand jury.
Armitage says he didn't come forward because "the special counsel, once he was appointed, asked me not to discuss this and I honored his request."
"I thought every day about how I'd screwed up," he adds.
Armitage never did tell the president, but he's talking now because Fitzgerald told him he could.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- National Mall Showing Its Age
- Fans Clamor for Jackson Memorial Tickets
- America's First Conservationist



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 66 CommentsWhy woulnd't CBS even ask?
Why did the special counsel asked Richard Armitage to not reveal that he was the leak? It seems there was a frenzy for no reason.
Why did the special counsel continue to spend millions of dollars and collect a salary when the man that leaked the information had confessed so early on.
Why is Richard Armitage not it trouble?
Why were people put in jail?
Why is Scooter Libby still in so much trouble?
This whole affair and the special counsels handling of it seem reprehensible. It also seems reprehensible that CBS failed to ask or address any of these simple questions.
One of the common errors the news media keeps making is to write or state that Ms. Wilson was a covert or covered agent of the CIA. She clearly was not covered by any law as a covert agent, having served overseas more than 5 years previous to her name being mentioned by Mr. Armitage. This fact is the basis for the whole investigation being a red herring. I would appreciate the media, including CBS, correcting this factual error.
Issue now is why this played out the way it did viz Fitzgerald and Libby. I'm sure we'll find out more as this unfolds further.
See: http://www.observer.com/20060911/20060911_Joe_Conason_politics_joeconason-2.asp
"Specifically, she ran the Joint Task Force on Iraq, which was part of the Counterproliferation Division of the C.I.A.%u2019s Directorate of Operations. She worked overseas, including trips to Jordan and other theatres of operations, using a %u201Cnonofficial cover.%u201D
See:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rachel-sklar/broder-hitchens-frum-a_b_28899.html
Fact: Karl Rove leaked Joe Wilson's wife's identity to Matt Cooper BEFORE Novak published his column.
Fact: Scooter Libby leaked Joe Wilson's wife's identity to Judith Miller BEFORE Novak published his column.
man who furnished Novak the name, yet he pursued a crime that did not exist. Does that not violate a trust and an oath? I thought that a prosecutor was sworn to uphold the law, not to try and manufacture crimes when no crimes exist.
I guess that Fitzgerald first had to assist in creating some crimes and then getting some criminals in order to be a prosecutor. He reversed the process! After all, what good is a prosecutor if there are no crimes? He made himself relevant.
And of course Armitage only thinks he owes the Wilsons an apology. Wouldn't want to miss any cocktail parties over a small thing like allowing peoples lives and reputations to be smeared.
Positively revolting.
For a crime to be committed two things must be proven: actus rea (criminal act) and mens rea (criminal intent). It looks seriously doubtful that a crime has even been committed. Assuming a jury could be convinced that she was a covert agent, I see serious problems proving criminal intent.
Now, that said, I hope that the special investigator is most specially investigated. He obviously bilked us tax payers out of a lot of money.
Fact: We will never know the whole story.
This guy should be fired immediately, and then disbarred and finally indicted for abuse of power.
He is an embarrassment to the U.S. Department of State and to the U.S. Government. He should be locked away for the rest of his life for treason.
Robert
USMC Embassy Guard 1977-1982
Islamabad Pakistan
Geneva Switzerland
San Salvador, El Salvador
(1) Richard Armitage is given permission by Fizgerald to publically disclose that he was the one who told columist Robert Novak that Valerie Plame Wilson worked for the CIA.
(2) Bush acknowleges the existence of secret CIA prisons & says (14) high value terrorists have been transferred from the system to Guantanamo Bay for trial.
(3) "The Path to 9/11", with all it's distortions & factual errors, will be aired SU& MON. Hopefully, there will be enough protest & it'll be cancelled. 9/11 was a horrific tragedy for all America. No one should take "dramatic license" with what happened that day; especially to make a profit!
All the above mention "events" aren't just happening @ this time out of coincidence.
GO TO YOUR ROOM WITH NO SUPPER AND NO ELECTRONICS!!! I DO NOT HAVE TO TAKE THE COMPLAINING AND I WILL NOT LEAVE MY FAMILY TO THE WHIMS OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD PREFER US DEAD INSTEAD OF AS FRIENDS!!!!! You can not bargain my life for the political life of someone who does not care without it coming back into your face and not by me, but it will be by the very person you are bargaining with.
Remember Teddy Roosevelt: Speak softly and carry a big stick -
The man LIED to Fitzgerald. Nothing else matters. He broke the law. Whether or not he needed to is nobody's business but his own; the man got caught doing what crooked politicians do.
And now he should pay for it.
I am a staunch Republican too, but consider the facts:
1) I was the second source for Novak's column.
2) I spilled the beans to Cooper so that Cooper could report it if Novak chickened out like Judy Miller did.
3) I even told Libby that Novak was planning to write the column. By the way send Libby some money - he's going to need every penny to delay the trial till the time comes when he can be pardoned.
4) I told Chris Matthews that we were going to screw the Wilsons. Plame WAS fair game. I aint giving no stinking apology like that Armitage fellow.
5) I successfully hid my email to Hadley about the Cooper call for almost a year. Until Cooper was ready to spill the beans on me.
6) I have a legendary memory, but had a case of amnesia when I failed to tell the FBI and the grand jury about my conversation with Cooper. Things were so much easier under Ashcroft where the journalists would not have been forced to reveal their sources, as they should never be.
Now that Fitz has cleared me, expect me to hit the networks like Armitage has, and I'll clear everything up. On second thought, Scott McClennan did such a good job the first time around lying about my involvement, I'll send him instead.
Love you all and thanks for your support.
Maybe you got problems with the truth. That puts you in league with the Bush administration.
How much do you want to bet this same complainer saw Micael Moore's Farenheit 9/11 a dozen times and believed ever distortion in it?
Oh I get it, as long as it attacks the Republicans then it is OK to tell a lie.
There should be another criteria....if you STEAL top secret, original documents out of the 9/11 commission room you should not be able to complain about ANYTHING. Maybe those secret documents that Sandy "the burglar" Buergar SLOPPELY shoved down his pants contained proof that Clinton was too busy with Monica to wage a war on terror nad turned down an opportunity to kill or capture Bin Ladin.
I thought progressives were against censorship.
Both sides play partisian politics but I have never seen the right actually put the national security of the country and the safety of the American people at risk, like I am seeing the democrats do today.
safecents@aol.com (Ayn Rand Libertarian)
Patriot Motors (PMCY)
Be carefull what you wish for. Opening hearings would only result in the discovery of the fact that there was no reason for armitage to mention mrs. wilson other than the fact that he was directed to do so by rove and cheney.
James O. Dirden
CSM, U. S. Army
'44-'49/'50-'73
The man LIED to Congress. Nothing else matters. He broke the law. Whether or not he needed to is nobody's business but his own; the man got caught doing what crooked politicians do.
And now he should pay for it."
Wow. If only that happened with EVERY POLITICIAN out there. The problem is, no one is willing to even REMEMBER what our politicians do from day to day, let alone punish them for it. The only ones who seem to care are those who are more interested in partisanship than truth. They keep pointing out the flaws of those they disagree with while completely ignoring the flaws of people they agree with politically. Those who want to educate themselves on modern political philosophy should read Schopenhauer's "38 ways to win an argument." And watch and wait for it ALL to show up in the next election cycle.
Another problem with the claim that Plame was a covert agent is the fact that she worked at CIA Hq. and she apparently didn't enter the building through a secret entrance in a tailor shop (Man From U.N.C.L.E.) or a phone booth (Get Smart).
Finally, to those who are so opposed to everything that America does in the war on terror, why don't you consider moving to the country of your choice, that way, it will be much easier for you to "kiss the ***" of those petty dictators!!
Long live America and may we all Thank God for our men and women of the Armed Services!!!
And Thank God for a leader such as President Bush who understands the true evil that exists in this world and is willing to do everything within his powers to destroy it while the only things that the Democrats, the press and liberals do is "whine". Grow up you BIG LOSERS.....
Dwight H. Slough, MBA
Then they investigate members of the White House, with full knowledge of how the leak occured, slandering and ruining carreers of how many people?
That is a crime.
Investigating Clinton wasnt.
Since Schumer will not apologise that he knew the Armitage connection. He could be indicted for obstruction of justice. A pardon would avoid further litigation.
1. continuing to spend tax dollars to investigate the source of the news article revelation when he knew from the start who that source was, and
2. for tying up government officials with this frivolous investigation for years...keeping them from doing their normal important duties and forcing them to spend unnecessary monies on lawyers and
3. for placing people, whom he knew were not guilty of the focus of his investigation, in judicial jeopardy with obvious entrapment schemes!
Fitzgerald%u2019s Nifong (Duke Lacrosse rape case dunce) like tactics are totally un-American! He is, at the very least, guilty of judicial misconduct in my humble opinion...not as an expert, just on the basis of common sense and decency!
Tommy Flores,
Goldsboro, NC
What an interview. Mr. David Martin did'nt know that the same was told "casually" to Bob Woodward? This is just plain junk. Shame.
SINCERELY
RIC STARNES
NC
Good Luck in November. With no ideas and no direction to a better future for America, the democratic party rips bush and offers no vision of where they would take us. They just tell us with perfect 20/20 hindsight what has failed without even having the ability to offer a better solution.
Perfect!!
Since the get go, this whole story has been a ploy by Bob Novak to buffer his own ego, and secondarily to force more people to read his column; he knew from the beginning that the equally guilty demofrauds had nothing on him, but let the story work itself into an empty media frenzy. In a time when there are so many more important issues to cover, this is a sin in itself.
Everyone in the media should be ashamed for pushing this nothing of a story so hard on us.
Ooh, who leaked the name of Valerie Plame.. ask yourself: do you actually care? Why?
I'm never reading another Bob Novak column again.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 66 Comments