U.S. Army Bans Torture Of Prisoners
New Manual Prohibits Forced Nakedness, Starvation And 'Water Boarding'
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Gitmo Tribunals
Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.
-
Interactive
Abuse At Abu Ghraib
Investigation timeline, the chain of command, POW rules, global mistreatment of prisoners and video reports.
Delayed more than a year amid criticism of the Defense Department's treatment of prisoners, the new Army Field Manual was released Wednesday, revising one from 1992.
It also explicitly bans beating prisoners, sexually humiliating them, threatening them with dogs, depriving them of food or water, performing mock executions, shocking them with electricity, burning them, causing other pain and a technique called "water boarding" that simulates drowning, said Lt. Gen. John Kimmons, Army Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence.
Officials said the revisions are based on lessons learned since the U.S. began taking prisoners in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the Unted States.
Release of the manual came amid a flurry of announcements about U.S. handling of prisoners, which has drawn criticism from Bush administration critics as well as domestic and international allies.
The Pentagon also announced an overall policy statement on prisoner operations. And President George W. Bush acknowledged the existence of previously secret CIA prisons around the world where terrorist suspects have been held and interrogated, saying 14 such al Qaeda leaders had been transferred to the military prison at Guantanamo Bay and will be brought to trial.
An international outcry about prisoner rights began shortly afterward. Human rights groups and some nations have urged the Bush administration to close the prison at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since not long after it opened in 2002 with prisoners from the campaign against al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Scrutiny of U.S. treatment of prisoners shot to a new level in 2004 with the release of photos showing U.S. troops beating, intimidating and sexually abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq — and then again with news of secret facilities.
Though defense officials earlier this year debated writing a classified section of the manual to keep some interrogation procedures a secret from potential enemies, Kimmons said Wednesday that there is no secret section to the new manual.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said from the start of the counter-terror war that prisoners are treated humanely and in a manner "consistent with Geneva Conventions."
But President George W. Bush decided shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks that since it was not a conventional war, "unlawful enemy combatants" captured in the fight against al Qaeda would not be considered prisoners of war and thus would not be afforded the protections of the convention.
The new manual, called "Human Intelligence Collector Operations," applies to all the armed services, not just the Army. It does not cover the Central Intelligence Agency, which also has come under investigation for mistreatment of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan and for allegedly keeping suspects in secret prisons elsewhere around the world since the Sept. 11 attacks.
Sixteen of the manual's 19 interrogation techniques were covered in the old manual and three new ones were added on the basis of lessons from the counter-terror war, Kimmons said.
The additions are that interrogators may use the good-cop/bad-cop tact with prisoners, they may portray themselves as someone other than an American interrogator, and they may use "separation," basically keeping prisoners apart from each other so enemy combatants can't coordinate their answers with each other.
The last will be used only on unlawful combatants, not POWS, only as an exception and only with permission of a high-level commander, Kimmons said.
The Pentagon also on Wednesday released a new policy directive on detention operations that says the handling of prisoners must — at a minimum — abide by the standards of the Geneva Conventions and lays out the responsibilities of senior civilian and military officials who oversee detention operations.
"The revisions ... took time," Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Detainee Affairs Cully Stimson said at the briefing. "It took time because it was important to get it right, and we did get it right."
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



As far I know, ALL METHODS are applicable and acceptable as long as the CIA can squueze vital information out of these suspected terrorists so as to AVERT future attacks planned by these terrorists. WHY NOT? If the CIA can TORTURE OR EVEN KILL these suspected terrorists in order to SQUEEZE OUT vital information that can prevent more Sep 11 attacks to happen in the US, WHY NOT?
It the CIA can TORTURE these terrorists in order to save thousands of innocent US lives-- WHY NOT?
These terrorists are worst than BRUTE BEASTS and don't deserve to be treated according to the CIVIL JUSTICE or human rights of the US Civil Courts.
U seem to be so stupid that you didn't even understand what was written in the above article.
U need a psychiatrist, no doubt. Consult one, FAST
Still no way for a freedom seeker to understand why this President (GWBush) has allowed such practices against prisonners of war... what he did is FREEDOM Lynching. Not only the life and dignity of a (human) person is and must be so central to respect by anybody (indeed more importantly by A state claiming to be the Human Rights Defender). Those humans caught wherever in Afghanistan, Iraq, Bosnia... have personified the humiliation of Humans and Freedom at the hands of some liars who don't deserve to be respected. Shame on them. Shame on Blair, Bush, shame on Italy's Berlusconi and Spain ex-prime-minister. Shame on Europe Union who tolerated the existence of illegal (not so secret) CIA prisons. In this regard Israel's prisons are way closer to humane treatment as per UN charter.