February 11, 2009 6:02 PM

Bush: 'We Don't Torture'

By
Melissa McNamara
(CBS)  It was one of the worst-kept secrets in the world — and on Wednesday, President Bush confirmed it: In a major speech about the war on terror, the president, for the first time, acknowledged the existence of secret CIA prisons around the world.

He said 14 terror suspects held in them have been moved to Guantanamo Bay — and he's asking Congress to change the law so they can be tried by special military tribunals. The 14 include men allegedly behind the worst terror attacks against the United States, including 9/11.

The President also defended the way terror suspects are being interrogated. CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric sat down with the President for an exclusive interview at the White House, and she asked him about this transfer to Guantanamo.

"The reason why we're moving them there is we want them to go through a military tribunal. We want them to receive the justice that they denied other people," Mr. Bush said. "But the other thing is that we have to have the capacity to interrogate — not torture, but interrogate people to learn information."

The President says information already obtained from interrogating terror suspects has protected the country from attack.

Couric asked the President if he could give any indication about the kind of information he was able to glean from the "high-valued targets."

"We uncovered a potential anthrax attack on the United States. Or the fact the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed had got somebody to line up people to fly airlines, to crash airlines into I think the West Coast, or somewhere in America, and these would be Southeast Asians," Mr. Bush said.

"This is pretty rich data that has been declassified, so that I'm capable of telling America the importance of the interrogation program, and I'm going to call upon Congress to make sure the interrogators has the capacity to do so without breaking the law. See we're not interrogating now, because CIA officials feel like the rules are so vague that they cannot interrogate without being tried as war criminals. That's irresponsible."

Couric asked Mr. Bush if this is a tacit acknowledgement that the way these detainees were handled was wrong.

"No. Not at all. It's a tacit acknowledgement that we're doing smart things to get information to protect the American people," the President said. "I've said to the people that we don't torture, and we don't."

President Bush also insisted that the war in Iraq is a key part of the war on terror, and that it must be won. Couric asked the President what exactly he means when he says that the country can't cut and run, that the United States must stay to win — otherwise, we'll be fighting the terrorists here at home on our own streets.

"I mean that a defeat in Iraq will embolden the enemy, and will provide the enemy more opportunity, to train, plan to attack us, that's what I mean. One of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror," Mr. Bush said. "I believe it, but the American people have got to understand that a defeat in Iraq, in other words if this government there fails, the terrorists will be emboldened, the radicals will topple moderate governments. I truly believe that this is the ideological struggle of the 21st century. And the consequences for not achieving success are dire."

Mr. Bush added that when he thinks about potential threats, his biggest fear is that "somebody will come in, slip into this country and kill Americans.

"And I can't tell you how. You know, one way to look at it is we have to be right 100 percent of the time in order to protect this country, and they got to be right once," he said.

You can see much more of Couric's interview with President Bush on our CBS News 9-11 Special — "Five Years: How Safe Are We?" tonight at 10 (9 p.m. Central).

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 75 Comments
by book54552134 September 8, 2006 7:34 PM EDT
I suspect that, because of recent media scrutiny, there is little American sponsored torture occuring at the moment. However, it is reasonable to believe that, in the past few years, there have been hundreds & perhaps thousands of violations of the War Crimes Act & Geneva Conventions by the CIA, & U.S. military personel as they were instructed to do by Bush Administration authorities. Anyone who believes the Bush Administration's propaganda regarding this issue is either blindly partisan, incredibly naive, or totally ignorant of the facts. All involved in these crimes must be brought before the bar of justice.
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 1:01 PM EDT
<b>alphaa10 says:</b> ... Those who need reinforcement to begin a personal jihad or join a collective one get a huge boost from Bush, just as Hezbollah (and al Qaeda) get all the video of "Crusader Terror" they need for a lifetime from the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

And, as far is Israel/Hezbollah go? Please. Who crossed whose border and killed/kidnapped Israeli soldiers? You act as if Hezbollah are innocent angels who were just simply minding their own biz when, all of a sudden, Israel decided to go berserk for absolutely no reason. If you expect us to believe Hezbollah and other jihadists, and their cohorts, haven't given plenty of "Jihadist Terror" throughout the decades to <u>reinforce</u> Israel's behavior? You've got to be kidding. Frankly, I'm growing sick of folks who seem to forget there are those in the ME who aren't innocent angels, who've perpetrated acts that have given <i>us</i> cause to be angry, just as much so as <i>they've</i> got cause to be angry. Why is it OK for these jihadists to hold animosity/anger for perceived wrong-doings done to them by the U.S./Israel - however, if the U.S./Israel harbors any animosity/anger, this is unheard of and unacceptable?
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 1:01 PM EDT
<b>alphaa10 says:</b> ... Those who need reinforcement to begin a personal jihad or join a collective one get a huge boost from Bush, just as Hezbollah (and al Qaeda) get all the video of "Crusader Terror" they need for a lifetime from the Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

This is ***. They don't <i>need</i> <u>reinforcement</u> to begin a personal jihad or join a collective, from Pres. Bush. They've already <i>got</i> plenty of <u>reinforcement</u>, if they so choose, for such behavior simply in America's, or even Christian history, alone. In fact, BL has used everything from America's use of A-bombs on Japan, to slavery, to America's treatment of Indians and, even the Crusades, among other things, as his <u>reinforcement</u>. So, don't give me this nonsense that, somehow, BL and his cohorts <i>need</i> any kind of <u>reinforcement</u> from Pres. Bush or, anyone else for that matter.
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 6:11 AM EDT
<b>wilkeske at 12:00 AM : Sep 07, 2006 says:<i>Bin Laden is free</i></b> and we are bogged down in Iraq. Why hasn't Bush devoted more resources to securing Afghanistan and catching Bin Laden?

Interesting. I'd be extremely curious to know what your definition of "free" is. No wonder there are those who are too weak-kneed and lackadaisical to take bold and strong action. Especially, if their definition of "free" is attributed to bin Laden. Gee, if we were all just as "free" as bin Laden, the world would be a wonderful place...wouldn't it?
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 6:02 AM EDT
<b>reyesron at 12:30 AM : Sep 07, 2006 says:</b> there was somewhat less fluff tonight than last night, some actual news made it on the show. I think I have become immune to George W. Bush. His condescending and snitty manner towards Katie Couric, in days past, would have really gotten under my skin. Now it is so incredibly difficult to take anything he says as being honest or truthful, I just flip the channel. As we approach the November elections, we now have this guy saying almost off the cuff, "oh, yeah, we stopped an anthrax attack." What is really scary is the press doesnt even bother to discredit him anymore, why should they?, it does no good. I have little fondness for Ms. Couric in this role, however, when Bob Schieffer interviewed the prez last year, he also let him skate the issues, and I like Bob. <i><b>There has to be some precondition to an interview with this particular president that you cant ask the guy tough questions and you cant say there are preconditions.</b></i>

Curious. Even though there <u><b>has</b></u> to be <i>some precondition to an interview with this particular President that you can't ask the guy tough questions</i>...but, <i>you can't say there are preconditions</i>, you seem to know there <u><b>are</b></u> <i>preconditions</i> to an interview with this particular President. Weird.
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 5:52 AM EDT
<b>T-A-Roof at 11:58 PM : Sep 06, 2006 says:</b> The current administration has clouded the issue of why we declared war on Iraq. consider, A. Halliburton's no bid contracts.(Former employer of *** Chaney)B. GW is an Oil Man and Iraq has a very lucrative oil deposit. C. His father's mistake of not entering Baghdad (quoting Gen Norman Schwarzkopf Army Ret.)and finishing Saddam in the first Gulf war. I think the War on terror has been stretched into an all encompassing catch phrase hiding the real agenda. 1st and foremost, Iraq did not attack the Twin Towers! Why has the emphasis shifted to Iraq? Is it because the administrations views don't fit the political views of the majority of the American public? As yourself this, is it to far from the realm of possibility to think that G.W.'s agenda might be 1. To control the oil fields of Iraq with a permanent U.S. presence in the Gulf, 2. Complete his fathers legacy of a job left undone in the 1st Gulf War and 3. Help line the pockets of special interest groups? I firmly believe that the American people in general don't know the underling reasons behind the decisions of this commander in chief. My opinion, To serve the will of the people has been de-facto changed by the G.W.'s regime to "serve the people that matter to the White House and Blow Off the constituency. <i><b>What do you think?</b></i>

I think <u>someone</u> may quite possibly have their <i>aluminum-foil hat</i> screwed on a little too tight.
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 5:47 AM EDT
<b>JaStewrt at 09:41 PM : Sep 06, 2006:</b> This man is so unqualified to be the leader of anything that it is pathetic to realize he is the President.
Anyone who believes anything he says is too bogged down with their own daily lives to be paying attention even though I am sure they mean well. <i><b>I wish they could see the truth.</b></i>

Don't ya' mean, in fact, you wish they could see <i>your version</i> of "the truth"?
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 5:44 AM EDT
<b>Kenwillmore at 08:34 PM : Sep 06, 2006 says:</b> Whenever I see our President I get sick to my stomach. I can't believe there are those who continue to defend this guy. <i><b>He has done nothing for the poor or the middle class and the reset of the world hates us.</b></i>

<i><b>Your scare tactics with not work this time.</b></i>

Neither will yours.
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 5:41 AM EDT
<b>nynative1340 at 07:40 PM : Sep 06, 2006 says:</b> Well, if Bush said it, it must be true. He truly believes if he says it, it's got to be true, and everyone will believe it, because he lives in 'Bushworld'.

<b>Well, if nynative1340 said it, it must be true. He/she truly believes if he/she says it, it's got to be true, and everyone will believe it, because he/she lives in 'nynative1340world".</b>
Reply to this comment
by grumpy1963 September 8, 2006 5:38 AM EDT
<b>emhawks at 12:31 AM : Sep 07, 2006 says:</b> Bush said his biggest fear is that " somebody will come in, slip into this country & kill Americans." I doubt that's his biggest fear, don't you? I think his biggest fear might be that someone will come in, & actually bring he & Cheney ( the real President) to task by impeachment. I agree with T-A-Roof's posting. I would add to that to read about Project for the New American Century, the Carlyle Group, Halliburton, Brown & Root& the Bush families history with Mid-East oil connections.
There has been corruption in almost all American presidential adm., but this is by far the worst of any. For the record, I'm an Independent; I would feel the same way if this was a Democrat adm.

<b>How would ya' feel if it was an Independent administration?</b>
Reply to this comment
See all 75 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook