LOS ANGELES, Sept. 6, 2006

Father Wants To Own 'O.J. Simpson'

Fred Goldman Files Suit For Publicity Rights, Says Simpson Hasn't Paid Judgment

    • O.J. Simpson signing autographs in October, 2005. His ability to cash in on his fame might be hampered if he loses the lawsuit.

      O.J. Simpson signing autographs in October, 2005. His ability to cash in on his fame might be hampered if he loses the lawsuit.  (AP)

    • Fred Goldman in June 2004.

      Fred Goldman in June 2004.  (CBS/The Early Show)

    • former football player O.J. Simpson and Fred Goldman

      former football player O.J. Simpson and Fred Goldman  (AP Photo)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Photo Essay Murder In Brentwood

    A look back at the Simpson-Goldman murders.

  • Photo Essay Celebrity Circuit

    Jessica's stadium cheer, Celine's swan song and Ashley Tisdale's new nose

(AP)  The father of murder victim Ron Goldman asked a court Tuesday to give him the publicity rights to the name, image and likeness of O.J. Simpson, who has failed to pay a $33.5 million judgment in a 1997 wrongful death lawsuit.

"He personally has never paid a dime on the judgment to anyone," Fred Goldman said. "He has made it very clear over the years that he has no intention of doing so."

The petition, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, asks that Simpson's "right of publicity" be transferred to help pay off the Goldman family's portion of the award, estimated at about $20 million, plus interest.

A hearing on the petition was scheduled for Oct. 17.

Simpson, who lives in Florida, was acquitted after a criminal trial of the June 12, 1994, slayings of his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, outside her Brentwood home. No one else has been arrested.

The Goldman and Brown families later sued Simpson. A civil court jury, using a lesser standard of proof than is required at a criminal trial, found him liable for the killings in 1997.

Goldman continues to believe Simpson killed his son and said it would be "poetic justice" to take away the fame Goldman believes helped the football star prevail in the criminal case.

Simpson has avoided paying the civil judgment because his National Football League pension and his Florida home cannot legally be seized. However, Goldman's petition contends Simpson has continued to earn money through appearances and autograph signings.

Goldman said he wants to take from Simpson "what we perceive is probably the most important thing to him, and that's his ego, and that's the opportunity to use his name and likeness to earn money."

Yale Galanter, Simpson's attorney, said he would review the petition but had not found any legal precedent that gives a court the authority to take publicity rights.

He also denied that Simpson had avoided paying the lawsuit award.

"It's not a question of intentionally trying to avoid anything," he said. "O.J.'s life is very simply an open book. There is no money."

He estimated that Simpson makes only a few thousand dollars from autograph-signing sessions.

Goldman said he did not know how much Simpson's publicity rights might be worth or what he would do with them if he obtained them.

While publicity rights have been sold or transferred, the petition to forcibly take them to satisfy a lawsuit award is an untried legal maneuver, said Karl Manders, owner of Continental Enterprises, an Indianapolis-based company that designs and implements intellectual property protection programs. Manders said he suggested the idea to Goldman.


©MMVI The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
by jklingon23 September 8, 2006 1:22 AM EDT
This is the most idiotic thing that I have ever heard. How can a person own someone elses name and likeness. It is really almost sad to see just how money hungry the goldmans are. Maybe they should use all of this time and energy to sue the lapd for all the mistakes that they made in the case. They should leave OJ alone. He was innocent until proven guilty, and the court did not find him guilty. OJ if you take the time to read this keep on golfing, cause you have the worst swing Ive seen in a long time.
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 September 7, 2006 4:38 PM EDT
O.J. Simpson bears the mark of Cain.
Reply to this comment
by pggvthmm September 6, 2006 7:38 PM EDT
It is obvious the pain the Goldmans are still experiencing is still as raw as when they lost their son. It is a shame that our legal system let that trial become such a circus and the Goldmans and Browns have to resort to such extremes to get some measure of justice served. I wonder if OJ has the same smug look on his face now as he did in court then? His life can never possibly be as miserable as the Browns and Goldmans or his children's.
Reply to this comment
by malcaver49 September 6, 2006 6:45 PM EDT
Money grubbing jerks like Goldman ought to be jailed for life! All he's interested in is the money!! Period!! In addition you don't find someone not guilty in a criminal trial and then find them guilty in a civil suit just so some jerk can make money off the situation.
Reply to this comment
by wozz4 September 6, 2006 6:34 PM EDT
Wizzardjoe: Did you sit in the back of your little bus and lick the windows as a child, and do you dress yourself in the morning or does someone else do that as well and think for you? While you search for your brain I hope you find your heart too, you obviously must not be parent, I pitty your poor children if you are.
Reply to this comment
by flautus September 6, 2006 6:16 PM EDT
To the moron wizzardjoe. Mr. Goldman had a life.
OJ murdered it.
Reply to this comment
by a-view September 6, 2006 6:00 PM EDT
There is no doubt that the Goldman's pain will be with them forever as will the Brown's and OJ's children. Simpson's life will forever be clouded by the question of did he really murder Nicole and Ron?

Unfortunately, this continued wrangle to collect from Simpson only reduce's a child's life and memory to monetary funds. Where is the justice in this?

The civil court trial, with its' much lower threshold of evidence, was meant to 'punish' Simpson for something the Goldman's were convinced he did and to lay claim to his finances as punishment for that. The civil verdict was fueled by anger from the white community and the angry political climate of the DA's office when they lost the case. The civil verdict was a payback to the jury of the criminal trial.

However, I say shame on Karl Manders for contributing to Mr. Goldmans pain and rage. Every time this is allowed to rear it's ugly head Mr. Goldman takes a giant leap back into the past. In the end the intelligent road to travel, for both mental and physical health, is one of forgiveness and moving forward.

Ron Goldman's memory would be better served by focusing on forgivenss; moving forward with love and kindness in the community instead of focusing on hate, rage and revenge.

There are always those who want to grab their 15 minutes of fame. I think Karl Manders is exploiting the Goldmans pain and loss, under the guise of aiding him, in his effort to grab his 15 minutes. Shame on him.
Reply to this comment
by spidercakes September 6, 2006 5:11 PM EDT
One can only hope that the ignorance of the people who posted that the Goldman family should 'get over' the violent murder of their young son can experience it first hand themselves and then perhaps we can take their posts a little more seriously.
The Goldmans know that Simpson has money (more of if than he cares to admit) and deserve to have all of his $$$ since it seems that OJ is living a good and happy life, playing golf every day - which everyone knows, green fees aren't cheap.
Reply to this comment
by paridee September 6, 2006 5:09 PM EDT
Dear Mr. Goldman,
When I first heard about Nicole and Ron, I happened to be sitting with a friend who at the time was an investagator for the Richmond,Virginia police department...He simply said to me, "He did it"(meaning OJ)...I asked why he thought that?...he said, "because knives are personal"...that one comment made a lot of sense...I believe that OJ has gotten away with murder and is living the high life...how he sleeps at night is a wonder to me...

Nor, can I imagine the hell you and the Browns have been living in since June 12, 1994.

Why isn't he in jail for not paying the judgement?...I don't understand this...he really has thumbed his nose at the courts hasn't he...

and...To YOU Mr. Yale Galanter, IF as you say "there is no money"...then,
WHO'S PAYING YOU???!!!!!! what a joke...

I wish you luck with this suit, Mr. Goldman...do what you need to do. I think you have every right to go after what ever you can get...I for one will be out here cheering you on...
Reply to this comment
by jetlizhan September 6, 2006 4:55 PM EDT
hey kitten9811 - if someone MURDERED your five year old, could you so easily 'just let it go and be an adult'? i think not if you're any kind of a parent at all. shame on you!!! oh, and it's not called 'bragging'. . .it's called GRIEVING!!! you ignorant jackass.
Reply to this comment
by godseyesore-2009 September 6, 2006 4:36 PM EDT
Troglodytes kitten9811 & mookie7210 must inhabit same cave...If not, they sure wear the same myopic blinders. Anyone who thinks OJ didn't do this atrocity, belongs in the Darwin Awards, because those genes are doomed.

The "justice" system in this country is desperately sick. Civil and criminal verdicts should have teeth to encumber all assets (past, current, and future) to settle judgements as meted.

Mr. Goldman deserves to claim what is owed.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall September 6, 2006 4:30 PM EDT
I don't get how a court can find him not guilty of the crime yet another court finds him liable for a civil suit for a crime the first court found him not guilty of!
Reply to this comment
by billhec7491 September 6, 2006 4:25 PM EDT
The Goldmans should get a LIFE and MOVE on. A jury of peers found OJ innocent, and I think the civil proceedings were BS.
Goldman, write you a book and hope you can suck the public that way.
The OJ sugardaddy bandwagon is over, and who cares now, with all the other issues going on in this world.
Reply to this comment
by afotia September 6, 2006 4:13 PM EDT
Go Fred Goldman!! It's about time he paid something for that crime! GET HIM FOR ALL YOU CAN!!
Reply to this comment
by mookie7210 September 6, 2006 4:03 PM EDT
dude, get a life.let it go, let it go....
the only person that knows anything about those killings are god and the one who really did it, and it was not oj... hello
Reply to this comment
by interlocket September 6, 2006 3:43 PM EDT
somewhere I read that adultry is a cardinal sin as well as murder. Maybe OJ should sue to retain the rights to Ron goodman's name (such as it is considering he in an adulterer, and all)....While this post is somewhat tongue in cheek it is still a serious comment to the theme of this series of posts.
Reply to this comment
by aessedai9 September 6, 2006 3:42 PM EDT
A parent never "gets over" losing a child. Especially brutal is when your child is slaughtered by another human being. Imagine having the details of the murder splashed all over the news for months and months on end. Then, because the perv who murdered your child just happens to be famous, he's not convicted.

I understand why he would do this. And, I think he should do what he can to make OJ's life a living hell. As long as Mr. Simpson is walking around a free man, the Goldmans will never have peace.
Reply to this comment
by graetz3 September 6, 2006 3:16 PM EDT
I believe the Browns and the Goldmans should be able to get all the money awarded them by the court; Simpson lost that case. I also believe that a percentage of any money he gets, for appearances or signing autographs or whatever, should be awarded to those families. Simpson is just a man (granted, an evil man) and should have to pay what he owes just like the rest of us.
Reply to this comment
by graetz3 September 6, 2006 3:11 PM EDT
The Goldmans and the Browns won the civil suit against O.J. Simpson; why shouldn't they be able to collect? I believe a percentage of ANY income Simpson has should be going to those families to pay his debt to them. I don't believe they are golddiggers - I believe they want justice, and if the only way they can get it is but hitting him where it hurts the most, so be it.
Reply to this comment
by Calexfo September 6, 2006 2:59 PM EDT
The idea of suing an individual to terminate his or her rights to him/herself is ridiculous. Fred Goldman continues to show that he like others who want to destroy O.J. Simpson is not only gullible butfinancially manipulative. In the 18th Century, people like Goldman owned other men and that was slavery. In 2006 I believe that the idea of owning a person's name and rights is not only grasping for straws, but downright tainted with slave mentality.
Reply to this comment
See all 22 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Senate Report: Bin Laden Was Within Grasp

    (167 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: